Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. Started off strong, Mark. But then your mouth over ran common sense and you started rambling again. E N G L I S H C O M P O S I T I O N The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. I guess you missed the part where the FCC said it was dismissing all those other petitions and was focusing on the Code issue at the moment. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. Also guess you haven't been paying attention to some of the demographics of the respondents. You are far and away from being "...one of the few...", Mark... It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. Let's see if Lennie ahs the same Field Day with THAT as he does anytime any of the REST of us suggest even the remotest degree of importance or relevance of the Amateur Radio Service... I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. Congratulations. 104 words before you managed to get a period in there. And the FCC could care less about the price of radios. From personal experience...(SNIP) Goat sacrifice counts here? I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. The only thing that impedes ANY licensee from operating on ANY band or mode is just DOING it. I know several NCT's who rarely touch a 2 meter rig. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Signing this comment with an Amateur Radio callsign will be even WORSE for the Amateur Service. Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |