Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kim:
"That would mean, essentially, I am a Codeless Tech?" Or, from your question, maybe, "A clueless tech?" Warmest regards, John "Kim" wrote in message . .. "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... I find it interesting to note what is *not* part of the NPRM, despite a bunch of proposals that asked for changes beyond code testing: - No change to the written tests at all - No new entry-level license class - No free upgrades or consolidations of existing licenses, except that all Technicians will essentially become Tech Pluses (in privileges but not in name). After re-reading the NPRM, I'm no longer so sure of that as I was. The appendix shows the new wording of the changed sections and the sections that show privileges have not been changed. So it may be that the FCC intends to keep the distinction between flavors of Tech and make the codeless Technicians upgrade to get any HF privileges. Their extensive discussion sections also seem to support that. Thirty pages including footnotes is a lot of details to digest. If approach is true, there are a lot of Technicians in for a shock. Anyway, I think the FCC needs to clarify that. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Ah! Here it is...wouldn't ya know it? OK, so you're thinking the NPRM in its submitted form, if accepted and passed, would mean that Codeless Technicians would have to upgrade? I agree with you--lots of folks in for a shock. I am now intrigued enough to look through there and see what it says. My initial thoughts are that, to do so, would seem to open up a whole can of worms from a administration perspective. I mean, as it is, I have to produce the actual piece of paper to prove that I have the 5wpm endorsement (if I wanted to upgrade to General under the current licensing structure). That is, if I understand the "way it works." LOL So, there'd be more affected than just the No-Code techs, I think. For instance, I couldn't begin to even find my endorsement and I am not sure I'll ever be able to. That would mean, essentially, I am a Codeless Tech? Kim W5TIT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL NPRM v. NOI | Policy | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Shortwave |