Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leo" wrote in message ... On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:19:36 GMT, "Bill Sohl" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... wrote: snip Y'know, the only reason that we Canadians were able to keep Morse testing around (as an option) was because our regulatory authority agreed that it would be valuable for the purpose of reciprocity agreements with countries that have decided (or will!) to keep Code testing as a mandatory requirement for their Amateur licensees. It's a valid point - without a Morse-qualified licence, one may not be permitted to operate HF in a foreign country that requires Morse for access should one choose to travel there. Yet that has not become an issue for any country yet. Indeed, by the nature of agreements, it has not been an issue with CEPT reciprocation even before WRC-2003 deleted morse as a requirement for HF licensing. Reciprocity has always been an important part of the worldwide Amateur community.....therefore, we would have lost something tangible that we already had should this scenario have played out! It sure makes a non-emotional, fact-based arguement - which worked quite well up here. I wonder, if enough people presented this reasoning to the FCC in their comments, if they might be willing to buy in to it? Might be worth a try....? But as of today, and I'll defer to you to provide an example, I am unaware of the issue being raised in any request by any ham for reciprocal licensing. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest Online Oldies shows on Rock-it Radio | Broadcasting | |||
New York Art Show Shuttered After Bush Monkey Portrait | Shortwave | |||
Latest 50's Rock and Roll Shows Online | Broadcasting | |||
6th Annual East Coast vs. West Coast Oldies Show online at Rock-it Radio | Broadcasting |