LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old July 27th 05, 01:30 AM
Dee Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


[snip]

I'll have to read the NPRM again. I didn't come to that
conclusion myself.


It's not clear to me - I just assumed that since the Tech requirement
would be Element 2, and since all Tech Pluses are being renewed as
Tech, and the only difference between Tech and Tech Plus is Element 1.


It's not clear at all. However, the appendix shows the proposed new wording
and the privileges sections of Part 97 remain unchanged.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL NPRM v. NOI Len Over 21 Policy 149 April 8th 04 12:59 PM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 06:58 PM
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI Len Over 21 Policy 1 March 16th 04 01:38 PM
BPL NPRM Len Over 21 Policy 5 February 23rd 04 03:15 AM
BPL NPRM Approved Keith Shortwave 7 February 20th 04 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017