Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] You refuse to use a spellchecker. yes I do That makes you a voluntary idiot. no it makes me at worst stuborn You want me to spend time and energy on what you want? You are a fool if you think you can bully me into doing your will One becuase it is made as a demand Two, becuase in sending a message to someone that does not want to recieve it it takes special action. Have you not heard that the man that will not listen to the shout may strain to hear the wisper. Other are efectively shoutin gth message, in making Stevie and other strain for it you also make em think about it, It is simply one more tool in the aresenal Three, It take alot of time and effort Four in going and On about the message they help to reach the real audience which is the lurker gruop out there In the NoCode movements various people are taking various parts My message gets out there well enough to suit me, but every voice need not reach all the listeners Five producing prefectly correct spelling (I went to trouble for awhile some years back) will not stop the flaming from Stevie and Dave, and I prefer the flavour of these flames to the others I have seen BTW I am totaly convinced that Stevie understand better than 95%, his complaints of Giberish are too well placed against the center of my arguements to beleive otherwise, that with the fact that the degree to which folks seem to have problems with my depends directly on the degree to which they oppose my ideas also leads me to conclusion I am comunicating quite well indeed Any questions? You are being polite so I will try and answer you But why be so stubborn about using a spell checker? Is your ego more important than your message? In every communications class that I have ever been involved in, the instructors taught that it is the message that is important. It is the responsibility of the person wanting to communicate that message to be sure it is sent in a manner that the audience can understand. If your audience tunes out because of the extra effort to read or listen to it because of avoidable problems, it is your fault not theirs. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE break Well it is your choice but frankly I skip any message that takes extra effort to decipher. I keep my spell checker and grammar checker turned on at all times despite the fact that I received straight A's throughout elementary school, high school, and college in all the English classes (and related classes) that I took. Even with these aids turned on, I take time to look through my message and make sure that it is as clear as possible. I want people to read what I've written. Otherwise why bother to write anything? You are of course free to do so I want people to process what I write not merely read it, and judging by Stevies behvoir I do a pretty good, which is likely why he goes into such a frenzy since I am getting through to him, and others like him Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#132
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: Dee: Break If I took the time to read and carefully check usenet posts, think of the intricate detail I would pay attention to with important things in my life, and how little time I would soon have... a usenet post is a casual exchange medium, not a doctors thesis written in perfect script with a quill pen on the finest parchment! You letting them fool you into thinking these posts are archived into gov't archives for posterity? Guarded my secret agent types with brass keys ready to sound the SOS to the CIA? Thank you John on many levels I could never have said that better myself ... naaaa .... John |
#133
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AOF:
I will share something important with you, a secret I am rather ashamed of. In latter elementary school and most of high school, because of my height and speed, I was rather a bully. I fear I made some other kids lives a "bit of hell" rather than just taking my insignificant (and rightly so) place in the scheme of things and attempting to make my teachers and parents proud of my caliber, I let them down--worse, and even worse--myself. The good news is I learned better... I took what steps I could to apologize and set things right, after I had gained the common sense to see it for the insanity it was... The bad news, I still think about it and feel sad... I suppose it will be like that to my grave, perhaps a lot longer... If the lesson I learned is of value to anyone else, I summarize it here, "When you strike another person, the blow really lands upon you. You just don't see that it does you the damage, others do..." I still would not back down from a fight, but the other clearly has to ask for it. John On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:51:57 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: [snip] No I can't, 5 years pretty well proved that Well I believe it was Alun who, for 15 years, "proved" he couldn't learn code. Then he found the right teachers. Part of the problem is that many people do NOT really know how to teach the code even though they may be proficient at using it. Ms Flint, I spent 5 years in my teens working with a Specail ed teacher and Ham radio operator, the teacher specaily was LD's such my Dyslexia and Dyslexiod Aphasia. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#135
