RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/81125-frankie-silliland-stretches-something-hold-but-cant-get-grip.html)

K4YZ November 2nd 05 12:18 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP)


what you going on about?


For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK.

And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP)


You have never disclosed your reservist status

reservist? Stevie boy is reservist?


Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry"
prior to going active in September 1974.

It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed
liar, Mark.

I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up


He can't.


Sure I can.


No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.


Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)

But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.


Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402. Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of
1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at
MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I
was interested in doing.

BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for
life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW
in 1990 for a second event...

That EMT training came in handy!

Also, in the late
'80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and
your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in
1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually
impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech.


Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from
the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...)
be a problem?

Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville,
Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing
something illegal?

Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at
Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big
Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?!

The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained
experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist.


How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the
barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits?

"Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on
Marines who did exactly those things....

Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?

All this information is publically available from what -you- have
written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was
hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the
Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts
with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto).


Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which
means "Prepared and Vigilant".

Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!

Nor does it explain your
interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly
you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one
person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe
and a hero-wannabe.


I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do"
sentiments that Lennie and Brain do...

Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you
held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of
"uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?!

There's plenty more information that is publically available about
you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!!


So far, you've not "proven" a single thing.

Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part
time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that
were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?!

Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,
want' it...?!?!

BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you
took those vows before God?


"marriage"

I didn't tell you?

He also dodges following up on all of the references I have
posted.


See above.


I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it
causing even "collateral damage".

That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of
crow.

Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a
lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have
more than that


He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification,
nothing.


Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills.


Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a
calculator.

That's all I
need to prove that you are a liar.


Uhhhhh....How's that?

So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active
duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. What part of MCO's were therein
violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never
spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was
"island wide".

Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic
book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you
sure earned the opportunity here today!

Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit
and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular
requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they
do their active duty components.

This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and
USMC policy.

I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times.

So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would
have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces...

And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are
carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right
now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism
is ludicrous and assinine.

Steve, K4YZ


Frank Gilliland November 2nd 05 04:36 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
.com:


Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP)

what you going on about?

For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK.

And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP)

You have never disclosed your reservist status

reservist? Stevie boy is reservist?

Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry"
prior to going active in September 1974.

It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed
liar, Mark.

I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up

He can't.


Sure I can.


No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.



Sure it does -- your own words.


Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.


Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...



If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged. In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.


And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)



Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.


Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.



Where you were stationed at Camp .....?


Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of
1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at
MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I
was interested in doing.



Uh-huh.


BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for
life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW
in 1990 for a second event...

That EMT training came in handy!



Dudly the hero!!!


Also, in the late
'80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and
your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in
1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually
impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech.


Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from
the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...)
be a problem?



See above, moonlighting.


Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville,
Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing
something illegal?



Some were.


Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at
Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big
Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?!



Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares
if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But
an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems.
Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the
possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or
any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that
would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence.
As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps, and I don't think
-any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who
is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary
obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a
candy-striper.....


The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained
experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist.


How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the
barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits?



Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations.


"Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on
Marines who did exactly those things....



Name one.


Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?



I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going
to fall down and puke.


All this information is publically available from what -you- have
written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was
hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the
Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts
with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto).


Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which
means "Prepared and Vigilant".



You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example:

===========
......[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed
(as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has
returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for
helping to save my life."


Some occupation, huh?!


Semper Paratus

Steve Robeson, LPN
Chattanooga, TN
============

You even explained why you used it:

"If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast
Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis
to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as
charged."

And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a
praise-seeking hero wannabe.


Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!



Did I say it was illegal?


Nor does it explain your
interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly
you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one
person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe
and a hero-wannabe.


I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do"
sentiments that Lennie and Brain do...



Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up
your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles
-your- horse.


Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you
held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of
"uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?!



If the shower-shoe fits.


There's plenty more information that is publically available about
you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!!


So far, you've not "proven" a single thing.



And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say.


Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part
time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that
were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?!



So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have
one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far
your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the
argument against you even stronger.


Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,
want' it...?!?!



Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop?


BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you
took those vows before God?


"marriage"



Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh?


I didn't tell you?



Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your
marrIAge?


He also dodges following up on all of the references I have
posted.


See above.


I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it
causing even "collateral damage".



Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend?


That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of
crow.

Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a
lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have
more than that

He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification,
nothing.


Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills.


Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a
calculator.



Once again, you're the expert.


That's all I
need to prove that you are a liar.


Uhhhhh....How's that?

So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active
duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits.



Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits",
Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both
with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference.


What part of MCO's were therein
violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never
spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was
"island wide".



That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks
restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake.

Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty
and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine
(and probably known by active duty members of the other services as
well). Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig
your hole.


Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic
book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you
sure earned the opportunity here today!



Grow up, "Major".


Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit
and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular
requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they
do their active duty components.



Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many
active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's
your point?


This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and
USMC policy.



Where did I say anything different?


I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times.



Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should
give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims....


So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would
have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces...



That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist, didn't
have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. And active duty
Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist. Too bad
you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself
off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine.


And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are
carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right
now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism
is ludicrous and assinine.



I have nothing against reservists. I -do- take issue with reservists
who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't.
It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then
you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire
Marine "career" as a reservist.

What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be
someone you're not? It works for me.









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Dave Heil November 2nd 05 04:43 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
 
K4YZ wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:

On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
ps.com:

wrote:

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP)

what you going on about?

For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK.


And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP)

You have never disclosed your reservist status

reservist? Stevie boy is reservist?

Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry"
prior to going active in September 1974.

It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed
liar, Mark.


I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up

He can't.


Sure I can.



No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.


Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.



Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)


But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.



Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402. Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of
1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at
MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I
was interested in doing.

BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for
life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW
in 1990 for a second event...

That EMT training came in handy!


Also, in the late
'80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and
your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in
1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually
impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech.



Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from
the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...)
be a problem?

Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville,
Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing
something illegal?

Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at
Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big
Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?!


The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained
experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist.



How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the
barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits?

"Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on
Marines who did exactly those things....

Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?


All this information is publically available from what -you- have
written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was
hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the
Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts
with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto).



Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which
means "Prepared and Vigilant".

Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!


Nor does it explain your
interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly
you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one
person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe
and a hero-wannabe.



I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do"
sentiments that Lennie and Brain do...

Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you
held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of
"uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?!


There's plenty more information that is publically available about
you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!!



So far, you've not "proven" a single thing.

Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part
time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that
were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?!

Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,
want' it...?!?!


BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you
took those vows before God?



"marriage"

I didn't tell you?


He also dodges following up on all of the references I have
posted.


See above.



I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it
causing even "collateral damage".


That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of
crow.


Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a
lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have
more than that

He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification,
nothing.


Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills.



Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a
calculator.


That's all I
need to prove that you are a liar.



Uhhhhh....How's that?

So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active
duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. What part of MCO's were therein
violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never
spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was
"island wide".

Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic
book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you
sure earned the opportunity here today!

Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit
and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular
requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they
do their active duty components.

This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and
USMC policy.

I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times.

So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would
have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces...

And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are
carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right
now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism
is ludicrous and assinine.


I'd imagine that Frank and Leonard are feeling rather stupid about now.


Dave K8MN


Frank Gilliland November 2nd 05 04:51 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine



No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Dave Heil November 2nd 05 05:17 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
 
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine




No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

I can't yet figure your motivation but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.

Dave K8MN

K4YZ November 2nd 05 06:53 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in
.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP)

what you going on about?

For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK.

And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP)

You have never disclosed your reservist status

reservist? Stevie boy is reservist?

Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry"
prior to going active in September 1974.

It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed
liar, Mark.

I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back thisup

He can't.

Sure I can.


No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.


Sure it does -- your own words.


And substantiation of my assertion that you're a liar follows:

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.


Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...


If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged...(SNIP)


Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post
was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?!

In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.


Of course I knew it.

And I had the Commanding Officer's approval chit for off duty
employment as was required by Marine Aircraft Group 16 policy at the
time.

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)


Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


Sorry, SilliOne...Delayed entry WAS considered "reserve" time.

But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.


Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.


Where you were stationed at Camp .....?


There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie.

Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of
1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at
MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I
was interested in doing.


Uh-huh.


Yep.

BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for
life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW
in 1990 for a second event...

That EMT training came in handy!


Dudly the hero!!!


Nope. Just did the right thing at the right time.

Also, in the late
'80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and
your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in
1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually
impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech.


Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from
the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...)
be a problem?


See above, moonlighting.


And AGAIN you waffle on the question at hand...

You make some suggestive comments yet don't answer the questions.

Why?

PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992)
that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as
an EMT...JUST ONE.

Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville,
Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing
something illegal?


Some were.


And HOW MANY of those were EMT's...?!?!

I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks
and ambulances.

Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at
Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big
Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?!


Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares
if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But
an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems.


No kidding, eh...?!?!

So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how
to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I
can't make it in..."...?!?!

Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the
possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or
any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that
would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence.


As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP)


Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER
those two courts martials, eh...?!?!

(UNSNIP)...and I don't think
-any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who
is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary
obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a
candy-striper.....


Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter
at your ignorance and arrogance~!

The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained
experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist.


How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the
barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits?


Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations.


You have it turned around again, AS USUAL, Cowardly One.

"Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on
Marines who did exactly those things....


Name one.


Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck
anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for
what you are....

Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?


I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going
to fall down and puke.


No...

That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that
I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in
doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140
hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical
duties..

All this information is publically available from what -you- have
written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was
hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the
Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts
with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto).


Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which
means "Prepared and Vigilant".


You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example:

===========
.....[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed
(as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has
returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for
helping to save my life."

Some occupation, huh?!


Semper Paratus

Steve Robeson, LPN
Chattanooga, TN
============

You even explained why you used it:

"If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast
Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis
to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as
charged."

And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a
praise-seeking hero wannabe.


So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and
that's "wrong"...

Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut and
having been twice court martialed, and that's OK...?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! !

Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!


Did I say it was illegal?


You obviously have a problem with it...

Nor does it explain your
interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly
you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one
person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe
and a hero-wannabe.


I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do"
sentiments that Lennie and Brain do...


Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up
your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles
-your- horse.


I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie.

And as for the rest, I can see how a busted-back-to-boot-camp PFC
would have a "problem" with a Marine who DID make it to Gunnery
Sergeant and did so without so much as a single Article 15....

Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you
held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of
"uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?!


If the shower-shoe fits.


And I think we have the correct shoe on you, Frankie...

There's plenty more information that is publically available about
you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!!


So far, you've not "proven" a single thing.


And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say.


I've proven you to be a liar.

What more could I ask for...?!?!

Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part
time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that
were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?!


So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have
one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far
your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the
argument against you even stronger.


No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't
"straight-up" answer the question.

Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time
job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were
not part-and-parcel of their USMC duties...?!?!

EVER?

"Go soak your head" is the BEST you can come up with, Frankie?

Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,


Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop?


You took one from being a Marine. Twice.

Your point?

BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you
took those vows before God?


"marriage"


Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh?

I didn't tell you?


Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your
marrIAge?


Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my
USMC career?

Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been
unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?!

He also dodges following up on all of the references I have
posted.

See above.


I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it
causing even "collateral damage".


Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend?


And who is YOURS?

Or Lennie's? Or Brain or Markie's?

I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging
insult" phase...

That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of
crow.

Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would makea
lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have
more than that

He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification,
nothing.


Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills.


Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a
calculator.


Once again, you're the expert.


Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness
the following:

That's all I
need to prove that you are a liar.


Uhhhhh....How's that?

So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active
duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits.


Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits",
Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both
with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference.


I did?

W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?!

Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! !

I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K...

What part of MCO's were therein
violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never
spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was
"island wide".


That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks
restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake.


I did...very thoughtfully...The ONLY "barracks restriction" I was
ever "on" was during island wide restrictions for Typhoon Condition 1A.

Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty
and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine
(and probably known by active duty members of the other services as
well).


Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much
as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines...

Can YOU say the same thing...?!?!

Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig
your hole.


How's that?

So far, you're the one in "negative numbers", Frankie...

Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic
book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you
sure earned the opportunity here today!


Grow up, "Major".


I'm doing just fine.

But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by
facts, Frankie.

Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit
and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular
requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they
do their active duty components.


Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many
active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's
your point?


The POINT is that YOU seem to express duty as a Reservist as a
negativism.

This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and
USMC policy.


Where did I say anything different?


At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at
the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was
somehow less-than-adequate.

I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times.


Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should
give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims....


It doesn't matter what "weight" you give it, Frankie...

You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and
you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the
Marines.

So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would
have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces...


That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist...(SNIP)


Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie.

(UNSNIP)...didn't have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. Andactive
duty Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist...(SNIP)


Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie.

Too bad you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself
off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine.


Three in a row.

And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are
carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right
now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism
is ludicrous and assinine.


I have nothing against reservists...(SNIP)


Your words in this forum demonstrate otherwise.

(That's four)

(UNSNIP)...I -do- take issue with reservists
who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't.


Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum.

It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then
you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire
Marine "career" as a reservist.


Five

What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be
someone you're not? It works for me.


Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials
prove it.

So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT
proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to
another Lenniesque blustery diatribe?

Steve, K4YZ


K4YZ November 2nd 05 02:07 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

K4YZ wrote:

That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP)


Excuse me...that was "12".....

Steve, K4YZ


Frank Gilliland November 2nd 05 04:19 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine




No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.



Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


I can't yet figure your motivation



I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.



One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than
any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a
reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's
easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on
active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the
soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient
armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong
or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the
-right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my
accomplishments.

I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military
obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from
others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use.
What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't
heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that
fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning
tactics I can only laugh.

Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you
-any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if
you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need
to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State
Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a
****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not
helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as
I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash
together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland November 2nd 05 04:32 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 06:07:15 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
.com:


K4YZ wrote:

That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP)


Excuse me...that was "12".....

Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ



You were saying something about needing a calculator....?






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[email protected] November 2nd 05 05:00 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
s.com:


Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland

cut He can't.

Sure I can.


No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.



Sure it does -- your own words.


Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.


Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...



If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged.


so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not
some against the regs and some not

I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest
of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army
In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.


And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)



Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served.



breaking out for coment
And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that


But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.


Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.


cuting to move on to rest of Stevie ****
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[email protected] November 2nd 05 05:02 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:19:35 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine



No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.



Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


I can't yet figure your motivation



I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.

don't you know Dave and Stevei are qualified to read minds and they
have determined by reading from your id that you have another
motivation

the powers of the MMM are covered in the sercret protocols of the
Elders of Morsemen


but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.



One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than
any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a
reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's
easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on
active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the
soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient
armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong
or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the
-right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my
accomplishments.

I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military
obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from
others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use.
What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't
heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that
fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning
tactics I can only laugh.

Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you
-any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if
you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need
to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State
Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a
****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not
helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as
I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash
together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Dave Heil November 2nd 05 05:40 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
 
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:


Frank Gilliland wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine



No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.




Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


There isn't any "Dudly" and I didn't attempt any rescue. I made
comments. Steve provided an explanation for all of your sinister
imaginings.


I can't yet figure your motivation




I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


I know of no statement of motivation issued by you.


but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.




One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB).


Two courts martial show me that "I wasn't exactly the model Marine" may
not be an appropriate phrase.

I am no less proud of my service than
any other Marine.


There are oodles of folks who are proud of records which others would
find to be less than stellar.

And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.


So far, we have you guessing and making accusations. There is no "Dudly".

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose.


Is that how your value system works? You think that I never got caught
doing something wrong? The fact is, I never did anything which could
nail me with Article 15 punishment, much less get me court martialed.

However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).


I didn't write that I've never done anything wrong. I wrote that I'd
not done anything which could result in Article 15 punishment or a court
martial.

Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.


We're different. I try not to find myself in situations where I have to
overcome something caused by me.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a
reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's
easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on
active duty.


I was never a reservist and I didn't blindly follow orders. There isn't
any "Dudly". Can you find it in yourself to use the man's name?

Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the
soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient
armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong
or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the
-right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my
accomplishments.


So both of your courts martial are cases in which you were only trying
to do the right thing?

I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military
obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from
others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use.


There isn't any "Dudly". That is your attempt at denigrating someone
who wasn't court martialed. His name is Steve.

What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't
heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that
fact.


Both of your courts martial were overturned?

So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning
tactics I can only laugh.


You blew in here touting the wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio
newsgroup, started a game of "I'll bet he never...." in regards to Steve
and you don't expect to be demeaned? I guess you'll have to get used to it.

Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you
-any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if
you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need
to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State
Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a
****bird PFC?


You should regroup, rethink your motives and gather some facts if you
think Steve, not "Dudly" has manufactured anything about his record. If
you can provide proof and feel the need to do so, post it. Otherwise
your rants have no meaning, especially here.

If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not
helping it.


Well, there's one man's view.

If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as
I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash
together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy.


I was Air Force. I don't row. My dad was Navy though--a Normandy
Invasion vet. He always told me that the reason there were two sailors
on each landing craft was that one piloted the craft and the other was
to chase the Marines down the ramp and onto the beach.

My experience with Marines has been with those on MSG duty. When the
Gunny would come to the Comm center for message traffic, I'd provide it
and even read it to him if necessary.

Dave K8MN

K4YZ November 2nd 05 05:42 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.


Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a
few degrees closer to boiling than mine.....

I can't yet figure your motivation


I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


No, you've not.

but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.


One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB).


No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.

Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.

I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine.


You should be...you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a
Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may
have been in your MOS.

And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know.

And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.


What fudging?

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.


What you MEAN is that you were completely incapable of operating
within the "value system" of what it was to be a Marine, but now you
try some boohoo about how more challenging it was for you.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders.


I questioned orders on numerous occasions. But that's part of that
"value system"...Knowing how to work within the system.

You were stupid.

Twice.

Now that's fine for a
reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge.


And again an out-and-out misrepresentation of the character of
service of the Reserve Forces of the United States...

What part of what the Reserves are doing today is any less
challenging than what the active duty guys are doing?

Indeed...they have it harder...Taken from homes and 'real jobs' to
fight in the desert.

It's easy to blindly follow orders.


And it's even easier to make up silly stories like yours.

But that isn't always the case on
active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the
soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient
armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong
or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the
-right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my
accomplishments.

I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military
obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from
others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use.
What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't
heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that
fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning
tactics I can only laugh.


All you've done is make a laughing stock out of your "arguments"
here, Frankie...

You were incompetent as a Marine. You are where incompetent
Marines SHOULD be...in civilian life with two courts martials to live
with.

Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you
-any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if
you can't understand it, tough ####.


Frankie trying to soft-soap Dave since just last night he was
telling "everyone" that "no one" here was "on my side".

That having now been proven false, Frankie tries his own version of
"spin".

But do you really feel the need
to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State
Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a
####bird PFC?


A liar's a liar, Frankie...You're a very determined one, but a liar
none the less.

If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it.


Ahhhhhhh...Just like President Nixon's "Silent Majority" trick,
Frankie...?!?!

If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as
I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash
together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy.


So here we have it, folks...

Frankie "comes over" from the CB NG for no other purpose than to
take up for Markie and Company against a former Marine since he knows
just enough of "the lingo" to sound impressive. It's OK for "them" to
go 5-to-1 on me.

He is, however, a twice disgraced loser who didn't have the
dignity or strength of character to get through ONE tour of duty
without being court martialed TWICE.

He is "all about" teaming up with Lennie, Markie, etc, but let
someone say something in MY support and they are "defending" me, as if
words of support for me were verbal herpes.

I wonder what it is about Dave saying something that makes Frankie
worry about the possible odds now being 5:2 instead of 5:1...?!?!

More substantiation of my claim that he's a coward.

Steve, K4YZ


[email protected] November 2nd 05 05:50 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.


Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?


nobdoy does that was just Dave

And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a
few degrees closer to boiling than mine.....


really?

I can't yet figure your motivation


I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


No, you've not.


that si the problem you can't read plain english

or distored english or any other kind


but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.


One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB).


No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.


wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie

Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.


and who appointed you judge?

I thought you were an LPN


I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine.


You should be.

back you Stvie trying to tell everybody how to live and that if they
ever slipped up they were forever worthless

Boring Stevie but exactly the sort of **** we all expect from you


..you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a
Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may
have been in your MOS.

And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know.


sounds like he does KNOW


And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.


What fudging?


yours



So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.


What you MEAN is that you were completely incapable of operating
within the "value system" of what it was to be a Marine, but now you
try some boohoo about how more challenging it was for you.


more lies Stevie

he does mean he was unable to live witjhing your value system but that
thank the goods is requred of no one

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders.


I questioned orders on numerous occasions. But that's part of that
"value system"...Knowing how to work within the system.

You were stupid.


read enough of Stevie **** flushing the rest
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ November 2nd 05 05:52 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, wrote in
s.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland

cut He can't.

Sure I can.

No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.


Sure it does -- your own words.

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.

Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...


If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged.


so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not
some against the regs and some not


This is but one of Frankie's sillier suggestions...that having a
part time job/pursuit is somehow "evidence" of having NOT done the
things I claim...

I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest
of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army


Not so in the Marine Corps. I had to sign a statement that stated
my USMC duties must never be compromised, and I was given a very short
list of "no no's" for part time work...Law enforcement, any "job" which
was in conravention to any local, state or federal law, and partisan
politics wherein my status as a member of the Armed Forces may lend the
appearence of that branch having any preference for any political party
or candidate.

Took all of a day to walk the chit (A Naval term for a "permission
slip...Not an abbreviation for excrement) through. No big deal.

In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)


Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served.


breaking out for coment


And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that


Your buddy Frankie is the one short on facts here, Markie...

For two days now he's been insinuating that having a part time job
is "evidence" that I was not on active duty and was "nothing more" than
a reservist.

How assinine.

But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.

Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.


cuting to move on to rest of Stevie ####


"cutting"

Ahhhhhhhh...So providing even MORE references is #### now, eh,
Markie???

Seems you don't LIKE facts, now do you...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ


K4YZ November 2nd 05 06:13 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.


Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?


nobdoy does that was just Dave


"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!

THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!

Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various
Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals
that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your
"circle"?

On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various
publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing
but glowing terms....

And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a
few degrees closer to boiling than mine.....


really?


Really.

I can't yet figure your motivation

I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


No, you've not.


that si the problem you can't read plain english


"is" "English".

or distored english or any other kind


"distorted" "English"

Sheeeeeeeeesh.

but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.

One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB).


No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.


wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie


Sure it is!

We Frankie's ADMISSIONS that he was COURT MARTIALED not once, but
TWICE!

That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court,
Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice
is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather
than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And
he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record.

Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.


and who appointed you judge?


Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private
First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on
my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant.

I thought you were an LPN


I am.

I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine.


You should be.


back you Stvie trying to tell everybody how to live and that if they
ever slipped up they were forever worthless


Where did I say Frankie was "forever worthless"...?!?!

I said he has a lot of room where it comes to him being "proud" of
what he did in the Marines...

Boring Stevie but exactly the sort of #### we all expect from you


Coming from YOU, "Colonel", that's a compliment.

..you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a
Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may
have been in your MOS.

And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know.


sounds like he does KNOW


No, it does not.

His courts martials prove otherwise.

And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.


What fudging?


yours


I ask again, WHAT fudging?

So far Frankie is the fudging king...

Actually, it's more like he's a fudging idiot.

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.


What you MEAN is that you were completely incapable of operating
within the "value system" of what it was to be a Marine, but now you
try some boohoo about how more challenging it was for you.


more lies Stevie


Nope.

he does mean he was unable to live witjhing your value system but that
thank the goods is requred of no one


"within"

Markie, BY HIS OWN ADMISSION he was court martialed. A court
martial is the epitome of proof that FRANK GILLILAND was the one with
the "value systems" deficiencies.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders.


I questioned orders on numerous occasions. But that's part of that
"value system"...Knowing how to work within the system.

You were stupid.


read enough of Stevie #### flushing the rest


Sorry you don't like the facts, Markie. Tough.

Steve, K4YZ


[email protected] November 2nd 05 06:28 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 09:52:29 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, wrote in
s.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland

cut He can't.

Sure I can.

No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.

Sure it does -- your own words.

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.

Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...

If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged.


so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not
some against the regs and some not


This is but one of Frankie's sillier suggestions...that having a
part time job/pursuit is somehow "evidence" of having NOT done the
things I claim...


more evasion Stevie you are ducking the issue as usual

if you were presueing something on the side say so, don't go about how
moonlighting is discouraged

deal with the issue

but then you can't deal with issues it seems


I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest
of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army


Not so in the Marine Corps. I had to sign a statement that stated
my USMC duties must never be compromised, and I was given a very short
list of "no no's" for part time work...Law enforcement, any "job" which
was in conravention to any local, state or federal law, and partisan
politics wherein my status as a member of the Armed Forces may lend the
appearence of that branch having any preference for any political party
or candidate.


admitng that Franks is correct in his base charge

BTW so much for strongly discouraged


Took all of a day to walk the chit (A Naval term for a "permission
slip...Not an abbreviation for excrement) through. No big deal.

In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)

Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served.


breaking out for coment


And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that


Your buddy Frankie is the one short on facts here, Markie...


nope

For two days now he's been insinuating that having a part time job
is "evidence" that I was not on active duty and was "nothing more" than
a reservist.


it is eveidence, not convincing in and off itself I agree but it is
eveidence when combined with your erros in equipment and such it
starts to add up

How assinine.

But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.

Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.

cuting to move on to rest of Stevie ####


"cutting"

Ahhhhhhhh...So providing even MORE references is #### now, eh,
Markie???


no but all you were proiving to that point was **** so it is
reasonable to assume the rest was ****

Seems you don't LIKE facts, now do you...?!?!


wrong again

I just wish you proivde som

Steve, K4YZ


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[email protected] November 2nd 05 06:33 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?


nobdoy does that was just Dave


"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!


yes I am

THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!


glad you enjoyed it


Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various
Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals
that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your
"circle"?


no thanks

but Dave is a nobody as are you

anybody that is such lying hypocrite as you 2 ceratinly qualifies as
nobody in my book

On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various
publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing
but glowing terms....


so?

he advocates poor ham practice by his own words


And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a
few degrees closer to boiling than mine.....


really?


Really.

I can't yet figure your motivation

I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.

No, you've not.


that si the problem you can't read plain english


"is" "English".

or distored english or any other kind


"distorted" "English"

Sheeeeeeeeesh.

but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.

One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB).

No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.


wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie


Sure it is!


nope

We Frankie's ADMISSIONS that he was COURT MARTIALED not once, but
TWICE!


so what?

That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court,
Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice
is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather
than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And
he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record.


so?


Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.


and who appointed you judge?


Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private
First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on
my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant.


another lie

they did not appoint you judge


I thought you were an LPN


I am.


for now at least


I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine.

You should be.


back you Stvie trying to tell everybody how to live and that if they
ever slipped up they were forever worthless


Where did I say Frankie was "forever worthless"...?!?!


plenty of times


I said he has a lot of room where it comes to him being "proud" of
what he did in the Marines...

Boring Stevie but exactly the sort of #### we all expect from you


Coming from YOU, "Colonel", that's a compliment.

..you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a
Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may
have been in your MOS.

And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know.


sounds like he does KNOW


No, it does not.

His courts martials prove otherwise.

bull****

And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.

What fudging?


yours


I ask again, WHAT fudging?


yours the whole fabric of your stech of vague claims with no back up

they make it possible to reasonable doubt you even went to boot camp
exceeding **** tolerance flcuhing the rest
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ November 2nd 05 06:44 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:52:29 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, wrote in
s.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
cut He can't.

Sure I can.

No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.

Sure it does -- your own words.

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech.It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.

Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowedto
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...

If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged.

so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not
some against the regs and some not


This is but one of Frankie's sillier suggestions...that having a
part time job/pursuit is somehow "evidence" of having NOT done the
things I claim...


more evasion Stevie you are ducking the issue as usual


There's no "issue" here, twitless.

Frankie claimed my part time job was "evidence" that I was not an
active duty Marine.

That was ludicrous on the face of it...However HIS refusal to cite
even one MCO of the period that said "you can't be an EMT while you're
in the Marine Corps" pretty well proves MY assertion that he's full of
your "bovine excrement"...

if you were presueing something on the side say so, don't go about how
moonlighting is discouraged


(1) I already stated, YEARS AGO, that I worked part time as an EMT
in an ER...

(2) I am not the one going on about "moonlighting" being
"discouraged"...That's in your's and Frankie's ballpark! I already
stated that I complied with Group Orders for off duty employment.

deal with the issue


I did.

but then you can't deal with issues it seems


Sure I did.

I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest
of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army


Right there you admit that moonlighting is acceptable, then I went
on to say....:
Not so in the Marine Corps. I had to sign a statement that stated
my USMC duties must never be compromised, and I was given a very short
list of "no no's" for part time work...Law enforcement, any "job" which
was in conravention to any local, state or federal law, and partisan
politics wherein my status as a member of the Armed Forces may lend the
appearence of that branch having any preference for any political party
or candidate.


Issue "dealt with".

admitng that Franks is correct in his base charge


"admitting" "Frank"

No, I did nothing of the sort.

Frankie claimed that by having "admitted" to being an EMT I was
somehow "proving" that I was "only" a reservist. Nothing of the sort
is even remotely factual.

BTW so much for strongly discouraged


It was NOT "strongly discouraged" when I was on active duty, except,
as previously noted, where it conflicted with official duties.

I already addressed that.

Took all of a day to walk the chit (A Naval term for a "permission
slip...Not an abbreviation for excrement) through. No big deal.

In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.

And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)

Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served.

breaking out for coment


And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.

Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that


Your buddy Frankie is the one short on facts here, Markie...


nope


Yep.

Like his "facts" about how my working part time as an ER tech
"proved" that I was "only" a reservist.

For two days now he's been insinuating that having a part time job
is "evidence" that I was not on active duty and was "nothing more" than
a reservist.


it is eveidence, not convincing in and off itself I agree but it is
eveidence when combined with your erros in equipment and such it
starts to add up


"evidence" "of" "evidence [again]" "errors"

No, it's nothing of the kind.

And what "equipment" errors?

You and Toiddie are the only one in this forum with "equipment
errors".

How assinine.

But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.

Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.

cuting to move on to rest of Stevie ####


"cutting"

Ahhhhhhhh...So providing even MORE references is #### now, eh,
Markie???


no but all you were proiving to that point was #### so it is
reasonable to assume the rest was ####


"proving"

It was nothing of the kind.

And you broke your own "don't assume" rule...And it bit you.

Seems you don't LIKE facts, now do you...?!?!


wrong again

I just wish you proivde som


"provide" "some"

I have.

And as I have said before...Just because you can't/won't acccept
them does not negate them as such.

Steve, K4YZ


Dave Heil November 2nd 05 07:15 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
 
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


Frankie of Silliland wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:

Frankie of Silliland wrote:


I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


No, you've not.



that si the problem you can't read plain english

or distored english or any other kind



Classic, Mark, simply classic.

You make it far too easy.

Dave K8MN

[email protected] November 2nd 05 10:18 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
From: Frank Gilliland on Wed 2 Nov 2005 08:19

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote


snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.


It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.


Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!


It's the on-going Pro-Code-Test-Advocate Morsemen alliance
working hard with the PCTA Double Standard. :-)

Davie KNOWS things. He worked in the Department of State!
He served IN a country at WAR! [busy doing MARS at Tan
Son Nhut]

I can't yet figure your motivation


I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times
in plain English.


