| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 26 Oct 2005 03:58:45 -0700, wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Oct 2005 17:33:29 wrote in .com: The concept of "One Shot One Kill" is still the principle technique taught to all Marine recruits. More horse#### from Gunny Dudly. No...More lies from Frank Gilliland. But then you've made a career of lying, haven't you...?!?! More projection from Gunny Dudly. Nope. YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! All that stuff you would have learned if you had graduated beyond the yellow footsteps. But you didn't. Why are you lying, Frank? I won't answer a question the requires me to accept a premise that is not true. The fact is that I DID "graduate beyond the yellow footsteps". I've provided more than a few references that any reasonably "connected" Marine, ex-Marine, retired Marine or just plain old Joe or JoAnn Citizen could corroborate as true. You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. Steve, K4YZ |
Stevie claims to personal the govt, again
On 26 Oct 2005 09:26:24 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 26 Oct 2005 03:58:45 -0700, wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Oct 2005 17:33:29 wrote in .com: The concept of "One Shot One Kill" is still the principle technique taught to all Marine recruits. More horse#### from Gunny Dudly. No...More lies from Frank Gilliland. But then you've made a career of lying, haven't you...?!?! More projection from Gunny Dudly. Nope. YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. now you are really crossing into new territory you have no way of making that statement No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". making up claims for frank again Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. where? Oh I am sorry oposing you is proof that you are lying I forgot Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. he isn't sure there is anything to critique off hand I think he is mistaken on that count I think you had one. one of keeping your head down covering your ass (big job there I guess) and avoiding anything that might lead a big decision It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! you are right you are just not honest enough to fess up to what you do after all nothing is your fault All that stuff you would have learned if you had graduated beyond the yellow footsteps. But you didn't. Why are you lying, Frank? I won't answer a question the requires me to accept a premise that is not true. The fact is that I DID "graduate beyond the yellow footsteps". I've provided more than a few references that any reasonably "connected" Marine, ex-Marine, retired Marine or just plain old Joe or JoAnn Citizen could corroborate as true. indeed I think you serve as to the quality of that service or wether you were chaeting Us Sam out of your paycheck is a another matter You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. indeed here you explain a lot about yourself accusastion is the same as guilt which has become your SOP here in RRAP and likely in real life Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. again you want other to your work is this what you did in the service always tell other to do your work? You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. ah yes noone you dislike is even human borong Stevie and showing you off in the bad light we RRAP'ers have come to expect for you Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. you got something right you are not humble but then NO ONE has accused you of that here, and likely nowhere else either Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
|
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
K4YZ wrote: cut YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. now you are really crossing into new territory Nope. guess you are right you been in the lying range so long you have no way of making that statement Sure I do. That lying SOB swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, wherein he ALSO swore to obey those appointed senior to him. One no reason but your word to say is lying SoB but his first duty is the constitution entitirely possible to feel a conflict in which case he is bound to disobey (rather like some solders at Abu Graib should have done but that is another topic) even were he tried and found guilty (it being found that the orders were not illegal) thais does not prove he was lying or in any way violated his oath or stole his rightfull pay you have presented nothing that allows you to state He freely brags about having disobeyed orders and subsequently was court martialed...Not once, but TWICE, for his conduct. so what? BTW your facts don't seem to be true he has admited to making a mistake (haven't seen him says it was violating orders) and taking a lumps and once to being tried and found not guilty No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". making up claims for frank again Nope. Frank suggests that it's NOT a Marine's job to kill his enemy. Can't speak for the USMC but the Army teaches it people that it is better to wound the enemy in most cases ties at least 4 people that way I suspect the USMC theaching much the same thing Follw the thread back and read for yourself, Markie. Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. where? Where he swore to uphold his oath, no such documentaion and his frequent assertions that I did not serve in the United States Marine Corps, among others. he has expressed his opinion you did not serve holding that opinion even if it may be contary to fact is not a lie if it were you would been guilty of lying when you say I have not served in the Army, in those cases you are simply mistaken Oh I am sorry oposing you is proof that you are lying I forgot Nope...You asked, I told you. another lie no proof was offered And Frankie's only reason to be in this forum were to try and "undermine" my USMC service claims on your behalf. I doubt that I think Frank was acting on his own I believe you served just that you served very badly indeed Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. he isn't sure there is anything to critique He's an idiot. of course he is he dares to oppose you,when are you going to publish that dictionary of words as you use them You two have a lot in common. I doubt we have much in common One we both oppose you here two we both have lived our lives I supect that is about it off hand I think he is mistaken on that count I think you had one. one of keeping your head down covering your ass (big job there I guess) and avoiding anything that might lead a big decision And therein YOU'D be wrong again. maybe I would but I don't think so But then it's a habit for you. It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! you are right you are just not honest enough to fess up to what you do after all nothing is your fault I do my best to make sure I have my bets covered, Markie. That's just a prudent thing to do. no you don't do that either Frankie claimed I "profess" to be the "newsgroup spelling cop". That was a lie. I've never done it. I agree he was in error You are the cp just not hoest enough to admit it cut You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. indeed here you explain a lot about yourself Nope. I have a Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal with four bronze stars on it (Not THE "Bonze Star"...the small attachments that signify a multiple issue of the same award) so what? means you kept you know out anything for years I am not impressed accusastion is the same as guilt which has become your SOP here in RRAP and likely in real life The "guilt" is Frankie's and is from HIS admissions, Markie. no it isn't it comes from your distortion of his words and tthat is hardly guilt Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. again you want others to your work Try that in English. calling you lazy again ahven't you seen that statement for enough to reconize it is this what you did in the service always tell other to do your work? What "work"...??? any work He claims I didn't do something. I provided verifiable references. you asked him to do your homework You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. ah yes noone you dislike is even human You and Frankie are high on that list, however you have a track record that substantiates my claims. indeed as close to admision as we ever see from Stevie the weasel borong Stevie and showing you off in the bad light we RRAP'ers have come to expect for you "Boring" No...Only you, Brian, and Lennie. which is about half of the regulars Stevie more than a thrid prehaps less than half Frankie's not even a regular here...Just a lurker with a competency and confidence deficit. but you treat him like one Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. you got something right you are not humble but then NO ONE has accused you of that here, and likely nowhere else either I didn't say anything about MY "humbleness", Markie... another lie "in my NOT so humble" that is part of the statement above on your humbleness or rather the lack of it But there you go showing off that English comprehension problem of yours again.... no you show you don't evn bother to understand your own posts Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Well...that makes it hard to figure out the attributes...But it DOES make it easy for Markie to claim "I didn't say that..." YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. now you are really crossing into new territory Nope. guess you are right you been in the lying range so long I've been lying on the couch today, but that's all the "lying" I've done today. you have no way of making that statement Sure I do. That lying SOB swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, wherein he ALSO swore to obey those appointed senior to him. One no reason but your word to say is lying SoB but his first duty is the constitution entitirely possible to feel a conflict in which case he is bound to disobey (rather like some solders at Abu Graib should have done but that is another topic) One, No, it's not "another topic". The soldiers at Abu Gharib shold have REPORTED THE INFRACTIONS via the chain of command. even were he tried and found guilty (it being found that the orders were not illegal) thais does not prove he was lying or in any way violated his oath or stole his rightfull pay Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! you have presented nothing that allows you to state Almost right, Markie! I didn't "present" it...FRANKIE did! He's the one who made the "####bird PFC" comment which, on "cross examination" led to the discovery that he's twice convicted for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Courts maritals are reserved for the real idiots or the specially grevious charges. Since it's apparent that Frankie didn't spend any time in Leavenworth, we can safely put him in the "real idiot" category. His conduct in this forum corroborates that. He freely brags about having disobeyed orders and subsequently was court martialed...Not once, but TWICE, for his conduct. so what? BTW your facts don't seem to be true Then if they were not true, they'd not be facts. he has admited to making a mistake (haven't seen him says it was violating orders) and taking a lumps and once to being tried and found not guilty He WAS found guilty. No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". making up claims for frank again Nope. Frank suggests that it's NOT a Marine's job to kill his enemy. Can't speak for the USMC but the Army teaches it people that it is better to wound the enemy in most cases ties at least 4 people that way You can't speak for the Army, either, Markie. I suspect the USMC theaching much the same thing "teaching" Naw...We were basically told that the phrase dusbiously attributed to General George S Patton, that it was a soldiers duty not to die for hiscountry, but to make the other SOB die for his. USMC attitudes on this are that if you let those four guys carry that fifth guy off the battlefield, there will be five guys to worry about later. Better to kill them all now than to ahve to face them a second time. So, better you quit trying to figure out who you're "speaking for", Markie. Follow the thread back and read for yourself, Markie. Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. where? Where he swore to uphold his oath, no such documentaion Sure there is! He provided a partial copy of his DD214 here. In order to have gotten a DD214, he had to have been sworn in in the first place. and his frequent assertions that I did not serve in the United States Marine Corps, among others. he has expressed his opinion you did not serve holding that opinion even if it may be contary to fact is not a lie Sure it's a lie. He alleges to have some great "contacts", even dropping LtCol Oliver North's name as if they were bunk buddies. If he HAD those kind of contacts, he could corroborate the information given to him. He's not doen it, prefering to call me "Dudly" and further substantiating my claims that his courts martials were probably warranted on several levels! if it were you would been guilty of lying when you say I have not served in the Army, in those cases you are simply mistaken I am not "mistaken". Oh I am sorry oposing you is proof that you are lying I forgot Nope...You asked, I told you. another lie no proof was offered Sure it was. Frankie's own words. Or are you now calling him a liar too? And Frankie's only reason to be in this forum were to try and "undermine" my USMC service claims on your behalf. I doubt that I think Frank was acting on his own I KNOW he's not acting on his own, Markie! But thanks for agreeing with me! I believe you served just that you served very badly indeed Uh huh...That's why I don't have a single disciplinary action in my SRB and four stars on my GCM. Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. he isn't sure there is anything to critique He's an idiot. of course he is he dares to oppose you,when are you going to publish that dictionary of words as you use them It's already published. It's called "Websters". You should get one. You two have a lot in common. I doubt we have much in common Sure you do! One we both oppose you here two we both have lived our lives I supect that is about it And you're both liars and cheats. off hand I think he is mistaken on that count I think you had one. one of keeping your head down covering your ass (big job there I guess) and avoiding anything that might lead a big decision And therein YOU'D be wrong again. maybe I would but I don't think so No...you don't THINK, Markie... But then it's a habit for you. It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! you are right you are just not honest enough to fess up to what you do after all nothing is your fault I do my best to make sure I have my bets covered, Markie. That's just a prudent thing to do. no you don't do that either Sure I do. Frankie claimed I "profess" to be the "newsgroup spelling cop". That was a lie. I've never done it. I agree he was in error You are the cp just not hoest enough to admit it The "cp"...?!?! "hoest"...?!?! cut Censorship. You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. indeed here you explain a lot about yourself Nope. I have a Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal with four bronze stars on it (Not THE "Bonze Star"...the small attachments that signify a multiple issue of the same award) so what? means you kept you know out anything for years I am not impressed It means I did my job. And I did it well. accusastion is the same as guilt which has become your SOP here in RRAP and likely in real life The "guilt" is Frankie's and is from HIS admissions, Markie. no it isn't it comes from your distortion of his words What's to distort? He called HIMSELF a "####bird PFC" and admitted to his two courts martials. There was nothing there for me to distort if I wanted to! and tthat is hardly guilt "that" Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. again you want others to your work Try that in English. calling you lazy again ahven't you seen that statement for enough to reconize it "haven't" "recognize" Haven't YOU had your nose rubbed in your own laziness and childish spelling errors to fix them? Again...I was asked for specifics...I gave them. is this what you did in the service always tell other to do your work? What "work"...??? any work WHAT are you talking about, Markie? He claims I didn't do something. I provided verifiable references. you asked him to do your homework No, I didn't. Frankie claims I didn't seerve in the Marines. I've given him units, dates of boot camp including units and locations, and even my promotion boards dates and precedent numbers. He claims to have "contacts". Obviously he doesn't. That substantiates my claim of LIAR. You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. ah yes noone you dislike is even human You and Frankie are high on that list, however you have a track record that substantiates my claims. indeed as close to admision as we ever see from Stevie the weasel "admission" There's TWO weasels here, Markie...You and Frankie of Silliland. borong Stevie and showing you off in the bad light we RRAP'ers have come to expect for you "Boring" No...Only you, Brian, and Lennie. which is about half of the regulars Stevie more than a thrid prehaps less than half "third" "perhaps" Nope. You, Lennie and Brain. Then myself, Cmdr Corey, Dee, Mike Coslo, "Ace WH2T", Alun N3KIP, Dan W4NTI, Kim W5TIT, Dave K8MN, Jim AA2AQ, John K KC2HMZ, Bert WA2SI. If we go into the Wiseman crowd, we pull in about another five or six "regulars". Unless, of course, you have yet another "definition" for the term "regulars". Frankie's not even a regular here...Just a lurker with a competency and confidence deficit. but you treat him like one You're darn right I treat him like he's a lurker with a competency and confidence deficit! Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. you got something right you are not humble but then NO ONE has accused you of that here, and likely nowhere else either I didn't say anything about MY "humbleness", Markie... another lie "in my NOT so humble" that is part of the statement above on your humbleness or rather the lack of it And AGAIN you've screwed up the English, Markie... But there you go showing off that English comprehension problem of yours again.... no you show you don't evn bother to understand your own posts Sheeesh. I'll give you ONE thing, Markie... Just when I think it's NOT possible for you to make a bigger idiot out of yourself, you go and prove me wrong. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
|
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
"K4YZ" wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Get a room. |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
|
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Get a room. I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
"K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Get a room. I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
Steveo wrote:
You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? Naaaaah...You have me confused with your daddy. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:49:16 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: Got lots of work today so I'll only make a few comments: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:17:50 -0400, wrote in : snip abu graib is another topic than frank and so The soldiers at Abu Gharib shold have REPORTED THE INFRACTIONS via the chain of command. no they should have refused to prefrom them and then informed the chain of comand the "orders" were unlawfull and they should have had the gut to refuse them Quite right. The oath requires you to perform any -LEGAL- order given to you by your superiors. This was the issue during the Iran-Contra scam when Ollie claimed he was just following orders and didn't care if his actions were legal or not (although I'm sure he knew they were illegal). That's blind obedience and it's wrong. and dangerous as well even were he tried and found guilty (it being found that the orders were not illegal) thais does not prove he was lying or in any way violated his oath or stole his rightfull pay Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? Me, but Dudly didn't have all the facts. I pled guilty at the first court-martial and so was never tried. snip Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times And that's exactly what I did for the second infraction. I forced a summary court-martial so the facts regarding the case would be a matter of record. snip He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you For once Dudly is right. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. well thanks for clearing it up Id say it was an appeal of sorts but then try not to quible when I can snip USMC attitudes on this are that if you let those four guys carry that fifth guy off the battlefield, there will be five guys to worry about later. Better to kill them all now than to ahve to face them a second time. The USMC attitude on this is simple: "Accomplish the Mission". snip he has expressed his opinion you did not serve holding that opinion even if it may be contary to fact is not a lie Sure it's a lie. nope it is an opinion Frank holds and stets that he doesn't believe you sered that is no lie Oh, I'm sure he served alright. And I'm sure he served all of 18 years as he claimed. But I'm also sure that his time was spent almost entirely in garrison, that nothing on his record is outstanding, that he probably got a few Page 11 entries, and that his discharge was not an honorable retirement but a general discharge, probably for medical reasons (suggested by his current career in the medical field, which, according to statistics gathered by psychologists, happens to be the preferred occupational field for hypochondriacs). he claims that his discharge is medical he also denies that it was for a physical cuase which leaves ..... In other words, he served 18 years as a sick-bay commando. Certainly nothing to be proud of, nothing to brag about, and nothing he will ever publically admit. Hence his silence about his "military career". And the epitath that will be imprinted on his tombstone will be, "I Told You I Was Sick", just like the one I saw on a PBS special last night. so your thought run pretty close to mine if not in the same mold interesting as I suspect we are rather different but we share the noton that at least when lie under our tombstones an eitaff can read "well at least we lived out lives" Just let Dudly keep running his mouth -- the more he talks the more he proves that he's a socially isolated misfit with serious psychological issues. He's like a cat in a box: shake the box and he thrashes around for a while. Let him calm down then shake the box again. Heck, that's better entertainment than anything on TV!!! Forgiveme if I wish I could call you liar on that one ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Steveo Suffering Same Comprehension Problems As Mark Morgan
Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: Steveo wrote: You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? Naaaaah...You have me confused with your daddy. Steve, K4YZ I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ So let me get this straight. You want to bang my mom, sister, and dad? I see you have the same comprehension problems as Markie does. At least you can spell well enough to not have to muddle through your replies. What the #### is wrong with you, STEVEN J ROBESON K4YZ ? Getting profane, self-righteous "get a room" comments from punks like you who is what is wrong. If the cross posting was bothering you, you could have either (1) killfiled the address (2) ASKED to get the groups deleted, or (3) just ignored it like I do OTHER cross-posts. But you snapped in with a smart alec quip, you got one back. Even-Stevens. Steve, K4YZ |
Steveo Suffering Same Comprehension Problems As Mark Morgan
On 28 Oct 2005 02:05:27 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: Steveo wrote: You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? Naaaaah...You have me confused with your daddy. Steve, K4YZ I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ So let me get this straight. You want to bang my mom, sister, and dad? I see you have the same comprehension problems as Markie does. At least you can spell well enough to not have to muddle through your replies. What the #### is wrong with you, STEVEN J ROBESON K4YZ ? Getting profane, self-righteous "get a room" comments from punks like you who is what is wrong. If the cross posting was bothering you, you could have either (1) killfiled the address (2) ASKED to get the groups deleted, or (3) just ignored it like I do OTHER cross-posts. But you snapped in with a smart alec quip, you got one back. Even-Stevens. Steve, K4YZ Dickhead. Quit your cross-posting, and go back to your nice little newsgroup. If you need the attention like K1MAN, I suggest getting in touch with him and becoming friends, so you both can bring down the government all by yourself. Vinnie S. |
