![]() |
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP) what you going on about? For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK. And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP) You have never disclosed your reservist status reservist? Stevie boy is reservist? Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry" prior to going active in September 1974. It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed liar, Mark. I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of 1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I was interested in doing. BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW in 1990 for a second event... That EMT training came in handy! Also, in the late '80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in 1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech. Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...) be a problem? Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville, Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing something illegal? Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?! The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist. How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits? "Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on Marines who did exactly those things.... Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? All this information is publically available from what -you- have written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto). Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which means "Prepared and Vigilant". Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Nor does it explain your interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe and a hero-wannabe. I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do" sentiments that Lennie and Brain do... Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of "uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?! There's plenty more information that is publically available about you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!! So far, you've not "proven" a single thing. Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?! Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, want' it...?!?! BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you took those vows before God? "marriage" I didn't tell you? He also dodges following up on all of the references I have posted. See above. I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it causing even "collateral damage". That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of crow. Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have more than that He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification, nothing. Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills. Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a calculator. That's all I need to prove that you are a liar. Uhhhhh....How's that? So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. What part of MCO's were therein violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was "island wide". Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you sure earned the opportunity here today! Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they do their active duty components. This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and USMC policy. I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times. So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces... And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism is ludicrous and assinine. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP) what you going on about? For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK. And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP) You have never disclosed your reservist status reservist? Stevie boy is reservist? Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry" prior to going active in September 1974. It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed liar, Mark. I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged. In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Where you were stationed at Camp .....? Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of 1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I was interested in doing. Uh-huh. BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW in 1990 for a second event... That EMT training came in handy! Dudly the hero!!! Also, in the late '80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in 1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech. Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...) be a problem? See above, moonlighting. Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville, Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing something illegal? Some were. Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?! Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems. Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence. As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps, and I don't think -any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a candy-striper..... The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist. How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits? Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations. "Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on Marines who did exactly those things.... Name one. Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going to fall down and puke. All this information is publically available from what -you- have written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto). Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which means "Prepared and Vigilant". You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example: =========== ......[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed (as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for helping to save my life." Some occupation, huh?! Semper Paratus Steve Robeson, LPN Chattanooga, TN ============ You even explained why you used it: "If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as charged." And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a praise-seeking hero wannabe. Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Did I say it was illegal? Nor does it explain your interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe and a hero-wannabe. I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do" sentiments that Lennie and Brain do... Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles -your- horse. Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of "uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?! If the shower-shoe fits. There's plenty more information that is publically available about you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!! So far, you've not "proven" a single thing. And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say. Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?! So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the argument against you even stronger. Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, want' it...?!?! Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop? BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you took those vows before God? "marriage" Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh? I didn't tell you? Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your marrIAge? He also dodges following up on all of the references I have posted. See above. I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it causing even "collateral damage". Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend? That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of crow. Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have more than that He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification, nothing. Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills. Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a calculator. Once again, you're the expert. That's all I need to prove that you are a liar. Uhhhhh....How's that? So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits", Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference. What part of MCO's were therein violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was "island wide". That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake. Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine (and probably known by active duty members of the other services as well). Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig your hole. Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you sure earned the opportunity here today! Grow up, "Major". Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they do their active duty components. Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's your point? This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and USMC policy. Where did I say anything different? I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times. Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims.... So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces... That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist, didn't have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. And active duty Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist. Too bad you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine. And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism is ludicrous and assinine. I have nothing against reservists. I -do- take issue with reservists who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't. It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire Marine "career" as a reservist. What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be someone you're not? It works for me. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
