![]() |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
From: on Oct 30, 2:43 pm
wrote: From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 21:47 wrote: wrote: The U.S. Constitution has a (gasp!) "age requirment" minimum on voters! Yikes! That sounds almost unconstitutional! Quick...to the Supremes...have the ARRL argue that in front of the robed crowd! Jimmie has implied he is an EXPERT on military matters and can "judge" veterans. However he NEVER served one moment of time IN the military. [there's a minimum age requirement for that as well as a maximum age...:-) ] Jimmy may be many things, but he is no judge of the military nor its veterans. The best Jim can do is stand on the sidewalk and wave a flag as the parade goes by. Maybe Kelly and Cos will join him. Great "cheering section"...NOT. :-) Except for these guys. They can bitch up a storm. In HERE. They seem to get "lost" when it comes time to communicate with their own government...but that does NOT stop them being judgemental to an ultimate degree in HERE. Jimmie will "file when he wants to." In order to be counted, he MUST file a Comment by October 31st and a Reply to Comments by November 14. Maybe he thinks (because of his "superiority") that the U.S. government will "listen to him" even if he files beyond the official ending date? [I'm sure he does] Jim will file. He'll do it from work tomorrow. Probably has nothing else to do. He just doesn't want counter-comments at this time. You have a point there...Jimmie no want any opposition to his opinions. He gets all upset and starts making nasty ("just asking some questions") over and over and over again. Jimmie ain't said he read ALL of the Comments in Docket 05-235. He's said he will NOT do his own tally...but he is QUICK to condemn and berate and call "inaccurate" the tallies of others! Anyplace else he would be called a hypocrite. In here he is a Morseman Extra. I wonder what's on the "FISTS" site? A bunch of ancient propaganda pro morsemanship, I'd expect. Haven't bothered to look there since last year. Back then I was looking up some ancient history on radio communication. Morsemanship is ancient radio communications. :-) Beep, beep, huh-rawhhh! beebeep bit bit |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: From: on Oct 30, 2:31 pm wrote: From: on Oct 30, 5:50 am wrote: wrote: On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by "Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering") or somebody else? Then you must be dim-witted. Nah...he's only in a truss over trying to misdirect the subject thread on all about how we should all be FORMAL and RESPECTFUL to the mighty macho morsemen extras. Maybe I'll get a tuxedo and wear one when posting to these mighty macho motivated morsemen? Now if they would only specify white-tie or black-tie? :-) You could do like the news anchors; just wear the upper half. Hmmm...good idea. However, KNBC and KTLA out here aren't bottomless in the studio. Well, KTLA might be...in the morning news show they act like "Laugh In Looks At the News." [less Judy Carne and Goldie Jean Hawn] Ever notice that James P. Miccolis never concerned himself at all about Dudly the Imposter calling me "Lennie" for over a year in here? :-) Jimmie thought he could get another to the dirty work he craved. :-) Jim is completely oblivious to everything except his own peeves. If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? All this confusion, then you go ahead and answer af if it were you he was referring to. That is the lie that Mark refers to. Further reinforcement of the misdirection onto Jimmie's demand for FORMALITY and RESPECTFULNESS...when it comes to HIM. :-) Whole nother set of rules for Jim. PCTA Double Standard...alive and well in rrap. MMMM. Poor Jimmie. I dropped that "age requirement for amateur licensees" six years ago and he just can't LET GO of it. He MUST keep on arguing and arguing and arguing and arguing it over and over and over and over again...perhaps hoping that I will "give in" or acknowledge his Lordship's Superior Intellect or whatever. :-) He just wants me to bring up him saying that "A Morse Code Exam would be a barrier to Morse Code Use." He hasn't done it YET. How long has it been? He's embarassed that he ever utered such words. Might get him tossed out of FISTS. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Good for you. Len is in favor of an age requirement. What I "favor" is NOT allowed in here according to James P. Miccolis, renowned amateur historian and mighty macho motivated morseman extra. :-) He is self-appointed. But...he might have an "official certificate" (suitable for framing) saying he IS one or both of those! :-) I think I still have some blank Air Force certificates of thanks. You gotta remember that these guys are almost always behind the times. They'd probably be behind the Wall Street Journal...if they could afford a copy. :-) Having to build a tube transmitter probably saved him a bunch. Now, if Jimmie wants to fire up his "state of the art" 1990s vacuum tube Southgate Type 7 and beep to young boys with CW, let him. It keeps him "happy" when he doesn't have to reveal a thing about his REAL identity...on-off keying morse code cannot reveal a single clue to gender, age, emotion, or anything else while voice can tell much. Jimmie can, effectively, HIDE behind his on-off key. Jimmie can be the "X-man superhero," a "masked avenger" (like Captain Code) who keeps alive the old, Old, OLD modes forever and ever. [long live 1844! :-) ] But in all that anonymity, Jim know the sex, age, race, religion, sexual preference, and political party of all those anonymous signals. He's said so! Hi, hi!!! He's a heckuva guy! :-) Too bad he is turning into Dudly the Imposter, Jr. Everyone is scrupulously honest in morse mode...they never ever swear, are always civil towards one another, and never is heard a discouraging word while the skies are not cloudy all day... bit bit Home, home on the RADAR Range... |
