Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Oct 2005 19:58:05 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 26 Oct 2005 19:05:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 26 Oct 2005 18:03:12 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 22 Oct 2005 05:51:41 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote: wrote: grow up What does that mean in this context? in this context it means either do your own countor shut up Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any questions? no but he does npt have to answer any questions "not" Then to NOT clarify his work is to admit that it's not prepared in any remotely scientific manner, which is to say that it's just a lot of bufoonery. not at all Sure it is! nope Yep. no he simply sees no profit in enaging you on this issue he is right for himself it more a matter of thinking the questioners to be buffons cuting all after stevie proves he is not engaged in anything serious _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy |