LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old July 29th 05, 02:03 AM
Dee Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Kim wrote:

large cut
It would be the height of irony if, in fact, the FCC dropped
Element 1 yet kept non-code-tested Techs off of HF until
they got Generals or Extras.


But isn't that exactly what is proposed. Once it becomes the
new regulations (i.e. no code test anymore at all) there really
is no way for a code-less Tech to then become a Tech
with coode since there won't be anymore code tests being
administered.


OTOH this being the govt it could be the result I hope the FCC will
make it clear in the report and order


In the discussion in the NPRM, they make it clear that they expect any Tech
not having HF privileges (i.e. codeless Techs) to take the General exam and
upgrade to get HF privileges.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL NPRM v. NOI Len Over 21 Policy 149 April 8th 04 01:59 PM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 07:58 PM
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI Len Over 21 Policy 1 March 16th 04 02:38 PM
BPL NPRM Len Over 21 Policy 5 February 23rd 04 04:15 AM
BPL NPRM Approved Keith Shortwave 7 February 20th 04 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017