Another Len Quote
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: RST Engineering wrote: Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim OK, from one Jim to another: Novice 1967 (age 13) Technician 1968 Advanced 1968 Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait) 2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972 BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania MSEE 1992 Drexel University Coinventer US patent #5,358,202 I could go on... Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. That's pretty impressive, Jim. You've been involved in quite a number of things in and out of amateur radio. Even if I was an "Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas", I don't think I could bring myself to so describe myself. Aside from your not including attributions, not signing your post and the top posting, you even manage to present some of your ideas here in a reasonable manner. My own credentials have been "on the table" for nearly a decade here in r.r.a.p. One of those taking a knife to them on a regular basis is Leonard H. Anderson. He has routinely insulted my employment, experience in radio (amateur, commercial and government), my authorship of amateur radio articles and even my German surname. Don't forget military service... That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. It's not what you did there. What you didn't do in Vietnam appears to have defined your time there. You were a frustrated amateur in Vietnam which caused you to under go a career change. He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity. That must be the MARS duty that he refers to. Or maybe not. I can't claim that I'm special in that regard though. Len does similar things to anyone who disagrees with him. Also anyone who points out a mistake he makes or proves him wrong about anything. ...or, come to think of it, anyone who even questions his methods or motivation. I think Len's a little too hard on you guys. I'm sure that your cuts and jabs are given with the best of intentions. Here's another fun quote from Len, made two years ago today: Len wrote: "Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English. Ah yes. That was directed at me, wasn't it? I was never in the Marine Corps. Can you prove that? ;^) As of 1 PM EST on the 27th of October the ARRL website news page had NOTHING about the California wildfires. NOTHING. Go "munch" someone else's shoes, preferrably some CROW as dessert." - Leonard H. Anderson http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...514cd48c14fbb1 Then there's his classic "sphincters post", but you get the general idea. Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even though he was never actually under artillery fire. I thought that he was quoting W0EX or GrayJL or Xray or all three when he said that. That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. Dave K8MN But, but, but what if the Coslo BBS is up and running? Hi, hi! |
Another Len Quote
From: on Oct 31, 4:52 pm
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: RST Engineering wrote: Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim OK, from one Jim to another: Novice 1967 (age 13) Technician 1968 Advanced 1968 Extra 1970 (because of mandatory 2 year wait) 2nd Class Commercial Radiotelephone 1972 BSEE 1976 University of Pennsylvania MSEE 1992 Drexel University Coinventer US patent #5,358,202 I could go on... But not much farther. Present employer unnamed. The patent is described only as involving "vehicular technology" according to one of Miccolis' old Comments on one of the 18 Petitions. My sole-invention patent of 1974 is on RADIO. shrug That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. It's not what you did there. What you didn't do in Vietnam appears to have defined your time there. You were a frustrated amateur in Vietnam which caused you to under go a career change. What DID Heil DO in Vietnam? He's never been anymore specific than Dudly the Imposter (of the "seven hostile actions"). He keeps alluding to MARS duty and I did spend time operating a MARS circuit from Tan Son Nhut, but only in an off duty capacity. That must be the MARS duty that he refers to. Or maybe not. Damifino. Heil just hasn't been specifc about it. Can't "take shots" at something invisible. :-) Poor Davie has forgotten my quoting from the Army Center for Military History which mentions the good morale service that Army MARS did in Vietnam. I think Len's a little too hard on you guys. I'm sure that your cuts and jabs are given with the best of intentions. I'm sure Jack the Ripper thought the same... :-) I'm also sure Ted Bundy thought all his female victims "were asking for it." Len's description of what it was like to be under artillery fire--even though he was never actually under artillery fire. I was once but it was from U.S. Army artillery. :-) Just the same, the 8235th Army Unit (that I was in) never allowed any Tokyo territory to fall into communist hands! :-) At the same time, that same battalion of signalmen were moving message "traffic" at the rate of 220 thousand a month over the Army Command and Administrative Network (later integrated into the DCS or Defense Communications System), a worldwide network. All with TTY. Not a single morse code link in that system since 1948. I thought that he was quoting W0EX or GrayJL or Xray or all three when he said that. Irrelevant. If Davie says I did bad, then I did bad. He is da Judge! "Heah come da judge...heah come da judge!" That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. James Weir runs RST Engineering. It is located in Grass Valley, CA, in Nevada County (California's "gold country"). He ran for Governor of California, had his picture in the L.A. Times as one of many candidates. [a former Austrian citizen won the election] I sent Jim Weir one of my computer programs (LCie4, synthesis and analysis of passive-component inductor-capacitor filters) and he stated that this (freeware) program has been used by his students (successfully) in Grass Valley. We had some brief e-mail exchages that resulted in my modifying the older LCie program to fit the DOS 7 in newer Windows. LCie was written in MS FORTRAN 5.1 but on an earlier operating system and that (now unsupported by MS) FORTRAN did not have the compiler links to fit DOS 7. LCie4 runs only under DOS, doesn't have the flash, dash, or pizazz of color Windows but is nonetheless accurate and proven. It is freeware to anyone requesting it...something I mentioned in rec.radio. amateur.homebrew some time ago. RST Engineering makes some neat electronics for general aviation aircraft. RST has a nice website if anyone cares to look. One of the neat things they do is what I would term "SURFACE MOUNT VHF antennas" for aircraft fabric surfaces. :-) Neat! They don't stick out in the airstream and thus have minimal drag. [international civil aviation band is 108 to 137 MHz] But, but, but what if the Coslo BBS is up and running? Hi, hi! Then the Coslonaut will - once again - be "at the edge of space!" By the way, outer space is only a half hour's drive away... provided your car can go straight UP. :-) bit bit |
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
From: on Oct 31, 4:42 pm
wrote: From: on Oct 30, 2:31 pm wrote: From: on Oct 30, 5:50 am wrote: wrote: On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Ever notice that James P. Miccolis never concerned himself at all about Dudly the Imposter calling me "Lennie" for over a year in here? :-) Jimmie thought he could get another to the dirty work he craved. :-) Jim is completely oblivious to everything except his own peeves. That's IMPORTANT to him. Personally, I think he wants Dave Sumner's job of writing editorials in QST for the ARRL. He ought to do a historical article on how he pioneered the NTS as a teen-age ham in those ancient days of the 1970s. If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? All this confusion, then you go ahead and answer af if it were you he was referring to. That is the lie that Mark refers to. Further reinforcement of the misdirection onto Jimmie's demand for FORMALITY and RESPECTFULNESS...when it comes to HIM. :-) Whole nother set of rules for Jim. PCTA Double Standard...alive and well in rrap. MMMM. The only "standard" that is allowed is unflagging allegiance to the Order of the Church of St. Hiram. Poor Jimmie. I dropped that "age requirement for amateur licensees" six years ago and he just can't LET GO of it. He MUST keep on arguing and arguing and arguing and arguing it over and over and over and over again...perhaps hoping that I will "give in" or acknowledge his Lordship's Superior Intellect or whatever. :-) He just wants me to bring up him saying that "A Morse Code Exam would be a barrier to Morse Code Use." He hasn't done it YET. How long has it been? He's embarassed that he ever utered such words. Might get him tossed out of FISTS. It's sort of like Dee Flint - experienced scoutmaster - wanting to "explain" scouting to all...and especially to adult leaders. By ignoring critique from those who actually know, they can claim "message victory" and that they are really "right." :-) I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Good for you. Len is in favor of an age requirement. What I "favor" is NOT allowed in here according to James P. Miccolis, renowned amateur historian and mighty macho motivated morseman extra. :-) He is self-appointed. But...he might have an "official certificate" (suitable for framing) saying he IS one or both of those! :-) I think I still have some blank Air Force certificates of thanks. You could send a few to all those "military supporters" out there. The first one ought to go to "Captain" Stevie Wonder of the TN CAP for "outstanding