| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
September 6th 05, 12:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 07:48 wrote: snip From: on Aug 28, 8:18 am In the end, if they cannot lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s), they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Actually the logic is quite different. It comes down to asking why Len is so interested in amateur radio policy even though Len is not a ham and has never been one. There has been a nocodetest amateur radio license in the USA since 1991, yet Len never got one. The maximum code test required for any US amateur radio license has been 5 wpm since 1990 (with medical waiver) and since 2000 without a waiver. [Jimmie NEVER got a no-code-test Technician license...] But he's got 101 opinions about it. Nor is Len a manufacturer of amateur radio equipment, nor does he have anything to do with FCC. [Jimmie is a "manufacturer of amateur radio equipment"...makes one of a kind equipment...state-of-the-art style using vacuum tubes in the 1990s] He's preparing for the big EM Pulse. More than 5-1/2 years ago, Len told us he was going for Extra, but didn't say when, and it hasn't happened yet. [tsk, tsk, make a statement long ago and the Profiler HOLDS ONTO that as a "lifelong goal"...as he was taught in Seminary...] Hey Len, have you ever worked Frenchmen out of band on Six Meters? So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Jimmie has a need to WIN MESSAGE POINTS. :-) No, there's something else to it. Probably something on Aaron Jones list of "Morse Myths." By coming out with whatever their motivations are, it will expose yet another myth. But which one? Jimmie wants to be TOP DAWG in here! :-) Never happen if he can't face legitimate discussion. And regardless of how someone replies to Len's posts here, Len will reply according to the profile. It's just his way. Why should anyone reply to his posts at all, Dave? 73 de Jim, N2EY Hi, hi! You reply directly to my comment, then you act as if you are speaking to Dave. Then you ask why anyone should reply to Len's posts at all. More hi, hi's! Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. Brian, don't expect a "rational discussion" with Jimmie. Repeated asking will get you PROFILED! :-) Yeh, well. |
|
#3
September 7th 05, 05:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 07:48 wrote: Actually the logic is quite different. It comes down to asking why Len is so interested in amateur radio policy even though Len is not a ham and has never been one. There has been a nocodetest amateur radio license in the USA since 1991, yet Len never got one. The maximum code test required for any US amateur radio license has been 5 wpm since 1990 (with medical waiver) and since 2000 without a waiver. [Jimmie NEVER got a no-code-test Technician license...] Then you and Jim have something in common. :-) :-) Nor is Len a manufacturer of amateur radio equipment, nor does he have anything to do with FCC. [Jimmie is a "manufacturer of amateur radio equipment"...makes one of a kind equipment...state-of-the-art style using vacuum tubes in the 1990s] More than 5-1/2 years ago, Len told us he was going for Extra, but didn't say when, and it hasn't happened yet. [tsk, tsk, make a statement long ago and the Profiler HOLDS ONTO that as a "lifelong goal"...as he was taught in Seminary...] You boasted of what you were going to do and you didn't follow through. It has now been years since your boast. You've done nothing about obtaining *any* amateur radio license, much less the Extra. So in the end, when Jim Miccolis/N2EY, David Heil/K8MN, Brian Kelly/W3RV, and Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP point out that Len is not an amateur, for what purpose do you do so? What do you hope to gain from pointing out that Len isn't an amateur? Jimmie has a need to WIN MESSAGE POINTS. :-) Are those MESSAGES POINTS anything like those MESSAGE KNUCKLES you wrote about some time back? From your sheer number of posts, you'd be likely to achieve some sort of MESSAGE POINT award. If you were to get credit for the number of words you've posted, you might even get a MESSAGE POINT plaque. Jimmie wants to be TOP DAWG in here! :-) There's been no indication of that whatever. I wonder what prompted you to write such an inaccurate statement. Hi, hi! You reply directly to my comment, then you act as if you are speaking to Dave. Then you ask why anyone should reply to Len's posts at all. More hi, hi's! Jim, when you're ready to have a rational discussion with me, I'll be here. Brian, don't expect a "rational discussion" with Jimmie. Repeated asking will get you PROFILED! :-) I don't think your advice is very accurate, Leonard. Repeated behavior of the type you've demonstrated here could result in your having a profile written. Dave K8MN |
|
#4
September 9th 05, 12:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Brian, don't expect a "rational discussion" with Jimmie. Repeated asking will get you PROFILED! :-) I don't think your advice is very accurate, Leonard. Repeated behavior of the type you've demonstrated here could result in your having a profile written. Dave K8MN Indeed. Your repeated behavio[u]r can be profiled in one word: Smug. You're fairly one dimensional. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| K8CPA Email | CB | |||
Hybrid Mode
