wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Honus wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:TyF2f.418739$x96.87311@attbi_s72...

"an old friend" wrote in message

you don't respect the constitution premise that All men are created
equal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Only under the eyes of the law.....

You're both wrong; shame on you. It's the Declaration of Independence, and
it's predicated on the belief that government serves only to secure the
rights that we're all born with.

it is in the principle on which the constitution and its framer built
the govt of the USA

To whit:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
Powers from the consent of the governed, -- "

Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of
SC

Wrong, stupid Marky, Thomas Jefferson, one of the principal authors of
the Declaration of Independence, WAS a slave-owner.

Inded he was as I said without naming him but of course he was ONE
person not "slaveholders" pural

you realy should try learning english


As were many
others. It wasn't just written by one person, either, Marky.

the other authors (whose roles were minor) Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman were not slave holders

Rutledge
needed the clause to be stricken for economic reasons. The agrarian
economy at the time in the South depended upon slaves as a workforce

yes of that was the reason advanced, beat then you are into beating
dead horses

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Honus wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:TyF2f.418739$x96.87311@attbi_s72...

"an old friend" wrote in message

you don't respect the constitution premise that All men are created
equal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Only under the eyes of the law.....

You're both wrong; shame on you. It's the Declaration of Independence, and
it's predicated on the belief that government serves only to secure the
rights that we're all born with.

it is in the principle on which the constitution and its framer built
the govt of the USA

To whit:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
Powers from the consent of the governed, -- "

Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of
SC

Wrong, stupid Marky, Thomas Jefferson, one of the principal authors of
the Declaration of Independence, WAS a slave-owner.

Inded he was as I said without naming him but of course he was ONE
person not "slaveholders" pural

you realy should try learning english

You are the one that said to this statement:
Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

You replied:

"no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of

SC"

YOU are the one who said the document wasn't written by slaveholders,
when anybody with a modicum of education knows differently, Marky.

You are the one in desperate need of learning English, child abuser.

As were many
others. It wasn't just written by one person, either, Marky.

the other authors (whose roles were minor) Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman were not slave holders

You are even more stupid then you show on here, Marky, if you think
that... Adams and Franklin were not minor roleplayers, either, stupid.

Rutledge
needed the clause to be stricken for economic reasons. The agrarian
economy at the time in the South depended upon slaves as a workforce

yes of that was the reason advanced, beat then you are into beating
dead horses

Wrong stupid, as usual.

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Honus wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:TyF2f.418739$x96.87311@attbi_s72...

"an old friend" wrote in message

you don't respect the constitution premise that All men are created
equal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Only under the eyes of the law.....

You're both wrong; shame on you. It's the Declaration of Independence, and
it's predicated on the belief that government serves only to secure the
rights that we're all born with.

it is in the principle on which the constitution and its framer built
the govt of the USA

To whit:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
Powers from the consent of the governed, -- "

Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of
SC

Wrong, stupid Marky, Thomas Jefferson, one of the principal authors of
the Declaration of Independence, WAS a slave-owner.

Inded he was as I said without naming him but of course he was ONE
person not "slaveholders" pural

you realy should try learning english

You are the one that said to this statement:
Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

You replied:

"no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of

SC"

YOU are the one who said the document wasn't written by slaveholders,
when anybody with a modicum of education knows differently, Marky.

anyone one with a real education knows that it was written by A slave
Holder, not by a group of them, but I guess that lets you out


You are the one in desperate need of learning English, child abuser.

As were many
others. It wasn't just written by one person, either, Marky.

the other authors (whose roles were minor) Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman were not slave holders

You are even more stupid then you show on here, Marky, if you think
that... Adams and Franklin were not minor roleplayers, either, stupid.

Minor in American indenpendance no in the writing of the document yes,
at Adams is a minor player in that drama according to Adams, Franklin
according to Adams and Jefferson, one the few things Adamas and
jefferson agred on in later year

and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural


shocking the lack of education displayed


Rutledge
needed the clause to be stricken for economic reasons. The agrarian
economy at the time in the South depended upon slaves as a workforce

yes of that was the reason advanced, beat then you are into beating
dead horses

Wrong stupid, as usual.

I am right on target

"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

shocking the lack of education displayed

And that lack wouldn't be so obvious if you had a spell-checker.

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Honus wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:TyF2f.418739$x96.87311@attbi_s72...

"an old friend" wrote in message

you don't respect the constitution premise that All men are created
equal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Only under the eyes of the law.....

You're both wrong; shame on you. It's the Declaration of Independence, and
it's predicated on the belief that government serves only to secure the
rights that we're all born with.

it is in the principle on which the constitution and its framer built
the govt of the USA

To whit:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
Powers from the consent of the governed, -- "

Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of
SC

Wrong, stupid Marky, Thomas Jefferson, one of the principal authors of
the Declaration of Independence, WAS a slave-owner.

Inded he was as I said without naming him but of course he was ONE
person not "slaveholders" pural

you realy should try learning english

You are the one that said to this statement:
Of course, that document was written by slaveholders...so much for -that-,
eh?

You replied:

"no it wasn't but slaveholders were included in the Contienal Congress
It was written a by a Slave holder who did include an anti slavery
clause, stricken at the last minute at the insistance of Mr Rutlegde of

SC"

YOU are the one who said the document wasn't written by slaveholders,
when anybody with a modicum of education knows differently, Marky.

anyone one with a real education knows that it was written by A slave
Holder, not by a group of them, but I guess that lets you out

Yet, YOU are the one who said it wasn't, not anybody else, Marky. And
trying to use my exact same argument back to me is lame, but you are a
world class fool.


You are the one in desperate need of learning English, child abuser.

As were many
others. It wasn't just written by one person, either, Marky.

the other authors (whose roles were minor) Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman were not slave holders

You are even more stupid then you show on here, Marky, if you think
that... Adams and Franklin were not minor roleplayers, either, stupid.

Minor in American indenpendance no in the writing of the document yes,

No, stupid. You are wrong, as usual.

at Adams is a minor player in that drama according to Adams, Franklin
according to Adams and Jefferson, one the few things Adamas and
jefferson agred on in later year

You are really ****ing stupid, Marky. You need to go back to school,
also.


and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

shocking the lack of education displayed

Oh, the irony, Marky.


Rutledge
needed the clause to be stricken for economic reasons. The agrarian
economy at the time in the South depended upon slaves as a workforce

yes of that was the reason advanced, beat then you are into beating
dead horses

Wrong stupid, as usual.

I am right on target

No, stupid, you missed by a parsec.

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing
The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

cut

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing

Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment
without the use of a quill pen, too.

The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

"Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are
talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid.

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid.

cut

Run away, Marky, run away.

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing

Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment
without the use of a quill pen, too.

no never said that idiot

The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

"Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are
talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid.

sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem

not that knowing more than you about much of anything is much of an
acheievement

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid.

I sure do as is obvious by the thread

cut

Run away, Marky, run away.

"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

you realy should try learning english

Oh Lord.

"Honus" wrote in message
news:LQY2f.25226$3w.20208@trnddc07...

"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

you realy should try learning english

Oh Lord.



Has any one else noticed that all Markie does is copy the opponents
argument? Even to the exact words.

Dan/W4NTI