b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an old friend wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an old friend wrote:

Jim Hampton wrote:

I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the
imagination.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder
submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM

It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as
Bruce/WA8ULX.

That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks
volumes.

It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to
believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing
and so he jumps at it

It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it

Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it.

Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be
a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served.

wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday
...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek
sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio


They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips.


Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just
send ...---...--- and hope for the best...

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an old friend wrote:

b.b. wrote:

an old friend wrote:

Jim Hampton wrote:

I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the
imagination.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder
submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM

It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as
Bruce/WA8ULX.

That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks
volumes.

It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to
believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing
and so he jumps at it

It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it

Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it.

Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be
a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served.

wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday
...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek
sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio


They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips.


Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just
send ...---...--- and hope for the best...

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others


Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just
send ...---...--- and hope for the best...

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others

Whoa right there, Mark......

(1) Dave was, again, correct. What you typed was "SOSO"

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

(3) As for "procoders" aiding others, I have "elmered" and/or
proctored tests for dozens of folks and helped who-knows-how-many folks
ON the radio...regardless of thier class of license.

You've "helped"...how many...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just
send ...---...--- and hope for the best...

Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were
so so.

indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others

Whoa right there, Mark......

(1) Dave was, again, correct. What you typed was "SOSO"

break


(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

your bluff is called

carry out your threats or drop em

make the call to mental or shreff or FBI,

call the marines if you like

put up or shut up

(3) As for "procoders" aiding others, I have "elmered" and/or
proctored tests for dozens of folks and helped who-knows-how-many folks
ON the radio...regardless of thier class of license.

You've "helped"...how many...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

becuase he is a Coward and a Bully

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote in message
oups.com...
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

Good answer, Jim!

"Way back when" the Saturday Evening Post (or maybe Colliers) had a periodic
reader-contribution column called "The Perfect Squelch". With this, you'd have
won the $50.00 prize offered.

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

Good answer, Jim!

"Way back when" the Saturday Evening Post (or maybe Colliers) had a perio=
dic
reader-contribution column called "The Perfect Squelch". With this, you'=
d have
won the $50.00 prize offered.


if it works and shut's stevie rants down I'll pay you the 50$ less 5$
Shipping and handling of course

any one what to bet on wether it will squech Stevie?
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

73 de Jim, N2EY

Now Jim/N2EY has a problem "wasting time" with handicapped people.

b.b. wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself
despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your
disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why
would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you
for anything?

Good question, Steve!

Why do you?

73 de Jim, N2EY

Now Jim/N2EY has a problem "wasting time" with handicapped people.

No Jim is making a fair point, for once pointing Stevie faults

Ie Since Stevie claims my posts are not worth responding Jim askss why
he does.

That is a fair question and I conmend him for it


Now if Stevie would just have the courage to answer

or follow through