|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
You just don't get it, do you Steve? This is not a poll or a vote. This is
the FCC asking for cogent, reasoned, logical discussion for doing or not doing something. Read the responses and ask yourself who has the edge in the discussion. From where I sit, it is about as clear cut as the Chicago series. Jim With THESE numbers, "Litoi", it's even better...Notice in the "ALL to date" column, "support" (for the NPRM) dropped a whole percentage point in only five hours per Lennie's reporting! And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. It's a good day. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:45:12 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote: You just don't get it, do you Steve? This is not a poll or a vote. This is the FCC asking for cogent, reasoned, logical discussion for doing or not doing something. Read the responses and ask yourself who has the edge in the discussion. From where I sit, it is about as clear cut as the Chicago series. nope he doesn't get it indeed if it should happen that procode coments should edge out no code coments then Stevie will be complaining he was cheated for a few decades like some of the OT about Incentive licenses the "vote" count will likely count about the level as the better of the coment but I have not seen anything new from the ProCode side in them and those arguements are all ready shot down at the FCC Jim With THESE numbers, "Litoi", it's even better...Notice in the "ALL to date" column, "support" (for the NPRM) dropped a whole percentage point in only five hours per Lennie's reporting! And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. It's a good day. 73 Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
RST Engineering wrote: You just don't get it, do you Steve? Sure I do, Jim, but I think you're the one who may be a bit confused here. This is not a poll or a vote. This is the FCC asking for cogent, reasoned, logical discussion for doing or not doing something. Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. The FCC is only incidentally involved as it is their numbers he quotes. Read the responses and ask yourself who has the edge in the discussion. From where I sit, it is about as clear cut as the Chicago series. Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Thanks for stopping by. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 10:02:32 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:45:12 -0700, "RST Engineering" wrote: You just don't get it, do you Steve? This is not a poll or a vote. This is the FCC asking for cogent, reasoned, logical discussion for doing or not doing something. Read the responses and ask yourself who has the edge in the discussion. From where I sit, it is about as clear cut as the Chicago series. nope he doesn't get it indeed if it should happen that procode coments should edge out no code coments then Stevie will be complaining he was cheated for a few decades like some of the OT about Incentive licenses Now you're even more confused than Jim is, Markie. another flasehood on your part I say a lie but it mught just be within the realm of opinion the "vote" count will likely count about the level as the better of the coment but I have not seen anything new from the ProCode side in them and those arguements are all ready shot down at the FCC You need to take those words and re-arrange them, Markie. now you are lying But as for any "vote", there is no "vote". Only percentages based on very broad categories. Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 09:59:40 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
RST Engineering wrote: You just don't get it, do you Steve? Sure I do, Jim, but I think you're the one who may be a bit confused here. a Lie you don't get and your poroof it everytime you post so the rest of your ****..... _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. Jim |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:24:00 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message roups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. Stevie seems to think so He certainly states it should be required to licenses for all sorts of things, Posting, having kids or even opinion Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. I take issue with comparing vision to assholes in this manner many visions a re at least quite pleasent (even the flawed visions can be quite attractive till closely examained Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. Jim _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Quote:
I wonder if James will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". The Man in the Maze QRV at Baboquivari Peak, AZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
Iitoi wrote:
I wonder if James Do you mean me? will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard' is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward, but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he posts here. Here are some of the questions: 1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len does this) 2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments? (it appears they include reply comments too) 3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted, even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or something else?) 4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"? Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no license makes no difference to me. Whether they are procodetest or nocodetest also makes no difference to me. I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults by Len. Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. They show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a link to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference, and dupes stand out clearly. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 14:29:50 -0700, wrote:
Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James Do you mean me? will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard' is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward, but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he posts here. Here are some of the questions: 1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len does this) no you want the job 2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments? (it appears they include reply comments too) ys it would seem so 3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted, even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or something else?) well given the grading it would seem that they count as one unless someone out there is submiting coments both For and Against code testing 4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"? by gut feeling Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no license makes no difference to me. Whether they are procodetest or nocodetest also makes no difference to me. I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults by Len. you have your answers BTW I thought I read you were leaving RRAP? what gives? Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. They show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a link to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference, and dupes stand out clearly. 73 de Jim, N2EY _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
RST Engineering wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. No kidding? You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. No, you don't need any credentials to post but you'd better have some knowledge of the material the group deals with. Feel free to post to a group dealing with 17th century Chinese art but you'd better not attempt coming off as an expert. You'll be seen as a fraud and no one will take you seriously. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. Dave K8MN |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. I am sure you do, Jim, but you summate my opinion on YOUR opinion very well. Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. I normally consider yours to be one of the more rational voices of reason in this forum, Jim, but then I guess your last two posts pretty well show that even the most reasoned of men just like to get in there an toss a bit of mud from time to time, eh...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
Iitoi wrote: K4YZ Wrote: With THESE numbers, "Litoi", it's even better... The name is Iitoi, not Litoi. I statnd corrected...My apologies! I wonder if James will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". Or was Lennie just caught up in the heat of the moment, no longer able to hide the change of the tide? Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