K4YZ wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in ps.com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP) what you going on about? For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK. And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP) You have never disclosed your reservist status reservist? Stevie boy is reservist? Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry" prior to going active in September 1974. It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed liar, Mark. I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of 1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I was interested in doing. BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW in 1990 for a second event... That EMT training came in handy! Also, in the late '80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in 1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech. Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...) be a problem? Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville, Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing something illegal? Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?! The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist. How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits? "Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on Marines who did exactly those things.... Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? All this information is publically available from what -you- have written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto). Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which means "Prepared and Vigilant". Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Nor does it explain your interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe and a hero-wannabe. I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do" sentiments that Lennie and Brain do... Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of "uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?! There's plenty more information that is publically available about you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!! So far, you've not "proven" a single thing. Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?! Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, want' it...?!?! BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you took those vows before God? "marriage" I didn't tell you? He also dodges following up on all of the references I have posted. See above. I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it causing even "collateral damage". That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of crow. Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have more than that He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification, nothing. Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills. Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a calculator. That's all I need to prove that you are a liar. Uhhhhh....How's that? So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. What part of MCO's were therein violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was "island wide". Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you sure earned the opportunity here today! Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they do their active duty components. This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and USMC policy. I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times. So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces... And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism is ludicrous and assinine. I'd imagine that Frank and Leonard are feeling rather stupid about now. Dave K8MN |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. I can't yet figure your motivation but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. Dave K8MN |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP) what you going on about? For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK. And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP) You have never disclosed your reservist status reservist? Stevie boy is reservist? Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry" prior to going active in September 1974. It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed liar, Mark. I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back thisup He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. And substantiation of my assertion that you're a liar follows: Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged...(SNIP) Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?! In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. Of course I knew it. And I had the Commanding Officer's approval chit for off duty employment as was required by Marine Aircraft Group 16 policy at the time. And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. Sorry, SilliOne...Delayed entry WAS considered "reserve" time. But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Where you were stationed at Camp .....? There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie. Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of 1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I was interested in doing. Uh-huh. Yep. BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW in 1990 for a second event... That EMT training came in handy! Dudly the hero!!! Nope. Just did the right thing at the right time. Also, in the late '80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in 1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech. Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...) be a problem? See above, moonlighting. And AGAIN you waffle on the question at hand... You make some suggestive comments yet don't answer the questions. Why? PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992) that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as an EMT...JUST ONE. Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville, Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing something illegal? Some were. And HOW MANY of those were EMT's...?!?! I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks and ambulances. Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?! Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems. No kidding, eh...?!?! So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I can't make it in..."...?!?! Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence. As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP) Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER those two courts martials, eh...?!?! (UNSNIP)...and I don't think -any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a candy-striper..... Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter at your ignorance and arrogance~! The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist. How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits? Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations. You have it turned around again, AS USUAL, Cowardly One. "Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on Marines who did exactly those things.... Name one. Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for what you are.... Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going to fall down and puke. No... That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140 hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical duties.. All this information is publically available from what -you- have written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto). Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which means "Prepared and Vigilant". You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example: =========== .....[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed (as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for helping to save my life." Some occupation, huh?! Semper Paratus Steve Robeson, LPN Chattanooga, TN ============ You even explained why you used it: "If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as charged." And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a praise-seeking hero wannabe. So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and that's "wrong"... Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut and having been twice court martialed, and that's OK...?!?! BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Did I say it was illegal? You obviously have a problem with it... Nor does it explain your interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe and a hero-wannabe. I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do" sentiments that Lennie and Brain do... Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles -your- horse. I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie. And as for the rest, I can see how a busted-back-to-boot-camp PFC would have a "problem" with a Marine who DID make it to Gunnery Sergeant and did so without so much as a single Article 15.... Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of "uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?! If the shower-shoe fits. And I think we have the correct shoe on you, Frankie... There's plenty more information that is publically available about you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!! So far, you've not "proven" a single thing. And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say. I've proven you to be a liar. What more could I ask for...?!?! Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?! So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the argument against you even stronger. No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't "straight-up" answer the question. Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of their USMC duties...?!?! EVER? "Go soak your head" is the BEST you can come up with, Frankie? Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop? You took one from being a Marine. Twice. Your point? BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you took those vows before God? "marriage" Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh? I didn't tell you? Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your marrIAge? Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my USMC career? Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?! He also dodges following up on all of the references I have posted. See above. I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it causing even "collateral damage". Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend? And who is YOURS? Or Lennie's? Or Brain or Markie's? I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging insult" phase... That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of crow. Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would makea lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have more than that He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification, nothing. Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills. Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a calculator. Once again, you're the expert. Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness the following: That's all I need to prove that you are a liar. Uhhhhh....How's that? So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits", Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference. I did? W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?! Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! ! I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K... What part of MCO's were therein violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was "island wide". That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake. I did...very thoughtfully...The ONLY "barracks restriction" I was ever "on" was during island wide restrictions for Typhoon Condition 1A. Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine (and probably known by active duty members of the other services as well). Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines... Can YOU say the same thing...?!?! Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig your hole. How's that? So far, you're the one in "negative numbers", Frankie... Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you sure earned the opportunity here today! Grow up, "Major". I'm doing just fine. But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by facts, Frankie. Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they do their active duty components. Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's your point? The POINT is that YOU seem to express duty as a Reservist as a negativism. This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and USMC policy. Where did I say anything different? At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was somehow less-than-adequate. I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times. Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims.... It doesn't matter what "weight" you give it, Frankie... You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the Marines. So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces... That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist...(SNIP) Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie. (UNSNIP)...didn't have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. Andactive duty Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist...(SNIP) Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie. Too bad you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine. Three in a row. And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism is ludicrous and assinine. I have nothing against reservists...(SNIP) Your words in this forum demonstrate otherwise. (That's four) (UNSNIP)...I -do- take issue with reservists who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't. Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum. It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire Marine "career" as a reservist. Five What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be someone you're not? It works for me. Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials prove it. So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to another Lenniesque blustery diatribe? Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
K4YZ wrote: That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP) Excuse me...that was "12"..... Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in . net: Frank Gilliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the -right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my accomplishments. I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use. What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning tactics I can only laugh. Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you -any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a ****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 06:07:15 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
.com: K4YZ wrote: That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP) Excuse me...that was "12"..... Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ You were saying something about needing a calculator....? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in s.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland cut He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged. so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not some against the regs and some not I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. breaking out for coment And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. cuting to move on to rest of Stevie **** _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:19:35 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frank Gilliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. don't you know Dave and Stevei are qualified to read minds and they have determined by reading from your id that you have another motivation the powers of the MMM are covered in the sercret protocols of the Elders of Morsemen but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the -right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my accomplishments. I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use. What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning tactics I can only laugh. Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you -any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a ****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frank Gilliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! There isn't any "Dudly" and I didn't attempt any rescue. I made comments. Steve provided an explanation for all of your sinister imaginings. I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. I know of no statement of motivation issued by you. but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). Two courts martial show me that "I wasn't exactly the model Marine" may not be an appropriate phrase. I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. There are oodles of folks who are proud of records which others would find to be less than stellar. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. So far, we have you guessing and making accusations. There is no "Dudly". So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. Is that how your value system works? You think that I never got caught doing something wrong? The fact is, I never did anything which could nail me with Article 15 punishment, much less get me court martialed. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). I didn't write that I've never done anything wrong. I wrote that I'd not done anything which could result in Article 15 punishment or a court martial. Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. We're different. I try not to find myself in situations where I have to overcome something caused by me. Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on active duty. I was never a reservist and I didn't blindly follow orders. There isn't any "Dudly". Can you find it in yourself to use the man's name? Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the -right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my accomplishments. So both of your courts martial are cases in which you were only trying to do the right thing? I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use. There isn't any "Dudly". That is your attempt at denigrating someone who wasn't court martialed. His name is Steve. What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that fact. Both of your courts martial were overturned? So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning tactics I can only laugh. You blew in here touting the wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio newsgroup, started a game of "I'll bet he never...." in regards to Steve and you don't expect to be demeaned? I guess you'll have to get used to it. Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you -any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a ****bird PFC? You should regroup, rethink your motives and gather some facts if you think Steve, not "Dudly" has manufactured anything about his record. If you can provide proof and feel the need to do so, post it. Otherwise your rants have no meaning, especially here. If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it. Well, there's one man's view. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy. I was Air Force. I don't row. My dad was Navy though--a Normandy Invasion vet. He always told me that the reason there were two sailors on each landing craft was that one piloted the craft and the other was to chase the Marines down the ramp and onto the beach. My experience with Marines has been with those on MSG duty. When the Gunny would come to the Comm center for message traffic, I'd provide it and even read it to him if necessary. Dave K8MN |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a few degrees closer to boiling than mine..... I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. No, you've not. but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination. Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good" Marines. I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. You should be...you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may have been in your MOS. And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. What fudging? So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. What you MEAN is that you were completely incapable of operating within the "value system" of what it was to be a Marine, but now you try some boohoo about how more challenging it was for you. Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. I questioned orders on numerous occasions. But that's part of that "value system"...Knowing how to work within the system. You were stupid. Twice. Now that's fine for a reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. And again an out-and-out misrepresentation of the character of service of the Reserve Forces of the United States... What part of what the Reserves are doing today is any less challenging than what the active duty guys are doing? Indeed...they have it harder...Taken from homes and 'real jobs' to fight in the desert. It's easy to blindly follow orders. And it's even easier to make up silly stories like yours. But that isn't always the case on active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the -right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my accomplishments. I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use. What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning tactics I can only laugh. All you've done is make a laughing stock out of your "arguments" here, Frankie... You were incompetent as a Marine. You are where incompetent Marines SHOULD be...in civilian life with two courts martials to live with. Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you -any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if you can't understand it, tough ####. Frankie trying to soft-soap Dave since just last night he was telling "everyone" that "no one" here was "on my side". That having now been proven false, Frankie tries his own version of "spin". But do you really feel the need to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a ####bird PFC? A liar's a liar, Frankie...You're a very determined one, but a liar none the less. If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it. Ahhhhhhh...Just like President Nixon's "Silent Majority" trick, Frankie...?!?! If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy. So here we have it, folks... Frankie "comes over" from the CB NG for no other purpose than to take up for Markie and Company against a former Marine since he knows just enough of "the lingo" to sound impressive. It's OK for "them" to go 5-to-1 on me. He is, however, a twice disgraced loser who didn't have the dignity or strength of character to get through ONE tour of duty without being court martialed TWICE. He is "all about" teaming up with Lennie, Markie, etc, but let someone say something in MY support and they are "defending" me, as if words of support for me were verbal herpes. I wonder what it is about Dave saying something that makes Frankie worry about the possible odds now being 5:2 instead of 5:1...?!?! More substantiation of my claim that he's a coward. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? nobdoy does that was just Dave And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a few degrees closer to boiling than mine..... really? I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. No, you've not. that si the problem you can't read plain english or distored english or any other kind but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination. wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good" Marines. and who appointed you judge? I thought you were an LPN I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. You should be. back you Stvie trying to tell everybody how to live and that if they ever slipped up they were forever worthless Boring Stevie but exactly the sort of **** we all expect from you ..you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may have been in your MOS. And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know. sounds like he does KNOW And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. What fudging? yours So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. What you MEAN is that you were completely incapable of operating within the "value system" of what it was to be a Marine, but now you try some boohoo about how more challenging it was for you. more lies Stevie he does mean he was unable to live witjhing your value system but that thank the goods is requred of no one Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. I questioned orders on numerous occasions. But that's part of that "value system"...Knowing how to work within the system. You were stupid. read enough of Stevie **** flushing the rest _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 09:52:29 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, wrote in s.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland cut He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged. so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not some against the regs and some not This is but one of Frankie's sillier suggestions...that having a part time job/pursuit is somehow "evidence" of having NOT done the things I claim... more evasion Stevie you are ducking the issue as usual if you were presueing something on the side say so, don't go about how moonlighting is discouraged deal with the issue but then you can't deal with issues it seems I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army Not so in the Marine Corps. I had to sign a statement that stated my USMC duties must never be compromised, and I was given a very short list of "no no's" for part time work...Law enforcement, any "job" which was in conravention to any local, state or federal law, and partisan politics wherein my status as a member of the Armed Forces may lend the appearence of that branch having any preference for any political party or candidate. admitng that Franks is correct in his base charge BTW so much for strongly discouraged Took all of a day to walk the chit (A Naval term for a "permission slip...Not an abbreviation for excrement) through. No big deal. In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. breaking out for coment And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that Your buddy Frankie is the one short on facts here, Markie... nope For two days now he's been insinuating that having a part time job is "evidence" that I was not on active duty and was "nothing more" than a reservist. it is eveidence, not convincing in and off itself I agree but it is eveidence when combined with your erros in equipment and such it starts to add up How assinine. But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. cuting to move on to rest of Stevie #### "cutting" Ahhhhhhhh...So providing even MORE references is #### now, eh, Markie??? no but all you were proiving to that point was **** so it is reasonable to assume the rest was **** Seems you don't LIKE facts, now do you...?!?! wrong again I just wish you proivde som Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? nobdoy does that was just Dave "nobody" "just Dave". So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?! yes I am THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS! glad you enjoyed it Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your "circle"? no thanks but Dave is a nobody as are you anybody that is such lying hypocrite as you 2 ceratinly qualifies as nobody in my book On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing but glowing terms.... so? he advocates poor ham practice by his own words And as for the temperature of the water, I'd say your feet are a few degrees closer to boiling than mine..... really? Really. I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. No, you've not. that si the problem you can't read plain english "is" "English". or distored english or any other kind "distorted" "English" Sheeeeeeeeesh. but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination. wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie Sure it is! nope We Frankie's ADMISSIONS that he was COURT MARTIALED not once, but TWICE! so what? That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court, Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record. so? Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good" Marines. and who appointed you judge? Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant. another lie they did not appoint you judge I thought you were an LPN I am. for now at least I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. You should be. back you Stvie trying to tell everybody how to live and that if they ever slipped up they were forever worthless Where did I say Frankie was "forever worthless"...?!?! plenty of times I said he has a lot of room where it comes to him being "proud" of what he did in the Marines... Boring Stevie but exactly the sort of #### we all expect from you Coming from YOU, "Colonel", that's a compliment. ..you were incompetent as a Marine...Competency as a Marine does not limit itself to how skilled or knowledgeable you may have been in your MOS. And HAD you been a "good Marine", you'd know. sounds like he does KNOW No, it does not. His courts martials prove otherwise. bull**** And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. What fudging? yours I ask again, WHAT fudging? yours the whole fabric of your stech of vague claims with no back up they make it possible to reasonable doubt you even went to boot camp exceeding **** tolerance flcuhing the rest _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 09:52:29 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:22 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 -0800, wrote in s.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland cut He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech.It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowedto keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged. so? a lot of things are strongly discouraged, some ilgeal some not some against the regs and some not This is but one of Frankie's sillier suggestions...that having a part time job/pursuit is somehow "evidence" of having NOT done the things I claim... more evasion Stevie you are ducking the issue as usual There's no "issue" here, twitless. Frankie claimed my part time job was "evidence" that I was not an active duty Marine. That was ludicrous on the face of it...However HIS refusal to cite even one MCO of the period that said "you can't be an EMT while you're in the Marine Corps" pretty well proves MY assertion that he's full of your "bovine excrement"... if you were presueing something on the side say so, don't go about how moonlighting is discouraged (1) I already stated, YEARS AGO, that I worked part time as an EMT in an ER... (2) I am not the one going on about "moonlighting" being "discouraged"...That's in your's and Frankie's ballpark! I already stated that I complied with Group Orders for off duty employment. deal with the issue I did. but then you can't deal with issues it seems Sure I did. I know it is legal to "moonlight" in the army it take a slain forest of paperwork to do but so does almost evrything in the army Right there you admit that moonlighting is acceptable, then I went on to say....: Not so in the Marine Corps. I had to sign a statement that stated my USMC duties must never be compromised, and I was given a very short list of "no no's" for part time work...Law enforcement, any "job" which was in conravention to any local, state or federal law, and partisan politics wherein my status as a member of the Armed Forces may lend the appearence of that branch having any preference for any political party or candidate. Issue "dealt with". admitng that Franks is correct in his base charge "admitting" "Frank" No, I did nothing of the sort. Frankie claimed that by having "admitted" to being an EMT I was somehow "proving" that I was "only" a reservist. Nothing of the sort is even remotely factual. BTW so much for strongly discouraged It was NOT "strongly discouraged" when I was on active duty, except, as previously noted, where it conflicted with official duties. I already addressed that. Took all of a day to walk the chit (A Naval term for a "permission slip...Not an abbreviation for excrement) through. No big deal. In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. breaking out for coment And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. Frank dudly does not bother with facts you know that Your buddy Frankie is the one short on facts here, Markie... nope Yep. Like his "facts" about how my working part time as an ER tech "proved" that I was "only" a reservist. For two days now he's been insinuating that having a part time job is "evidence" that I was not on active duty and was "nothing more" than a reservist. it is eveidence, not convincing in and off itself I agree but it is eveidence when combined with your erros in equipment and such it starts to add up "evidence" "of" "evidence [again]" "errors" No, it's nothing of the kind. And what "equipment" errors? You and Toiddie are the only one in this forum with "equipment errors". How assinine. But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. cuting to move on to rest of Stevie #### "cutting" Ahhhhhhhh...So providing even MORE references is #### now, eh, Markie??? no but all you were proiving to that point was #### so it is reasonable to assume the rest was #### "proving" It was nothing of the kind. And you broke your own "don't assume" rule...And it bit you. Seems you don't LIKE facts, now do you...?!?! wrong again I just wish you proivde som "provide" "some" I have. And as I have said before...Just because you can't/won't acccept them does not negate them as such. Steve, K4YZ |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
From: Frank Gilliland on Wed 2 Nov 2005 08:19
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote Frank Gilliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! It's the on-going Pro-Code-Test-Advocate Morsemen alliance working hard with the PCTA Double Standard. :-) Davie KNOWS things. He worked in the Department of State! He served IN a country at WAR! [busy doing MARS at Tan Son Nhut] I can't yet figure your motivation I don't know why -- I've clearly stated my "motivation" several times in plain English. Irrelevant, Frank. Davie DEMANDS MOTIVATION (when he runs out of valid/coherent replies). Davie DEMANDED that I "should" have gotten an amateur radio license BEFORE EVER getting into professional radio. Implied that it was the proper thing to do...no doubt showing MOTIVATION to HIM. Tsk, the U.S. Army didn't know that... but you've admitted being a screw up in the military. It looks as if you're out to smear the service of others for whatever reason. Most of us who served managed to get through a hitch without an Article 15, much less a court martial. One more time, Dave: I wasn't exactly the 'model Marine', but I did my service and I did it well (despite Dudly's imagined version of the facts as recorded in my SRB). I am no less proud of my service than any other Marine. And like any other Marine, I find it reprehensible when someone like Dudly makes false claims about his "career", fudging the truth in order to get a little more praise. Frank, I've NO problems with your pride and espirit d'corps about the USMC. It shows. It also shows you have no qualms about stating what you did without embellishments, embroidery, or exaggeration. You are telling it like it is. Davie and Dudly sin by omission, leaving out the details of their exploits. Davie was HIGHLY CRITICAL of MY service in the Army, of NOT being "at war" or even IN a country at war. When I voluntarily enlisted on 13 Mar 52, there was a very hot war going on in Korea. The Army didn't send me there directly, stationed me in Tokyo beginning in early February, 1953, a sort-of cease fire then in Korea. The formal Truce period began in July, 1953. [that "Truce" period has NOT ended...technically, a state of war still exists with North Korea 52 years later] Why is Davie so critical? Tsk, a long time ago in here I mentioned being assigned to work at the (then) 3rd largest Army radio station in ACAN (the worldwide Army Command and Administrative Network...later called "StarCom" and then Defense Communications System). HF radio. HF was the old mainstay of long-distance message traffic in the military. Three dozen transmitters on HF with power outputs of 1 KW to 40 KW, operating 24/7. [Dave said "you never worked 24/7" but we did...all over the Pacific] Thing was that this 3rd largest station was far bigger than ANY State Department foreign station of any time in State's existance and even helped carry State message traffic on some of the circuits. Davie said "you don't know anything about what State Department does!" but I did...as did everyone who was INTO the ACAN and DID carry some of their message load] Davie got on a toot, adjusted his truss, and couldn't stop condemning me in here ever since. Doesn't matter what the subject is, Davie is so damn critical of being "opposed" in anything he says that he does the "revenge" bit all the time now. He is a MORSEMAN and, according to him, NO radio amateur shows "motivation" unless they love, honor, and obey morsemanship. So you never got caught doing anything wrong. Hooray for you. Something to be proud of, I suppose. However, I have a slightly different value system. I don't rest my laurels on never having done anything wrong (which I don't think anyone can honesty claim). Instead, I list my accomplishments by the challenges I have faced and overcome, whether they were caused by my own actions or by circumstances beyond my control. And believe me, I have done both. That's the way it is in the military. One seldom gets a "choice" on what to do. Follow orders, etc. Davie worked for the Department of State. "Following orders," then Secretary of State Colin Powell (under President Bush the 2nd] told the world that "Saddam Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction" thereby "justifying a war" in Iraq. [Powell had been Chief of Staff of the military under President Bush the 1st] Over 2000 service personnel killed since, absolutely NO "weapons of mass destruction" have been found in Iraq. Has the Department of State taken back Powell's public statement? No. Has Davie ever taken back a single personal insult thrown at others (many have been thrown)? No. "Lessons learned?" Maybe. Dudly said it himself: It's easy to get through the military without so much as an Article 15 -- just follow orders. Now that's fine for a reservist, where the orders given aren't much of a challenge. It's easy to blindly follow orders. But that isn't always the case on active duty. Maybe you forgot Abu Graib, or that incident where the soldiers refused to make an unnecessary supply run without sufficient armor..... or even the Iran-Contra scandal. When the orders are wrong or illegal, as happens from time to time, it's -not- easy to do the -right- thing and challenge authority. I consider that to be one of my accomplishments. Good on you, Frank. Davie won't let up on you, though. You see, he was IN a country at war (busy killing commies with his MARS code key?) and knows ALL about following orders. [the Vietnam War ended 30 years ago] We all have to follow DAVIE's "orders." Especially the one on MOTIVATION. The best Dudly the Imposter has come up with is "he was in 'seven hostile actions'!" Dud has NEVER said the WHEN or WHERE of those infamous "seven hostile actions." We must all honor and praise Dud for his valor and heroism or forever be recipients of emotional exaggerated personal insults. I also consider it an accomplishment to have fulfilled my military obligation after two courts-martial and the constant denigration from others that resulted from them, a tactic that Dudly is trying to use. What Dudly doesn't realize is that he can say nothing that I haven't heard before and overcome. I proved them wrong and I'm proud of that fact. So when Dudly (and now yourself) try to use the same demeaning tactics I can only laugh. Dudly doesn't understand that because his mindset works in some strange personal fantasy via his computer. He lives by exaggerated emotional phrases (most praising himself) and trying to do a snow job (badly) on others about his "accomplishments." Davie is probably just looking for a word fight with his perceived "enemies." He is of a control-freak kind and does NOT like ANYONE telling him "no" or what to do. He MUST "win" these word fights and be "in the right." Dave, I have no beef with you. I didn't feel it necessary to give you -any- sort of explanation but I did anyway. If it wasn't enough, or if you can't understand it, tough ****. But do you really feel the need to defend Dudly -- a retired Marine Gunny, a CAP Major, a TN State Guardsman, and a veteran of seven hostile actions -- against me, a ****bird PFC? If you do then you are only hurting Dudly's case, not helping it. If you are going to stick up for Dudly, fine. As far as I'm concerned, you two love-birds can row your boat out into the wash together and do whatever it is that makes you two happy. I suggest they both go see the premiere of the new film "Jarhead" (as a couple). They can both get some emotional espirit d'corps. Dudly can use the film's fiction for better embroidery of his "hostile actions." Davie can get the emotional thrill of doing battle "in-country" that ended over three decades ago. That will get them all fired up to throw more hissy fits against other veterans of the U.S. military who don't agree with their personal opinions. |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? nobdoy does that was just Dave "nobody" "just Dave". So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?! yes I am That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious! glad you enjoyed it THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS! glad you enjoyed it On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you! either way gald you enjoyed it Please, Markie...provide us with some references to various Amateur Radio related discussions in Amateur Radio related journals that highlight you, Frankie, Brain, or any of the rest of your "circle"? no thanks Uhhhh..."no thanks" was the wrong answer. bull**** it was the right answer "Not able" was. but Dave is a nobody as are you Whelp...There you have it...Frankie AND Markie opting for the "stinging personal insult" in the face of no other options to persue! more lying by Stevie he must be very afarid these days with the way he goes on and on and on about things anybody that is such lying hypocrite as you 2 ceratinly qualifies as nobody in my book The problem for YOU is that you've proved NEITHER of those assertions! proved em both, to any one with any objectivity but that does let you out I know nor do I have to prove em to form the opinion it is also no problem ME at all On the OTHER hand, I can find quite a few articles in various publications over the last 10 years that mention Dave Heil in nothing but glowing terms.... so? he advocates poor ham practice by his own words No he doesn't. sure does we had that arguement before all you did was keeping claiming he did not over and over again not a spread of proof on your part of course pruning shear out again No, you did NOT "do it well", save perhaps in YOUR imagination. wether he did or did not is something YOU don't know Stevie Sure it is! nope Sure it is! To state otherwise is for YOU to call Frankie a liar! not a tall ctuing stevie repating himself That's the same as YOU getting hauled into General Sessions Court, Markie...And Frankie's probably lucky that the Armed Forces' practice is to just let idiots like him go at the end of their enlsitment rather than putting them in the brig...It's far chaper to do it taht way...And he now has two FEDERAL convictions on his record. so? I see criminal records are your favorite kind. another Stevie lie it is true I don't see having a criminal record as the end of the world or as something akin to treason Marines with TWO courts martials in one tour are NOT "good" Marines. and who appointed you judge? Four Commanding Offiers that effected my promotions to Private First Class through Sergeant, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps on my promotions to Staff Sergeant and Gunnery Sergeant. another lie they did not appoint you judge Sure they did. prove it stevie lie stevie get cut off and find his typing was wasted _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...ButCan't Get A Grip
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Well, while Davie and Dudly and all their their sock puppets are busy reminiscing about their Hollywood-forged military careers, I'm taking a few days to winterize the homestead. We are long overdue for a hard winter and I want to be ready. It's that "Semper Paratus" thing..... I'm not Davie and there is no Dudly. I've spoke very little about my military service. I didn't stay for a career. Perhaps you'd like to do a little guessing and see if I made the whole thing up, Frank. Maybe after you've winterized your home. Dave K8MN |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
From: Frank Gilliland on Nov 2, 4:43 pm
On 2 Nov 2005 14:18:20 -0800, wrote in . com: snip I suggest they both go see the premiere of the new film "Jarhead" (as a couple). They can both get some emotional espirit d'corps. Dudly can use the film's fiction for better embroidery of his "hostile actions." Davie can get the emotional thrill of doing battle "in-country" that ended over three decades ago. That will get them all fired up to throw more hissy fits against other veterans of the U.S. military who don't agree with their personal opinions. Well, while Davie and Dudly and all their their sock puppets are busy reminiscing about their Hollywood-forged military careers, I'm taking a few days to winterize the homestead. We are long overdue for a hard winter and I want to be ready. It's that "Semper Paratus" thing..... Gotcha, Frank. Have fun on the homestead work. Davie Heil don't wanna talk about his military daze. He wants to talk about "little johnsons." Tsk, tsk, and I thought he didn't get turned on by THAT. Takes all kinds! |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 2 Nov 2005 23:03:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? nobdoy does that was just Dave "nobody" "just Dave". So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?! yes I am That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious! glad you enjoyed it Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?! you did I said it was "hillarious". yes you did THAT'S FREAKIN' HILLARIOUS! glad you enjoyed it On, no, Markie...we're laughing AT you, not WITH you! either way gald you enjoyed it "glad" I didn't say I enjoyed it...I said it was hillarious. then you lied and Flush _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
|
Frankie of Silliland "Stretches" For Something To Hold On To...But Can't Get A Grip
