Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: John Smith wrote: Anyone aware of any court challenges to the FCC banning the use of "codes" (encryption/decryption) on radio. No I am not It seems insane that encrypted data is exchanged freely on the internet and yet regulations prevent its use on amateur radio, how such can be prevented on one specific form of communications seems insane. As I understand the matter it comes in part from concerns that Spies would use Ham radio to do thier deeds Today with al queada I can't see the FCC budging on this one Very sophisticated means are even used to embed text/voice data in video and binary pictures which is virtually impossible to detect/decrypt with the even the fastest computers--within practical time periods (like millions of years--let alone lifetimes.) I have heard of this never studied it could something like that be used to embed same in something like SSTV John OTOH Your mention PGP I suppose based on the discusions of the USE of PSK 31 and other modes you could argue the use PGP would be legal is the non encoded parts of the tranmision in addition to your Call sign contained the addresses where both of the keys could be found. The addresses would have to be acesable over say the internet but it should be legal You're only problem here, Mark, is that PSK31 is not an encryption technique. Otherwise I agree with your above assessment (esp w/reference to Al-Queda) PSK31 is an encryption/encoding method as is morse encoded cw both legal becuase they are published (and morse is of course enshined by name in the rule book) the rules are rather vague on where the line drwn in these matters esp as technolgy advances so fast to make one year unbreakable code, todays public key Alothough the FCC is liable to try to make a fight of it, one that isn't worth it to me at anyrate Probably true. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|