Irrelevant, Frank. Davie DEMANDS MOTIVATION (when he runs out
of valid/coherent replies).

Davie DEMANDED that I "should" have gotten an amateur radio
license BEFORE EVER getting into professional radio. Implied
that it was the proper thing to do...no doubt showing
MOTIVATION to HIM. Tsk, the U.S. Army didn't know that...

but you've admitted being a screw up
in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of
others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get
through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial.


One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my
service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the
facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than
any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible
when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging
the truth in order to get a little more praise.


Frank, I've NO problems with your pride and espirit d'corps
about the USMC. It shows. It also shows you have no qualms
about stating what you did without embellishments,
embroidery, or exaggeration. You are telling it like it is.
Davie and Dudly sin by omission, leaving out the details of
their exploits.

Davie was HIGHLY CRITICAL of MY service in the Army, of NOT
being "at war" or even IN a country at war. When I voluntarily
enlisted on 13 Mar 52, there was a very hot war going on in
Korea. The Army didn't send me there directly, stationed me
in Tokyo beginning in early February, 1953, a sort-of cease
fire then in Korea. The formal Truce period began in July,
1953. [that "Truce" period has NOT ended...technically, a
state of war still exists with North Korea 52 years later]

Why is Davie so critical? Tsk, a long time ago in here I
mentioned being assigned to work at the (then) 3rd largest
Army radio station in ACAN (the worldwide Army Command and
Administrative Network...later called "StarCom" and then
Defense Communications System). HF radio. HF was the old
mainstay of long-distance message traffic in the military.
Three dozen transmitters on HF with power outputs of 1 KW
to 40 KW, operating 24/7. [Dave said "you never worked
24/7" but we did...all over the Pacific] Thing was that
this 3rd largest station was far bigger than ANY State
Department foreign station of any time in State's existance
and even helped carry State message traffic on some of the
circuits. Davie said "you don't know anything about what
State Department does!" but I did...as did everyone who
was INTO the ACAN and DID carry some of their message load]

Davie got on a toot, adjusted his truss, and couldn't stop
condemning me in here ever since. Doesn't matter what the
subject is, Davie is so damn critical of being "opposed" in
anything he says that he does the "revenge" bit all the time
now. He is a MORSEMAN and, according to him, NO radio
amateur shows "motivation" unless they love, honor, and
obey morsemanship.

So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you.
Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly
different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done
anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim).
Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and
overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by
circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both.


That's the way it is in the military. One seldom gets a
"choice" on what to do. Follow orders, etc.

Davie worked for the Department of State. "Following orders,"
then Secretary of State Colin Powell (under President Bush
the 2nd] told the world that "Saddam Hussein has Weapons of
Mass Destruction" thereby "justifying a war" in Iraq. [Powell
had been Chief of Staff of the military under President Bush
the 1st] Over 2000 service personnel killed since, absolutely
NO "weapons of mass destruction" have been found in Iraq. Has
the Department of State taken back Powell's public statement?
No. Has Davie ever taken back a single personal insult thrown
at others (many have been thrown)? No.

"Lessons learned?" Maybe.

Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without
so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a
reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's
easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on
active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the
soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient
armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong
or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the
-right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my
accomplishments.


Good on you, Frank.

Davie won't let up on you, though. You see, he was IN a country
at war (busy killing commies with his MARS code key?) and knows
ALL about following orders. [the Vietnam War ended 30 years ago]
We all have to follow DAVIE's "orders." Especially the one on
MOTIVATION.

The best Dudly the Imposter has come up with is "he was in
'seven hostile actions'!" Dud has NEVER said the WHEN or
WHERE of those infamous "seven hostile actions." We must all
honor and praise Dud for his valor and heroism or forever be
recipients of emotional exaggerated personal insults.

I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military
obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from
others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use.
What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't
heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that
fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning
tactics I can only laugh.


Dudly doesn't understand that because his mindset works in
some strange personal fantasy via his computer. He lives by
exaggerated emotional phrases (most praising himself) and trying
to do a snow job (badly) on others about his "accomplishments."

Davie is probably just looking for a word fight with his
perceived "enemies." He is of a control-freak kind and does
NOT like ANYONE telling him "no" or what to do. He MUST "win"
these word fights and be "in the right."

Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you
-any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if
you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need
to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State
Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a
****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not
helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as
I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash
together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy.


I suggest they both go see the premiere of the new film "Jarhead"
(as a couple). They can both get some emotional espirit d'corps.
Dudly can use the film's fiction for better embroidery of his
"hostile actions." Davie can get the emotional thrill of doing
battle "in-country" that ended over three decades ago. That
will get them all fired up to throw more hissy fits against other
veterans of the U.S. military who don't agree with their personal
opinions.




[email protected] November 2nd 05 10:49 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

nobdoy does that was just Dave

"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!


yes I am


That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious!


glad you enjoyed it

THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!


glad you enjoyed it


On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you!


either way gald you enjoyed it


Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various
Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals
that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your
"circle"?


no thanks


Uhhhh..."no thanks" was the wrong answer.


bull**** it was the right answer


"Not able" was.

but Dave is a nobody as are you


Whelp...There you have it...Frankie AND Markie opting for the
"stinging personal insult" in the face of no other options to persue!


more lying by Stevie he must be very afarid these days with the way he
goes on and on and on about things

anybody that is such lying hypocrite as you 2 ceratinly qualifies as
nobody in my book


The problem for YOU is that you've proved NEITHER of those
assertions!


proved em both, to any one with any objectivity


but that does let you out I know

nor do I have to prove em to form the opinion


it is also no problem ME at all

On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various
publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing
but glowing terms....


so?

he advocates poor ham practice by his own words


No he doesn't.


sure does we had that arguement before all you did was keeping
claiming he did not over and over again

not a spread of proof on your part of course

pruning shear out again
No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.

wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie

Sure it is!


nope


Sure it is!

To state otherwise is for YOU to call Frankie a liar!


not a tall
ctuing stevie repating himself
That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court,
Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice
is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather
than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And
he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record.


so?


I see criminal records are your favorite kind.


another Stevie lie

it is true I don't see having a criminal record as the end of the
world or as something akin to treason


Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.

and who appointed you judge?

Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private
First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on
my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant.


another lie

they did not appoint you judge


Sure they did.


prove it
stevie lie stevie get cut off and find his typing was wasted
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Frank Gilliland November 3rd 05 12:43 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 14:18:20 -0800, wrote in
om:

snip
I suggest they both go see the premiere of the new film "Jarhead"
(as a couple). They can both get some emotional espirit d'corps.
Dudly can use the film's fiction for better embroidery of his
"hostile actions." Davie can get the emotional thrill of doing
battle "in-country" that ended over three decades ago. That
will get them all fired up to throw more hissy fits against other
veterans of the U.S. military who don't agree with their personal
opinions.



Well, while Davie and Dudly and all their their sock puppets are busy
reminiscing about their Hollywood-forged military careers, I'm taking
a few days to winterize the homestead. We are long overdue for a hard
winter and I want to be ready. It's that "Semper Paratus" thing.....







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Dave Heil November 3rd 05 04:24 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
 
Frank Gilliland wrote:

Well, while Davie and Dudly and all their their sock puppets are busy
reminiscing about their Hollywood-forged military careers, I'm taking
a few days to winterize the homestead. We are long overdue for a hard
winter and I want to be ready. It's that "Semper Paratus" thing.....


I'm not Davie and there is no Dudly. I've spoke very little about my
military service. I didn't stay for a career. Perhaps you'd like to do
a little guessing and see if I made the whole thing up, Frank. Maybe
after you've winterized your home.

Dave K8MN

[email protected] November 3rd 05 06:29 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
From: Frank Gilliland on Nov 2, 4:43 pm

On 2 Nov 2005 14:18:20 -0800, wrote in
. com:



snip

I suggest they both go see the premiere of the new film "Jarhead"
(as a couple). They can both get some emotional espirit d'corps.
Dudly can use the film's fiction for better embroidery of his
"hostile actions." Davie can get the emotional thrill of doing
battle "in-country" that ended over three decades ago. That
will get them all fired up to throw more hissy fits against other
veterans of the U.S. military who don't agree with their personal
opinions.


Well, while Davie and Dudly and all their their sock puppets are busy
reminiscing about their Hollywood-forged military careers, I'm taking
a few days to winterize the homestead. We are long overdue for a hard
winter and I want to be ready. It's that "Semper Paratus" thing.....


Gotcha, Frank. Have fun on the homestead work.

Davie Heil don't wanna talk about his military daze. He
wants to talk about "little johnsons." Tsk, tsk, and I
thought he didn't get turned on by THAT. Takes all kinds!




K4YZ November 3rd 05 07:03 AM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

nobdoy does that was just Dave

"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!

yes I am


That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious!


glad you enjoyed it


Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?!

I said it was "hillarious".

THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!

glad you enjoyed it


On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you!


either way gald you enjoyed it


"glad"

I didn't say I enjoyed it...I said it was hillarious.

Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various
Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals
that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your
"circle"?

no thanks


Uhhhh..."no thanks" was the wrong answer.


bull@@@@ it was the right answer


No, it was a direct "evasion".

YOU claim that Dave Heil is a "nobody", yet I can find numerous
references to him in all of the major Amateur Radio journals over tha
last 10-12 years...I find NO SUCH references to you or any of the rest
of your "circle".

"Not able" was.

but Dave is a nobody as are you


Whelp...There you have it...Frankie AND Markie opting for the
"stinging personal insult" in the face of no other options to persue!


more lying by Stevie...(SNIP)


Nope. You called Dave a "nobody" when I can readily find HIS name
in numerous references in Amateur Radio related publications. And at
least I've been quoted twice in "CQ" magazine, had several letters
published in CQ and QST, and have my name in such references as "DXCC"
and the contest scores over the years.

I find NO such references to KB9RQZ in any of them.

he must be very afarid these days with the way he
goes on and on and on about things


I see you're back to delusional episodes, Markie.

anybody that is such lying hypocrite as you 2 ceratinly qualifies as
nobody in my book


The problem for YOU is that you've proved NEITHER of those
assertions!


proved em both, to any one with any objectivity


No, you've not. Not by a long stretch.

but that does let you out I know

nor do I have to prove em to form the opinion

it is also no problem ME at all


More random words in search of order, Markie.

Try E N G L I S H......

On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various
publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing
but glowing terms....

so?

he advocates poor ham practice by his own words


No he doesn't.


sure does we had that arguement before all you did was keeping
claiming he did not over and over again


Because HE didn't.

not a spread of proof on your part of course


"...a spread of proof..."

