| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rick wrote:
My League Director told me in public that only 4 Directors voted to review the Executive Committee's ruling. He said he told them that there was no "upside" to keeping Carl off the ballot, and that as just one director, there was no damage he could do anyway, even if he was as dangerous as they thought. I agree! But, seems to me the Board is hellbent on paybacks for Carl's work with NCI. After all, he and the rest of the NCI Board have beaten them at every turn on the code issue. No, they haven't. It's clear that FCC was pushing for reductions in Morse Code testing long before NCI existed. And there are strong no-code-test directors on the ARRL BoD. If it's not paybacks time, then the Board is scared to death of what Carl might do to try to reform the organization. It's one or the other. No, it isn't. There are other possibilities. One is that Carl's manner *in the past* may have upset some people. Or his *past* comments about ARRL and many aspects of ham radio. There's also his leapfrogging over the field organization and going straight for Director. Personally I don't see any conflict between his present employment and being an ARRL director. The commitees and Board see different. Either way, this will stiffle future candidates who might otherwise consider running for an ARRL office, but don't want the public humiliation of being disqualified by the Elections Committee if they don't like the way you part your hair. It might stifle some. But the alleged "humiliation" can be avoided by not going public until the Board accepts your candidacy. And, of course if doesn't do much for League recruiting, particularly of younger hams who tend to rebel against such shenanigans when they see them in adults. I agree that there is no upside to keeping him off the ballot, but apparently, the Board would rather bring the house down on their heads than have to deal with an outsider who doesn't care much for the way the exclusive good ol' boys club has been doing things. Seems that way. OTOH, there could be other factors. Spread the word to your clubs around the country, and let's let the Directors hear of our disgust over this blatant abuse of power. Can I be an NCI Board Member? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Past Gems from Candidate Carl | Policy | |||
| Carl WK3C Runs for ARRL Directorship | Policy | |||
| NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||