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Dee: If I took the time to read and carefully check usenet posts, think of the intricate detail I would pay attention to with important things in my life, and how little time I would soon have... a usenet post is a casual exchange medium, not a doctors thesis written in perfect script with a quill pen on the finest parchment! You letting them fool you into thinking these posts are archived into gov't archives for posterity? Guarded my secret agent types with brass keys ready to sound the SOS to the CIA? ... naaaa .... John Nope but it isn't worth my time to compose if people aren't going to bother reading it. If I'm not going to take the time to do it reasonably well, I'm not going to bother at all. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:47:18 -0400, Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] You refuse to use a spellchecker. yes I do That makes you a voluntary idiot. no it makes me at worst stuborn You want me to spend time and energy on what you want? You are a fool if you think you can bully me into doing your will One becuase it is made as a demand Two, becuase in sending a message to someone that does not want to recieve it it takes special action. Have you not heard that the man that will not listen to the shout may strain to hear the wisper. Other are efectively shoutin gth message, in making Stevie and other strain for it you also make em think about it, It is simply one more tool in the aresenal Three, It take alot of time and effort Four in going and On about the message they help to reach the real audience which is the lurker gruop out there In the NoCode movements various people are taking various parts My message gets out there well enough to suit me, but every voice need not reach all the listeners Five producing prefectly correct spelling (I went to trouble for awhile some years back) will not stop the flaming from Stevie and Dave, and I prefer the flavour of these flames to the others I have seen BTW I am totaly convinced that Stevie understand better than 95%, his complaints of Giberish are too well placed against the center of my arguements to beleive otherwise, that with the fact that the degree to which folks seem to have problems with my depends directly on the degree to which they oppose my ideas also leads me to conclusion I am comunicating quite well indeed Any questions? You are being polite so I will try and answer you But why be so stubborn about using a spell checker? Is your ego more important than your message? In every communications class that I have ever been involved in, the instructors taught that it is the message that is important. It is the responsibility of the person wanting to communicate that message to be sure it is sent in a manner that the audience can understand. If your audience tunes out because of the extra effort to read or listen to it because of avoidable problems, it is your fault not theirs. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well it is your choice but frankly I skip any message that takes extra effort to decipher. I keep my spell checker and grammar checker turned on at all times despite the fact that I received straight A's throughout elementary school, high school, and college in all the English classes (and related classes) that I took. Even with these aids turned on, I take time to look through my message and make sure that it is as clear as possible. I want people to read what I've written. Otherwise why bother to write anything? Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#136
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: [snip] No I can't, 5 years pretty well proved that Well I believe it was Alun who, for 15 years, "proved" he couldn't learn code. Then he found the right teachers. Part of the problem is that many people do NOT really know how to teach the code even though they may be proficient at using it. Ms Flint, I spent 5 years in my teens working with a Specail ed teacher and Ham radio operator, the teacher specaily was LD's such my Dyslexia and Dyslexiod Aphasia. Which is great but doesn't mean he/she had the correct training in teaching code. It is a bit different than teaching other subjects. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#137
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Well it is your choice but frankly I skip any message that takes extra effort to decipher. I keep my spell checker and grammar checker turned on at all times despite the fact that I received straight A's throughout elementary school, high school, and college in all the English classes (and related classes) that I took. Even with these aids turned on, I take time to look through my message and make sure that it is as clear as possible. I want people to read what I've written. Otherwise why bother to write anything? You are of course free to do so I want people to process what I write not merely read it, and judging by Stevies behvoir I do a pretty good, which is likely why he goes into such a frenzy since I am getting through to him, and others like him What you are "getting through to (me)" is this: (1) That you're a pathological liar that can't tell the truth since it will disrupt your rants in this newsgroup. What a petty excuse for not telling the truth. (2) You exhibit significant paranoid behaviour. Your constant rants of "stalking", "bully" and "attempting to kill me" are classic. Wrap this up in your "I am a victim" personna and you have some pretty lame stories. (3) You probably are a fairly intelligent person, but you INSIST on LOOKING like an idiot. Your excuses as to why you can't manage to spell check your posts are transparent, baseless and are in direct opposition to OTHER posts you've made about what great resources you have at your disposal. Again...More stories that your OWN words unravel. Your spelling HAS been getting better...Now if we can just funnel it into more coherent sentences based on some truth, you'll be well on your way to getting better as a human being. Steve, K4YZ |
#138
