Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... I find it interesting to note what is *not* part of the NPRM, despite a bunch of proposals that asked for changes beyond code testing: - No change to the written tests at all The VEC organization has full authority to change written tests (e.g. specific questions, subjects, etc) without any FCC action needed. The NPRM specifically mentioned the process is much quicker than rule making via the FCC. - No new entry-level license class - No free upgrades or consolidations of existing licenses, except that all Technicians will essentially become Tech Pluses (in privileges but not in name). I'll have to read the NPRM again. I didn't come to that conclusion myself. - No "refarming" of subbands, nor expansion of license privileges except the above-mentioned Techs-get-Tech- Plus-privileges change Didn't the FCC mention that was being considered under different RMs? And now the big one - "Entry-level-licensd" hams (for lack of a better term that includes Novices, Technicians and Tech Pluses) will still have very limited HF privileges. Ironically, they will have only Morse Code/CW on small segments of 80, 40 and 15 meters, plus SSB and Morse Code/CW on a somewhat bigger slice of 10 meters. No digital/data/image modes, no FM on HF at all - even though most of those "entry-level-licensed" hams have all privileges above 50 MHz. No access to five of the HF/MF bands at all. Seems FCC went for "minimum change". Seems that way to me too. Is that the best we can do? What else do you want? Cheers Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL NPRM v. NOI | Policy | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Shortwave |