Must be an Upper Penninsula thing....

pruning shear out again


No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination.

wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie

Sure it is!

nope


Sure it is!

To state otherwise is for YOU to call Frankie a liar!


not a tall


"not a tall"...?!?!

So..Frankie's only...what? 5'3"...?!?!

ctuing stevie repating himself


"cutting" "repeating"

More of your censorship and issues you do not want to address, is
what yoiu mean.

That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court,
Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice
is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather
than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And
he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record.

so?


I see criminal records are your favorite kind.


another Stevie lie


Nope.

You think Frankie's court martials are "nothing". They FEDERAL
convictions, regardless of whether he was "found guilty" or "pled
guilty".

it is true I don't see having a criminal record as the end of the
world or as something akin to treason


No...I won't go as far as calling Frankie's conduct treason, nor
the end of the world...However HE tries to make issue of MY
military service when to call HIS service "less than adequate" would be
giving him one huge benefit of the doubt.

Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good"
Marines.

and who appointed you judge?

Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private
First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on
my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant.

another lie

they did not appoint you judge


Sure they did.


prove it


Six documents signed by four commanding officers and two
Commandants addressed to me that start off with the words 'To All Those
Who Shall See These Presents Greetings'.....

Those certificates of appointment (better known in the Corps as
"promotion warrants") gave me the authority to make those decisons.
That's why the Marine Corps has the widest Enlisted-to-Officer ratio of
all the services.

stevie lie stevie get cut off and find his typing was wasted


No, it wasn't wasted.

Your feeble attempts to act as censor substantiated their efforts
as valid, Markie.

Steve, K4YZ


[email protected] November 3rd 05 06:58 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 2 Nov 2005 23:03:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

nobdoy does that was just Dave

"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!

yes I am

That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious!


glad you enjoyed it


Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?!


you did

I said it was "hillarious".


yes you did


THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!

glad you enjoyed it

On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you!


either way gald you enjoyed it


"glad"

I didn't say I enjoyed it...I said it was hillarious.


then you lied

and Flush

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ November 3rd 05 08:47 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 

wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 23:03:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

nobdoy does that was just Dave

"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!

yes I am

That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious!

glad you enjoyed it


Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?!


you did


I requoted EVERTYHING you did, Markie.

NO WHERE in there did I say I "enjoyed" it.

I said it was "hillarious".


yes you did


And NO WHERE did I say I 'enjoyed it'. Please show us where I
said that?

THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS!

glad you enjoyed it

On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you!

either way gald you enjoyed it


"glad"

I didn't say I enjoyed it...I said it was hillarious.


then you lied


Nope.

But you ahve...Again...You even quoted all of the text from which
YOU allege I said something that I clearly did not...

and Flush


Lame try, Markie...

Steve. K4YZ


[email protected] November 5th 05 05:57 PM

Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
 
On 3 Nov 2005 12:47:45 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 23:03:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t:

snip

I'd imagine

No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up.

It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing
and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done.

Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue!

So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh,
Frankie?

nobdoy does that was just Dave

"nobody"

"just Dave".

So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?!

yes I am

That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious!

glad you enjoyed it

Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?!


you did


I requoted EVERTYHING you did, Markie.

NO WHERE in there did I say I "enjoyed" it.


then you were lying

and flush

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Frank Gilliland November 14th 05 10:39 AM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:


Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in
.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP)

what you going on about?

For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK.

And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP)

You have never disclosed your reservist status

reservist? Stevie boy is reservist?

Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry"
prior to going active in September 1974.

It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed
liar, Mark.

I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up

He can't.

Sure I can.

No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of
"Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses.

"Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve
status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period...

The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists.


Sure it does -- your own words.


And substantiation of my assertion that you're a liar follows:

Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's
only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20
years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their
freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising
their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between
active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It
-doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case
you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny.

Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to
keep personal pursuits while on active duty...


If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is
-strongly- discouraged...(SNIP)


Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post
was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?!



Since when does it require an MCO for a superior officer to give a
legal and lawful order to a subordinate? The granting of liberty is at
the discretion of the unit's commanding officer. And liberty doesn't
mean you are free to do as you please. If you come back from a 96 with
a decent sunburn you can end up with NJP -- that very situation has
happened more than once.

"What MCO was violated?" That's the wrong question, Dud. The right
question is, "What MCO grants a CO the authority to let his Marines
take on obligations outside the Corps that could, and very possibly
will, conflict with the obligations of the Corps?" The answer is....
There isn't one.


In some units it's even prohibited by the
commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job
usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't
know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from
your own ignorant words.


Of course I knew it.

And I had the Commanding Officer's approval chit for off duty
employment as was required by Marine Aircraft Group 16 policy at the
time.



Gee, and all this time you have refused to provide -any- details about
your military "career". How silly of me to think that now, when
confronted with an issue even more intrusive than a few lines from a
DD-214, you would spit up some specific information. Gee, I need to
reconsider my position regarding your credibility........LOL!!!!


And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record
states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record
shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry
notwithstanding...)


Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't
specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish
between active or reserve." The reason is because military members
frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve,
to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total
time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed
enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or-
inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me.


Sorry, SilliOne...Delayed entry WAS considered "reserve" time.



Not according to your DoD record. Check the dates yourself.


But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10
year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than
four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps.

Uh huh. Six, actually.

Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue
personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits.

My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.


Where you were stationed at Camp .....?


There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie.



MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......?


Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of
1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at
MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I
was interested in doing.


Uh-huh.


Yep.

BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for
life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW
in 1990 for a second event...

That EMT training came in handy!


Dudly the hero!!!


Nope. Just did the right thing at the right time.



Yeah, I know what you mean. When I visited Disneyland back in '82 I
caught a kid who fell down a flight of stairs. It doesn't make me a
hero, just the dope who happened to be there at the time. I've had a
few things like that happen, as I'm sure a lot of people have. Anyone
else would have done the same. In fact, most people who -have- been
able to save life and limb by nature of circumstances consider their
actions to have been a natural response. But most people don't define
their lives and "careers" by such actions. That is, most -normal- and
-mentally balanced- people.


Also, in the late
'80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and
your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in
1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually
impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech.

Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from
the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...)
be a problem?


See above, moonlighting.


And AGAIN you waffle on the question at hand...

You make some suggestive comments yet don't answer the questions.

Why?



I -did- answer the question. You just couldn't understand the answer
because you have never served on active duty.


PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992)
that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as
an EMT...JUST ONE.



Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were-
allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It
would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time.


Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville,
Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing
something illegal?


Some were.


And HOW MANY of those were EMT's...?!?!



Beats me. But I've never heard of an EMT that was also on active duty.
Never would have happened in any of the units I was in. In fact, in
3/8 you couldn't even get a part-time job delivering pizza since no
outside employment was allowed by order of the CO, period.


I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks
and ambulances.



That sort of stuff turns you on, huh? Well, it doesn't really matter
since the Marines don't have MP's...... they have SP's. That pile of
dirt just keeps getting bigger and bigger. Stay tuned because one day
real soon I plan to compile all of your military 'wisdom' into one big
easy-to-reference list.....LOL!!!


Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at
Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big
Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?!


Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares
if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But
an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems.


No kidding, eh...?!?!

So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how
to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I
can't make it in..."...?!?!



More proof that you were never on active duty: frequently there are
times when you don't have access to a telephone, especially when
liberty is cancelled because the alert status of the base or unit is
raised. In those cases, outside comm is usually prohibited because of
security issues. Happened when the US shot down the Libyan jets, when
Beirut got bombed, when Reagan invaded Grenada..... Speaking of which,
I had a friend in 2/8 that I knew from MCAGCC. They were prohibited
from using the telephone several days before deployment, outgoing mail
was held on ship during transit, and even the ship's MARS station was
shut down.

But you never experienced such things because you were never on active
duty..... -or- on float.


Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the
possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or
any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that
would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence.


As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP)


Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER
those two courts martials, eh...?!?!



Actually, it didn't sink in until after the first court-martial, but
well before the second.


(UNSNIP)...and I don't think
-any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who
is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary
obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a
candy-striper.....


Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter
at your ignorance and arrogance~!



Prove me wrong, Dudly.


The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained
experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist.

How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the
barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits?


Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations.


You have it turned around again, AS USUAL, Cowardly One.



Being an EMT does not require an obligation? You make it sound like a
hobby. You must not have taken the job very seriously.


"Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on
Marines who did exactly those things....


Name one.


Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck
anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for
what you are....



YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR
claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an
'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one
of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT
while in active duty. Just one.


Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?


I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going
to fall down and puke.


No...

That's what you've implied...



Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own
distorted imagination? Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate
your moral confusion.


You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that
I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in
doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140
hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical
duties..



Don't try to be clever, Dud -- in your desperation to defend your fake
service record you forgot about the other 3 years and 8 months..... or
was it 5 years and 8 months..... gee, Dud, make up your mind: were you
an EMT on active duty for four or six years?


All this information is publically available from what -you- have
written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was
hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the
Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts
with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto).

Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which
means "Prepared and Vigilant".


You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example:

===========
.....[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed
(as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has
returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for
helping to save my life."

Some occupation, huh?!


Semper Paratus

Steve Robeson, LPN
Chattanooga, TN
============

You even explained why you used it:

"If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast
Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis
to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as
charged."

And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a
praise-seeking hero wannabe.


So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and
that's "wrong"...



In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in
dressing up like a clown.


Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut



Allegedly? No, I posted the proof, Dud. You should try it sometime.


and
having been twice court martialed, and that's OK...?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! !



When you get done laughing, how about showing me where I said that
getting court-martialed twice is "OK"?


Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!


Did I say it was illegal?


You obviously have a problem with it...



You obviously have an obsession with it.


Nor does it explain your
interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly
you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one
person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe
and a hero-wannabe.

I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do"
sentiments that Lennie and Brain do...


Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up
your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles
-your- horse.


I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie.



I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud.


And as for the rest, I can see how a busted-back-to-boot-camp PFC
would have a "problem" with a Marine who DID make it to Gunnery
Sergeant and did so without so much as a single Article 15....



I have no problem with it at all. In fact, I have the highest respect
for most of the staff NCO's I've met over the years. Funny tho, every
one of them who retired held a rank higher than Gunny..... why do you
suppose that is, Dud? Come to think of it, most of the SNCO's I knew
made Gunny within 8-10 years. And it didn't take them 8 years to get
promoted to First/Master Sergeant. But then they were active duty.....


Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you
held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of
"uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?!


If the shower-shoe fits.


And I think we have the correct shoe on you, Frankie...