service." [he stood out on the flightline] The second one ought to go to long-time supporter and athlete cup holder Jimmie for all that extraordinary traffic direction on the NTS and his historical knowledge of the military. You gotta remember that these guys are almost always behind the times. They'd probably be behind the Wall Street Journal...if they could afford a copy. :-) Having to build a tube transmitter probably saved him a bunch. He made up for it in all the praise he got from all his neighbors who came in to admire his extraordinary work and praise his expertise in pioneering vacuum tube technology in the 1990s. Everyone is scrupulously honest in morse mode...they never ever swear, are always civil towards one another, and never is heard a discouraging word while the skies are not cloudy all day... Home, home on the RADAR Range... Well, after (ugh) reading through 3,599 filings on the FCC ECFS under WT Docket 05-235 (up to 31 October 2005), I'm convinced that way too many radio amateurs are still stuck to the glorious past of a half century ago in radio communications. Their bliss over the efficacy of morsemanship shines on under skies unclouded by progress in technology...which had already begun before they got their first amateur license. They BELIEVE deep in their little hearts that morsemanship is THE essential ingredient in becoming an extra-super-special radio "expert," "well-rounded" and a "leader" in amateurism. It's a Belief so deep, so basic, that they are convinced that ALL morsemen are "experts" on everything and those who don't Believe as they do are heretics who know nothing about everything. Must be wonderful to exist in such deep delusions of grandeur, very satisfying, off in a wonderland of their own fantasies of self-importance and Greatness. shrug |
Another Len Quote
|
Another Len Quote
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Oct 31, 4:52 pm Dave Heil wrote: That brings us back to RST Jim. It is apparent that he's done a number of things in amateur radio. Perhaps he hasn't been around long enough to see who and what Len Anderson is. Maybe his agenda in defending Len is something entirely different. Perhaps he'll explain. I'll be around after the CQ WW SSB DX 'test. James Weir runs RST Engineering. It is located in Grass Valley, CA, in Nevada County (California's "gold country"). Fine. I don't want to deflate his ego but when I saw a post from "RST Engineering" signed "Jim", it meant nothing to me. I never heard of it or him. I've seen him on various r.r.a... groups for years. |
Another Len Quote
|
Another Len Quote
From: Dave Heil on Nov 1, 8:38 pm
wrote: From: on Oct 31, 4:52 pm Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: RST Engineering wrote: Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. That slipped my mind. Len has taken numerous shots at my Air Force service in Vietnam, though he doesn't seem to know what it is that I did there. It's not what you did there. What you didn't do in Vietnam appears to have defined your time there. You were a frustrated amateur in Vietnam which caused you to under go a career change. What DID Heil DO in Vietnam? He's never been anymore specific than Dudly the Imposter (of the "seven hostile actions"). I see the sentence with my name in it. I see the sentence which follows it. That is typical of your behavior. Heil did NOT answer the question. Heil did NOT supply any details of what he did with a MARS thing in Tan Son Nhut. Tsk, that too is "typical" of Heil's remarks in here. :-( Damifino. Heil just hasn't been specifc about it. Can't "take shots" at something invisible. :-) Then again, you have already done so on a number of occasions. :-) :-) Tsk, tsk, tsk. Heil have a guilty conscience? Poor Davie has forgotten my quoting from the Army Center for Military History which mentions the good morale service that Army MARS did in Vietnam. I've forgotten, have I? What're you, Madame Cleo? I was never assigned to a MARS unit anywhere, anytime in the military. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Maybe Bob Hope never did a USO show at Tan Son Nhut? :-) I'm pretty certain that Len Anderson thinks he's somehow involved in amateur radio too. Pity the FCC then...they regulate and enforce ALL civil radio in the United States, including amateur radio. Absolutely none of the staff nor commissioners are required to be granted any amateur radio license in order to regulate and enforce. Tsk, tsk, tsk...I'm just trying to eliminate the morse code test from United States amateur radio regulations. According to the United States Constitution (First Amendment), all citizens have the RIGHT to free speech in the USA. Just the same, the 8235th Army Unit (that I was in) never allowed any Tokyo territory to fall into communist hands! :-) At the same time, that same battalion of signalmen were moving message "traffic" at the rate of 220 thousand a month over the Army Command and Administrative Network (later integrated into the DCS or Defense Communications System), a worldwide network. All with TTY. Not a single morse code link in that system since 1948. It took an entire battalion of signalmen to do that, Len? All this time, I was under the impression that you did it all by yourself. Tsk, tsk. Davie can't "impress" people as he wishes. I've never said what you think I did. I explained it several times...but your mind can't grasp that, can it? I explained that station ADA was operating "24/7" meaning (in colloquial use) around-the-clock, every day of the week. You said that "was never done." It was. It was done on a FAR LARGER scale than any MARS facility anywhere. ADA did carry MARS TTY traffic on a second-priority basis when the primary circuit wasn't busy. I explained the RESPONSIBILITY of team leaders in keeping the transmitters up and operating, one part of the entire operation, but you insist on word-twisting to suit your savage beast within that wants to fight. All you wish to do is denigrate anyone who did MORE in REAL HF radio than you did. Tsk, tsk. James Weir runs RST Engineering. It is located in Grass Valley, CA, in Nevada County (California's "gold country"). Fine. I don't want to deflate his ego but when I saw a post from "RST Engineering" signed "Jim", it meant nothing to me. I never heard of it or him. Tsk, tsk. Jim Weir has posted in here for several years. That YOU didn't notice that is not my concern. YOU seem to "notice" only those posts where you can engage in word fights with your "opponents." Down, big warrior. He ran for Governor of California, had his picture in the L.A. Times as one of many candidates. [a former Austrian citizen won the election] No doubt Jim's charm, as evidence here, was a factor. Davie said, sarcasm dripping down his chin like alien slime... I sent Jim Weir one of my computer programs (LCie4, synthesis and analysis of passive-component inductor-capacitor filters) and he stated that this (freeware) program has been used by his students (successfully) in Grass Valley. We had some brief e-mail exchages that resulted in my modifying the older LCie program to fit the DOS 7 in newer Windows. LCie was written in MS FORTRAN 5.1 but on an earlier operating system and that (now unsupported by MS) FORTRAN did not have the compiler links to fit DOS 7. LCie4 runs only under DOS, doesn't have the flash, dash, or pizazz of color Windows but is nonetheless accurate and proven. It is freeware to anyone requesting it...something I mentioned in rec.radio. amateur.homebrew some time ago. That's nice. Damn straight. LCie4 IS a very nice program for quickly and accurately synthesizing (designing) and analyzing a passive L-C filter of lowpass, highpass, bandpass, or bandstop configuration. The user can optionally change component values, modify Q of inductors or capacitors, do printouts of schematics or analysis results (or store them in a file), analyze input and output impedances in lieu of normal decibel insertion loss, phase change, or group delay. It's been proven in real hardware results that came out exactly as predicted. RST Engineering makes some neat electronics for general aviation aircraft. RST has a nice website if anyone cares to look. I looked at the web site. It isn't particularly nice. If one orders online, the payment information isn't even sent securely. You aren't involved in general aviation. You have NO business with general aviation let alone private flying. Why are YOU being critical of something you aren't even close to being involved in? Why are YOU being critical of someone else's website to ME? You don't even live in California. You have NO business with any California elections of any kind. Why do you give a **** of any elections of governors in California or state politics? One of the neat things they do is what I would term "SURFACE MOUNT VHF antennas" for aircraft fabric surfaces. :-) Neat! They don't stick out in the airstream and thus have minimal drag. [international civil aviation band is 108 to 137 MHz] I've not noted many fabric surfaces on the aircraft I've seen in recent decades. Tsk, tsk, tsk. There are tens of thousands of general aviation aircraft having "fabric" covering in United States registry alone. That YOU "haven't seen them" doesn't mean they exist. In a half hour's drive from my residence, I can go to two major airports and one air park that have well over a thousand such "fabric" covered aircraft. You said nothing about "surface mounting," indicating you are unable to perceive any humor (as in "SMD" now the common method of electronics hardware construction) or the fact that MOST of a general aviation aircraft structure UNDER the skin is largely empty. Any antenna can thus be mounted on the surface of a non-conductive skin and be largely unaffected on characteristics in that position. Rather basic EM theory involved there, but meaningless to those who will not bother to think about basic radio theory. Thanks for providing the information on the aircraft band. Perhaps nobody here knew where the band could be found. YOU have NO BUSINESS with general aviation concerns, are NOT INVOLVED. It is no surprise that those who are NOT INVOLVED would be ignorant of technical details. Amateur radio is NOT INVOLVED with the international civil aviation band in VHF or the specific frequencies for that in the HF spectrum. If you have any more questions, don't be afraid to show your ignorance. You haven't yet. With warmest, best regards, |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com