wrote in message
oups.com...
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

I'll have to read the NPRM again. I didn't come to that
conclusion myself.

It's not clear to me - I just assumed that since the Tech requirement
would be Element 2, and since all Tech Pluses are being renewed as
Tech, and the only difference between Tech and Tech Plus is Element 1.


It's not clear at all. However, the appendix shows the proposed new wording
and the privileges sections of Part 97 remain unchanged.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

I'll have to read the NPRM again. I didn't come to that
conclusion myself.

It's not clear to me - I just assumed that since the Tech requirement
would be Element 2, and since all Tech Pluses are being renewed as
Tech, and the only difference between Tech and Tech Plus is Element 1.


It's not clear at all. However, the appendix shows the proposed new
wording
and the privileges sections of Part 97 remain unchanged.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



Dee, did I see a post from you--I was just trying to look it up--where you
said it looked to you like the No-Code Techs would have to upgrade
to.......can't remember what class it was that was said? But, at any rate,
it was stated (maybe by you) that some upgrades would have to happen?

Can you direct me to the post? I am curious about what I was reading now.
If it wasn't you, no matter, I'll see if I can come across it again.

Kim W5TIT