an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

From: on Sep 14, 4:08 am

cut


Find me some articles of "great interest in millimeter bands"
allocated to amateur radio by the FCC. Who in here has EVER
worked up in the millimeter bands?

I have, on numerous occasions from WA8ONQ.


Who in here has EVER worked
any ham bands above 70 cm? [besides using a 1 GHz cell phone
or 2.4 GHz cordless telephone?]

I have, on numerous occasions.


as Have I

Tell Len. I didn't ask you.

That piece of
information is necessary to get an insight into the problem. I didn't find
it on the web site. Of course I don't have a lot of time this morning.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


I found it extremely EASY to obtain all the details on Carl's
website. Just a couple of mouse clicks while reading this in
Google. The same with checking out the League's web site to see
the "announcement" of the candidates for Division. At NIGHT,
when I first saw Carl's message on Google.

Well, let's get a membership drive going, right? "Join and
CHANGE THE LEAGUE FROM 'WITHIN'!" Free, open, democratic
principle stuff. Uh huh. :-)

cuting Daves gartuous insults

I see that you continue to "cute" things. Perhaps you think that is
somehow making my words go away. I've never made a "gartuous" insult in
my life.

Look. I can make the words come back:

Off the top of my head, those who post here who cannot run for ARRL
Director:

1. Those with a potential conflict of interest.

2. Non-radio amateurs.

3. Non-ARRL members.

One of those snags your "old_friend" and two of them fit Leonard H.
Anderson.


Are you insulted because you aren't an ARRL member? Are you insulted
because Len is neither an ARRL member nor a radio amateur? If so, I
cordially invite you to live with it.

Dave K8MN