Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Jim: It is only necessary to create the association between any spoken word and the series of characters you wish to generate when that word is spoken, into a library of such associations... In other words, if I speak "the" and make the association to the characters "t-h-e" the speech to text engine will always generate those characters when I speak that specific word--I could just as easily associate the spoken "the" with any other series of characters. Now, while you and I might not go to that trouble if we are fast typists, others who do not type will... those who are blind will... companies and corps will (and especially those employing disabled workers.) I have seen such libraries on the net for specific uses, such as programming, before. You most likely can download one for the speech engine in question... There are groups devoted to the blind who could easily supply you with them, I am sure... John Hello, John You have an idea that is remiss in a thought or two. One of my friends I have known for years is blind. He types. You do *not* have to see in order to type. I need not (and usually do not) look at the keyboard. In fact, I never look at the keyboard. Once you know where the home keys are, you don't need to see. In fact, check and see if your "f" and "j" keys have little bumps on them to assist you in finding the home keys. Amazing, ain't it LOL I learned grade 1.5 Braille when I was a teenager. I used a Braille slate, although it is far easier to use a Braille writer. My friend has a text to speach translator. They work quite well and are great for his e-mail, but speach to text has a problem. This brings to mind a simple diddy: Rockabye homonym, on the tree top when the wind blows, the homonym will rock and when the bow breaks, the homonym will fall and down comes your arguement, homonym and all. takes a bough As you can see, I might associate "to" with the letters "t" and "o" combined for one word. Unfortunately, when I wish to add the word "two", I will see that the spoken word is already associated with the word "to". Too big a problem, I suspect. Woops, there just went another too, too - or is that tu-tu? Further, how does one do addresses? I want the numbers to be stated as one block, with no commas should the address be something like 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Of course, no one is usually there at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue, but the arguement seems solid. I can't even use "my address" as two words come out rather than my street address - heaven help me if I want to add my e-mail address. Will "at" appear as "at" or "@"? Will ampersand appear as "ampersand" or "@"? Suppose I wish to use the word in a sentence? If you can't speak, you could always be in a restaurant with a lap-top with text to speach and type in "blew cheese dressing, please" and it sounds perfectly proper, despite the error in spelling. However, it doesn't work in the other direction. Now you have a spelling and/or context problem. Hope you understand my point ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Headline: Brain Dead Woman Gives Birth To Baby Girl | General | |||
Breaker 1-9 good buddy! I got a Dead Leprechaun on my tail! | CB | |||
Wanted Dead or alive Communications receiver,s and radio equipment | Shortwave |