K4YZ wrote:
b.b. wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote

Well, well, well....................

Well, well, well, indeed!

For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new=
NPRM, then
pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not follo=
wing his
lead.

Well, well, well!

Hans hasn't been paying attention.

He's an idiot.

Oh, gee, Brain, after all we've meant to each other, you want to
go and be "that way"...

Whatever "way" I might wish to be, changes not the fact that you're an
idiot.

Of course pathological liars such as yourself have a need to hide
behind others...And you DO have a lot to hide...

Looks like a clear case of projection.

As for the comments...It's not as if there hasn't been a seven
year plus history of this NG IRT the Code test, Hans...One might draw
the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the
subject and had make decisions on what to say.

"had make???" Heil would stumble all over that one.

=20
Steve, K4YZ

Yes, yes. "Groupthink." Hi!

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"K4YZ" wrote

One might draw the conclusion that this group had
a predetermined interest in the subject and had make
decisions on what to say.

One might, or then again, one might not.

Since the Docket responds to 18 different petitions and runs to 30 pages
in length with over 200 footnote references, one might take the time to
thoughtfully review the FCC discussion in an unhurried (but timely)
fashion.

Having done that, my comments have been submitted to FCC.

beep beep
de Hans, K0HB






Hans,

I made my comments short and sweet. Basically asked them to leave a little
room for CW. The handwriting is on the wall my friend.

Dan/W4NTI