K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC.

realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy


And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of
his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era
Army career!

of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides

Sheesh!

Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's
comments:

"Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily
affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already
licensed and have already passed any test given under older
regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had
worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that
applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission
is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure
feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed.

Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of
"mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have
become used to here.

The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a
potential Amateur Radio licensee.

Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on
filings.

more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part


Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC.

realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy


And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of
his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era
Army career!

of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides

No, it doesn't.

Not a one of the other comments I read are so obviously
grandstanding.

Sheesh!

Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's
comments:

"Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily
affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already
licensed and have already passed any test given under older
regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had
worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that
applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission
is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure
feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed.

Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of
"mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have
become used to here.

The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a
potential Amateur Radio licensee.

Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on
filings.

more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part

What libel?

I quoted Lennie's comments word-for-word, Markie...Go read them
yourself.

Furthermore, Lennie has, on numerous occassions in this forum,
stated that he has no intention of getting an Amateur Radio license,
yet he says just the opposite to the FCC in his opening comments.

So one way or the other he lied. Again.

So again I ask you..."what libel"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Yes, some idiot really sent this to the FCC.

realy tlaking to yourself today ole boy


And speaking of idiots, I see Lennie didn't get past the first of
his five pages of comments without lying or mentioning his 1950's era
Army career!

of course he does a bio is part of establish ones bono fides

No, it doesn't.

sure does

Not a one of the other comments I read are so obviously
grandstanding.

again you are not empowered as a style cop


Sheesh!

Oooops...forgot to mention, The last footnote in Lennie's
comments:

"Any change in the license examination regulations will primarily
affect license applicants. That does not directly affect those already
licensed and have already passed any test given under older
regulations...despite the displayed spite in a few Comments who had
worked hard to pass the morse code tests and are disturbed that
applicants in the future might not have to do the same. The Commission
is in no way responsible to hold thigs in perpetuity or to insure
feeding of emotional sustanance to those already licensed.

Of course his comments were laced with the usual amount of
"mythology", "tribal" and other insulting inferences that we have
become used to here.

The biggest lie being his suggestion on page 1 that he was a
potential Amateur Radio licensee.

Too bad there's not a method for filing charges of perjury on
filings.

more libel stevie and more stupidity on your part

What libel?

accusing someone of perjury is libel


I quoted Lennie's comments word-for-word, Markie...Go read them
yourself.

Furthermore, Lennie has, on numerous occassions in this forum,
stated that he has no intention of getting an Amateur Radio license,
yet he says just the opposite to the FCC in his opening comments.

not as I recall the only way you say that is take his statements of
context, which is nothing new for you


So one way or the other he lied. Again.

only in your twisted mind

So again I ask you..."what libel"...?!?!

accsuing someone of perjury in a document not even under oath is libel
stevie

Even if he is lying he can't comit perjury, he has to be under oath for
that

so you remarks are false on the face of them, and therefore you have no
defense against a chrage of libel for them

Steve, K4YZ