Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"KU2S" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:31:42 GMT, "DesignGuy" wrote: I'm getting read to take the exam for a ham ticket next month. I was curious to know if having a ham radio license precludes one from the GMRS license requirement, so paying the $75 for the GMRS license is no longer necessary for ham license holders? No. Amateur radio and GMRS are seperate and unrelated. The possession of a licence for one has no bearing on licensing for the other. Also, how long does it take to get the actual paper license from the FCC with your callsign? Thanks in advance. Usually about a week, but since your first question should have been answered in your preparation for taking the Amateur Radio licensing exam, this license holder entertains severe reservations regarding your ability to pass said examination. Wow. That didn't take long. I only just decided to take the exam a couple days ago (and awaiting prep material by mail), and I've already met my first ham asshole. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Herb wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ a.k.a. the *least* credible source of information on Usenet. You're welcome to post any evidence that anything I said was untrue or inappropriate, other than "because I said so", which is pretty much stock-and-trade of the ToBraMarLen Quartet. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
DesignGuy wrote: "KU2S" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:31:42 GMT, "DesignGuy" wrote: I'm getting read to take the exam for a ham ticket next month. I was curious to know if having a ham radio license precludes one from the GMRS license requirement, so paying the $75 for the GMRS license is no longer necessary for ham license holders? No. Amateur radio and GMRS are seperate and unrelated. The possession of a licence for one has no bearing on licensing for the other. Also, how long does it take to get the actual paper license from the FCC with your callsign? Thanks in advance. Usually about a week, but since your first question should have been answered in your preparation for taking the Amateur Radio licensing exam, this license holder entertains severe reservations regarding your ability to pass said examination. Wow. That didn't take long. I only just decided to take the exam a couple days ago (and awaiting prep material by mail), and I've already met my first ham ###hole. I'll agree. In the USMC, we were fond of the old saying "The Only "Stupid" Question Is The One You Didn't Ask, But Would Have Kept You From LOOKING Stupid Later" The ironic thing is that many years ago there was a petition request in front of the FCC to allow Amateurs onto GMRS without any additional licensing requirements, inorder to facliltate "honey-do" traffic without the spouse having to get an Amateur license. Needless to say, it didn't go anywhere. Welcome to Amateur Radio, Design Guy. If you're ever in the south/cental part of Tennessee try the 147.195 (+/COR) repeater in Manchester, TN and say hello. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: Herb wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ a.k.a. the *least* credible source of information on Usenet. You're welcome to post any evidence that anything I said was untrue or inappropriate, other than "because I said so", which is pretty much stock-and-trade of the ToBraMarLen Quartet. he and I for that matter lack the bandwidth to itemize all your unture or esp inappropriate materail Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Herb wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ a.k.a. the *least* credible source of information on Usenet. You're welcome to post any evidence that anything I said was untrue or inappropriate, other than "because I said so", which is pretty much stock-and-trade of the ToBraMarLen Quartet. he and I for that matter lack the bandwidth to itemize all your unture or esp inappropriate materail What you lack is anything valid to submit as "inappropriate materail". Steve, K4YZ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Herb wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ a.k.a. the *least* credible source of information on Usenet. You're welcome to post any evidence that anything I said was untrue or inappropriate, other than "because I said so", which is pretty much stock-and-trade of the ToBraMarLen Quartet. he and I for that matter lack the bandwidth to itemize all your unture or esp inappropriate materail What you lack is anything valid to submit as "inappropriate materail". just a few examples just from your titles I Stand Corrected On N9OGL/KB9RQZ Wedding...It's N0IMD/KB9RQZ... Obsessed Gay Lid If the Pope Had Met N9OGL, Would He Reconsider Abortion? WARNING! GAY PAGAN DRAFTEE IDIOT BACK IN TOWN! KB9RQZ and N9OGL to WED..?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Herb" wrote in message ... "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ a.k.a. the *least* credible source of information on Usenet. Believe me, one does *not* want to use a repeater without authorization. It won't be the FCC that catches you, it will be the repeater owner. They may report you to the FCC, but will probably file a suit against you. See ya in court 73 from Rochester, NY Jim |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"DesignGuy" wrote in message news:cZiFe.180142$x96.88553@attbi_s72... "KU2S" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:31:42 GMT, "DesignGuy" wrote: I'm getting read to take the exam for a ham ticket next month. I was curious to know if having a ham radio license precludes one from the GMRS license requirement, so paying the $75 for the GMRS license is no longer necessary for ham license holders? No. Amateur radio and GMRS are seperate and unrelated. The possession of a licence for one has no bearing on licensing for the other. Also, how long does it take to get the actual paper license from the FCC with your callsign? Thanks in advance. Usually about a week, but since your first question should have been answered in your preparation for taking the Amateur Radio licensing exam, this license holder entertains severe reservations regarding your ability to pass said examination. Wow. That didn't take long. I only just decided to take the exam a couple days ago (and awaiting prep material by mail), and I've already met my first ham asshole. Don't worry about a few folks that may say something that may irritate you. Although licensed first in 1962 and getting my extra in 1966, unless one studied other parts of the FCC rules beyond the amateur license, this could certainly be an honest question. I've delved into such a bit as I obtained my 1st class radiotelephone license in 1966 as well as my telegraph license the same year. The FCC has more rules than the hams have a**holes, I can assure you LOL. Some hams are concerned that the tests are being watered down; I suspect the answer you got was someone concerned about the watered down tests. Although it didn't appear directed as a flame, I agree he should have simply answered the question without pontificating. Try not to concern yourself too much. There is a lot of bickering going on (can you tell by reading many posts ROTFLOL) amongst the licensed folks; you happened to post a question read by someone with a short fuse. If you have studied a bit for your ticket, you will note that there is no sanity test for licensed amateurs. Oooops. I've gotta go. Some men in white coats asking for me by name ....... 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Believe me, one does *not* want to use a repeater without authorization. It won't be the FCC that catches you, it will be the repeater owner. They may report you to the FCC, but will probably file a suit against you. See ya in court HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah Right! Just amazing, the piles of pure B.S. put out on Usenet daily. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Bobby Joe Good Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Believe me, one does *not* want to use a repeater without authorization. It won't be the FCC that catches you, it will be the repeater owner. They may report you to the FCC, but will probably file a suit against you. See ya in court HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah Right! Just amazing, the piles of pure B.S. put out on Usenet daily. You, sir, are absolutely right! ROTFLMAO ZBM-2, Jim AA2QA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|