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: [snip] No I can't, 5 years pretty well proved that Well I believe it was Alun who, for 15 years, "proved" he couldn't learn code. Then he found the right teachers. Part of the problem is that many people do NOT really know how to teach the code even though they may be proficient at using it. Ms Flint, I spent 5 years in my teens working with a Specail ed teacher and Ham radio operator, the teacher specaily was LD's such my Dyslexia and Dyslexiod Aphasia. break Which is great but doesn't mean he/she had the correct training in teaching code. It is a bit different than teaching other subjects. You know MS Flint claiming that Morse Code is so different that specail in Education In LD educatio who are ham themselves can't teach it right, is pretty bad You are starting to sound like Stevie, "he didn't work hard enough" didn't have the right teacher etc what was the point? If effort was the point I put it in If code was that manifextly import why does the ITU and the FCC disgree with you Even if you happen to be right why should I spend more time on the off chance you are right Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#139
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Well it is your choice but frankly I skip any message that takes extra effort to decipher. I keep my spell checker and grammar checker turned on at all times despite the fact that I received straight A's throughout elementary school, high school, and college in all the English classes (and related classes) that I took. Even with these aids turned on, I take time to look through my message and make sure that it is as clear as possible. I want people to read what I've written. Otherwise why bother to write anything? You are of course free to do so I want people to process what I write not merely read it, and judging by Stevies behvoir I do a pretty good, which is likely why he goes into such a frenzy since I am getting through to him, and others like him What you are "getting through to (me)" is this: (1) That you're a pathological liar that can't tell the truth since it will disrupt your rants in this newsgroup. What a petty excuse for not telling the truth. Nope it doesn't dispurt my message at all more medical judgements made impoperly (2) You exhibit significant paranoid behaviour. Your constant rants of "stalking", "bully" and "attempting to kill me" are classic. Wrap this up in your "I am a victim" personna and you have some pretty lame stories. get it right Threatening to kill you can't even tell your lies straight (3) You probably are a fairly intelligent person, but you INSIST on LOOKING like an idiot. Your excuses as to why you can't manage to spell check your posts are transparent, baseless and are in direct opposition to OTHER posts you've made about what great resources you have at your disposal. Again...More stories that your OWN words unravel. I don't waste resources which Is why I have suffiecent resources but here they would be wasted Even in a post with nothing spelled wrong my post to the FCC you can't manage to say anything on point Your spelling HAS been getting better...Now if we can just funnel it into more coherent sentences based on some truth, you'll be well on your way to getting better as a human being. you are the liar Steve, K4YZ |
#140
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: What you are "getting through to (me)" is this: (1) That you're a pathological liar that can't tell the truth since it will disrupt your rants in this newsgroup. What a petty excuse for not telling the truth. Nope it doesn't dispurt my message at all "dispurt" Sure it does. Telling lies that are so transparent ALWAYS disrupt the flow of information. more medical judgements made impoperly No medical judegements made here, Markie. (2) You exhibit significant paranoid behaviour. Your constant rants of "stalking", "bully" and "attempting to kill me" are classic. Wrap this up in your "I am a victim" personna and you have some pretty lame stories. get it right Threatening to kill you can't even tell your lies straight Regardless of how you try and twist it, Markie, it's still paranoia. (3) You probably are a fairly intelligent person, but you INSIST on LOOKING like an idiot. Your excuses as to why you can't manage to spell check your posts are transparent, baseless and are in direct opposition to OTHER posts you've made about what great resources you have at your disposal. Again...More stories that your OWN words unravel. I don't waste resources which Is why I have suffiecent resources Obvioulsy you do NOT have "suffiecent resources". Much of what you need is either freeware or very inexpensive software. You claim to be some sort of "professional" with "pool of typists" at your disposal, but then you claim you can't afford less than $50 worth of software. The lie is transparent. but here they would be wasted No they wouldn't. Even in a post with nothing spelled wrong my post to the FCC you can't manage to say anything on point The problem is you didn't! Your post was rife with spelling errors! The third paragraph was full of typos, and the grammatical structure looked as though it was fired from a shotgun. And WHAT were you trying to say about privileges before 1998? It looked idiotic! Your spelling HAS been getting better...Now if we can just funnel it into more coherent sentences based on some truth, you'll be well on your way to getting better as a human being. you are the liar I am...?!?! Your spelling's not getting any better? And like it or not, until you learn how to USE the English language like the rest of us, you'll still look like a pathetic idiot trying to string words together with Crazy Glue. Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |