|
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Nothing is beyond your "understanding", Markie...You've said so yourself. No I have not Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie more evasion And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb Nope. you are But the "telephone call" story sure was! sure was but it served its purpose Now I know what you did and that you are full of **** to sugest it could have any effect Your letter was circlar filed as soon as it arived Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. It could also mean "stupid story", which is what I am betting on. It could also mean social service worker, which makes far more sense than your stupid assumption. Markie's story STILL doesn't bear weight. Nor do yours. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. If I were, then I WOULD be PLAYING. Call it what you want. You can -be- dumb, or you can be -playing- dumb. Your choice. |
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. |
|
|
K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter You're right! And those were his very words. Steve, K4YZ |
From: on Aug 23, 3:25 pm
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does With Heil "SS" means SchutzStaffel, complete with black uniform, twin lightning bolts, and jackboots. Monocle optional. How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Farf!! Snort... :-) Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? Stebie learned that serving under "Colonel Vinson" at Ft. Gordon. :-) There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. Wiley Coyote but badly animated in black and white? Stalking uses implied threats. Stalking is part of the Con Game he is doing, more bluff than stuff. But, Stebie GETS THE ATTENTION HE CRAVES! HE IS A SOMEBODY! :-) boo his |
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter "speaker" Sure the intent matters. That's why there are courts, Markie. And remember...they are going to have to consider whether or not you were a "mutual combatant" by inviting such comments with your "...is that your best shot" comment. Good luck. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter "speaker" Sure the intent matters. That's why there are courts, Markie. More lies Stevie The court is there to judge wether the one using the claim of self defense was reasonable in his belief your intentions matter not in a self defense case And remember...they are going to have to consider whether or not you were a "mutual combatant" by inviting such comments with your "...is that your best shot" comment. No one invites a death threat Good luck. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com