K4YZ wrote: And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. The ARRL e-newsletter came out. |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:43:33 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. No kidding? You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. No, you don't need any credentials to post but you'd better have some knowledge of the material the group deals with. Feel free to post to a group dealing with 17th century Chinese art but you'd better not attempt coming off as an expert. You'll be seen as a fraud and no one will take you seriously. and how are you conecting this the the thread at a hand And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 16:00:39 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. I am sure you do, Jim, but you summate my opinion on YOUR opinion very well. summate? Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. I normally consider yours to be one of the more rational voices of reason in this forum, Jim, but then I guess your last two posts pretty well show that even the most reasoned of men just like to get in there an toss a bit of mud from time to time, eh...?!?! Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 16:16:26 -0700, wrote:
K4YZ wrote: And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. The ARRL e-newsletter came out. that would explain a lot interesting that Stevie wasn't bright enough to notice this point would be even if you could confirm said e-letter had something about the NPRM in it just for completeness sack _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
Iitoi wrote: K4YZ Wrote: With THESE numbers, "Litoi", it's even better... The name is Iitoi, not Litoi. Hi! Steve prides hisself on correcting others misspellings. I wonder if James will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". He sure won't do the required footwork himself to verify Len's tally. And in the past he and the other MMMM have challenged him based upon the latter. The Man in the Maze QRV at Baboquivari Peak, AZ -- Iitoi |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:
wrote: Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James Do you mean me? will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard' is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward, but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he posts here. Here are some of the questions: 1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len does this) We appoint you to do this. 2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments? (it appears they include reply comments too) You tell us. 3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted, even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or something else?) You tell us. 4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"? You tell us. Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no license makes no difference to me. Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference. Whether they are procodetest or nocodetest also makes no difference to me. But will you respect us in the morning? I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults by Len. Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's work, See Q/A #1 above. Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. What other parties? They show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a link to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference, and dupes stand out clearly. 73 de Jim, N2EY Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
K4YZ wrote: Iitoi wrote: K4YZ Wrote: With THESE numbers, "Litoi", it's even better... The name is Iitoi, not Litoi. I statnd corrected...My apologies! "stand" |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:16:26 -0700, wrote: K4YZ wrote: And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. The ARRL e-newsletter came out. that would explain a lot Complete with a clickable link to the FCC comment page and instructions how to do it. interesting that Stevie wasn't bright enough to notice this point Interesting that Steve didn't get the e-mail. He made such a stink about me getting the annual dues amount incorrect, and he doesn't even get the ARRL e-newsletter. Hmmmm? Is Steve even an ARRL member? would be even if you could confirm said e-letter had something about the NPRM in it just for completeness sack Had -something- about??? It was ALL about... Uh, lemmee see what I can do? ---------------------------------- SB QST @ ARL $ARLB024 ARLB024 Deadline is October 31 to file comments in FCC "Morse code" proceeding ZCZC AG24 QST de W1AW ARRL Bulletin 24 ARLB024 From ARRL Headquarters Newington CT October 25, 2005 To all radio amateurs SB QST ARL ARLB024 ARLB024 Deadline is October 31 to file comments in FCC "Morse code" proceeding With just a few days to go before the filing deadline, more than 2600 comments have been filed in response to the FCC "Morse code" Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order (NPRM&O) in WT Docket 05-235. The NPRM&O has proposed to do away with the 5 WPM Morse code requirement for all license classes. It also denied several proposals to create a new entry-level license class. The closing date for comments is Monday, October 31. Reply comments are due Monday, November 14. To file on-line comments on the FCC NPRM&O in WT Docket 05-235 or to view others' comments in the proceeding, visit the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. In the "Proceeding" field, enter "05-235" (without the quotation marks but including the hyphen). Alternative filing formats are available for people with disabilities. Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc) by e-mail, , or telephone 202-418-0530 or TTY 202-418-0432. For additional information, contact William T. Cross, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, ; 202-418-0680; TTY 202-418-7233. An FCC Report and Order in this proceeding is not likely until sometime in 2006. |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:17:38 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:43:33 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message legroups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. No kidding? You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. No, you don't need any credentials to post but you'd better have some knowledge of the material the group deals with. Feel free to post to a group dealing with 17th century Chinese art but you'd better not attempt coming off as an expert. You'll be seen as a fraud and no one will take you seriously. and how are you conecting this the the thread at a hand Get someone else to explain it to you, Mark. I don't have the time nor do I have the inclination. meaning you did not realy have a point beyond trying to flame Len And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James Do you mean me? will continue to challenge the tally now that it appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based on "you can't trust someone who has no license". I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard' is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward, but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he posts here. Here are some of the questions: 1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len does this) We appoint you to do this. 2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments? (it appears they include reply comments too) You tell us. 3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted, even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or something else?) You tell us. 4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"? You tell us. Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no license makes no difference to me. Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference. Whether they are procodetest or nocodetest also makes no difference to me. But will you respect us in the morning? I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults by Len. Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's work, See Q/A #1 above. Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. What other parties? They show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a link to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference, and dupes stand out clearly. 73 de Jim, N2EY Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James cut 73 de Jim, N2EY Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are still vitaly concerned about what he may say _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
Really?
