| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
NewsFlash stevie action may no longer be MIA
I just got the phone with the local ss worker.
he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. He asked after my relationship with Mr Roberson, I explained that Steve Robeson (and gave him your address from Qrz.com) has made threatening statements in past and present, that they were must likely idle, holding the opinion that Lying and Kiddy Porn are on the same level. that anyone online whould answer turthfully questions about there personal info (he laughed and told me never to give out such info online, or to lie if pressed, that You were threatening others (went into you and BB you and Todd) Claimed that you could get someone more than anoyed over there. He siad that a case would be added to the Adult protective orders docket where the State Of Michigan would ask for protection of Mark Morgan and my family from Steven Robeson. that he would be served the papers by publising them in the local news paper, it would become effect 10 days after that or about 10 days from thursday if the judge agreed with him. It would then be illegal for you to come here Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me |
an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". He asked after my relationship with Mr Roberson, I explained that Steve Robeson (and gave him your address from Qrz.com) has made threatening statements in past and present, that they were must likely idle, holding the opinion that Lying and Kiddy Porn are on the same level. Uh huh. Suuuuuuuuuuuure you did. that anyone online whould answer turthfully questions about there personal info (he laughed and told me never to give out such info online, or to lie if pressed...(SNIP) Uh huh...more phantom "officials" telling you to lie... Just like the "DoJ" and the "FBI" did when you went off on your OTHER "he's out to get me" rants. (UNSNIP)...that You were threatening others (went into you and BB you and Todd) Claimed that you could get someone more than anoyed over there. Uh huh. He siad that a case would be added to the Adult protective orders docket where the State Of Michigan would ask for protection of Mark Morgan and my family from Steven Robeson. that he would be served the papers by publising them in the local news paper, it would become effect 10 days after that or about 10 days from thursday if the judge agreed with him. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! It would then be illegal for you to come here No, Markie, it would not! If MI protection orders are like TN, they would prohibit an enjoined party from approaching or being in closer than 500ft proximity to the protected party. Nice try...AGAIN! Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me Protect you...?!?! From what? Your imagination...?!?! BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nice try, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you just reporting the facts of his call And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there He asked after my relationship with Mr Roberson, I explained that Steve Robeson (and gave him your address from Qrz.com) has made threatening statements in past and present, that they were must likely idle, holding the opinion that Lying and Kiddy Porn are on the same level. Uh huh. Suuuuuuuuuuuure you did. yep I did that anyone online whould answer turthfully questions about there personal info (he laughed and told me never to give out such info online, or to lie if pressed...(SNIP) Uh huh...more phantom "officials" telling you to lie... no one officail advocates telling the truth to threatening people stevie The Shiriff does not Just like the "DoJ" and the "FBI" did when you went off on your OTHER "he's out to get me" rants. no he is out to get me but you did threaten me Stevie Idly but it was threat (UNSNIP)...that You were threatening others (went into you and BB you and Todd) Claimed that you could get someone more than anoyed over there. Uh huh. Yep He siad that a case would be added to the Adult protective orders docket where the State Of Michigan would ask for protection of Mark Morgan and my family from Steven Robeson. that he would be served the papers by publising them in the local news paper, it would become effect 10 days after that or about 10 days from thursday if the judge agreed with him. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! It would then be illegal for you to come here No, Markie, it would not! sure would If MI protection orders are like TN, they would prohibit an enjoined party from approaching or being in closer than 500ft proximity to the protected party. well more like a mile in rural areas, and that does prevent you from coming here since you don't where I'd be Nice try...AGAIN! Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me Protect you...?!?! yes me or anyone else From what? Your imagination...?!?! people that make threats BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nice try, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! WHY DON'T YOU JUST FESS UP TO THE ABSLOUTE LACK OF TRUTH OF THIS TALE NOW, MARKIE...?!?! He asked after my relationship with Mr Roberson, I explained that Steve Robeson (and gave him your address from Qrz.com) has made threatening statements in past and present, that they were must likely idle, holding the opinion that Lying and Kiddy Porn are on the same level. Uh huh. Suuuuuuuuuuuure you did. yep I did Uh huh... that anyone online whould answer turthfully questions about there personal info (he laughed and told me never to give out such info online, or to lie if pressed...(SNIP) Uh huh...more phantom "officials" telling you to lie... no one officail advocates telling the truth to threatening people stevie And you've not SPOKEN to anyone "officaill", Markie. The Shiriff does not What's a "Shiriff"...?!?! Some Arabic sultan? Maybe he rode in on his magic carpet to grant your three wishes... Just like the "DoJ" and the "FBI" did when you went off on your OTHER "he's out to get me" rants. no he is out to get me but you did threaten me Stevie Idly but it was threat What threat? Seven years of this silly claim and you have yet to make it stick. (UNSNIP)...that You were threatening others (went into you and BB you and Todd) Claimed that you could get someone more than anoyed over there. Uh huh. Yep Uh huh... He siad that a case would be added to the Adult protective orders docket where the State Of Michigan would ask for protection of Mark Morgan and my family from Steven Robeson. that he would be served the papers by publising them in the local news paper, it would become effect 10 days after that or about 10 days from thursday if the judge agreed with him. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! It would then be illegal for you to come here No, Markie, it would not! sure would Nope. If MI protection orders are like TN, they would prohibit an enjoined party from approaching or being in closer than 500ft proximity to the protected party. well more like a mile in rural areas, and that does prevent you from coming here since you don't where I'd be More like 'in your dreams' DelusionBoy! Nice try...AGAIN! Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me Protect you...?!?! yes me or anyone else from WHAT...?!?! Your imagination...?!?! From what? Your imagination...?!?! people that make threats No one and no legal document can protect you from people making threats. No legal order could STOP someone from harming you if they were so determined...The papers are FULL of stories every week of some poor soul who HAD "orders of protection" that were assaulted or murdered by the enjoined party. Those orders are a placebo, Markie. They don't work. Neither did this story about a Social Security clerk and your order of protection! BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nice try, Markie! Again! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". and you know this how? just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. never said social security you made that up I though socail services was clear enough cuting sure would Nope. If MI protection orders are like TN, they would prohibit an enjoined party from approaching or being in closer than 500ft proximity to the protected party. well more like a mile in rural areas, and that does prevent you from coming here since you don't where I'd be More like 'in your dreams' DelusionBoy! you are the one with delusions Nice try...AGAIN! Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me Protect you...?!?! yes me or anyone else cuting stvie rant Those orders are a placebo, Markie. They don't work. not for real protection I agree I already said that more or less But they would make it a crime for you to come here you just can't get that fact through your head you have also admitted to using the US mail for fraud BTW cuting stevie lies Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: cut he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". and you know this how? Because a friend wouldn't put me in that position. Would a "friend" send e-mail to me in YOUR name making inapproprite suggestions, Mark? If ANYONE approached the "ss" in my name in regards to you, it was an effort to compromise me. That's not friendship. And if anyone DID approach them in my name, they were stupid. However I am still of the opinion that this is nothing more tha just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. never said social security you made that up Nope. YOU did. Unless you were intending "ss" to be in reference to some neo-Nazi office that you call on a regular basis? I though socail services was clear enough Nope. Not at all. What's "socail" services? This is why YOU have a problem being understood. You "assume" that everyone else in the world knows which set of definitions, abbreviations, or other abuses of the English language you intend to use today. And in any case, it still stands that I made no phone calls. cuting Of course you would. sure would Nope. If MI protection orders are like TN, they would prohibit an enjoined party from approaching or being in closer than 500ft proximity to the protected party. well more like a mile in rural areas, and that does prevent you from coming here since you don't where I'd be More like 'in your dreams' DelusionBoy! you are the one with delusions Nope. Nice try...AGAIN! Of course it is unlikely to mean much to you since while you were threatening to come UP but I am sure that was more of your blowing smoke, but I am have made aware of how it changes thing in self defense and reminded that the Suprume Court has ruled the cops realy don't have to protect me Protect you...?!?! yes me or anyone else cuting stvie rant "cutting" "Stevie" What rant? Those orders are a placebo, Markie. They don't work. not for real protection I agree I already said that more or less But they would make it a crime for you to come here Nope. Only for me to contact you directly or intentionally approach within a set distance. Usually 500 feet. you just can't get that fact through your head You're the one with "fact" issues, Markie. No protection order can keep me from visiting ANY part of Michigan I chose to visit, other than a moving 500ft bubble around you. And trust me, Markie...My sense of smell will redirect my travel if I get that close to you! you have also admitted to using the US mail for fraud BTW No, I've not. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. |
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. It could also mean "stupid story", which is what I am betting on. Markie's story STILL doesn't bear weight. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. If I were, then I WOULD be PLAYING. You and the rest of the Infamous Four think it's a birthright. Steve, K4YZ |
wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb |
nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Nothing is beyond your "understanding", Markie...You've said so yourself. Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie That's not waht I said, Markie. YOU said a "freind" was "helping me out". I said that anyone who was doing that wasn't a friend of mine. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb Nope. But the "telephone call" story sure was! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Nothing is beyond your "understanding", Markie...You've said so yourself. No I have not Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie more evasion And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb Nope. you are But the "telephone call" story sure was! sure was but it served its purpose Now I know what you did and that you are full of **** to sugest it could have any effect Your letter was circlar filed as soon as it arived Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. It could also mean "stupid story", which is what I am betting on. It could also mean social service worker, which makes far more sense than your stupid assumption. Markie's story STILL doesn't bear weight. Nor do yours. And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. If I were, then I WOULD be PLAYING. Call it what you want. You can -be- dumb, or you can be -playing- dumb. Your choice. |
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. |
|
|
K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: I just got the phone with the local ss worker. Nice try, Markie! want try? Huh? English, DelusionBoy, English! he informed me that someone claiming to be Steven Roberson (his words) has called and made claims that he was unwilling to repeat. Double nice try. I sent a letter. Well then one of your freind was trying to help you What's a "freind"...??!! And no one tried to "help me". just reporting the facts of his call Markie, the simple fact that you tried to start off your STORY by suggesting that it was a "Social Security" representitive made all the rest of it ludicrous. Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? And Markie...I know better than to send it to "ss". well you should have sent it there Why would I, a healthcare professional, send medically related correspondence to a SOCIAL SECURTIY office, Markie...?!?! More playing dumb? Indeed. He isn't playing dumb, he is dumb There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter You're right! And those were his very words. Steve, K4YZ |
From: on Aug 23, 3:25 pm
an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does With Heil "SS" means SchutzStaffel, complete with black uniform, twin lightning bolts, and jackboots. Monocle optional. How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Farf!! Snort... :-) Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? Stebie learned that serving under "Colonel Vinson" at Ft. Gordon. :-) There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. Wiley Coyote but badly animated in black and white? Stalking uses implied threats. Stalking is part of the Con Game he is doing, more bluff than stuff. But, Stebie GETS THE ATTENTION HE CRAVES! HE IS A SOMEBODY! :-) boo his |
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter "speaker" Sure the intent matters. That's why there are courts, Markie. And remember...they are going to have to consider whether or not you were a "mutual combatant" by inviting such comments with your "...is that your best shot" comment. Good luck. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat break No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" nope the court makes a final judgement but for example as long as someone could reasonably take something as a threat like one shot one kill.. then the intent of the speacker doesn't matter "speaker" Sure the intent matters. That's why there are courts, Markie. More lies Stevie The court is there to judge wether the one using the claim of self defense was reasonable in his belief your intentions matter not in a self defense case And remember...they are going to have to consider whether or not you were a "mutual combatant" by inviting such comments with your "...is that your best shot" comment. No one invites a death threat Good luck. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" You're right! And those were his very words. Sure is fun watching the two of you pat each other on the back! Haven't seen so much self-congratulation for nothing at all since Clinton's book came out... Steve, K4YZ Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- So, was Steve lying then, or now? |
wrote: From: on Aug 23, 3:25 pm an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Playing dumb like Heil? SS could mean social services worker. Indeed it does With Heil "SS" means SchutzStaffel, complete with black uniform, twin lightning bolts, and jackboots. Monocle optional. Salty Schnitzel? How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Farf!! Snort... :-) It was a fair question... Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? Stebie learned that serving under "Colonel Vinson" at Ft. Gordon. :-) Col Vinson make him "A" NCOIC of Geedunk? There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. Wiley Coyote but badly animated in black and white? Just black? Darkside? Stalking uses implied threats. Stalking is part of the Con Game he is doing, more bluff than stuff. His game is going to get him into trouble. But, Stebie GETS THE ATTENTION HE CRAVES! HE IS A SOMEBODY! :-) boo his "Dialing..." |
From: on Aug 24, 7:15 pm
