wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoot.

he does get a bit verbose and rambling but that is simply a matter of
style

Style? When did Len develop style? Len is windy, pontificating and
unpleasant. Some style.


But maybe after you guys huddle on Mike's BBS for a while and figure
out how far it is to the moon, Jim can report back here.

I haven't written anything about going anywhere. If I haven't left over
your playing red-hatted monkey and haven't left over Len's stream of
conciousness rants, Colonel Mark's mindless drivel and Roger Wiseman's
filth aren't likely to result in my departure.


the subject was the content of the new BBS and len myself and Brain
are not likely to receive invations

I think you could bank on not receiving an invitation. You are fouling
the newsgroup nearly as much as sociopath Roger Wiseman. Brian alone was
responsible for the departure of Ed Hare. Len routinely insulted Ed as
well as Jon Bloom. The subject, according to the headers is still
"Lennie Reveals True Identity of Dudly...and It Is HE!".

therefore the content you are whining about will not be there dispite
your claims to the contary

I didn't make any claims to the contrary, Colonel. I'm quite certain
that Len's stuff would not be there.

in the sprit of being civil i cut the rest of the paragraph

In the spirit of being accurate, I've re-inserted it.

I do find it interesting that you and Mark have found so much common ground.

why?

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

we are NoCoders and that bring a ceertain openess in thought that
ProCoders don't have with us

You are not only a no-code-test advocate, you are a no-can-do-coder.

we do disagree on issues and nuance even at times on the facts, you
just stand so far away from us we seem to agree on everything

I'm sure you'll understand that I'm being quite sincere when I write
that I prefer to stand very, very far away from a number of NCTA folks.
You are high on that list. You have so many issues that I'd want to
stand far away from you if you were *for* code testing.

we have even disagred over our exact opinion of YOU

You may hold any opinion you like, even if you are short on facts.

you should have caught that

I tell you seeing the inability of some of the procoders to see what
is written in front of them I am forced to wonder if too much code use
does not cause brain damge to some folks

What accounts for your damage, Colonel? We know darn well that it
wasn't from the use of morse code.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo

yes it is your opinion

your effort to label your opinion as fat get the rest of the hack job
since till you learn you are not the font of all fact you are not
engaging in deabte yourself

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.

your effort to label your opinion as fat...

My "effort" to do what? In the instance I offered above, I present fact
and then provided an opinion. Do you label all of your opinions?

get the rest of the hack job...

Get it? Where did it go?

since till you learn you are not the font of all fact

If you want folks to take you seriously, Mark, you must stop issuing
falsehoods. I've made no statement describing myself as the "font of
all fact".

you are not
engaging in deabte yourself

No, I've not engaged in "deabte" and I'm not sure that it is legal in my
state. I have engaged in debate and discussion here and elsewhere but
I've never stated, even once, that my purpose here is to engage in
debate, civil or otherwise.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.

then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:




wrote:



Dave Heil wrote:




wrote:




wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.


then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

That is incorrect, Mark. I have not stated my opinion as fact.
You can't write well; you can't read well. Your lack of skills leaves
you with erroneous views.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:12:32 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.


then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

That is incorrect, Mark. I have not stated my opinion as fact.
"I've stated one as fact." no other way of parsing that sentence

so BUZZZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Dave Heil wrote:

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL.

Well there you have it.

Dave admits that the vast majority of Len's post are on-topic.

Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

Belligerent?

Bully?

Strange words coming from a guy who's claims "admiration" for a
person known to be a pathological liar and deceiver. Even more strange
when one considers your numerous outstanding unresolved claims about
Amatuer Radio...all of which, to date, have been proven false.

Nice try, Brain. Now try again.

Steve, K4YZ

On 28 Oct 2005 03:56:33 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

Belligerent?

sure you are belligerent

and since you are not honest enough to admit it
BUUUUZZZZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account