Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really?
Novice 1959 Technician 1960 Advanced 1981? Extra 2002? BS Electronics Physics; 18 semester units to an MSEE. Community College and Adult High School credential teaching ham radio class since 1967. Taught roughly 50 semester classes. 100% pass rate. VE ARRL VE LAARG Published technical articles in 73, HR, and local club rags. Internationally acknowledged expert in the subject of hidden antennas. Monthly column in national magazine on do-it-yourself electronics. Now, lay YOURS out on the table and see who takes a knife to it. Jim Now I have some questions as to your credentials. Len Anderson is a sidewalk superintendent to amateur radio. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. I am sure you do, Jim, but you summate my opinion on YOUR opinion very well. Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. I normally consider yours to be one of the more rational voices of reason in this forum, Jim, but then I guess your last two posts pretty well show that even the most reasoned of men just like to get in there an toss a bit of mud from time to time, eh...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Oct 2005 16:00:39 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
RST Engineering wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's where your confusion exists, Jim...The post responded to was by Lennie Anderson, a non-licensed participant in an Amateur Radio forum on USENET. I don't give a royal flying freak if it was posted by a little green Martian. Last I looked it was data posted to a usenet group by an individual. You don't need any credentials or licenses to post to any given group, last I looked. And, I consider Len to be just a little more competent to post than you. I am sure you do, Jim, but you summate my opinion on YOUR opinion very well. summate? Everyone sees things as they will, Jim. I am sure you "vision" is as clear as anyone else's from THEIR perspective at any given moment. Visions and opinions are much like assholes -- everybody has one, and most of them stink. Mine included. Thanks for stopping by. Don't mention it. I normally consider yours to be one of the more rational voices of reason in this forum, Jim, but then I guess your last two posts pretty well show that even the most reasoned of men just like to get in there an toss a bit of mud from time to time, eh...?!?! Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. The ARRL e-newsletter came out. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:16:26 -0700, wrote: K4YZ wrote: And the support FOR code testing in that five hours in the "Since Notice" column jumped almost 3 points. The ARRL e-newsletter came out. that would explain a lot Complete with a clickable link to the FCC comment page and instructions how to do it. interesting that Stevie wasn't bright enough to notice this point Interesting that Steve didn't get the e-mail. He made such a stink about me getting the annual dues amount incorrect, and he doesn't even get the ARRL e-newsletter. Hmmmm? Is Steve even an ARRL member? would be even if you could confirm said e-letter had something about the NPRM in it just for completeness sack Had -something- about??? It was ALL about... Uh, lemmee see what I can do? ---------------------------------- SB QST @ ARL $ARLB024 ARLB024 Deadline is October 31 to file comments in FCC "Morse code" proceeding ZCZC AG24 QST de W1AW ARRL Bulletin 24 ARLB024 From ARRL Headquarters Newington CT October 25, 2005 To all radio amateurs SB QST ARL ARLB024 ARLB024 Deadline is October 31 to file comments in FCC "Morse code" proceeding With just a few days to go before the filing deadline, more than 2600 comments have been filed in response to the FCC "Morse code" Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order (NPRM&O) in WT Docket 05-235. The NPRM&O has proposed to do away with the 5 WPM Morse code requirement for all license classes. It also denied several proposals to create a new entry-level license class. The closing date for comments is Monday, October 31. Reply comments are due Monday, November 14. To file on-line comments on the FCC NPRM&O in WT Docket 05-235 or to view others' comments in the proceeding, visit the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. In the "Proceeding" field, enter "05-235" (without the quotation marks but including the hyphen). Alternative filing formats are available for people with disabilities. Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc) by e-mail, , or telephone 202-418-0530 or TTY 202-418-0432. For additional information, contact William T. Cross, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, ; 202-418-0680; TTY 202-418-7233. An FCC Report and Order in this proceeding is not likely until sometime in 2006. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
Lennie's Double Standard Once Again Revealed...BY Lennie! | Policy |