wrote: From: on Aug 23, 3:25 pm an old friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: How anyone even Stevie could come up with Social security a federal agency when the subject was possible actions of the state of michigan is beyond my understanding Do you think that Steve, unlike David Heil, is actually dumb? Farf!! Snort... :-) It was a fair question... Sorry, I can't rate alien beings from other planets... :-( Did you catch how Stevie is also claiming to have certain knowledge that no one seeing the exchance between us decided to call Michigan and claim to be Stevie Trying to shed notice of his actions? Stebie learned that serving under "Colonel Vinson" at Ft. Gordon. :-) Col Vinson make him "A" NCOIC of Geedunk? Sure as hell wasn't Carl Vinson, Secretary of the Navy once. There you have it. But he really is wiley about coming just a short hair shy of making threats. He wants you to think that you've been threatened, but he's too chickenexcrement to actually do it. He's very, very practiced in that art. Wiley Coyote but badly animated in black and white? Just black? Darkside? "Darkman!" Stalking uses implied threats. Stalking is part of the Con Game he is doing, more bluff than stuff. His game is going to get him into trouble. It already has... But, Stebie GETS THE ATTENTION HE CRAVES! HE IS A SOMEBODY! :-) "Dialing..." :-) got som |
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" You're right! And those were his very words. Sure is fun watching the two of you pat each other on the back! Haven't seen so much self-congratulation for nothing at all since Clinton's book came out... Steve, K4YZ Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- So, was Steve lying then, or now? |
wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." Indeed But you over look the hidden escape clause printed in that secret Maraudars Map (with adknowledgement to the Harry Potter author) Of Part 97 Noen of the rules applies to those dreaded and powerfull foes that we are warned about in the english book of prayer , "the Wrathful Morsemen" ---------- So, was Steve lying then, or now? always but it can be so hard to sort out which lie he is telling since he changes his stories so often |
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" You're right! And those were his very words. Sure is fun watching the two of you pat each other on the back! Haven't seen so much self-congratulation for nothing at all since Clinton's book came out... Steve, K4YZ Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard So, was Steve lying then, or now? |
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his victum that decides what is a threat No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is. Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so, could say that's a "threat" You're right! And those were his very words. Sure is fun watching the two of you pat each other on the back! Haven't seen so much self-congratulation for nothing at all since Clinton's book came out... Steve, K4YZ Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. MIA or AWOL? |
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. well I have seen one post from him yesterday he was flaming me claiming that my refusual to address every point of one of his repetive flame posts was censorship of him. I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats MIA or AWOL? Definately MIA, stevie has always been MIA, plenty of talk though |
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. well I have seen one post from him yesterday he was flaming me claiming that my refusual to address every point of one of his repetive flame posts was censorship of him. I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats I dunno. I met someone at a McDonalds near Toledo to capture some GPS data, and when I booted up my laptop, it said that I had service to the Flying J and another truckstop's network. Most business oriented hotels have WAN also. Steve can post from anywhere. MIA or AWOL? Definately MIA, stevie has always been MIA, plenty of talk though I used to refer to him at the "Yell, Yell Marine." |
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. well I have seen one post from him yesterday he was flaming me claiming that my refusual to address every point of one of his repetive flame posts was censorship of him. I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats I dunno. I met someone at a McDonalds near Toledo to capture some GPS data, and when I booted up my laptop, it said that I had service to the Flying J and another truckstop's network. Most business oriented hotels have WAN also. Steve can post from anywhere. I can certainly do so not as sure about Stevie MIA or AWOL? Definately MIA, stevie has always been MIA, plenty of talk though I used to refer to him at the "Yell, Yell Marine." |
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. well I have seen one post from him yesterday he was flaming me claiming that my refusual to address every point of one of his repetive flame posts was censorship of him. I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats I dunno. I met someone at a McDonalds near Toledo to capture some GPS data, and when I booted up my laptop, it said that I had service to the Flying J and another truckstop's network. Most business oriented hotels have WAN also. Steve can post from anywhere. I can certainly do so not as sure about Stevie You're 3x3. Say again all after "i." MIA or AWOL? Definately MIA, stevie has always been MIA, plenty of talk though I used to refer to him at the "Yell, Yell Marine." |
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Steve lies. Here's proof: ---------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." ---------- Indeed Stevie when you going to address YOUR double standard I wonder if Steve has been picked up? He's strangely absent on RRAP. well I have seen one post from him yesterday he was flaming me claiming that my refusual to address every point of one of his repetive flame posts was censorship of him. I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats I dunno. I met someone at a McDonalds near Toledo to capture some GPS data, and when I booted up my laptop, it said that I had service to the Flying J and another truckstop's network. Most business oriented hotels have WAN also. Steve can post from anywhere. I can certainly do so not as sure about Stevie You're 3x3. Say again all after "i." you and I can certainly post from anyway but can stevie MIA or AWOL? Definately MIA, stevie has always been MIA, plenty of talk though I used to refer to him at the "Yell, Yell Marine." |
