| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. break And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. break no it is not that is another Stevie lie No, it's not. Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can I get more without doing anything"... nope Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way determine my ability to operate a tranmitter Sure it does. nope It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in the CW mode. no it does not I can do that right now, and have done so for providing code pratice, I use comptuer to encode and decode Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you support becuase it is that. Nope. yes it is I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all tongues. so? and withdrwaing your remarks about needing work to earn the license? For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into doing so You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk. no I refuse becuase I don't owe one, and I will not be bullied into one even if you had gotten the reason right, doesn't alter the facts you have beentrying to harass and bully me into making it He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. "Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it. Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the very same language the FCC uses was... that was after you made the federal case, he was condsending (as is the FCC and almost the entire govt) You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO Steve, K4YZ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine it is you that have comitted libel Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! it is you that have comitted libel Nope. Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all **** it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You were making those assinine assertions 7 years ago. You lied then, you're lying now. Just like Toiddie, you're one of those wusso's who thinks that all things are solved by threatening to "sue". You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all Still true. When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record Your misrepresentations as being a commissioned officer will be enough. We can add in your numerous posts wherein you insist it's "OK" to be a liar will round it out. and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high I've got lawyers and money in the family, Markie. Knock yourself out, Boyo. You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. Nope. Not one word of a threat. My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible It most certainly will make the case impossible for you. You have no credibility...Certainly none here. And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all #### Did you know that #### is spelled "M O R G A N" where I come from..?!?! Imagine that! it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Where? Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Nope. You're the one on the outside looking in. Try to stay warm. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. then you agree My side on code tesing will win? but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You were making those assinine assertions 7 years ago. You lied then, you're lying now. nope I thought and still think the matter will be resolved as I wish without needing to sue and spend that kind of money it does remain one of those wepaons in the arsenal Just like Toiddie, you're one of those wusso's who thinks that all things are solved by threatening to "sue". nope never threaten to sue merely pointed out the nature of the case You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all Still true. not pathological nor a coward When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record Your misrepresentations as being a commissioned officer will be enough. We can add in your numerous posts wherein you insist it's "OK" to be a liar will round it out. but I can say that if I think it will serve to defend myself, as it did you flustered around for days your post that you can attack and harrass anyone you like will sink yours and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high I've got lawyers and money in the family, Markie. good for you Knock yourself out, Boyo. why? as I have said I'd give real thought tomsuing you if I thought you anything worth taking You do increasingly make me consider doing it anyway, but I doubt it would be worth the bother You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. Nope. Not one word of a threat. "one shot one kill..." That is a threat My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible It most certainly will make the case impossible for you. You have no credibility...Certainly none here. credibility is not what I would need but you years of attacks should get the judgement but collecting on it well that is always the problem And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all #### Did you know that #### is spelled "M O R G A N" where I come from..?!?! no it is not, #### is Spelled ####, while **** is spelled **** everywhere more stevie lies Imagine that! I can a **** poor joke it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Where? in you fist post Gay pagan ...to wed todd that was libel Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Nope. You're the one on the outside looking in. like i said suit yourself Try to stay warm. Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| FM DX On the Henry Kloss Model 88 (OT) Part One | Shortwave | |||
| Info Needed: Fan Blade Part # for ICOM PS-30 Supply | Swap | |||