Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: Nope but it isn't worth my time to compose if people aren't going to bother reading it. If I'm not going to take the time to do it reasonably well, I'm not going to bother at all. Well it is your choice but frankly I skip any message that takes extra effort to decipher. I keep my spell checker and grammar checker turned on at all times despite the fact that I received straight A's throughout elementary school, high school, and college in all the English classes (and related classes) that I took. Even with these aids turned on, I take time to look through my message and make sure that it is as clear as possible. I want people to read what I've written. Otherwise why bother to write anything? I agree 100% with Dee's ideas expressed above. If something is worth writing, it's worth writing clearly. This doesn't mean we're all Shakespeares. It does mean we can at least do what we can to use correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization. -- An analogy: Suppose there are a group of hams who regularly QSO on VHF or UHF FM. Although they use different rigs, all have signals with "good audio" - clean, crisp, clear, easy to listen to and understand. Then a newcomer shows up, with a signal that has really poor audio. Muffled, distorted, very unclear. Not weak, off-frequency or over-deviating, just not clear. Varies from 'requires a careful listen' to 'completely impossible to understand'. Fortunately it is discovered that the problem lies in the microphone being used by the newcomer. It's the original that came with the rig, which is no longer made. Nothing wrong with the rig itself, it's the mike which is the problem. But the newcomer refuses to replace the microphone. Says it's too much trouble, costs too much money, and a new mike wouldn't be as easy to use as the old one. Plus he doesn't think his audio is all that bad in the first place. Newcomer finally says that if the group can't understand him, it's *their* problem, not his, and he shouldn't be expected to spend money, time and effort to get a new microphone for his rig. How should the group respond? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |