From: on Thurs, Oct 27 2005 3:41 pm


wrote:
From: on Tues, Oct 25 2005 2:30 am
wrote:
From: on Oct 24, 3:39 am
Alun L. Palmer wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

It's about *your* 'scorecard', Len.

Yes, it is. Did you think someone ELSE bothered to read ALL
the filings on WT Docket 05-235 and compile a day-by-day
tabulation of them? YOU did NOT.

Do those 'filings' include only Comments, or other things like Reply
Comments?

ALL the filings, Jimmie-James. ALL of them. Even those filings
which aren't about amateur radio! :-)


But it's not about me, Len. I'm not posting a 'scorecard' and making
any claims. You are.

Tsk, tsk...Jimmie-James, you ARE making "claims" of "inaccuracy"
and implications of badness. :-)

But, you've NOT made one single filing on WT Docket 05-235 as
of 5 PM EDT on 28 October 2005. In fact, the LAST time you
filed ANYTHING with the FCC ECFS was over 12 months ago on a
Petition. Tsk, tsk.


It's not about me, Len. I'm not posting a 'scorecard' and making
any claims. You are.

Tsk, tsk...I'm NOT "making claims." I'm doing READING and
counting and tabulating what I find. If you dislike the
results, DON'T READ THE "SCORE CARD." [simple solution]

That seems to unduly upset you. Tsk. If it bothers you so
much, just stop reading this thread! [easy solution to your
apparent problem]


Why is that so important to you?

Why is YOUR HECKLING "so important" to YOU? :-)

You aren't even discussing the opinions in all those 3,199
filings. All you do is try to trash-mouth those who've
bothered to look at ALL the filings. Tsk, tsk.


I read those notes. They are not comprehensive. They do not
answer several questions I have raised.

Why is that "so important to you?"

YOU are NOT in the FCC. YOU are NOT on the ARRL BoD.


Since this is a private compilation, I do my own "checking"
prior to each posting. Those can be verified by ANYONE who
bothers to READ ALL of the filings in WT Docket 05-235.

In other words, nobody checks your work.

No, dearie, that is NOT "in other words." All you are doing
is simple-minded heckling of ME...which seems "so important
to you." :-)


It's a very simple question.

...from a VERY unsatisfied simple person... :-)


You've filed at least 5 different comments
and reply comments, all of which are in support of the NPRM.

Yes, and...? Are you FORBIDDING my communications with my
own government?!?


Do they show up as a count of 1 or 5 on the tally of "for" filings?

Tsk, tsk...you understand very poorly. I've already said I
count ALL the filings.


Why does what I have posted matter at all?

Tsk. You talk MUCH in HERE about this NPRM yet you have
said NOTHING to the FCC on NPRM 05-143.

It would seem you are all about gabbling and heckling and
don't have the guts to make yourself heard to the FCC.

You're ducking some very basic questions.

NOT "ducking" anything, Jimmie-James.

You HECKLE a lot, asking inane questions to which the answers
were already posted with the first of my "score cards."

Tsk, tsk, tsk...you are acting like a whiny, petulant little
child with all those "I'm just asking questions" nonsense
comments.

Seems to me you'd
be proud to show how your totals came about, but instead
you attack the messenger.

Tsk. I "attack the messenger?!?" :-)

What do you call YOUR remarks in HERE, then, Jimmie-James?
Some kind of self-appointed morals-ethics "policeman" when
all you are is a petulant, whiny little heckler.

As you've pointed out (more than once), the "score card" is
MINE, isn't it? :-) If so, then I make up the rules,
don't I? :-) You don't like the results? Don't read the
"score card."

The results of the NPRM and its final Report and Order will
NOT AFFECT YOU, will it? You have your beloved badge, title,
rank, attendant privileges, and a neat certificate (suitable
for framing). Nobody can take that away from you. The results
of the final R&O will NOT affect you insofar as amateur radio
operating, will it?


Your name is James P. Miccolis.

That's one way to write it.

You have OTHER ways to write your legal name? :-)


But for some reason you have extreme difficulty calling people by their
names.