There's plenty more information that is publically available about
you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!!

So far, you've not "proven" a single thing.


And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say.


I've proven you to be a liar.



If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


What more could I ask for...?!?!



A better education.


Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part
time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that
were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?!


So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have
one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far
your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the
argument against you even stronger.


No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't
"straight-up" answer the question.



Because the question presumes an untrue premise. And yes, your
assertions are cowardly.


Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time
job,



Disregarding the horrific grammatical structure of your question, 3/8
in 1983-84.


went to school off duty,



Never prohibited, IME.


followed "personal" pursuits that were
not part-and-parcel of their USMC duties...?!?!



Never prohibited, IME.


EVER?



See above part-time jobs


"Go soak your head" is the BEST you can come up with, Frankie?



I suppose I should dumb down my statement to a level that you can
understand: Just because some active duty Marines were allowed to take
part-time jobs is not proof that you were ever on active duty. Is that
simple enough? Or do I need to draw a Venn diagram (i.e, a picture)?


Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,


Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop?


You took one from being a Marine. Twice.

Your point?



Well, I guess that means that you are no better than me. And never
forget that YOU made the equivocation, Dud.


BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you
took those vows before God?

"marriage"


Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh?

I didn't tell you?


Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your
marrIAge?


Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my
USMC career?



Absolutely. You accuse me of lying because I broke my oath. You broke
-your- oath to your wife and to your God. Therefore, you lied to your
wife and to your God. If you don't have enough respect for your God to
keep -your- oath, what makes you think that you can hold someone else
to the same standard? So it really IS a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing,
isn't it?

You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to
-my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you
would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups
throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies,
and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and
integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even
when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline
(let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you-
describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that
is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your
tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and
you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your
claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your-
standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a
Marine Gunny.

Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud.


Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been
unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?!



Forget it, Dud. It's obvious that you can't address anything that
deals with reality. Don't even try -- you might stroke out or
something.


He also dodges following up on all of the references I have
posted.

See above.

I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it
causing even "collateral damage".


Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend?


And who is YOURS?

Or Lennie's? Or Brain or Markie's?

I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging
insult" phase...



Hmmm..... "stinging insult"..... your words, not mine.


That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of
crow.

Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a
lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have
more than that

He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification,
nothing.


Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills.

Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a
calculator.


Once again, you're the expert.


Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness
the following:



Witness this:

=============
K4YZ wrote:

That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP)


Excuse me...that was "12".....

Steve, K4YZ

=============

Nuff said.


That's all I
need to prove that you are a liar.

Uhhhhh....How's that?

So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active
duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits.


Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits",
Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both
with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference.


I did?

W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?!

Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! !

I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K...



Oh, so of those 10+ years of experience you claimed to have in 1998,
six of them were actually only part-time? How "part time" were they?
10hrs/wk on the average? So those six years of experience while on
active duty is really equal to only 1-1/2 years or so of full-time
experience? Only a fourth of full-time experience? That's a pretty big
disparity, Dud, although not uncharacteristic of your propensity to
'stretch' the truth. But claiming to have 400% more experience than
you really had..... that's called "stretching the truth a little too
far" and I don't buy it. In your posts you omit the fact that much of
your experience wasn't spent as a career. In fact, you state quite
clearly in several posts that EMT -was- your career for all those
years, even while working at the hospital in California. So either you
lied about having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are
lying about -not- having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or
you are lying about being on active duty. Take your pick.

BTW, you never did answer the question of where you were stationed
when you worked as an EMT in PA. Care to give it another try?


What part of MCO's were therein
violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never
spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was
"island wide".


That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks
restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake.


I did...very thoughtfully...The ONLY "barracks restriction" I was
ever "on" was during island wide restrictions for Typhoon Condition 1A.



Did you have to sign in at the OOD's office every two hours? If not
then it's not the same thing.


Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty
and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine
(and probably known by active duty members of the other services as
well).


Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much
as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines...

Can YOU say the same thing...?!?!



What, are you dense? Haven't you been paying attention all this time?
Did I not declare, long ago, that I spent time in the brig? Are you
actually -trying- to look like a moron? If you are, it's working.

And I never stated, suggested or implied that you "stood" any
pushishment for anything. But that wasn't the issue. Not being granted
liberty is not restriction. Restriction in regards to punishment
simply means that restrictions are placed on your liberty (when
granted). You don't know the difference. You claim to have spent 18
years on active duty, where the duty of every NCO is to pull an
occasional 24-hr shift in the OOD's office (sometimes as the OOD), the
place where Marines on restriction show up every two hours to sign
their restriction forms..... yet you don't know the difference.

You didn't spend 18 years on active duty, Dud.


Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig
your hole.


How's that?

So far, you're the one in "negative numbers", Frankie...



Better be careful with your math -- remember, it was 18 years before
it was 14 years before it was 12 years..... when is the next revision?


Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic
book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you
sure earned the opportunity here today!


Grow up, "Major".


I'm doing just fine.



Ok then, don't grow up.


But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by
facts, Frankie.



You validate my arguments just fine.


Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit
and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular
requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they
do their active duty components.


Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many
active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's
your point?


The POINT is that YOU seem to express duty as a Reservist as a
negativism.



I degrade only your service as a reservist, Dud. I do it because of
the way -you- feel about -yourself-. You hate yourself for what you
think are your failings; for being a reservist that never saw action
and got drummed out of the Corps on a medical discharge. And because
you hate yourself so much, it's easy to push your buttons.

As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims
about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your
time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product
of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary
adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with
yourself, not with me.

Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof
of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in
due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the
torment of being stuck in your own web of lies.


This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and
USMC policy.


Where did I say anything different?


At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at
the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was
somehow less-than-adequate.



No, Dudly. I have clearly stated several times that I think there is
nothing at all wrong with being a reservist. It may be different than
active duty, but is no less worthy of pride and honor. The problem is
that -you- don't feel that way. It is -you- that feels a reservist is
"less-than-adequate" and not worthy of the same respect as a Marine
who served on active duty. I just push that button and, as expected,
you thrash around in a defensive fit of grade-school name calling and
emotionally charged avoidance tactics. You really need to learn some
discipline, Dud.


I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times.


Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should
give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims....


It doesn't matter what "weight" you give it, Frankie...



Very well, I shall give it as much weight as the rest of your claims:
none.


You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and
you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the
Marines.



True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and
you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action
(and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did). The fact
remains that I served my time on active duty while you were a
reservist. Hmmmm...... you claim that your 6 years of EMT work was
part-time, and a reservist is really a part-time job too......

Let's see now..... one weekend a month, that's 48 x 12 = 576 hours/yr.
Add to that 2 weeks a year, which is another 336 hours. So that's 912
hours/yr, times 16 years (18 years less boot camp and technical MOS
training, a very generous estimate) which is 14,592 hours. Now that
converts to 608 days, or 1.665 years. So for all practical purposes,
after 2 years of boot camp and MOS training you served the active duty
equivalent of slightly more than 1-1/2 years, for a grand total of
3-1/2 years, which is -LESS- than my 4 year cruise.

Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!!


So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would
have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces...


That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist...(SNIP)


Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie.

(UNSNIP)...didn't have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. And active
duty Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist...(SNIP)


Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie.

Too bad you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself
off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine.


Three in a row.

And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are
carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right
now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism
is ludicrous and assinine.


I have nothing against reservists...(SNIP)


Your words in this forum demonstrate otherwise.

(That's four)

(UNSNIP)...I -do- take issue with reservists
who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't.


Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum.



Your charade is getting really old, Dudly.


It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then
you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire
Marine "career" as a reservist.


Five

What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be
someone you're not? It works for me.


Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials
prove it.



You have a strange definition of 'proof', Dud. Care to cite a
dictionary or two (assuming you aren't afraid to learn something about
critical thinking)?


So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT
proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to
another Lenniesque blustery diatribe?



Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the
magnifying glass a little later.


Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

an old friend November 14th 05 05:28 PM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:

cut

Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post
was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?!



Since when does it require an MCO for a superior officer to give a
legal and lawful order to a subordinate? The granting of liberty is at
the discretion of the unit's commanding officer. And liberty doesn't
mean you are free to do as you please. If you come back from a 96 with
a decent sunburn you can end up with NJP -- that very situation has
happened more than once.


One Dudly is Student of Herr Geobels

a decnet sunburn geting an art 15 I don't think so, a Bad sunburn sure
shame on you Frank for the LIE:)

"What MCO was violated?" That's the wrong question, Dud. ...


agains you are slightly off it is the right question for Dudly Dogface
it is the right question if ones goals is decietion

and we both know that is Dudlies goal
cut

Gee, and all this time you have refused to provide -any- details about
your military "career". How silly of me to think that now, when
confronted with an issue even more intrusive than a few lines from a
DD-214, you would spit up some specific information. Gee, I need to
reconsider my position regarding your credibility........LOL!!!!

cut

There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie.


standard Dudly try to avoid the question byacting stupid, of Dudly
doesn't have to ACT


MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......?


secert sub-marine base no doubt like the Naval air warfare center in
INDY
cut
That is, most -normal- and
-mentally balanced- people.


well said




I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks
and ambulances.



That sort of stuff turns you on, huh?


look at the turn of phrase

he loves it, watching MEN dpoing something like that

I simply point out his represed (it seems to point of pathological)
sexual issues
cut

So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how
to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I
can't make it in..."...?!?!

it has not been established you made it through EMS school

cut
As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP)


Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER
those two courts martials, eh...?!?!



Actually, it didn't sink in until after the first court-martial, but
well before the second.


LOL not sure if I am laughing at Frank or the image of in mind eyes of
Stevie reading franks word



(UNSNIP)...and I don't think
-any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who
is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary
obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a
candy-striper.....


Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter
at your ignorance and arrogance~!



Prove me wrong, Dudly.


honestly in some places I know they are so short of Nurses they might
take on one that they could not rely on (for reason like Stevie's) in
order to have the chance for having enough nurses, don't know anyplace
is hard up ebough for EMT's but maybe

cut

Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck
anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for
what you are....



YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR
claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an
'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one
of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT
while in active duty. Just one.


I suspect I might be able to name one, Steven J Robeson, just not the
person posting

the more he goes on and on the more I suspect he found the origanal
Steve J Roberson dead, perhaps the current one killed him in a car
accident (or got him killed by telling a lie) and took on his life, but
he doesn't know enough about that life to live it



Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real
Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their
official duties?

I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going
to fall down and puke.


No...

That's what you've implied...



Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own
distorted imagination?


I can answer that for him NO he hasn't

Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate
your moral confusion.


not sure anything can help Stevie
cut

that's "wrong"...



