wrote:
From: on Oct 29, 4:44 am

wrote:
From: on Thurs, Oct 27 2005 3:41 pm
wrote:
From: on Tues, Oct 25 2005 2:30 am
wrote:
From: on Oct 24, 3:39 am
Alun L. Palmer wrote:

It's about *your* 'scorecard', Len.

Yes, it is.

Well, at least you finally admit to that plain and simple fact.

Let's see...Google accepts MY postings only under my IEEE
alias and I "sign" every "score card" with
."

WHO would be posting a "score card" under my name if
NOT me? :-)

I've seen none other than yours. Perhaps Jim is "seeing" things.

Did you think someone ELSE bothered to read ALL
the filings on WT Docket 05-235 and compile a day-by-day
tabulation of them?

I don't think that. I know it's true. I've seen the compilation
done by someone else and it's more informative than yours.

WHO else, Jimmie?

"Persons of Interest."

You are begining to sound like Dudly the Imposter in here,
always NON-specific but alleging you "know" someone else.

Translation for Jim: Dudley the Imposter IS K4YZ.

You've never been a radio amateur but you tell us How Amateur
Radio Should Be. Which is your right of free speech.

MISTAKE. ERROR. I'm telling the Federal Communications
Commission (a U.S. federal government agency) what I think
the regulations on GETTING INTO amateur radio "should be."
[i.e., my desires]

Hey, the government did ask, right?

Tsk. I could NOT "tell you anything" about amateur radio or
anything else if it was against what you wrote in here. You
would spend days, weeks, even years arguing over a "discussion"
as you did on "age requirements" LONG AFTER I dropped it. :-)

Yep, he's on another thread singing "ebony and ivory" about the
"anonymizing" nature of Morse Code.

The thing you seem to have trouble with is when others use their
right of free speech.

Tsk, tsk, I'm USED to heckling, catcalls, booing from the
peanut gallery in computer-modem communications. Been doing
that since early December, 1984.

YOU are one of the hecklers.

But Len, Jim is one of the most polite hecklers I've ever seen. I
wonder when he'll pull an Al Franken and tackle you?

Who is "Jimmie-James", Len? An imaginary friend of yours?

James P. Micollis, the one whose legal address given to the FCC
is at 136 Morningside Circle, Wayne, PA 19087.

Are YOU this same "James P. Miccolis?"

Answer truthfully. Any false responses will be treated to 23 years
of heckling... ;-)

He knows who he is and he knows that you're referring to Jim as Jimmie
and James. Proof: He answers all such postings.

ALL of them. Even those filings
which aren't about amateur radio! :-)

Finally! An answer to a straightforward question! Thank you.

Tsk, tsk. That ANSWER was clearly given in the Notes on each
"score card" posting since the first one. You did not seem to
understand it. Why did you keep on asking, keep on asking,
keep on asking? Disk record broken?

Jim can't handle not being answered. He is too important to be
ignored.

But I, Jim/N2EY, am simply asking questions about your 'scorecard'
process, and pointing out the *potential* for inaccuracy.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. The plain simple fact is that I am giving you
ANSWERS to stupid questions whose answers were in plain sight
in every "score card" posting I've done.

It's all in the "fine print," even though usenet makes it all the same
font size.

That sort of thing seems to really bother you, Len.

Poor baby. You keep asking all these inane questions. Why?

Are you afraid of the RESULTS of the opinions of the "amateur
community" being against your amateur Beliefs? Sure seems
that way.

Only Christian Belief Systems are open to redicule. All others are
sacred.

But, you've NOT made one single filing on WT Docket 05-235 as
of 5 PM EDT on 28 October 2005.

So? Is the filing of comments with FCC a requirement for asking
questions and posting comments here?

Tsk, tsk, tsk. After the tens of thousands of whiny, petulant
words, accusations, and implications in HERE, you can't even
make ONE filing on WT Docket 05-235 on MORSE CODE TESTING?!?

:-)

Must not be important to Jim.

Who made you the moderator?

The same one who made YOU "moderator!" :-)

Maybe not. Jim is self-appointed.

In fact, the LAST time you
filed ANYTHING with the FCC ECFS was over 12 months ago on a
Petition. Tsk, tsk.