I wrote "your name is James P. Miccolis." No problem to
me. It was easy to write. :-) NOT "extreme difficulty."


Y'know, Len, you seem to miss the point on a lot of things.

"Miss the point?" I've never been to West Point. Tell us
about it, your cadet days before you were actively "serving
your country."

I've been to Point Loma, Point Reyes, all without "missing" my
way there.

I have an LED pointer. I haven't missed with that one for a
long while.


A comment to FCC is not a vote. Citizenship is not required
to comment.

Did you fail high school Civics class?

No - I got all A's.

You "claim." :-)


FCC accepts comments from noncitizens too. They don't *have* to do
that, but they do it anyway.

So...you have it on "good authority" that the FCC actually
CONSIDERS those comments in deciding on a final R&O?

Tell us more, Mr. Insider. You ARE with the FCC, aren't you?


If FCC is willing to accept comments from foreigners, why don't you
list them as part of the total?

Tsk, tsk, tsk, Jimmie-James, they ARE listed. Have been since the
first of them showed up.

Gee, Len, you exhibit very childish behavior here ;-)

Ha. Ha. Ha. I'm not the one asking inane, petulant "questions"
which had ANSWERS already posted on the "score card." YOU ARE.


Looks like the prevailing opinion is in support of code testing. For
Extras, at least.

Why is that "so important to you?" It won't affect YOUR amateur
privileges.

The official end of Comments on WT Docket 05-235 is 31 October 2005;
official end of Replies to Comments is 14 November 2005. I am
posting this message on 28 October 2005. Whatever filings are
there, I'm simply READING them ALL, counting them up, tabulating
them and posting the results.



There's no age limit on an amateur radio license, nor on commentary to
FCC.

I'm NOT taking any "age limits" in my "score card," Jimmie. :-)

Why do you continue to make whiny little petulant remarks about
things NOT in the "score card?"


I see no need for a minimum age requirement for licensing in the
amateur radio service.

NPRM 05-143 is NOT about U.S. amateur radio license "age
requirements." Grow up.


You have stated here that you have always had problems integrating
young people into what you consider an adult activity.

Like VOTING if one is below the age limit? I have NO "problem"
with that.

Like getting a driver's license below the state law age
minimum? I have NO "problem" with that.

Like buying alcohol in a store by those below the state law
minimums? I have NO "problem" with that.

Like serving in the armed forces below the age minimum? I have
NO "problem" with that. [you should have NO "problem" with
that since you've never served]

Like getting married before the minimum legal age? I have NO
"problem" with that. [are you married, Jimmie? Had sex yet?]

Because they're relevant to your attitude towards young people.

Tsk. LOTS and LOTS of ordinary folks are all FOR minimum age
requirements in MANY things, Jimmie. I have NO "problems" with
that. YOU have a big PROBLEM with that, though.



Yet you don't answer questions on the process. Why?

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I don't "answer" heckling about questions which
have had ANSWERS already posted in the Notes section of my "score
card." :-)


There are no "CHARGES of inaccuracy" - just some questions on your
processes.

You have only whiny, petulant, childish HECKLING of others,
Jimmie. Not a nice thing to do.



And that means your postings are fair game for comment and question by
others. They are not somehow sacred and unimpeachable. They are not
immune to question and/or debat.

Freudian slip, Jimmie. The word is "debate." :-)

"De bat" is what you think you swing. But, you ain't got a ball
enough to post your own Comment on WT Docket 05-235. :-)


It seems to me that you cannot tolerate any disagreement with your
views.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...it seems you get VERY UPSET when a sizeable
group of hobbyists don't like morse code testing! :-)

Makes you ill-tempered, whiny, petulant, and childish with
your inane heckling! :-)


Did I say the numbers were wrong?

You implied that several times. :-)

Or did I simply ask how they were
derived, and pointed out how they *might be* in error?

You not only MIGHT be WRONG on your "assessment" but you ARE. :-)



Tsk, tsk, tsk...then you should cancel my amateur radio license
then, refuse to give me my amateur paycheck? :-)

It's really all about money to you, isn't it?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA.... :-

Poor Jimmie? Double-degreed "engineer" and you can't MAKE
ENOUGH to spend over $100 on a rig? :-)


Guess what, Len - I stay up very late to operate my amateur radio
station.

Who cares? :-)

It's YOUR body you are abusing...


Besides, you're such an experienced expert on "computer-modem
communications" that you should be able to find the tally without
my help.

I haven't needed it yet, Jimmie. :-)


Why not just answer the questions I posed, Len?

What "answers" would you LIKE, Jimmie? :-)


[it isn't
working, Jimmie, get a new knuckle-spanking ruler for the
Nun of the Above]

Ah yes, you advocate violence against those who question your
statements and beliefs.

"Knuckle-spanking" is VIOLENCE?

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ......


My name is not "Jimmie", so it can't be me.

Ah, but it IS, Jimmie. :-)

You want "formality?" Should we call you "your majesty?" :-)



Godwin invoked. You lose, Len.

I haven't "lost" anything, Jimmie-James. :-)

Tell "Godwin" to send me e-mail if he (or you) are so upset...


And ignoring honest questions about the process.

Ask them "honestly" and I might give you answers...but the
ANSWERS were already in every "score card" before you ever
asked them! :-)


You haven't been a radio amateur - ever - yet you tell us
all How It Should Be in amateur radio.

Tsk. Who can "tell" a morseman anything? :-)


You equate questions with heckling.

Yours ARE. :-)


Your explanations are incomplete and inadequate.

Tsk, tsk. I don't give you the "answers you want" and "with the
proper respectful attitude."

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...


I did. Your explanations are incomplete and inadequate.


Tsk, tsk. I don't give you the "answers you want" and "with the
proper respectful attitude."

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...


James P. Miccolis has NOT filed anything with the ECFS since
August of last year. ["put your money where your mouth is"]

Why don't you, Len?

Tsk, tsk...Jimmie-James has already FORGOTTEN about his remark
and my five filings on WT Docket 05-235. James P. Miccolis
has exactly ZERO filings on that Docket. :-)


Leads me to believe you're counting reply comments too.
And not checking for dupes.


Speaking of "dupes," why are you trying to DUPE everyone into
thinking I'm "always in error?" :-)


Are you so ****ed off at certain posters in here you stay up
until nearly midnight to post nastygrams? :-)


Go ahead, READ ALL of the filings in WT Docket 05-235 and do
your own compilations/tabulations. Check it out.


So far, Miccolis has NOT CHECKED MY WORK,


Nobody can. You haven't shown it.


Yes I have. It's IN the ECFS in two different Replies to
Comments. You just haven't seen it yet. :-)


Want to check my numbers out for totals? Easy to do with the
FCC ECFS and proper use of the date blocks. ECFS does the
totals for that period for you. Tsk, tsk, tsk.



I'm simply pointing out that you're not going to get an amateur radio
license.

How is that "important" to YOU? It sure isn't "important" on
NPRM 05-143 what any Commenter is "going to do." :-)

Had you READ ALL the filings, you would have seen some interesting
ones (other than mine, of course) by NON-radio-hobbyists! Try an
educational institution for starters...

If you wanted one, you'd have gotten one years ago.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Why? :-)

Get a ham license to "do a 'service' to my country?" :-) Done
the REAL service, Jimmie.

Well, I DID not follow the "accepted formal sequence" by getting an
amateur radio license BEFORE I operated all those transmitters at
ADA long ago...and messed that up by getting a Commercial radio
license after being released from Army service ten years after I
turned the magic age of fourteen. :-)

You don't want one and you're not going to get one.

I don't want your childish, petulant, whiny heckling in here but I
will EXPECT to get thousands of them... :-)

What you really want is something very different.

I want the FCC to make NPRM 05-143 into a Report and Order...without
changes to the basic precepts in the NPRM.

So...how long have YOU been taking those post-graduate courses in
behavioral psychology, Jimmie-James? Do you plan on becoming a
licensed shrink? Or do you just wear shrink-wrap?

BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA.........