Kim wrote:
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message
k.net...

"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...
Well, well, well....................

After I posted my comments and recovered from laughing at Lennie's
predictably pessimistic and mistruthful diatribe, I started to look
over some of the other comments.

Then I decided to just cut to the chase and search by names for
the rest of you.

Other than myself and Lennie, I only found ONE other semi-regular
of this group had cared enough to comment: WA2ISE.

Missing? K0HB, W5TIT, N8UZE, W5DXP, K2UNK, N2EY, AA2QA, K3LT,
W3RV, KB9RQZ, N0IMD, WK3C, W1RFI, N3KIP, KC2HMZ, K8MN.

Soooooooooooo......

We do have 60 days from when the NPRM is printed in the Federal
Register to comment.

Where is everyone from BOTH sides of the aisle?

On another note, I notice both Maia and West haven't said a word
either...guess they figure they'll sell books one way or the other...

You'll probably only see Fred's comments via the NCVEC comment
when that gets agreed to within the NCVEC groups.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK



Well, Bill. I am not sure that a kind of public indictment of people who've
not chosen to submit comments to something is all that democratic ( );
but...

I am, admittedly, a ham who is not all that active. I also *used* to be
more affected emotionally by issues of CW and ham traditions than I am now.
Maybe chalk that up to having spouted off to people like Larry, etc., for
long enough that I've lost sail...LOL I have opinions on the service, the
hobby, etc. But, I choose not to try to "affect" ham radio by way of my
comments to NPRMs (that is, unless there was some kind of something that
truly affected me emotionally) in things that I am OK with going either way
and this one, I am. I think it's probably something along the lines of
consensus. I may have an opinion of my own, but I am willing to step aside
and yield to the prevailing group.

Kim W5TIT

Kim, don't yield to these sandbaggers. Post your comments to the FCC.
bb