What's so "tsk tsk" about that?

Tsk, tsk, tsk. After the tens of thousands of whiny, petulant
words, accusations, and implications in HERE, you can't even
make ONE filing on WT Docket 05-235 on MORSE CODE TESTING?!?

True enough.

Tsk, tsk...I'm NOT "making claims."

Yes, you are, Len. You're claiming your 'scorecard' is accurate
but you won't answer questions about how it is prepared.

1. The "answers" were ALREADY POSTED in each of the "score cards"
I put up via Google. Well before you "asked" for the first
one.

2. You've gotten answers to your (petulant, whiny, accusatory)
"questions" in here...but you sure as hell don't LIKE them!

That may be changing, which is a good thing.

Who appoint you "judge" of what is "a good thing" or a "bad thing?"

3. The attitude towards morse code testing in the U.S. amateur
community has been CHANGING all along...AWAY from the old,
Old, OLD standards and practices. That seems to **** you off
greatly and makes you petulant, whiny, and accusatory. Tsk.

I think I'll study up and pass Extra before Jim's lack of support
allows the ARS to be watered down even more. I'm gonna be an
Extra-lite before it becomes and Extra-minus so I can brag about how
good I used to be. Hi!

Here's another solution, Len: If you don't want commentary on
things you post, don't post them.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You are telling me to SHUT UP! [but are attempting
to disguise it with uncivil "civil phrases"]

Yep. You juss got towld to "Shut Up!"

You seem to want everyone to just accept what you write here
without question, even though you don't behave that way
towards others. Doesn't work that way.

ERROR! MISTAKE!! Sorry, dearie, but it DOES work that way.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Did God appoint YOU as "judge" of "what works"
and "doesn't work" in here? [He didn't tell me that this
morning] Do you have a Certificate of Licensure (suitable for
framing) from a Divine Authority granting you "judgement"
capability on who posts what? I don't think so...

Jim thinks of himself as Godless. But he thinks pretty highly of
himself.

All this "tif for tat." Can't keep up. Jim must be retired now, too.

From: on Oct 30, 2:15 pm

wrote:
From: on Oct 29, 4:44 am
wrote:
From: on Thurs, Oct 27 2005 3:41 pm
wrote:
From: on Tues, Oct 25 2005 2:30 am
wrote:
From: on Oct 24, 3:39 am
Alun L. Palmer wrote:


It's about *your* 'scorecard', Len.

Yes, it is.

Well, at least you finally admit to that plain and simple fact.

Let's see...Google accepts MY postings only under my IEEE
alias and I "sign" every "score card" with
."

WHO would be posting a "score card" under my name if
NOT me? :-)

I've seen none other than yours. Perhaps Jim is "seeing" things.

Well, maybe he was told by Dudly the Imposter's buddie...the
one that said 'I was trying to hire into NADC in PA' and
'wasn't performing well while I was there' in 1971 (34 years
ago!). :-)

Did you think someone ELSE bothered to read ALL
the filings on WT Docket 05-235 and compile a day-by-day
tabulation of them?

I don't think that. I know it's true. I've seen the compilation
done by someone else and it's more informative than yours.

WHO else, Jimmie?

"Persons of Interest."

The only "persons of interest" I know are my financial advisers
at Bank of America. Whoops, now I did it...Jimmie will say
"I'm all about money!" :-)


You are begining to sound like Dudly the Imposter in here,
always NON-specific but alleging you "know" someone else.

Translation for Jim: Dudley the Imposter IS K4YZ.


You've never been a radio amateur but you tell us How Amateur
Radio Should Be. Which is your right of free speech.

MISTAKE. ERROR. I'm telling the Federal Communications
Commission (a U.S. federal government agency) what I think
the regulations on GETTING INTO amateur radio "should be."
[i.e., my desires]

Hey, the government did ask, right?

Yup. But, the resident PCTA in here absolutely FORBID
comment about getting into amateur radio if one is not
already IN amateur radio!

It's a "chicken and egg" thing. They are too chicken to
argue with those against morse code testing and, if they
do, they get egg on their face...


