Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 28, 6:02 pm Dave Heil wrote: hot Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Aug 25, 2:42 pm K4YZ wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: I've seen any number of Len's comments made to look like the product of one who has little experience. As Len has questioned your net control capabilities. Not quite true either side. I was citing Heil as a CONTROL FREAK that he appears to be from all his postings to me. Evident to all. Closing a net with CW? The only nets I've ever closed with CW were CW nets. More word play. Word play? Hardly. I've never participated in a State Department net on RTTY or CW. More word play. Clintonesque. Further down you just admitted to opening and closing RTTY net using CW on "another frequency." I have experience in radio. A considerable amount. Most of it is PROFESSIONAL radio...that kind that pays money for services rendered. Heil must not equate government employ in the Department of State as "professional" yet he obviously got MONEY for that, PLUS living expenses. Obviously he's not professional. ...not any more. There aren't any professional radio amateurs. When did that end? It never began. You should work on your facts. The W1AW operator is paid a salary to transmit on amateur frequencies. School teachers may make radio transmissions as a part of their paid instructions to students. Professional credentials don't get one a pass into amateur radio. What? Another set of redundant licensing requirements? They aren't redundant. They're for different services. Oh yeh, forgot the physics change with the different services. I recall taking the GROL. Looked identical to the Amatuer Advanced exam. Really? Were there lots of regulatory questions dealing with the amateur bands? There were lots of identical electronics and radio physics material. Identical to the Advanced exam. And whaddayaknow? The exam was administered by a famous VEC. Go figure? ...they claim that his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham. Sometimes Len's opinions are no good because they are issued because he has no experience in amateur radio. Sometimes his opinions are no good because they are the rantings of a geezer with an ax to grind. Often, he makes factual errors and there have been numerous times when he deliberately fabricates. You want us to believe that all of Len's comments are to be discarded. Heil doesn't like my commenting, therefore I am to be "discarded," discredited, demeaned, and some other "d" I can't think of. :-) demonized. Deep-sixed. As in murdered? As in "deep-sixed". As in "murdered?" David Heil/K8MN is a primary culprit in that tactic, but Jim has used it as well. Oh no, I've by no means been "a primary culprit", but I have participated over a period of years. Can you guess how many times you've commented that Len isn't an amateur radio operator? He has a macro sentence generator for that. :-) And there is a purpose for his stating that you're not an amateur. There certainly is. It is to point out that Len isn't a radio amateur and that he has no experience in amateur radio. There must be somthing more to it than that. A read-between-the-lines guy like you would probably attempt to find a hidden meaning or agenda. This is what surprises me. Except for this, your agendas and double-standards are obvious. This one has me puzzled. He is to amateur radio as a fishing rod to deer hunting. You're not even close enough to be considered a poor analogue. It'd be tough to come up with something. I'm a long time participant in amateur radio. The closest Len can come is being an SWL. Well there you go! You could say that he is a "lurker" on the HF frequencies. That should sound nefarious enough to raise eyebrows. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |