RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Lennie's Scorecard Backfires (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/80717-lennies-scorecard-backfires.html)

K4YZ October 28th 05 12:12 PM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 

RST Engineering wrote:

Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags.
Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas.
Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics.

Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it.


Hey Jim...I've read your articles in many mags before. Good job.
I've used RST products and found them to be "good stuff".

But you're presently posting tacit support for a known liar and
cheat in a public forum using your company name. Sure, he knows his
way around the bench, but he's a liar and a cheat none-the-less.

I don't give a rat's kazoo what you think of me persoanlly or my
opinions, but the fact remains that you're putting your company's name
behind a guy who lies for sport.

Is that wise?

Steve, K4YZ


Dave Heil October 28th 05 03:36 PM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 
RST Engineering wrote:
Really?

Novice 1959
Technician 1960
Advanced 1981?
Extra 2002?

BS Electronics Physics; 18 semester units to an MSEE.
Community College and Adult High School credential teaching ham radio class
since 1967.
Taught roughly 50 semester classes.
100% pass rate.

VE ARRL
VE LAARG

Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags.
Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas.
Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics.


Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it.

Jim




Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a
sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio.



That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of
things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally
acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I
could bring myself to so describe myself.

Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your post and
the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a
reasonable manner.

My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in
r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular basis is
Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment,
experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my authorship
of amateur radio articles and even my German surname. I can't claim
that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to
anyone who disagrees with him.

It is curious that a fellow such as you would make the blanket statement
that you did. Now I just question your judgment.


Dave Heil K8MN

[email protected] October 28th 05 10:58 PM

Another Len Quote (was: Lennie's Scorecard Backfires)
 
Dave Heil wrote:
RST Engineering wrote:
Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it.

Jim


OK, from one Jim to another:

Novice 1967 (age 13)
Technician 1968
Advanced 1968
Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait)

2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972

BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania
MSEE 1992 Drexel University

Coinventer US patent #5,358,202

I could go on...

Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len
Anderson is a
sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio.


That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of
things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was
an "Internationally
acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I
could bring myself to so describe myself.

Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your
post and
the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a
reasonable manner.

My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in
r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular
basis is
Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment,
experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my
authorship
of amateur radio articles and even my German surname.


Don't forget military service...

I can't claim
that I'm special in that regard though. Len does
similar things to
anyone who disagrees with him.


Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or
proves him wrong about anything.

Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today:

Len wrote:

"Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English.

As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had
NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING.

Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert."

- Leonard H. Anderson

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1

Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general
idea.


73 de Jim, N2EY


Dave Heil October 28th 05 11:16 PM

Another Len Quote
 
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

RST Engineering wrote:

Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it.

Jim



OK, from one Jim to another:

Novice 1967 (age 13)
Technician 1968
Advanced 1968
Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait)

2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972

BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania
MSEE 1992 Drexel University

Coinventer US patent #5,358,202

I could go on...

Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len
Anderson is a
sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio.



That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of
things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was
an "Internationally
acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I
could bring myself to so describe myself.

Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your
post and
the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a
reasonable manner.

My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in
r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular
basis is
Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment,
experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my
authorship
of amateur radio articles and even my German surname.



Don't forget military service...


That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force
service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did
there. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a
MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity.


I can't claim
that I'm special in that regard though. Len does
similar things to
anyone who disagrees with him.



Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or
proves him wrong about anything.


....or, come to think of it, anyone who even questions his methods or
motivation.

Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today:

Len wrote:

"Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English.


Ah yes. That was directed at me, wasn't it? I was never in the Marine
Corps.

As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had
NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING.

Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert."

- Leonard H. Anderson

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1

Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general
idea.


Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even
though he was never actually under artillery fire.

That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number
of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough
to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len
is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around
after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test.

Dave K8MN

[email protected] October 28th 05 11:17 PM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 
From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 03:07


wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700,
wrote:
wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700,
wrote:
wrote:
Iitoi wrote:


Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.


amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say


Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words
which might otherwise not attract so much attention.


...in one way that's good...in another, bad... :-)

Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being
uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a
primarily adult activity?

Hi!


Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING
in elections! Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...maybe it being okay for them to go into
liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...or serving in
armed forces of the United States (like Jimmie Noserve)...get
married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his
age-limit-less world?

James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How
many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer.

That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts. He is still
****ed at being confronted with opposite opinions in here by those
who will not accept HIS opinions. He MUST re-argue and re-argue
and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back. Maybe he hopes
to "win" an old argument that way? I don't think so. If the
Muppets need a new character, I'd nominate him as "Miss ****y." :-)

Meanwhile, Jimmie-James keeps up his "Philly-tuff" personna asking
me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on WT Docket 05-235. :-)

NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new
millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT
Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total.
That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times
more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open
comment period.

Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap
who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But,
for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor
the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed!

Sunnuvagun!




[email protected] October 29th 05 02:39 AM

Another Len Quote
 
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Don't forget military service...


That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force
service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did
there.


IIRC you mentioned it here a few times.

He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a
MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity.


Then there's Len's commentary on the military service of a
Cost Guard radio operator who posted here.....

I can't claim
that I'm special in that regard though. Len does
similar things to
anyone who disagrees with him.


Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or
proves him wrong about anything.


...or, come to think of it, anyone who even questions his methods or
motivation.


That's self-evident from his reaction to my questions.

Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today:

Len wrote:

"Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English.


Ah yes. That was directed at me, wasn't it?


Yes, it was.

I was never in the Marine Corps.


Neither was Len, but he uses phrases like "murine" and "dill sergeant"
to
make fun of a certain Marine...

As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had
NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING.

Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert."

- Leonard H. Anderson

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1

Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general
idea.


Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even
though he was never actually under artillery fire.


Never having experienced something hasn't prevented Len from expressing
opinions, comments and criticism about it.

That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number
of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough
to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len
is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around
after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test.


Perhaps a few more quotes from Len would be helpful...

73 de Jim, N2EY


RST Engineering October 29th 05 02:49 AM

Another Len Quote
 
Novice 1967 (age 13)

Same age.



2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972


1st Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1964 (age 17), Radar Endorsement




Coinventer US patent #5,358,202


I quit the company and the boss got the patent designations from my
notebooks, but I'm not going to press the issue.

However, designated responsible engineer for FCC type
acceptance/certification on seven commercial two-way transceivers; two for
studio-transmitter links and five for aircraft transceivers. Currently on
the "approved" list for type acceptance/certification for FCC Laurel
Laboratories.


That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number
of
things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was
an "Internationally
acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I
could bring myself to so describe myself.


Well, if you had sold ten thousand (actual count may vary a few percent)
hidden antenna original design products everywhere from Latvia to Louisiana,
you may describe yourself that way.



Aside from your not including attributions,


What do you mean by attributions? I'll give proof of anything I've said.


not signing your
post


I thought I signed it Jim. If you want a full formal signing, it is Jim
Weir, WX6RST. Most people know who I am; I don't hide behind a pseudonym.



and
the top posting,


In the vernacular, go screw yourself. I'll top post, interleave post, or
bottom post, whichever I think will get the point across better. "A foolish
consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds." Or, in the Latin, "Pusca,
puscalorum."




you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a
reasonable manner.


It is the engineer showing through the politician.



That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force
service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did
there. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a
MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity.


I have only the highest regard for anybody who wore the uniform. It was not
my privilege to do military duty as my parents neatly sandwiched me in
between Korea and Vietnam. Sure, I did MARS duty for twenty years, and
sure, I wear the local sheriff's Search and Rescue volunteer uniform, but it
pales in weak comparison to actual military duty. I bow my head in
gratitude.




Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today:

Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general
idea.


$#!+, we all get into the bottle from time to time and post stuff that we
regret in the morning, but what the hell. Two quotes from two years? Give
the guy a break. I'd hate (although my political opponents have done it
mercilessly) to be quoted two years after the fact and have to defend myself
at that time.




That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of
things in amateur radio.


Who is "he's". Me? Len? You? Steve? ???? And don't worry about RST.
It has been around since 1973 and will probably be around long after you and
I are SK. Don't worry about it. I have the cojones to put my reputation
and my company's reputation on the line when I see something that just cries
for comment.

Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough
to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is
something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after
the CQ WW SSB DX 'test.


If you are talking about me, I've been on the usenet and this ng since 1995.
I don't claim to defend Len, but again, most of what he says makes perfect
sense. It is YOU TWO that I'm worried about.


Jim



[email protected] October 29th 05 02:55 AM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 
wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children
VOTING in elections!


I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm
not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...


I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm
just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

maybe it being okay for them to go into
liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...


I don't think it's okay for children to buy alcohol. I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

or serving in armed forces of the United States


I don't think it's okay for children to serve in the military. I'm just
opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.

...get married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his age-limit-less world?


I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio
license.

James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How
many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer.


Why should I answer that question, Len? You refuse to answer on-topic
questions, so why should anyone answer your off-topic ones?

That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts.


I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len.

He is still ****ed at being confronted with opposite
opinions in here by those who will not accept HIS opinions.


You're describing yourself, Len.

He MUST re-argue and re-argue
and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back.


I know somebody who keeps telling old, Old, OLD stories of his service
at a radio station in Japan years back.

asking me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on
WT Docket 05-235. :-)


Looks like you are afraid, Len.

NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new
millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT
Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total.
That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times
more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open
comment period.


So?

Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from
rrap
who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But,
for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor
the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed!


So? What's your point, Len?

I'll "file" when I want to.


[email protected] October 29th 05 03:02 AM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote:

wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children
VOTING in elections!


I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm
not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.


Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above

Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...


I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm
just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.


and Len supports the notion at this point I neither support nor oppose
such a notion, but you have been beating this dead equine for years
cuting reps
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[email protected] October 29th 05 03:35 AM

Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
 
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700,
wrote:

wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children
VOTING in elections!


I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm
not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.


Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above


Where?

Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by
"Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering")
or somebody else?

If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY?

And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections".
I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio
license.

Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...


I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's
licenses. I'm
just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.


and Len supports the notion at this point


Why?

Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of
an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur
radio service?

We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all
that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if
the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be
plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but
wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur
license.

If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst
offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years....

I neither support nor oppose such a notion,


Why don't you oppose it? It's a completely unnecessary
requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented
to support it.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com