Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me. Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

On 27 Oct 2005 14:29:50 -0700, wrote:

Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

no you want the job
2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

ys it would seem so

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

well given the grading it would seem that they count as one unless
someone out there is submiting coments both For and Against code
testing

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

by gut feeling

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me. Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

you have your answers

BTW I thought I read you were leaving RRAP? what gives?

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments. They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James

Do you mean me?

will continue to challenge the tally now that it
appears to support his view of the topic, or if the challenge is based
on "you can't trust someone who has no license".

I'm simply asking for an explanation of how the 'scorecard'
is derived. The questions are simple and straightforward,
but Len gets all upset when someone questions anything he
posts here.

Here are some of the questions:

1) Does anyone check Len's work? (it appears that only Len
does this)

We appoint you to do this.

2) Do the totals include only comments, or reply comments?
(it appears they include reply comments too)

You tell us.

3) Are multiple comments/reply comments from the same person counted,
even if they are not identical? (Len has filed at least 5 different
comments/reply comments on WT 05-235. Are they counted as 1 or 5 or
something else?)

You tell us.

4) How is it determined if a comment has a "valid address"?

You tell us.

Whether or not the person posting a "scorecard" has a license or no
license makes no difference to me.

Wunnerful. Tally it both ways and let us know if it made a difference.

Whether they are procodetest or
nocodetest also makes no difference to me.

But will you respect us in the morning?

I just want some direct answers to questions about the process of
generating the tallies. But such answers are considered insults
by Len.

Your questions will be answered in the details of you checking Len's
work, See Q/A #1 above.

Meanwhile, other parties are also counting the comments.

What other parties?

They
show each and every comment on a website, classify it, and provide a
link
to the comment so you can see for yourself. They're listed in
alphabetical order by the last name of the filer for easy reference,
and dupes stand out clearly.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James
cut

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

I wonder if James
cut

73 de Jim, N2EY

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words
which might otherwise not attract so much attention.

Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being
uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a
primarily adult activity?

Hi!

From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 03:07


wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
Iitoi wrote:

Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to
compare/contrast the tallies?

obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len

Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind
that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose
now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs
RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS.

amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are
still vitaly concerned about what he may say

Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words
which might otherwise not attract so much attention.

...in one way that's good...in another, bad... :-)

Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being
uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a
primarily adult activity?

Hi!

Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING
in elections! Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...maybe it being okay for them to go into
liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...or serving in
armed forces of the United States (like Jimmie Noserve)...get
married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his
age-limit-less world?

James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How
many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer.

That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts. He is still
****ed at being confronted with opposite opinions in here by those
who will not accept HIS opinions. He MUST re-argue and re-argue
and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back. Maybe he hopes
to "win" an old argument that way? I don't think so. If the
Muppets need a new character, I'd nominate him as "Miss ****y." :-)

Meanwhile, Jimmie-James keeps up his "Philly-tuff" personna asking
me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on WT Docket 05-235. :-)

NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new
millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT
Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total.
That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times
more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open
comment period.

Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap
who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But,
for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor
the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed!

Sunnuvagun!