Novice 1959 Technician 1960 Advanced 1981? Extra 2002? BS Electronics Physics; 18 semester units to an MSEE. Community College and Adult High School credential teaching ham radio class since 1967. Taught roughly 50 semester classes. 100% pass rate. VE ARRL VE LAARG Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags. Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas. Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics. Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:47:28 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote: Really? Novice 1959 Technician 1960 Advanced 1981? Extra 2002? BS Electronics Physics; 18 semester units to an MSEE. Community College and Adult High School credential teaching ham radio class since 1967. Taught roughly 50 semester classes. 100% pass rate. VE ARRL VE LAARG Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags. Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas. Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics. Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. queitly wonders how Steveie and/or Dave Vile will try trashing that Jim Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James cut 73 de Jim, N2EY Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are still vitaly concerned about what he may say Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words which might otherwise not attract so much attention. Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a primarily adult activity? Hi! |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
RST Engineering wrote: Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags. Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas. Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics. Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Hey Jim...I've read your articles in many mags before. Good job. I've used RST products and found them to be "good stuff". But you're presently posting tacit support for a known liar and cheat in a public forum using your company name. Sure, he knows his way around the bench, but he's a liar and a cheat none-the-less. I don't give a rat's kazoo what you think of me persoanlly or my opinions, but the fact remains that you're putting your company's name behind a guy who lies for sport. Is that wise? Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
RST Engineering wrote:
Really? Novice 1959 Technician 1960 Advanced 1981? Extra 2002? BS Electronics Physics; 18 semester units to an MSEE. Community College and Adult High School credential teaching ham radio class since 1967. Taught roughly 50 semester classes. 100% pass rate. VE ARRL VE LAARG Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags. Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas. Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics. Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I could bring myself to so describe myself. Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your post and the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a reasonable manner. My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular basis is Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment, experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my authorship of amateur radio articles and even my German surname. I can't claim that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to anyone who disagrees with him. It is curious that a fellow such as you would make the blanket statement that you did. Now I just question your judgment. Dave Heil K8MN |
Another Len Quote (was: Lennie's Scorecard Backfires)
Dave Heil wrote:
RST Engineering wrote: Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim OK, from one Jim to another: Novice 1967 (age 13) Technician 1968 Advanced 1968 Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait) 2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972 BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania MSEE 1992 Drexel University Coinventer US patent #5,358,202 I could go on... Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I could bring myself to so describe myself. Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your post and the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a reasonable manner. My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular basis is Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment, experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my authorship of amateur radio articles and even my German surname. Don't forget military service... I can't claim that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to anyone who disagrees with him. Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or proves him wrong about anything. Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today: Len wrote: "Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English. As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING. Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert." - Leonard H. Anderson http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1 Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general idea. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Another Len Quote
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: RST Engineering wrote: Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim OK, from one Jim to another: Novice 1967 (age 13) Technician 1968 Advanced 1968 Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait) 2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972 BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania MSEE 1992 Drexel University Coinventer US patent #5,358,202 I could go on... Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I could bring myself to so describe myself. Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your post and the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a reasonable manner. My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular basis is Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment, experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my authorship of amateur radio articles and even my German surname. Don't forget military service... That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity. I can't claim that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to anyone who disagrees with him. Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or proves him wrong about anything. ....or, come to think of it, anyone who even questions his methods or motivation. Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today: Len wrote: "Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English. Ah yes. That was directed at me, wasn't it? I was never in the Marine Corps. As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING. Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert." - Leonard H. Anderson http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1 Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general idea. Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even though he was never actually under artillery fire. That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. Dave K8MN |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 03:07
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are still vitaly concerned about what he may say Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words which might otherwise not attract so much attention. ...in one way that's good...in another, bad... :-) Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a primarily adult activity? Hi! Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses...maybe it being okay for them to go into liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...or serving in armed forces of the United States (like Jimmie Noserve)...get married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his age-limit-less world? James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer. That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts. He is still ****ed at being confronted with opposite opinions in here by those who will not accept HIS opinions. He MUST re-argue and re-argue and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back. Maybe he hopes to "win" an old argument that way? I don't think so. If the Muppets need a new character, I'd nominate him as "Miss ****y." :-) Meanwhile, Jimmie-James keeps up his "Philly-tuff" personna asking me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on WT Docket 05-235. :-) NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total. That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open comment period. Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But, for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed! Sunnuvagun! |
Another Len Quote
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Don't forget military service... That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. IIRC you mentioned it here a few times. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity. Then there's Len's commentary on the military service of a Cost Guard radio operator who posted here..... I can't claim that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to anyone who disagrees with him. Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or proves him wrong about anything. ...or, come to think of it, anyone who even questions his methods or motivation. That's self-evident from his reaction to my questions. Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today: Len wrote: "Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English. Ah yes. That was directed at me, wasn't it? Yes, it was. I was never in the Marine Corps. Neither was Len, but he uses phrases like "murine" and "dill sergeant" to make fun of a certain Marine... As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING. Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert." - Leonard H. Anderson http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1 Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general idea. Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even though he was never actually under artillery fire. Never having experienced something hasn't prevented Len from expressing opinions, comments and criticism about it. That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. Perhaps a few more quotes from Len would be helpful... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Another Len Quote
Novice 1967 (age 13)
Same age. 2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972 1st Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1964 (age 17), Radar Endorsement Coinventer US patent #5,358,202 I quit the company and the boss got the patent designations from my notebooks, but I'm not going to press the issue. However, designated responsible engineer for FCC type acceptance/certification on seven commercial two-way transceivers; two for studio-transmitter links and five for aircraft transceivers. Currently on the "approved" list for type acceptance/certification for FCC Laurel Laboratories. That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I could bring myself to so describe myself. Well, if you had sold ten thousand (actual count may vary a few percent) hidden antenna original design products everywhere from Latvia to Louisiana, you may describe yourself that way. Aside from your not including attributions, What do you mean by attributions? I'll give proof of anything I've said. not signing your post I thought I signed it Jim. If you want a full formal signing, it is Jim Weir, WX6RST. Most people know who I am; I don't hide behind a pseudonym. and the top posting, In the vernacular, go screw yourself. I'll top post, interleave post, or bottom post, whichever I think will get the point across better. "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds." Or, in the Latin, "Pusca, puscalorum." you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a reasonable manner. It is the engineer showing through the politician. That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity. I have only the highest regard for anybody who wore the uniform. It was not my privilege to do military duty as my parents neatly sandwiched me in between Korea and Vietnam. Sure, I did MARS duty for twenty years, and sure, I wear the local sheriff's Search and Rescue volunteer uniform, but it pales in weak comparison to actual military duty. I bow my head in gratitude. Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today: Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general idea. $#!+, we all get into the bottle from time to time and post stuff that we regret in the morning, but what the hell. Two quotes from two years? Give the guy a break. I'd hate (although my political opponents have done it mercilessly) to be quoted two years after the fact and have to defend myself at that time. That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Who is "he's". Me? Len? You? Steve? ???? And don't worry about RST. It has been around since 1973 and will probably be around long after you and I are SK. Don't worry about it. I have the cojones to put my reputation and my company's reputation on the line when I see something that just cries for comment. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. If you are talking about me, I've been on the usenet and this ng since 1995. I don't claim to defend Len, but again, most of what he says makes perfect sense. It is YOU TWO that I'm worried about. Jim |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote:
wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point I neither support nor oppose such a notion, but you have been beating this dead equine for years cuting reps _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Where? Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by "Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering") or somebody else? If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point Why? Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur radio service? We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur license. If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years.... I neither support nor oppose such a notion, Why don't you oppose it? It's a completely unnecessary requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented to support it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com