In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in
dressing up like a clown.


like Gacy Dudly can't seem to help it
cut


When you get done laughing, how about showing me where I said that
getting court-martialed twice is "OK"?


I can explain it for you though

Dudly thinks no one would do anything they did not think was right, and
moral and proper

therefore you must have felt it ok to be courtmartialed or you would
commited hari-kari first, before standing trail, therefore the fact you
are still alive means you found it to be OK to be courtmartaled

Stevie tried the same stunts with me
I say it is ok to lie when diverting danger or direct attacks sthings
like that, therefore stevie claims i have said in the same word it is
desireable that the world is as it is and such lying is sometime a good
idea


Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!

Did I say it was illegal?


You obviously have a problem with it...



You obviously have an obsession with it.


nothing about Stevie may be questioned

cut
I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie.



I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud.


and you don't have 2 court martial "over you head" they are in the past
cut

I've proven you to be a liar.



If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


yep

which I why I will homeschool


What more could I ask for...?!?!



A better education.


a Life of his own?
cut
No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't
"straight-up" answer the question.



Because the question presumes an untrue premise. And yes, your
assertions are cowardly.


Nah Dudly is the coward the assertion are just inocent victums



Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time
job,



Disregarding the horrific grammatical structure of your question, 3/8
in 1983-84.

cut


I suppose I should dumb down my statement to a level that you can
understand: Just because some active duty Marines were allowed to take
part-time jobs is not proof that you were ever on active duty.


nor is it proof that if you were on active YOU were allowed etc

Is that
simple enough? Or do I need to draw a Venn diagram (i.e, a picture)?


Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch,

Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop?


You took one from being a Marine. Twice.

Your point?



Well, I guess that means that you are no better than me. And never
forget that YOU made the equivocation, Dud.


no he will never forget it

he will never understand he made it

cut
Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my
USMC career?


it is at least as related to both as your attack threads about my
sexuality, Todd's, Brain's et al are

stealing the atriubtuion form frank since the word earing repeating
Absolutely. You accuse me of lying because I broke my oath. You broke
-your- oath to your wife and to your God. Therefore, you lied to your
wife and to your God. If you don't have enough respect for your God to
keep -your- oath, what makes you think that you can hold someone else
to the same standard? So it really IS a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing,
isn't it?

You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to
-my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you
would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups
throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies,
and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and
integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even
when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline
(let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you-
describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that
is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your
tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and
you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your
claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your-
standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a
Marine Gunny.
ending my "theft of franks word

Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud.


Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been
unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?!



Forget it, Dud. It's obvious that you can't address anything that
deals with reality. Don't even try -- you might stroke out or
something.


please don't try to disaude him for taking the most honorable exit
avalable to a person like Him



cut
I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging
insult" phase...



Hmmm..... "stinging insult"..... your words, not mine.


rememebr Len words about "Mirror"

Once again, you're the expert.


Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness
the following:



Witness this:

=============
K4YZ wrote:

That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP)


Excuse me...that was "12".....

Steve, K4YZ

=============

Nuff said.

cut
I did?

W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?!

Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! !

I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K...



Oh, so of those 10+ years of experience you claimed to have in 1998,
six of them were actually only part-time? How "part time" were they?
10hrs/wk on the average? So those six years of experience while on
active duty is really equal to only 1-1/2 years or so of full-time
experience? Only a fourth of full-time experience? That's a pretty big
disparity, Dud, although not uncharacteristic of your propensity to
'stretch' the truth. But claiming to have 400% more experience than
you really had..... that's called "stretching the truth a little too
far" and I don't buy it. In your posts you omit the fact that much of
your experience wasn't spent as a career. In fact, you state quite
clearly in several posts that EMT -was- your career for all those
years, even while working at the hospital in California. So either you
lied about having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are
lying about -not- having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or
you are lying about being on active duty. Take your pick.

BTW, you never did answer the question of where you were stationed
when you worked as an EMT in PA. Care to give it another try?


cut

Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty
and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine
(and probably known by active duty members of the other services as
well).


Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much
as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines...

Can YOU say the same thing...?!?!



What, are you dense? Haven't you been paying attention all this time?
Did I not declare, long ago, that I spent time in the brig? Are you
actually -trying- to look like a moron? If you are, it's working.


and his claim never to stodd for ANY FROM OF punishment for even a
minute

No way he went through BCT ( or what ever the Marines call it) without
it

you don't even have to do anything wrong sometimes

And I never stated, suggested or implied that you "stood" any
pushishment for anything. But that wasn't the issue. Not being granted
liberty is not restriction. Restriction in regards to punishment
simply means that restrictions are placed on your liberty (when
granted). You don't know the difference. You claim to have spent 18
years on active duty, where the duty of every NCO is to pull an
occasional 24-hr shift in the OOD's office (sometimes as the OOD), the
place where Marines on restriction show up every two hours to sign
their restriction forms..... yet you don't know the difference.

You didn't spend 18 years on active duty, Dud.


maybe he means 18 dog years?

cut

I'm doing just fine.



Ok then, don't grow up.


But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by
facts, Frankie.



You validate my arguments just fine.

cut

As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims
about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your
time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product
of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary
adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with
yourself, not with me.


indeed

that is going to be his problem in "suing " me if I have harmed it was
only possible with HIS assiatnce, making him my coconspritor

Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof
of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in
due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the
torment of being stuck in your own web of lies.


Ah a fellow sadist, and Dudly the willing indeed needfull submission.
Np I do hope you enjoy your session

cut



You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and
you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the
Marines.



True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and
you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action
(and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did).


That is it been strugling for the Charater Dudly sort a reminds me of
Maj Powers

but back to Stevie

anyone that wishes to see combat is truely mad, who is proud of combat

cut
Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!!

cut

Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum.



Your charade is getting really old, Dudly.


old eneough it hardly even stink anymore

cut
Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials
prove it.



You have a strange definition of 'proof', Dud. Care to cite a
dictionary or two (assuming you aren't afraid to learn something about
critical thinking)?


I keep asking him to publish one so we can foolow his words



So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT
proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to
another Lenniesque blustery diatribe?



Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the
magnifying glass a little later.


Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ



[email protected] November 15th 05 12:13 AM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in


So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how
to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I
can't make it in..."...?!?!


More proof that you were never on active duty: frequently there are
times when you don't have access to a telephone, especially when
liberty is cancelled because the alert status of the base or unit is
raised. In those cases, outside comm is usually prohibited because of
security issues. Happened when the US shot down the Libyan jets, when
Beirut got bombed, when Reagan invaded Grenada..... Speaking of which,
I had a friend in 2/8 that I knew from MCAGCC. They were prohibited
from using the telephone several days before deployment, outgoing mail
was held on ship during transit, and even the ship's MARS station was
shut down.

But you never experienced such things because you were never on active
duty..... -or- on float.


This new information gives me insight into how Steve thinks.

We were given an amateur emergency response scenario by one of the
regulars on here. He stated the served agencies requirements and the
number of volunteers available. I said that the volunteer group could
not meet those stated requirements with available resources. Steve
said they could, and wrote a duty schedule with long periods of
uncovered and undercovered periods.

Probably goes back to his "service" days where he left his unit hanging
and thought nothing of it.

In the end, he said that I said that no volunteer group could ever
satisfy an agencies requirements, a lie like his many other lies. I
don't know about the USMC, but in the Air Force, we call uncovered
periods in a duty schedule "AWOL" and the person presently on duty just
eats it.

But I understand that some reserve units are more laid back.


[email protected] November 15th 05 12:26 AM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com:


Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in


My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA
EMT-MAST 014402.

Where you were stationed at Camp .....?


There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie.


MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......?


VA Medical Center? Third floor, room 308?


[email protected] November 15th 05 09:17 PM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 
From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39

On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in


etc

snip

PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992)
that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as
an EMT...JUST ONE.


Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were-
allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It
would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time.


Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly
was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time!

snip

Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter
at your ignorance and arrogance~!


Prove me wrong, Dudly.


He can't, Frank. After 7 years in here and NO evidence of anything
of that "18 year career" there's no point in asking for anything
NOW. :-(


Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck
anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for
what you are....


YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR
claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an
'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one
of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT
while in active duty. Just one.


Dudly isn't able to do that. He has NO proof.

snip

That's what you've implied...


Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own
distorted imagination? Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate
your moral confusion.


He is unable to deviate from his massive, long-running snow job
even long after the snow was melted by others.


You've suggested that in 18 years
(actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that
I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in
doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140
hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical
duties..


Don't try to be clever, Dud -- in your desperation to defend your fake
service record you forgot about the other 3 years and 8 months..... or
was it 5 years and 8 months..... gee, Dud, make up your mind: were you
an EMT on active duty for four or six years?


Must be the "new math" that was taught in school. :-)


You even explained why you used it:

"If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast
Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis
to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as
charged."

And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a
praise-seeking hero wannabe.


So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and
that's "wrong"...


In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in
dressing up like a clown.


Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-)


Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut


Allegedly? No, I posted the proof, Dud. You should try it sometime.


Most of us readers might like to see some REAL proof from
Dudly. Anything is an infinity more than the ZERO he has
presented.


Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in
THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?!

Did I say it was illegal?


You obviously have a problem with it...


You obviously have an obsession with it.


Nah. Dudly is still dancing around his faux pas. Would a real,
live MARINE use a Coast Guard motto in a sign-off? Wouldn't be
true to the Corps, would it?


I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie.


I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud.


True enough! However, since Dudly has NEVER posted any reference
proof to his active-duty or reserve career, we have to wonder if
Dudly REALLY served in ANY military branch.


I've proven you to be a liar.


If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old
trick of personal insulting in order to win message points.

What more could I ask for...?!?!


A better education.


I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling.
He needs it.


You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to
-my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you
would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups
throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies,
and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and
integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even
when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline
(let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you-
describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that
is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your
tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and
you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your
claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your-
standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a
Marine Gunny.

Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud.


Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It
sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in,
could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts,
unable to reconcile his desires with reality.


snip

I degrade only your service as a reservist, Dud. I do it because of
the way -you- feel about -yourself-. You hate yourself for what you
think are your failings; for being a reservist that never saw action
and got drummed out of the Corps on a medical discharge. And because
you hate yourself so much, it's easy to push your buttons.

As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims
about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your
time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product
of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary
adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with
yourself, not with me.

Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof
of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in
due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the
torment of being stuck in your own web of lies.


Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for
so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK,
wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is
terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS
the fantasy that he is all those things.


At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at
the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was
somehow less-than-adequate.


No, Dudly. I have clearly stated several times that I think there is
nothing at all wrong with being a reservist. It may be different than
active duty, but is no less worthy of pride and honor. The problem is
that -you- don't feel that way. It is -you- that feels a reservist is
"less-than-adequate" and not worthy of the same respect as a Marine
who served on active duty. I just push that button and, as expected,
you thrash around in a defensive fit of grade-school name calling and
emotionally charged avoidance tactics. You really need to learn some
discipline, Dud.


Not to mention consistency in his lies and exaggerations. :-)


True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and
you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action
(and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did). The fact
remains that I served my time on active duty while you were a
reservist. Hmmmm...... you claim that your 6 years of EMT work was
part-time, and a reservist is really a part-time job too......


Dud hasn't got his ducks in a row...he needs that consistency
to be believable. He ain't got it.

Let's see now..... one weekend a month, that's 48 x 12 = 576 hours/yr.
Add to that 2 weeks a year, which is another 336 hours. So that's 912
hours/yr, times 16 years (18 years less boot camp and technical MOS
training, a very generous estimate) which is 14,592 hours. Now that
converts to 608 days, or 1.665 years. So for all practical purposes,
after 2 years of boot camp and MOS training you served the active duty
equivalent of slightly more than 1-1/2 years, for a grand total of
3-1/2 years, which is -LESS- than my 4 year cruise.

Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!!


He can kiss mine, too...four years active in Army. He can
kiss my "toilet seat" too (Presidential Unit Citation,
awarded to my Battalion twice). Poor guy tried to say
that was "impossible" that it "couldn't have been so."
Not only were those in my official documentation but in
a Signal Corps photograph with the mimeographed data on
the back of the photo. Mimeograph went out years ago in
the military and is terribly hard to forge now, especially
on photographs' backs.

We have two more toilet seats here but I wouldn't want him
to kiss them...he might dirty them up with infection. Why
waste Clorox?

snip

Your charade is getting really old, Dudly.


Frank, it was OLD when Dud began it seven years ago...


So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT
proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to
another Lenniesque blustery diatribe?


Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the
magnifying glass a little later.


Poor Dudly. I stood up against him long ago and he hasn't
forgotten the anger he felt at being trumped. I said in
public that Dudly was doing the Big Lie technique worth of
Goebbels' propaganda efforts of the 1930s in Germany. Dud
then tried to "turn it around" and equate me to Goebbels
for continuing to challenge him for proof of his "service."
In seven years Dud hasn't come around with ANY referencible
proof of all his "warrior" claims. Tsk, tsk.

Dudly uses "Lenniesque" to describe anyone who stands up to
him and challenges him to provide PROOF. Since he can't do
that, he resorts to the Personal Insult schtick in order to
misdirect the subject thread. Very, very old.

Frank, you are on the right track with old Dud HATING
HIMSELF. To avoid that he looks at all his challengers
seeing himself in his mind's mirror and calls them bad
things. Whenever he does this Personal Insult thing he
is really insulting himself. But, his mind is so mixed
up that he doesn't realize what he does.


Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ


MAJOR DUD.

Frank, you called it in a previous message. Excellent. :-)




Frank Gilliland November 16th 05 05:07 AM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 
On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in
.com:

From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39

On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in


etc

snip

PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992)
that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as
an EMT...JUST ONE.


Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were-
allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It
would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time.


Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly
was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time!



True story. Now that you mentioned it, I think even a RESERVIST would
know the difference between Military Police and Shore Patrol. Dudly
has proven that he doesn't. But then again, one weekend each month
doing bends-&-thrusts doesn't build much of a knowledge base, nor does
it reinforce what little he was taught 30 years ago while standing on
the yellow footsteps.


snip
So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and
that's "wrong"...


In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in
dressing up like a clown.


Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-)



I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you
will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common
thread should become glaringly apparent:

1) His 'career' in the USMC;
2) His marital dysfunctions;
3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing;
4) His interest in CAP and YAF;
5) His frequent fits of transference;
6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles.

How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA?


snip
I've proven you to be a liar.


If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old
trick of personal insulting in order to win message points.



Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave?


What more could I ask for...?!?!


A better education.


I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling.
He needs it.



Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling,
and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that
reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking.


You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to
-my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you
would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups
throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies,
and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and
integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even
when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline
(let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you-
describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that
is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your
tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and
you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your
claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your-
standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a
Marine Gunny.

Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud.


Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It
sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in,
could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts,
unable to reconcile his desires with reality.



He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has
been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose
the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his
"retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged
for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I
might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell"
policy.....


snip
Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for
so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK,
wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is
terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS
the fantasy that he is all those things.



Uniforms impress young boys.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

an old friend November 16th 05 03:45 PM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in
.com:

From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39

On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in

cut

snip
So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and
that's "wrong"...

In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in
dressing up like a clown.


Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-)



I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you
will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common
thread should become glaringly apparent:

1) His 'career' in the USMC;
2) His marital dysfunctions;
3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing;
4) His interest in CAP and YAF;
5) His frequent fits of transference;
6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles.

How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA?


did gacy hang out a the Y (never had a reason to be that familier with
the case)


snip
I've proven you to be a liar.

If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old
trick of personal insulting in order to win message points.



Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave?


Stevie thinks he is


What more could I ask for...?!?!

A better education.


I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling.
He needs it.



Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling,
and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that
reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking.


i doubt he get thrapy that would mean admiting to himself he has a
problem, and he can't admit it when he is mistaken about the facts
..

Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud.


Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It
sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in,
could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts,
unable to reconcile his desires with reality.



He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has
been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose
the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his
"retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged
for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I
might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell"
policy.....


interesting that you say this?

You have proof? You intend to present such at some point?

for myself, Id like to see you get on with it, would make my life
easier to if that maggot get exposed


snip
Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for
so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK,
wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is
terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS
the fantasy that he is all those things.



Uniforms impress young boys.

yes they do


Frank Gilliland November 16th 05 04:24 PM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 
On 16 Nov 2005 07:45:48 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

snip
did gacy hang out a the Y (never had a reason to be that familier with
the case)



google "John Wayne Gacy"


snip
You have proof? You intend to present such at some point?



No proof that can be posted. It's info that recently came back to me
through the grapevine after I sent out a frost call about Dudly a few
months ago.


for myself, Id like to see you get on with it, would make my life
easier to if that maggot get exposed



In due time. In the meantime, just sit back and enjoy watching Dudly
squirm for a while. Right now he has chosen to ignoring me, but he
can't do that for very long without industrial-strength blood pressure
medication -- wait and see what happens when his supply runs out!








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[email protected] November 17th 05 02:01 AM

Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
 
From: Frank Gilliland on Nov 15, 9:07 pm

On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in
From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in


etc


Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly
was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time!


True story. Now that you mentioned it, I think even a RESERVIST would
know the difference between Military Police and Shore Patrol. Dudly
has proven that he doesn't. But then again, one weekend each month
doing bends-&-thrusts doesn't build much of a knowledge base, nor does
it reinforce what little he was taught 30 years ago while standing on
the yellow footsteps.


Surprising on his lack of attention. Even a long-ago Army person
would know the difference between MP and SP...and AP. :-)

AP is Air Police to the non-serving veterans of the Code War. :-)



I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you
will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common
thread should become glaringly apparent:

1) His 'career' in the USMC;
2) His marital dysfunctions;
3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing;
4) His interest in CAP and YAF;
5) His frequent fits of transference;
6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles.

How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA?


All bets off on that! :-)

Frank, put that way, it should be glaringly obvious to all readers.



I've proven you to be a liar.


If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's
the failure to teach critical thinking skills.


Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old
trick of personal insulting in order to win message points.


Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave?


Davie Heil, der UberOberst uf das Amatur Schutzstaffel?!?

BWAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!

Davie be Der Obliterator, busy busy with his biggest, blackest
Sanford Sharpie trying to STRIKE OUT any contrary opinions to
his lofty opinions...from his vast experience in the embassies'
of mid-Africa "synchronizing" his RTTY machines using morse
code. [see long discourses on his adventures in Guinea-Bisseau
keeping a close watch on nasty commies in neighboring countries]


I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling.
He needs it.


Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling,
and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that
reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking.


I was thinking of modern medications, new jacket tailoring,
and a padded apartment for "mental counseling"... :-)


Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It
sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in,
could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts,
unable to reconcile his desires with reality.


He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has
been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose
the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his
"retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged
for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I
might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell"
policy.....


Hmmm...that's rather cryptic...but it seems to fit.

The homosexuality angle might be there but it's difficult to
tell. Down here in the movie capital of the world, one in
five in the entertainment biz are homosexual (came out in two
separate Los Angeles Times feature articles...never a secret
down here). I know several socially and it is NOT always
easy to tell their gender-preference orientation just by
meeting-talking with them. Others are overt about it.

Note the "one in five" ratio. Coincidentally, the membership
of the ARRL is also "one in five" amateur licensees! :-)

Watch the response of the Believers in here and their OUTRAGE
vented at my two sentences just above. There are connections
and then there are connections. This group isn't in the James
Burke "Connections" TV show class.


Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for
so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK,
wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is
terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS
the fantasy that he is all those things.


Uniforms impress young boys.


...and there's a lot of the "young boy" inside Dudly.




K4YZ November 17th 05 02:40 AM

More Frankie of Silliland (FoS) Mistruths
 

Frankie of Silliland intentionally lied when he wrote:

He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist.


Nope. Active Duty, save for the Delayed Entry Program.

We all know he has
been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose
the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his
"retirement".


Nope.

But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged
for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I
might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell"
policy.....


Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Uniforms impress young boys.


It impressed you.

Too bad it didn't impress you enough to honor your commitment and
stay out of trouble for ONE enlistment, Frankie.

Steve, K4YZ


[email protected] December 4th 05 04:31 PM

More Frankie of Silliland (FoS) Mistruths
 

K4YZ wrote:
Frankie of Silliland intentionally lied when he wrote:

He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist.


Nope. Active Duty, save for the Delayed Entry Program.


Is your delayed entry period on your DD Form 214? I mean, would it be
on there if you had one?

We all know he has
been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose
the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his
"retirement".


Nope.


Yup.

But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged
for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I
might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell"
policy.....


Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.


He might have been able to have a full career.

Uniforms impress young boys.


It impressed you.


Your flight-suit photo impresses no one.

Too bad it didn't impress you enough to honor your commitment and
stay out of trouble for ONE enlistment, Frankie.

Steve, K4YZ


Does your nurse uniform impress you enough to honor your oath and stay
out of medical trouble? Or does your oath encourage you to shoot your
mouth off and give medical advice on rrap?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com