Tsk. I could NOT "tell you anything" about amateur radio or
anything else if it was against what you wrote in here. You
would spend days, weeks, even years arguing over a "discussion"
as you did on "age requirements" LONG AFTER I dropped it. :-)

Yep, he's on another thread singing "ebony and ivory" about the
"anonymizing" nature of Morse Code.

Really? I always imagined he had a BAD voice and had to resort
to manual morse in order to "sound good."


The thing you seem to have trouble with is when others use their
right of free speech.

Tsk, tsk, I'm USED to heckling, catcalls, booing from the
peanut gallery in computer-modem communications. Been doing
that since early December, 1984.

YOU are one of the hecklers.

But Len, Jim is one of the most polite hecklers I've ever seen. I
wonder when he'll pull an Al Franken and tackle you?

We'll see. I'm not familiar with Franken since his failed
half-hour comedy sitcom a few seasons back.


Who is "Jimmie-James", Len? An imaginary friend of yours?

James P. Micollis, the one whose legal address given to the FCC
is at 136 Morningside Circle, Wayne, PA 19087.

Are YOU this same "James P. Miccolis?"

Answer truthfully. Any false responses will be treated to 23 years
of heckling... ;-)

He knows who he is and he knows that you're referring to Jim as Jimmie
and James. Proof: He answers all such postings.

heh heh heh...all the readers in here can SEE that...


ALL of them. Even those filings
which aren't about amateur radio! :-)

Finally! An answer to a straightforward question! Thank you.

Tsk, tsk. That ANSWER was clearly given in the Notes on each
"score card" posting since the first one. You did not seem to
understand it. Why did you keep on asking, keep on asking,
keep on asking? Disk record broken?

Jim can't handle not being answered. He is too important to be
ignored.

El Jefe muy importante!


But I, Jim/N2EY, am simply asking questions about your 'scorecard'
process, and pointing out the *potential* for inaccuracy.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. The plain simple fact is that I am giving you
ANSWERS to stupid questions whose answers were in plain sight
in every "score card" posting I've done.

It's all in the "fine print," even though usenet makes it all the same
font size.

You're right...and Jimmie keeps sticking his font in his mouth...


That sort of thing seems to really bother you, Len.

Poor baby. You keep asking all these inane questions. Why?

Are you afraid of the RESULTS of the opinions of the "amateur
community" being against your amateur Beliefs? Sure seems
that way.

Only Christian Belief Systems are open to redicule. All others are
sacred.

It's sad to see a seminary kick-out behave that way... :-(



Tsk, tsk, tsk. After the tens of thousands of whiny, petulant
words, accusations, and implications in HERE, you can't even
make ONE filing on WT Docket 05-235 on MORSE CODE TESTING?!?

:-)

Must not be important to Jim.

True. He likes to sit in HERE and heckle to his heart's content!



Tsk, tsk, tsk. After the tens of thousands of whiny, petulant
words, accusations, and implications in HERE, you can't even
make ONE filing on WT Docket 05-235 on MORSE CODE TESTING?!?

True enough.

Maybe "Mr. Insider" has a "private ear" at the FCC?



3. The attitude towards morse code testing in the U.S. amateur
community has been CHANGING all along...AWAY from the old,
Old, OLD standards and practices. That seems to **** you off
greatly and makes you petulant, whiny, and accusatory. Tsk.

I think I'll study up and pass Extra before Jim's lack of support
allows the ARS to be watered down even more. I'm gonna be an
Extra-lite before it becomes and Extra-minus so I can brag about how
good I used to be. Hi!

Sounds like a Plan! :-)


Here's another solution, Len: If you don't want commentary on
things you post, don't post them.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You are telling me to SHUT UP! [but are attempting
to disguise it with uncivil "civil phrases"]

Yep. You juss got towld to "Shut Up!"

Right ON!



All this "tif for tat." Can't keep up. Jim must be retired now, too.

Either that or he spends ALL his time in front of a computer screen.

The other night he was up till nearly midnight, east coast time,
busy busy busy with message making.

Hey! Maybe if Dudly finds his WF orgy partner, he can get her
sister to snack up with Jimmie? :-)

...or even her brother? :-)

Ah, the mental pictures that evokes! Heh heh heh heh.

bit bit