an Old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I was glad to see it frankly as long as he posts every day or so we are safe since he is obviously not driving to one of to carru out one of his threats I dunno. I met someone at a McDonalds near Toledo to capture some GPS data, and when I booted up my laptop, it said that I had service to the Flying J and another truckstop's network. Most business oriented hotels have WAN also. Steve can post from anywhere. I can certainly do so not as sure about Stevie You're 3x3. Say again all after "i." you and I can certainly post from anyway but can stevie Yeh, he could. Stay vigilant. |
|
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote: an Old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut I can certainly do so not as sure about Stevie You're 3x3. Say again all after "i." you and I can certainly post from anyway but can stevie Yeh, he could. Stay vigilant. always if he shows he will eat lead since it will prove he is dangerous his quiet is blissfull though You know, Mark, a rational man could take your statement very, very seriously. You should be most careful in what you post to a newsgroup, lest it be misinterpreted. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut if he shows he will eat lead since it will prove he is dangerous his quiet is blissfull though You know, Mark, a rational man could take your statement very, very seriously. You should be most careful in what you post to a newsgroup, lest it be misinterpreted. good I hope you and Stevie do take it seriously If Stevie shows up here one of us (at least) will mostly likely die. I will do my best to see to it that it is Stevie. I am fully aware of what I am saying Stevie shows here I will shoot at him at least try to shoot him, and take my chances explaining myself later I take it very seriously as I took Stevie's "One shot one kill.." very seriously If Stevie show up here (which I tend to doubt for various reasons) I will take it as prove that he has been serious in the threats he has made over the years, and seek to kill him in self defense any confusion there Dave? (or Stevie?) Mark, I consider you to be unbalanced. I have no confusion and will make it a point to save your latest post. go ahead Google of course will do it for you but knock yourself out But caling defening oneself unblanced well that is of course rather strange Dave K8MN |
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut if he shows he will eat lead since it will prove he is dangerous his quiet is blissfull though You know, Mark, a rational man could take your statement very, very seriously. You should be most careful in what you post to a newsgroup, lest it be misinterpreted. good I hope you and Stevie do take it seriously If Stevie shows up here one of us (at least) will mostly likely die. I will do my best to see to it that it is Stevie. I am fully aware of what I am saying Stevie shows here I will shoot at him at least try to shoot him, and take my chances explaining myself later I take it very seriously as I took Stevie's "One shot one kill.." very seriously If Stevie show up here (which I tend to doubt for various reasons) I will take it as prove that he has been serious in the threats he has made over the years, and seek to kill him in self defense any confusion there Dave? (or Stevie?) Mark, I consider you to be unbalanced. I have no confusion and will make it a point to save your latest post. go ahead Google of course will do it for you but knock yourself out But caling defening oneself unblanced well that is of course rather... calling? defending? one's self? unbalanced? strange You're a lying, sado-masochistic, bisexual pagan (poly *not monotheistic*) who has threatened to kill someone and you think I'm strange? You're over the edge, Mark. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut any confusion there Dave? (or Stevie?) Mark, I consider you to be unbalanced. I have no confusion and will make it a point to save your latest post. go ahead Google of course will do it for you but knock yourself out But caling defening oneself unblanced well that is of course rather... calling? defending? one's self? unbalanced? strange You're a lying, sado-masochistic, bisexual pagan (poly *not monotheistic*) who has threatened to kill someone and you think I'm strange? You're over the edge, Mark. I have not threaten to kill anyone, Dave I have stated my intentions to defend myself if nessasary, Of course you don't want to see that and just what is your point on Polytheistic vs Montheitic? My Bisexaulity interest in S&M has nothing to do with anything at hand You are clearly unblanced But again your point is what? Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut any confusion there Dave? (or Stevie?) Mark, I consider you to be unbalanced. I have no confusion and will make it a point to save your latest post. You know dave if you realy think Stevie is in any dnger from me siting here in Michigan prehaps you better call the cops? OTOH don't get mad at me if they are not amused Dave K8MN |
"an old friend" wrote OTOH don't get mad at me if they are not amused Nobody finds death threats amusing. Frankly, they scare the hell out of me. If you'd make such a serious threat about a cyber-encounter on the internet, what would you do about a real-life encounter on the streets of your town? I'm certain the police in your town/county will NOT be amused. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com