Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 28th 05, 12:28 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kim:

"That would mean, essentially, I am a Codeless Tech?"

Or, from your question, maybe, "A clueless tech?"

Warmest regards,
John


"Kim" wrote in message
. ..
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
I find it interesting to note what is *not* part of the NPRM, despite a
bunch of proposals that asked for changes beyond code testing:

- No change to the written tests at all

- No new entry-level license class

- No free upgrades or consolidations of existing licenses, except that
all Technicians will essentially become Tech Pluses (in privileges but
not in name).


After re-reading the NPRM, I'm no longer so sure of that as I was. The
appendix shows the new wording of the changed sections and the sections

that
show privileges have not been changed. So it may be that the FCC intends

to
keep the distinction between flavors of Tech and make the codeless
Technicians upgrade to get any HF privileges. Their extensive discussion
sections also seem to support that. Thirty pages including footnotes is a
lot of details to digest.

If approach is true, there are a lot of Technicians in for a shock.

Anyway, I think the FCC needs to clarify that.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



Ah! Here it is...wouldn't ya know it? OK, so you're thinking the NPRM in
its submitted form, if accepted and passed, would mean that Codeless
Technicians would have to upgrade?

I agree with you--lots of folks in for a shock. I am now intrigued enough
to look through there and see what it says.

My initial thoughts are that, to do so, would seem to open up a whole can of
worms from a administration perspective. I mean, as it is, I have to
produce the actual piece of paper to prove that I have the 5wpm endorsement
(if I wanted to upgrade to General under the current licensing structure).
That is, if I understand the "way it works." LOL

So, there'd be more affected than just the No-Code techs, I think. For
instance, I couldn't begin to even find my endorsement and I am not sure
I'll ever be able to. That would mean, essentially, I am a Codeless Tech?

Kim W5TIT




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL NPRM v. NOI Len Over 21 Policy 149 April 8th 04 12:59 PM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 06:58 PM
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI Len Over 21 Policy 1 March 16th 04 01:38 PM
BPL NPRM Len Over 21 Policy 5 February 23rd 04 03:15 AM
BPL NPRM Approved Keith Shortwave 7 February 20th 04 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017