On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

wrote:
wrote:

On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:


wrote:


grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up


Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.

yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

Ya notice that too, Jim?

- Mike KB3EIA -

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

wrote:


On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:



wrote:



grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up


Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?

- Mike KB3EIA -

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

wrote:


cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?

no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP


- Mike KB3EIA -

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand inquisitors.

A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand inquisitors.

wrong again

Inquistors intoragte they want the target to talk

learn english


A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

wrong again we don't like Jim becuase he beats daed horses into
unreconizable plup and then gooes right on beating them

he does keep his cool beter than say Stevie (but then so does an active
volcano)

Jim is the best on his side but he goes to far in making aever post a
recitation of 50-100 years of history, told from his point of view only


- Mike KB3EIA -

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie. Damn
boy, wake up and smell the roses.

Dan/W4NTI

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do
find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the
ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand
inquisitors.

wrong again

Inquistors intoragte they want the target to talk

learn english


A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

wrong again we don't like Jim becuase he beats daed horses into
unreconizable plup and then gooes right on beating them

he does keep his cool beter than say Stevie (but then so does an active
volcano)

Jim is the best on his side but he goes to far in making aever post a
recitation of 50-100 years of history, told from his point of view only


- Mike KB3EIA -

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:37:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie. Damn
boy, wake up and smell the roses.

when someome lies about what I said I call em you too if needed

and you are a self confessed hate filled bigot who claims anyone he
does like saying the same things as he does hates Ham radio

Dan/W4NTI


but then you are such an easy target
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Mike Coslo wrote in
:

wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I
do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the
ones telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of
rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous
that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand
inquisitors.

A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he
generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

- Mike KB3EIA -

On the contrary, I like Jim because he is rational and polite. I don't have
to agree with him, though. He did raise a valid point about citizenship,
i.e. it is irrelevant, but I raised this point myself with Len before and
didn't get an answer.

Any way you look at it though, more than half the comments are in favour of
the NPRM and less than a third against, the rest being divided into those
who want a code test retained for the Extra and those who otherwise fall in
the middle ground. The FCC will have no problem deciding that they have a
mandate to abolish Element 1 based on the comments.

So we are all just waiting for the other shoe to drop.

73 de Alun, N3KIP

"Alun L. Palmer" wrote in message
.. .

: Any way you look at it though, more than half the comments are in favour
of
: the NPRM and less than a third against,

Not in fact is it ANY WAY (every way) you look at it. If Lenards tally is
accurate, your issue seems almost exactly an even race since the official
Federal Register publication of the NRPM with 50.41% in favor or dropping
Morse and 49.59% in sympathy to retain at least some Morse examination.
Based on your presidents election experience you should exam for perhaps
hanging chads in some preceints in Florida.

BGO


--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

"Usenet Central" wrote in
link.net:

"Alun L. Palmer" wrote in message
.. .

: Any way you look at it though, more than half the comments are in
: favour of the NPRM and less than a third against,

Not in fact is it ANY WAY (every way) you look at it. If Lenards
tally is accurate, your issue seems almost exactly an even race since
the official Federal Register publication of the NRPM with 50.41% in
favor or dropping Morse and 49.59% in sympathy to retain at least some
Morse examination. Based on your presidents election experience you
should exam for perhaps hanging chads in some preceints in Florida.

BGO


--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire





It's only an even race if you count those who want to retain a code test
for Extra only as being in the anti camp. I guarantee that the FCC will be
able to think of no reason to retain it only for Extras. In your dreams,
maybe.