Steveo Suffering Same Comprehension Problems As Mark Morgan
K4YZ wrote: Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: Steveo wrote: You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? Naaaaah...You have me confused with your daddy. Steve, K4YZ I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ So let me get this straight. You want to bang my mom, sister, and dad? I see you have the same comprehension problems as Markie does. At least you can spell well enough to not have to muddle through your replies. What the #### is wrong with you, STEVEN J ROBESON K4YZ ? Getting profane, self-righteous "get a room" comments from punks why are you only and Dan allowed to be profane ( or do you share that with the MMM) BUZZ hypocrite alarm |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
Frank Gilliland wrote: Got lots of work today so I'll only make a few comments: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:17:50 -0400, wrote in : Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? Me, but Dudly didn't have all the facts. I pled guilty at the first court-martial and so was never tried. Yes, Frankie...TRIED. You had the benefit of representation, stood before the court, and had your opportunity to say your piece. snip Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times And that's exactly what I did for the second infraction. Ahhhhh...Let's MINIMALIZE it and call it an "infraction". You are not charged with "infractions" at a court martial. It's an "offense". I forced a summary court-martial so the facts regarding the case would be a matter of record. It would have been a matter of record in an Artcle 15 proceeding, too. Dumb, Frankie...really, REALLY dumb. snip He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you For once Dudly is right. No "for once", Frankie. I've had you nailed for weeks now. Sorry it's made things a bit uncomfortable for you. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction....(SNIP) "Vindication" only in that you allow yourself that "warm fuzzy" for it. It has no legal bearing. And it was your second OFFENSE..."infractions" are dealt with at Article 15. You, by your own admission, blew that off. (UNSNIP)...was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. See..that's where we part ways, Frankie...My service never had to be UPGRADED to Honorable...It was that way all along. snip USMC attitudes on this are that if you let those four guys carry that fifth guy off the battlefield, there will be five guys to worry about later. Better to kill them all now than to have to face them a second time. |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
On 29 Oct 2005 01:55:00 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com: Frank Gilliland wrote: Got lots of work today so I'll only make a few comments: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:17:50 -0400, wrote in : Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? Me, but Dudly didn't have all the facts. I pled guilty at the first court-martial and so was never tried. Yes, Frankie...TRIED. You had the benefit of representation, stood before the court, and had your opportunity to say your piece. Wrong. A trial is used to determine guilt. I pleaded guilty so there was no trial; i.e, I was never "tried". You couldn't learn that much with a quick google search? That's pathetic. snip Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times And that's exactly what I did for the second infraction. Ahhhhh...Let's MINIMALIZE it and call it an "infraction". You are not charged with "infractions" at a court martial. It's an "offense". Call it a 'crime' if you want -- makes no difference to me. I forced a summary court-martial so the facts regarding the case would be a matter of record. It would have been a matter of record in an Artcle 15 proceeding, too. Wrong again, Dudly. The proceedings and evidence are not recorded for an Article 15, only the 'crime' and punishment. Dumb, Frankie...really, REALLY dumb. Well, maybe you should take that up with the attorney who was appointed to my case and made that recommendation. snip He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you For once Dudly is right. No "for once", Frankie. I've had you nailed for weeks now. Sorry it's made things a bit uncomfortable for you. Whatever you say, Dudly. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction....(SNIP) "Vindication" only in that you allow yourself that "warm fuzzy" for it. It has no legal bearing. Wrong yet again, Dudly: It had enough "legal bearing" to change the status of my discharge. And it was your second OFFENSE..."infractions" are dealt with at Article 15. You, by your own admission, blew that off. More semantics..... gee, I'm devastated. Really. And I mean that. (UNSNIP)...was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. See..that's where we part ways, Frankie...My service never had to be UPGRADED to Honorable...It was that way all along. Uh-huh. Sure thing, Dudly. That's why you claimed to have been discharged for medical reasons, huh? Probably because you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's...... snip Yet another snip-job -- too bad you can't address your failures. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 29 Oct 2005 01:55:00 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: Frank Gilliland wrote: Got lots of work today so I'll only make a few comments: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:17:50 -0400, wrote in : Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? Me, but Dudly didn't have all the facts. I pled guilty at the first court-martial and so was never tried. Yes, Frankie...TRIED. You had the benefit of representation, stood before the court, and had your opportunity to say your piece. Wrong. A trial is used to determine guilt. I pleaded guilty so there was no trial; i.e, I was never "tried". You couldn't learn that much with a quick google search? That's pathetic. What's "pathetic" is your attempts to minimize the fact that you're a disgraced, courtmartialed EX Marine, who's only reconcilliation with having BEEN a Marine is to try an undermine others. Basically, you're a punk, Frankie. snip Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times And that's exactly what I did for the second infraction. Ahhhhh...Let's MINIMALIZE it and call it an "infraction". You are not charged with "infractions" at a court martial. It's an "offense". Call it a 'crime' if you want -- makes no difference to me. Gee...Above you try and "teach" about legal fine points and here you want to dismiss them... Can't have your Kate and Edith too, Frankie. I forced a summary court-martial so the facts regarding the case would be a matter of record. It would have been a matter of record in an Artcle 15 proceeding, too. Wrong again, Dudly. The proceedings and evidence are not recorded for an Article 15, only the 'crime' and punishment. Wrong. Idiot. Dumb, Frankie...really, REALLY dumb. Well, maybe you should take that up with the attorney who was appointed to my case and made that recommendation. And all the attorney COULD do was RECOMMEND. YOU were the one who had to make the DECISION, Frankie. Don't try and slide out from under YOUR mistakes, frankie. snip He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you For once Dudly is right. No "for once", Frankie. I've had you nailed for weeks now. Sorry it's made things a bit uncomfortable for you. Whatever you say, Dudly. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction....(SNIP) "Vindication" only in that you allow yourself that "warm fuzzy" for it. It has no legal bearing. Wrong yet again, Dudly: It had enough "legal bearing" to change the status of my discharge. Perhaps. But the CONVICTIONS still stand. Convictions that may keep you from federal contracts and/or security clearances should you need one for contract work in the future. And it was your second OFFENSE..."infractions" are dealt with at Article 15. You, by your own admission, blew that off. More semantics..... gee, I'm devastated. Really. And I mean that. There's no "semantics" to it, Frankie. And I could care less about how "devastated" you are. Your lack of Honor and honesty are "devastating" enough. The Marines did the best possible thing with you...sent ya packin'. (UNSNIP)...was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. See..that's where we part ways, Frankie...My service never had to be UPGRADED to Honorable...It was that way all along. Uh-huh. Sure thing, Dudly. That's why you claimed to have been discharged for medical reasons, huh? Probably because you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's...... Your lack of grasp of the facts is hillarious. .. snip Yet another snip-job -- too bad you can't address your failures. Poor redirect to others "failures" in order to mitigate your own humiliation. Lame. Steve, K4YZ |
Steveo Suffering Same Comprehension Problems As Mark Morgan
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: Steveo wrote: You like Mark for sex..you hump his leg for hours and hours a day in front of a monitor. Isn't Todd getting jealous, or do you still hump his leg too? Naaaaah...You have me confused with your daddy. Steve, K4YZ I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. Steve, K4YZ So let me get this straight. You want to bang my mom, sister, and dad? I see you have the same comprehension problems as Markie does. At least you can spell well enough to not have to muddle through your replies. What the #### is wrong with you, STEVEN J ROBESON K4YZ ? Getting profane, self-righteous "get a room" comments from punks why are you only and Dan allowed to be profane ( or do you share that with the MMM) BUZZ hypocrite alarm STFU, child abuser. |
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity"
On 29 Oct 2005 03:29:24 -0700, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
. com: snip proof of comedic ineptitude It would have been a matter of record in an Artcle 15 proceeding, too. Wrong again, Dudly. The proceedings and evidence are not recorded for an Article 15, only the 'crime' and punishment. Wrong. Idiot. Well gee, Dudly, how would you know? Since you are so knowlegable about such things, what page in the SRB holds the transcript of an Article 15 hearing? And for that fact, what page is used to record crimes and punishments? Dumb, Frankie...really, REALLY dumb. Well, maybe you should take that up with the attorney who was appointed to my case and made that recommendation. And all the attorney COULD do was RECOMMEND. YOU were the one who had to make the DECISION, Frankie. Where did I say anything to the contrary? Don't try and slide out from under YOUR mistakes, frankie. I made no mistake, Dudly -- it is -you- who doesn't know squat about the UCMJ. snip "Vindication" only in that you allow yourself that "warm fuzzy" for it. It has no legal bearing. Wrong yet again, Dudly: It had enough "legal bearing" to change the status of my discharge. Perhaps. Fact. But the CONVICTIONS still stand. Yes they do. I seem to recall having said the very same thing several posts ago. Convictions that may keep you from federal contracts and/or security clearances should you need one for contract work in the future. They haven't been a problem so far. My security clearance has never been revoked. I had a job cleaning a bank while working my way through college. I also had a contract a few years ago to design and build a custom security system. I even have a concealed weapons permit. And I have no plans to start a new career in law enforcement. So I guess the only problem is the one you created in your imagination, Dudly. And it was your second OFFENSE..."infractions" are dealt with at Article 15. You, by your own admission, blew that off. More semantics..... gee, I'm devastated. Really. And I mean that. There's no "semantics" to it, Frankie. And I could care less about how "devastated" you are. Your lack of Honor and honesty are "devastating" enough. I haven't been honest about my military service? Hmmmm..... The Marines did the best possible thing with you...sent ya packin'. That might have been true had they not asked me to extend for a West-Pac float with 2nd AAV, but I declined. snip See..that's where we part ways, Frankie...My service never had to be UPGRADED to Honorable...It was that way all along. Uh-huh. Sure thing, Dudly. That's why you claimed to have been discharged for medical reasons, huh? Probably because you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's...... Your lack of grasp of the facts is hillarious. It's in the google archives, written by you, in your own words. If it isn't a fact then you lied. If it -is- a fact then you are lying now. Either way, you just proved once again that you are a liar. snip Yet another snip-job -- too bad you can't address your failures. Poor redirect to others "failures" in order to mitigate your own humiliation. Lame. You're the expert. Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ Don't look now but the medals on your uniform are tarnished. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
so ery sorry my hubby is such an asshole
On 26 Oct 2005 09:26:24 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 26 Oct 2005 03:58:45 -0700, wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Oct 2005 17:33:29 wrote in .com: The concept of "One Shot One Kill" is still the principle technique taught to all Marine recruits. More horse#### from Gunny Dudly. No...More lies from Frank Gilliland. But then you've made a career of lying, haven't you...?!?! More projection from Gunny Dudly. Nope. YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. now you are really crossing into new territory you have no way of making that statement No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". making up claims for frank again Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. where? Oh I am sorry oposing you is proof that you are lying I forgot Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. he isn't sure there is anything to critique off hand I think he is mistaken on that count I think you had one. one of keeping your head down covering your ass (big job there I guess) and avoiding anything that might lead a big decision It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! you are right you are just not honest enough to fess up to what you do after all nothing is your fault All that stuff you would have learned if you had graduated beyond the yellow footsteps. But you didn't. Why are you lying, Frank? I won't answer a question the requires me to accept a premise that is not true. The fact is that I DID "graduate beyond the yellow footsteps". I've provided more than a few references that any reasonably "connected" Marine, ex-Marine, retired Marine or just plain old Joe or JoAnn Citizen could corroborate as true. indeed I think you serve as to the quality of that service or wether you were chaeting Us Sam out of your paycheck is a another matter You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. indeed here you explain a lot about yourself accusastion is the same as guilt which has become your SOP here in RRAP and likely in real life Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. again you want other to your work is this what you did in the service always tell other to do your work? You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. ah yes noone you dislike is even human borong Stevie and showing you off in the bad light we RRAP'ers have come to expect for you Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. you got something right you are not humble but then NO ONE has accused you of that here, and likely nowhere else either Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
so very sorry about the insane asshole I married
