| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Iitoi" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl Wrote: IF (let's be hypothetical) the FCC did retain code for Extra, then the American Disabilities Act (ADA) will surely be raised by someone who need only point to the use of waivers previously and no court in this country would rule against such a clain. The "waivers previously" were only for the 13/20 WPM tests, and required the applicant to have passed a 5 WPM test. TTBOMK there has never been any waiver of 5 WPM, thus no precedent in support of such a claim. The ONLY reason waivers were not extended down to 5wpm in the past was because the FCC believed the USA could not waive the minimal code test because of the treaty. Now that there is no treaty requirement, the logic that lead to waivers of 13/20 wpm can and would be extended to a 5wpm test IF such test remains. The president stands based on the general application of waivers for non-treaty established code speeds. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
| Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
| Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||