Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... N2EY: I think at this time, the tech ticket can be dropped, let 'em go general to start or forget it!!! Just combine tech&gen tests to one... John As I've mentioned before, in my classes in the future, I'll be encouraging my students to do that extra bit of study and go straight for the General. Apparently some of the proposals to the FCC did suggest this but they are not ready to go this route just yet. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE That is a good idea Dee. With the massive desertion of V/UHF for HF, it will be a vast wasteland. Yes indeed, standby for the giant sucking sound. All us present users of HF will have to make room, we will have phone all the way down to 14.010. The FCC will be deluged with demands, yes demands for more spectrum. Maybe not, Dan. The license is just the first step. Then comes building a station, putting up an effective antenna, getting on the air, learning the characteristics of the various bands, etc. How many folks are actually going to do all that? Particularly during sunspot minimum? Even 11 meters will be turned back into a ham band. A lot of folks are going to be surprised that all of HF isn't like 11 m. After all that is what all the anti-code is all about, right? We'll see. --- One report I read is that in Germany, where the code test was dumped some time back, there has been an *increased interest* in Morse Code operation! Apparently a sizable number of newcomers want to use Morse Code, test or no test, simply because it's different, takes skill, etc. 73 de Jim, N2EY 313 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL NPRM v. NOI | Policy | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Shortwave |