On 26 Oct 2005 19:55:51 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Well...that makes it hard to figure out the attributes...But it DOES make it easy for Markie to claim "I didn't say that..." nope it cuts down on the **** being posted YOUR words have cemented THIS into the archives, Frankie! You lied. You stole from the government which is to say you stole from me. You swore an oath that you had no intention of keeping. now you are really crossing into new territory Nope. guess you are right you been in the lying range so long I've been lying on the couch today, but that's all the "lying" I've done today. no you just racked up another lie you have no way of making that statement Sure I do. That lying SOB swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, wherein he ALSO swore to obey those appointed senior to him. One no reason but your word to say is lying SoB but his first duty is the constitution entitirely possible to feel a conflict in which case he is bound to disobey (rather like some solders at Abu Graib should have done but that is another topic) One, No, it's not "another topic". abu graib is another topic than frank and so The soldiers at Abu Gharib shold have REPORTED THE INFRACTIONS via the chain of command. no they should have refused to prefrom them and then informed the chain of comand the "orders" were unlawfull and they should have had the gut to refuse them even were he tried and found guilty (it being found that the orders were not illegal) thais does not prove he was lying or in any way violated his oath or stole his rightfull pay Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? oh that is right you don't need sources people are never aquitted of any charges and even if they are they were still guilty riight Stevie you have presented nothing that allows you to state Almost right, Markie! I didn't "present" it...FRANKIE did! He's the one who made the "####bird PFC" comment which, on "cross examination" led to the discovery that he's twice convicted for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. not according to the body of his posts Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times Courts maritals are reserved for the real idiots or the specially grevious charges. not always but then you were so busy ducking you would not know Since it's apparent that Frankie didn't spend any time in Leavenworth, we can safely put him in the "real idiot" category. no we can't His conduct in this forum corroborates that. by no bwoing to you that is proof of his good sense He freely brags about having disobeyed orders and subsequently was court martialed...Not once, but TWICE, for his conduct. so what? BTW your facts don't seem to be true Then if they were not true, they'd not be facts. well they are n't facts then he has admited to making a mistake (haven't seen him says it was violating orders) and taking a lumps and once to being tried and found not guilty He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you No one, save for you, is projecting anything. One of the reasons the 5.56mm round was chosen...(SNIP) ...was the same reason other rounds are chosen...To kill the enemy. If that's what is required to accomplish the mission. If it's not, why are the only targets used to train Marine riflemen (and all recruits) head shots and "center mast", or chest shots? PLEASE, Frankie...Show me SOME reference to targets and USMC training resources that say "...just shoot for the arms or legs". making up claims for frank again Nope. Frank suggests that it's NOT a Marine's job to kill his enemy. Can't speak for the USMC but the Army teaches it people that it is better to wound the enemy in most cases ties at least 4 people that way You can't speak for the Army, either, Markie. not on an officail cap of course but I will never forget basic training I suspect the USMC theaching much the same thing "teaching" Naw...We were basically told that the phrase dusbiously attributed to General George S Patton, that it was a soldiers duty not to die for hiscountry, but to make the other SOB die for his. gee I thought the marines were smarter than Patton USMC attitudes on this are that if you let those four guys carry that fifth guy off the battlefield, there will be five guys to worry about later. Better to kill them all now than to ahve to face them a second time. So, better you quit trying to figure out who you're "speaking for", Markie. shove it stevie Follow the thread back and read for yourself, Markie. Just one...?!?! And STILL does not change the Marine Corps' practice of teaching "one shot one kill" to recruits. Except that such a policy ISN'T taught to Marine recruits. It's taught in sniper school, but not in boot camp. Sure it is. Perhaps if you'd paid a bit more attention in Boot you wouldn't have had such a hard time later on in your "career"... Maybe if you had -attended- boot camp then you would have had a -real- military career instead of a fabrication in your mind made up with bits and pieces from bad novels and war movies. Frank, you're a documented liar already. where? Where he swore to uphold his oath, no such documentaion Sure there is! He provided a partial copy of his DD214 here. In order to have gotten a DD214, he had to have been sworn in in the first place. not the issue but you don't understand that and his frequent assertions that I did not serve in the United States Marine Corps, among others. he has expressed his opinion you did not serve holding that opinion even if it may be contary to fact is not a lie Sure it's a lie. nope it is an opinion Frank holds and stets that he doesn't believe you sered that is no lie cuting the rant if it were you would been guilty of lying when you say I have not served in the Army, in those cases you are simply mistaken I am not "mistaken". yes you are Oh I am sorry oposing you is proof that you are lying I forgot Nope...You asked, I told you. another lie no proof was offered Sure it was. where? Frankie's own words. Or are you now calling him a liar too? no I am saying you are distorting his words IOW you are lying about what he said And Frankie's only reason to be in this forum were to try and "undermine" my USMC service claims on your behalf. I doubt that I think Frank was acting on his own I KNOW he's not acting on his own, Markie! But thanks for agreeing with me! another lie Stevie I said exactly the oppositie but then you realy can't read we knew that I believe you served just that you served very badly indeed Uh huh...That's why I don't have a single disciplinary action in my SRB and four stars on my GCM. no that isn't why has nothing to do with it Why continue the charade? YOU have NO BUSINESS critiquing ANYone's military service, let alone mine. he isn't sure there is anything to critique He's an idiot. of course he is he dares to oppose you,when are you going to publish that dictionary of words as you use them It's already published. where? It's called "Websters". nope it isn't You should get one. You two have a lot in common. I doubt we have much in common Sure you do! One we both oppose you here two we both have lived our lives I supect that is about it And you're both liars and cheats. nope I am not a cheat we both lie as does everyone else of course off hand I think he is mistaken on that count I think you had one. one of keeping your head down covering your ass (big job there I guess) and avoiding anything that might lead a big decision And therein YOU'D be wrong again. maybe I would but I don't think so No...you don't THINK, Markie... yes I do another lie from stevie But then it's a habit for you. It's incomprehensible to think that you never fired one after 18 years in the Corp (and, of course, seven hostile actions). "And in that we have even MORE evidence that your claims of military service are BOGUS!" It's "CORPS", non-hacker, since you're pointing out typos yourself...And ESPECIALLY since you're doing so to try and make some argument that I didn't serve in that CORPS. I'm pointing out your typos to further demonstrate the fact that you are a hypocrite. Feel free to point out -my- typos to your heart's content -- it doesn't bother me at all because, unlike you, I don't profess to be the newsgroup spelling cop. Hey! We have ONE thing in common! I don't "profess" to be the newsgroup spelling cop either! you are right you are just not honest enough to fess up to what you do after all nothing is your fault I do my best to make sure I have my bets covered, Markie. That's just a prudent thing to do. no you don't do that either Sure I do. you cheat on your bets Frankie claimed I "profess" to be the "newsgroup spelling cop". That was a lie. I've never done it. I agree he was in error You are the cp just not hoest enough to admit it The "cp"...?!?! "hoest"...?!?! more evasion cut Censorship. another lie You? You "profess" to have been a Marine, but even by your own admission were a ####bird of one, unable to keep your act together for just ONE enlistment...let alone four. indeed here you explain a lot about yourself Nope. I have a Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal with four bronze stars on it (Not THE "Bonze Star"...the small attachments that signify a multiple issue of the same award) so what? means you kept you know out anything for years I am not impressed It means I did my job. And I did it well. no it does not it means you stayed out of trouble accusastion is the same as guilt which has become your SOP here in RRAP and likely in real life The "guilt" is Frankie's and is from HIS admissions, Markie. no it isn't it comes from your distortion of his words What's to distort? plenty when you compare your account of his words to his words He called HIMSELF a "####bird PFC" and admitted to his two courts martials. There was nothing there for me to distort if I wanted to! he said a lot more than that you just left it out and tthat is hardly guilt "that" Probably for the same reason that you can't admit that you never graduated from MCRD. Platoon 2100, 03 Sept 74 to 20 Nov 74, Frankie...Just like I've said before. Oh, that's right.... and ending with your "medical retirement" in '92. Sure thing, Dudly. And yet another example of The Coward of Silliland trying to blow off facts. The base library at MCRD keeps a copy of every platoon's "yearbook". Theya re available in other forums. Look it up or acknowledge that you're the punk I claim you to be. again you want others to your work Try that in English. calling you lazy again ahven't you seen that statement for enough to reconize it "haven't" "recognize" Haven't YOU had your nose rubbed in your own laziness and childish spelling errors to fix them? obviously not and you are dumb enough to ask Again...I was asked for specifics...I gave them. you gave no proof at all is this what you did in the service always tell other to do your work? What "work"...??? any work WHAT are you talking about, Markie? you are not bright enough to know? He claims I didn't do something. I provided verifiable references. you asked him to do your homework No, I didn't. sure did you told him to go find the proof you lie so freely Frankie claims I didn't seerve in the Marines. I've given him units, dates of boot camp including units and locations, and even my promotion boards dates and precedent numbers. and told him to go check it out to do your work in other words He claims to have "contacts". Obviously he doesn't. That substantiates my claim of LIAR. nope You freely drop names like LtCol Oliver North as if you were old drinking buddies, yet can't seem to find simple information from archives you also claim to have access to... What's up with that? Frank, let's face it... You're just a punk. You were a punk in the service, you're a punk now. And with your present attitude, I am sure you'll die a punk. Awww, you hurt my feelings, Dudly.... sniff What feelings? Feelings are characteristic of human beings. ah yes noone you dislike is even human You and Frankie are high on that list, however you have a track record that substantiates my claims. indeed as close to admision as we ever see from Stevie the weasel "admission" There's TWO weasels here, Markie...You and Frankie of Silliland. neither you refuse to turthfully answer any question put to you you demand that everyone do your work for you borong Stevie and showing you off in the bad light we RRAP'ers have come to expect for you "Boring" No...Only you, Brian, and Lennie. which is about half of the regulars Stevie more than a thrid prehaps less than half "third" "perhaps" Nope. You, Lennie and Brain. Then myself, Cmdr Corey, doesn't count he is not a person Dee counts , Mike Coslo, outa here accrding to him "Ace WH2T", you even put him in qutes as less than real Alun N3KIP, not a reg Dan W4NTI dan is outa here , Kim W5TIT, not a reg Dave K8MN, he counts Jim AA2AQ not a reg , John K KC2HMZ, not a reg Bert WA2SI. not a reg If we go into the Wiseman crowd, we pull in about another five or six "regulars". they don't count no names 3 outa 6 is half the regualrs plus Frank who you treat as a regular BUZZZ you are wrong again Unless, of course, you have yet another "definition" for the term "regulars". Frankie's not even a regular here...Just a lurker with a competency and confidence deficit. but you treat him like one You're darn right I treat him like he's a lurker with a competency and confidence deficit! so he counts Back under your rock, non-hacker. It's where you belong. Steve, K4YZ I'd rather be a punk under a rock than a fantasy-prone hypocrite. Maybe someday you will set aside your delusions long enough to understand what 'integrity' means..... but I doubt it. Frankie, you're a liar, a coward, a cheat, and in my NOT so humble opinion, a thief. Being lectured by a punk like you about "integrity" is obscene. you got something right you are not humble but then NO ONE has accused you of that here, and likely nowhere else either I didn't say anything about MY "humbleness", Markie... another lie "in my NOT so humble" that is part of the statement above on your humbleness or rather the lack of it And AGAIN you've screwed up the English, Markie... not at all you did post about your humbleness you lied again But there you go showing off that English comprehension problem of yours again.... no you show you don't evn bother to understand your own posts Sheeesh. I'll give you ONE thing, Markie... Just when I think it's NOT possible for you to make a bigger idiot out of yourself, you go and prove me wrong. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
so sorry about my asshole hubby attackign a real marine
On 26 Oct 2005 21:58:59 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 26 Oct 2005 19:55:51 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Well...that makes it hard to figure out the attributes...But it DOES make it easy for Markie to claim "I didn't say that..." nope it cuts down on the #### being posted Two things...Stop posting and there won't be any #### here. another Stevie lie your stuff will be here and so the bull**** will continue ctuing all after the first stevie lie everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
i can't stand seeing my asshole hubby attack a real man
On 27 Oct 2005 04:20:16 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Get a room. I was going to but your sister's got the crabs again and your mom can't control her gag reflex like she used to. lalking to yourself Stevie? and boasting of your intent to cheat on your wife Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
i wiosh i understoof why my asshole hubby does this shit
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:49:16 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: Got lots of work today so I'll only make a few comments: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:17:50 -0400, wrote in : snip abu graib is another topic than frank and so The soldiers at Abu Gharib shold have REPORTED THE INFRACTIONS via the chain of command. no they should have refused to prefrom them and then informed the chain of comand the "orders" were unlawfull and they should have had the gut to refuse them Quite right. The oath requires you to perform any -LEGAL- order given to you by your superiors. This was the issue during the Iran-Contra scam when Ollie claimed he was just following orders and didn't care if his actions were legal or not (although I'm sure he knew they were illegal). That's blind obedience and it's wrong. and dangerous as well even were he tried and found guilty (it being found that the orders were not illegal) thais does not prove he was lying or in any way violated his oath or stole his rightfull pay Markie...He WAS tried and found guilty! Twice! Indicted, tried and CONVICTED! your source? Me, but Dudly didn't have all the facts. I pled guilty at the first court-martial and so was never tried. snip Mind you that the Marines would much rather send a "junior trooper" to Office Hours, whichn in the Marine Corps are Article 15 proceedings. In other words, letting the commander of the unit handle the incident at the lowest echelon. Something I would only advise a soldier to try if they are guilty of something but likely he reufsed Art 15 as I did many times And that's exactly what I did for the second infraction. I forced a summary court-martial so the facts regarding the case would be a matter of record. snip He WAS found guilty. not according to him not after apeal was it but that does not count with you For once Dudly is right. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. well thanks for clearing it up Id say it was an appeal of sorts but then try not to quible when I can snip USMC attitudes on this are that if you let those four guys carry that fifth guy off the battlefield, there will be five guys to worry about later. Better to kill them all now than to ahve to face them a second time. The USMC attitude on this is simple: "Accomplish the Mission". snip he has expressed his opinion you did not serve holding that opinion even if it may be contary to fact is not a lie Sure it's a lie. nope it is an opinion Frank holds and stets that he doesn't believe you sered that is no lie Oh, I'm sure he served alright. And I'm sure he served all of 18 years as he claimed. But I'm also sure that his time was spent almost entirely in garrison, that nothing on his record is outstanding, that he probably got a few Page 11 entries, and that his discharge was not an honorable retirement but a general discharge, probably for medical reasons (suggested by his current career in the medical field, which, according to statistics gathered by psychologists, happens to be the preferred occupational field for hypochondriacs). he claims that his discharge is medical he also denies that it was for a physical cuase which leaves ..... In other words, he served 18 years as a sick-bay commando. Certainly nothing to be proud of, nothing to brag about, and nothing he will ever publically admit. Hence his silence about his "military career". And the epitath that will be imprinted on his tombstone will be, "I Told You I Was Sick", just like the one I saw on a PBS special last night. so your thought run pretty close to mine if not in the same mold interesting as I suspect we are rather different but we share the noton that at least when lie under our tombstones an eitaff can read "well at least we lived out lives" Just let Dudly keep running his mouth -- the more he talks the more he proves that he's a socially isolated misfit with serious psychological issues. He's like a cat in a box: shake the box and he thrashes around for a while. Let him calm down then shake the box again. Heck, that's better entertainment than anything on TV!!! Forgiveme if I wish I could call you liar on that one ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
|
More Markie Mularkie, was: i wiosh i understoof why my asshole hubby does this shit
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Forgiveme if I wish I could call you liar on that one Oh...WAIT a minute, Markie! I thought YOU were one of the guys who said that a "different opinion" did NOT make one a "liar"... And you are one of the guys who says it does. Steve, K4YZ Steve, why do you edit headings and forge "raped an old friend?" Why? bb |
i wiosh i understoof why my asshole hubby does this shit
|
More Markie Mularkie
|
dave lies somemore
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:11:04 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:49:16 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: For once Dudly is right. There were no appeals and both convictions stand. The vindication of my second infraction was the result of a seperate entry made as the result of a review that I requested after my discharge. The violation leading to the conviction was found to have "mitigating circumstances that should have been considered [by the presiding officer] but were not," and that I "was denied evidence, and the opportunity to gather and present certain evidence" relevant to my defense. The conviction was not overturned (since it was not an appeal) but my conduct marks were adjusted accordingly, and my discharge upgraded to Honorable. well thanks for clearing it up Id say it was an appeal of sorts but then try not to quible when I can You'd say it was an appeal, except that it wasn't and you "quible" whenever you can. an apeal of sort indeed it was if you chop stateents out of context the you are lying from the word go everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
more stevie projection
On 19 Dec 2005 19:45:24 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: Steve, why do you edit headings and forge "raped an old friend?" Why? Brain, why do you lie and deceive and use diminutive names in reference to persons who DON'T do it to you? WHY? he doesn't lie and there is no coapsion betwen Stevie and rape That question, byt the way, has been pending for six weeks now. Any chance you'll stop the end-run dodge and answer it? Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
stvei claims he has right to be answered nobody else does
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Steve, why do you edit headings and forge "raped an old friend?" Why? Brain, why do you lie and deceive and use diminutive names in reference to persons who DON'T do it to you? WHY? why do expect an answer after all you have been dogding question for years That question, byt the way, has been pending for six weeks now. byt? Any chance you'll stop the end-run dodge and answer it? Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
|
More Markie Mularkie
"K4YZ" wrote Mark Morgan is a functionally illiterate idiot. Please apologize to all the idiots you have just insulted. Merry New Year, de Hans, K0HB -- {{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb |
stvei claims he has right to be answered nobody else does
an_old_friend wrote:
why do expect an answer after all you have been dogding question for years Dog ding? You're quite a regular poet, Mark. Dave K8MN |
stvei claims he has right to be answered nobody else does
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: why do expect an answer after all you have been dogding question for years Dog ding? You're quite a regular poet, Mark. Indeed. One can almost envision Shakespeare clapping his hands......over his ears and eyes. |
More Markie Mularkie, was: i wiosh i understoof why my asshole hubby does this shit
On 18 Dec 2005 08:17:48 -0800, wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Forgiveme if I wish I could call you liar on that one Oh...WAIT a minute, Markie! I thought YOU were one of the guys who said that a "different opinion" did NOT make one a "liar"... And you are one of the guys who says it does. you can't hold stevie to his own words Steve, K4YZ Steve, why do you edit headings and forge "raped an old friend?" Why? becuase enjoys forgery he siad so bb everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
stevie leis about BB
On 20 Dec 2005 04:16:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 19 Dec 2005 19:45:24 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: Steve, why do you edit headings and forge "raped an old friend?" Why? Brain, why do you lie and deceive and use diminutive names in reference to persons who DON'T do it to you? WHY? he doesn't lie Sure he does. never seen an example never seen any prove from you and there is no coapsion betwen Stevie and rape There's no WHAT...?!?! learn to read Mark Morgan is a functionally illiterate idiot. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
stvei claims he has right to be answered nobody else does
"Dave Heil" wrote in message
nk.net... an_old_friend wrote: why do expect an answer after all you have been dogding question for years Dog ding? You're quite a regular poet, Mark. Shows whats on his mind. LOL |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com