| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
September 7th 05, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 06:09 cut Translation: JIMMIE DOES NOT TOLERATE DISSENT!!! :-) Your translation leaves much to be desired. Jim tolerates dissent just fine. What he has done is create what, to this point, is a very accurate description of your likely behavior toward those who dare disagree with your views. All is relitive. Jim does tolerate dissent much better than Dave or Dan or esp Stevie But Dave you over look that I disagree at time with Len, no flames in return. cut What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to prevent Len from making those comments. Nor would I. What I have done is to point out errors in Len's reasoning and claims. And I backed it up with google quotes and other info. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jimmie CANNOT "shut me up" so he tries the next best thing: Disingenuous insults in the form of the Profiler's "Prediction" wherein all who disagree (all those who DARE disagree that is) are uncivilly chastised in a "formal" manner. Jim's profile isn't about "all those". It is about you. nope that is Jim SoP seend often enough around her cut The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon discrediting Len's comments and opinions. Free speech includes the right to discredit other's comments and opinions if those comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. Some of Len's comments and opinions are not based on facts and sound logical reasoning. Tsk, tsk, tsk. "Free speech" does not mean that opposition to the Words of the ARRL shall be silenced. When have you been silenced? What have you to do with the ARRL or with amateur radio? silenced no but attemps have been made to selience Len as well as myself that they are prettty feble and so silly as to make one wonder about the sanity of the efort is another matter but here again you try febly of course to silence or at drown him in **** if you prefer He has nothing to do with ARRL, indeed he is proud of that fact. I wish I felt it entirely practical to join him there. Why does he need to have anything to do the ARRL? similar text for the ARS stab Jimmie wants to re-argue and re-argue and re-argue OLD arguments that appeared in here, perhaps hoping to "win" one that he lost long ago? Yes, that is "free speech" but it does NOTHING. You've carped on many of the same issues for nearly a decade. You've argued and re-argued those issues. Are you hoping to win one? I think he has or more properly been on the winning side in one of the Biggest one. Or are still thinking Code testing is going to survivie this rounf at the FCC? cut |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| K8CPA Email | CB | |||
Hybrid Mode