On 3 Nov 2005 12:47:45 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 23:03:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 12:29:10 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 10:13:54 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 2 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:17:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in . net: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:43:18 GMT, Dave Heil wrote in t: snip I'd imagine No need to say any more -- that pretty much sums it up. It surely does. It pretty much sums up all of your imagining, guessing and assuming about what Steve has and hasn't done. Dudly gets himself in hot water and it's Dave to the rescue! So...Guess that "nobody here likes you" thing was WRONG, eh, Frankie? nobdoy does that was just Dave "nobody" "just Dave". So now YOU are calling Dave a "nobody"..?!?! yes I am That's DOUBLE freakin hillarious! glad you enjoyed it Who said I "enjoyed" it...?!?! you did I requoted EVERTYHING you did, Markie. NO WHERE in there did I say I "enjoyed" it. then you were lying and flush _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com: Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:04:36 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: Let's talk about standards, Dudly....(SNIP) what you going on about? For once you've gotten something VERY right, MARK. And let's take this "standard" thing a bit further....(HUGE SNIP) You have never disclosed your reservist status reservist? Stevie boy is reservist? Nope. Except, as I clearly noted, my 4 months as "Delayed Entry" prior to going active in September 1974. It was a wild stab in the dark by the disgraced, court martialed liar, Mark. I am not calling you a liar Frank but it would be nice to back this up He can't. Sure I can. No...You can make silly allegations (hence your nick-name of "Silliland") that are just pie-in-the-sky guesses. "Proof" would be some document that actually showed my reserve status above and beyond the Delayed Entry period... The problem for YOU is that nothing of the sort exists. Sure it does -- your own words. And substantiation of my assertion that you're a liar follows: Your DOD record confirms your service from '74 to '92 (yes, that's only 18 years, not 20 years as you claimed when you wrote, "I spent 20 years in the Marine Corps to give people the right to exercise their freedom of choice, and it hurts me to see so many people exercising their choice to be apathetic!"), but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve. It -does- confirm your MOS as an avionics tech. It -doesn't- indicate that you were in any medical field, in which case you would have been a Navy Corpsman, not a Marine Gunny. Uhhhh...Looking for that reg wherein US Marines are not allowed to keep personal pursuits while on active duty... If you were on active duty then you would know that moonlighting is -strongly- discouraged...(SNIP) Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?! Since when does it require an MCO for a superior officer to give a legal and lawful order to a subordinate? The granting of liberty is at the discretion of the unit's commanding officer. And liberty doesn't mean you are free to do as you please. If you come back from a 96 with a decent sunburn you can end up with NJP -- that very situation has happened more than once. "What MCO was violated?" That's the wrong question, Dud. The right question is, "What MCO grants a CO the authority to let his Marines take on obligations outside the Corps that could, and very possibly will, conflict with the obligations of the Corps?" The answer is.... There isn't one. In some units it's even prohibited by the commanding officer because the responsibilities of an outside job usually conflict with the responsibilities of the unit. But you didn't know that because you were never active duty; i.e, more proof from your own ignorant words. Of course I knew it. And I had the Commanding Officer's approval chit for off duty employment as was required by Marine Aircraft Group 16 policy at the time. Gee, and all this time you have refused to provide -any- details about your military "career". How silly of me to think that now, when confronted with an issue even more intrusive than a few lines from a DD-214, you would spit up some specific information. Gee, I need to reconsider my position regarding your credibility........LOL!!!! And you make reference as to what my "DOD" (properly DoD) record states per my MOS's, but you and I BOTH know that that same record shows nothing but active duty service (Delayed Entry notwithstanding...) Maybe you don't know -- your DOD (or DoD if you like) record doesn't specify. I mentioned that befo ".....but it doesn't distinguish between active or reserve." The reason is because military members frequently change from active to active reserve, to inactive reserve, to retired (in your dreams), etc, etc. The record states your total time, not how it was served. And BTW, your time in the delayed enlistment program isn't considered active -or- reserve (active -or- inactive). Read your contract if you don't believe me. Sorry, SilliOne...Delayed entry WAS considered "reserve" time. Not according to your DoD record. Check the dates yourself. But this conflicts with your 1998 claim that you were a "former 10 year+ EMT", which would make you an EMT -prior- to 1988, more than four years -before- you "retired" from the Corps. Uh huh. Six, actually. Thee are a LOT of Marines who are EMT's...Both as Crash-Rescue personnel on MCAS's and as "off duty" pursuits. My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Where you were stationed at Camp .....? There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie. MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......? Followed up by EMT-1A in Orange County CA in June of 1986. I also held National Registry (took that test at the hospital at MCB Camp Pendleton) It has/had nothing to do with my MOS...Just what I was interested in doing. Uh-huh. Yep. BTW...I received a CG's Certificate of Commendation in 1988 for life-saving from CG Third MAW, then another one from the CG First MAW in 1990 for a second event... That EMT training came in handy! Dudly the hero!!! Nope. Just did the right thing at the right time. Yeah, I know what you mean. When I visited Disneyland back in '82 I caught a kid who fell down a flight of stairs. It doesn't make me a hero, just the dope who happened to be there at the time. I've had a few things like that happen, as I'm sure a lot of people have. Anyone else would have done the same. In fact, most people who -have- been able to save life and limb by nature of circumstances consider their actions to have been a natural response. But most people don't define their lives and "careers" by such actions. That is, most -normal- and -mentally balanced- people. Also, in the late '80s, (before moving to Arkansas, home state of your second wife and your state of residence when you allegedly "retired" from the Corps in 1992), you worked in California as an ER tech at "Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA", which would be virtually impossible if you were also on active duty as an avionics tech. Uh....No...Why would having a part time job less than 10 miles from the base where I was stationed at (and 1.5 miles from where I lived...) be a problem? See above, moonlighting. And AGAIN you waffle on the question at hand... You make some suggestive comments yet don't answer the questions. Why? I -did- answer the question. You just couldn't understand the answer because you have never served on active duty. PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992) that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as an EMT...JUST ONE. Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were- allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time. Are all those Marines who work part-time jobs in Jacksonville, Oceanside, San Diego and other USMC-base associated cities doing something illegal? Some were. And HOW MANY of those were EMT's...?!?! Beats me. But I've never heard of an EMT that was also on active duty. Never would have happened in any of the units I was in. In fact, in 3/8 you couldn't even get a part-time job delivering pizza since no outside employment was allowed by order of the CO, period. I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks and ambulances. That sort of stuff turns you on, huh? Well, it doesn't really matter since the Marines don't have MP's...... they have SP's. That pile of dirt just keeps getting bigger and bigger. Stay tuned because one day real soon I plan to compile all of your military 'wisdom' into one big easy-to-reference list.....LOL!!! Is working part time as an ER tech any different than working at Taco Bell, singing in a church choir or participating in the Big Brothers/Sisters programs...?!?! Yes, by the amount of responsiblity required of the job. Nobody cares if you don't show up to work at Taco Bell or miss choir practice. But an emergency room tech missing a shift can result in real problems. No kidding, eh...?!?! So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I can't make it in..."...?!?! More proof that you were never on active duty: frequently there are times when you don't have access to a telephone, especially when liberty is cancelled because the alert status of the base or unit is raised. In those cases, outside comm is usually prohibited because of security issues. Happened when the US shot down the Libyan jets, when Beirut got bombed, when Reagan invaded Grenada..... Speaking of which, I had a friend in 2/8 that I knew from MCAGCC. They were prohibited from using the telephone several days before deployment, outgoing mail was held on ship during transit, and even the ship's MARS station was shut down. But you never experienced such things because you were never on active duty..... -or- on float. Especially when that tech is in the military and suseptible to the possibility that liberty could be cancelled, the base locked down, or any of the other things that sometimes happen, without warning, that would prevent you from even giving notice of your impending absence. As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP) Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER those two courts martials, eh...?!?! Actually, it didn't sink in until after the first court-martial, but well before the second. (UNSNIP)...and I don't think -any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a candy-striper..... Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter at your ignorance and arrogance~! Prove me wrong, Dudly. The ONLY way you could have been educated, trained and gained experience as an EMT while in the Corps is if you were a reservist. How is that? Did I violate some MCO in my 18 years by leaving the barracks and participating in non-USMC pursuits? Not pursuits, Dudly -- obligations. You have it turned around again, AS USUAL, Cowardly One. Being an EMT does not require an obligation? You make it sound like a hobby. You must not have taken the job very seriously. "Leatherneck" used to publish ton's of "human interest" stories on Marines who did exactly those things.... Name one. Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for what you are.... YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an 'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT while in active duty. Just one. Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going to fall down and puke. No... That's what you've implied... Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own distorted imagination? Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate your moral confusion. You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140 hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical duties.. Don't try to be clever, Dud -- in your desperation to defend your fake service record you forgot about the other 3 years and 8 months..... or was it 5 years and 8 months..... gee, Dud, make up your mind: were you an EMT on active duty for four or six years? All this information is publically available from what -you- have written on Usenet. Of course, you can always use that "my account was hacked" excuse, but that doesn't explain why you claimed to be in the Air Force Auxilliary, a retired Marine Gunny, and signed your posts with "Semper Paratus" (Coast Guard motto). Uh...Actually I use "Paratus et Vigilans", a personal motto which means "Prepared and Vigilant". You have used "Semper Paratus" in many posts. For example: =========== .....[nursing is] the one "technical occupation" that I have enjoyed (as both EMT and LPN) where more than one off my "projects" has returned to where I work and shook my hand and said "Thank you for helping to save my life." Some occupation, huh?! Semper Paratus Steve Robeson, LPN Chattanooga, TN ============ You even explained why you used it: "If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as charged." And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a praise-seeking hero wannabe. So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and that's "wrong"... In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in dressing up like a clown. Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut Allegedly? No, I posted the proof, Dud. You should try it sometime. and having been twice court martialed, and that's OK...?!?! BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! When you get done laughing, how about showing me where I said that getting court-martialed twice is "OK"? Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Did I say it was illegal? You obviously have a problem with it... You obviously have an obsession with it. Nor does it explain your interest in pirate radio, star gazing, or your hunt for ET. Clearly you are one very confused individual, Dudly. And as more than one person has previously noted, you are clearly a paramilitary-wannabe and a hero-wannabe. I see you harbor the same "hate anyone who does more than I do" sentiments that Lennie and Brain do... Keep dreaming, Dudly. I couldn't care less how bad you have screwed up your life -- it's what you claim to have done but haven't that hobbles -your- horse. I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie. I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud. And as for the rest, I can see how a busted-back-to-boot-camp PFC would have a "problem" with a Marine who DID make it to Gunnery Sergeant and did so without so much as a single Article 15.... I have no problem with it at all. In fact, I have the highest respect for most of the staff NCO's I've met over the years. Funny tho, every one of them who retired held a rank higher than Gunny..... why do you suppose that is, Dud? Come to think of it, most of the SNCO's I knew made Gunny within 8-10 years. And it didn't take them 8 years to get promoted to First/Master Sergeant. But then they were active duty..... Of course you managed to screw up the one paid "uniformed" job you held, so I guess no one should expect you to be involved in any kind of "uniformed" volunteer work, huh...?!?! If the shower-shoe fits. And I think we have the correct shoe on you, Frankie... There's plenty more information that is publically available about you, but I think I made my case -- using -YOUR OWN WORDS-!!! So far, you've not "proven" a single thing. And you have? Ok, Dudly. Whatever you say. I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. What more could I ask for...?!?! A better education. Unless you can show me where NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, went to school off duty, followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of thier USMC duties...?!?! So the fact that two-headed snakes have existed is proof that you have one? Go soak your head. I'm talking probability here, Dudly. So far your claims are so IM-probable that you defending them only makes the argument against you even stronger. No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't "straight-up" answer the question. Because the question presumes an untrue premise. And yes, your assertions are cowardly. Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, Disregarding the horrific grammatical structure of your question, 3/8 in 1983-84. went to school off duty, Never prohibited, IME. followed "personal" pursuits that were not part-and-parcel of their USMC duties...?!?! Never prohibited, IME. EVER? See above part-time jobs "Go soak your head" is the BEST you can come up with, Frankie? I suppose I should dumb down my statement to a level that you can understand: Just because some active duty Marines were allowed to take part-time jobs is not proof that you were ever on active duty. Is that simple enough? Or do I need to draw a Venn diagram (i.e, a picture)? Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop? You took one from being a Marine. Twice. Your point? Well, I guess that means that you are no better than me. And never forget that YOU made the equivocation, Dud. BTW, what happened to your first marraige? Were you lying when you took those vows before God? "marriage" Oh, I see..... it's a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing with you, huh? I didn't tell you? Nope. So what -are- your justifications for why you failed at your marrIAge? Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my USMC career? Absolutely. You accuse me of lying because I broke my oath. You broke -your- oath to your wife and to your God. Therefore, you lied to your wife and to your God. If you don't have enough respect for your God to keep -your- oath, what makes you think that you can hold someone else to the same standard? So it really IS a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing, isn't it? You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to -my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies, and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline (let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you- describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your- standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a Marine Gunny. Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud. Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?! Forget it, Dud. It's obvious that you can't address anything that deals with reality. Don't even try -- you might stroke out or something. He also dodges following up on all of the references I have posted. See above. I see you trying to stretch some things real far, none of it causing even "collateral damage". Take a poll, Dudly.... who here is your friend? And who is YOURS? Or Lennie's? Or Brain or Markie's? I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging insult" phase... Hmmm..... "stinging insult"..... your words, not mine. That's because in doing so he'd have to eat crow...A LOT of crow. Although for Stevie to be Carrer Resvist? National gaurd would make a lot of his #### make more sense now you bring it up but do you have more than that He has NOTHING, Mark...No "evidence", no facts, no justification, nothing. Wrong. I have your own words and some basic math skills. Then it seems you also have some comprehension issues and need a calculator. Once again, you're the expert. Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness the following: Witness this: ============= K4YZ wrote: That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP) Excuse me...that was "12"..... Steve, K4YZ ============= Nuff said. That's all I need to prove that you are a liar. Uhhhhh....How's that? So far all your "math" has proven is that while I was on active duty I ALSO had non-USMC pursuits. Pottery, polishing rocks, building hot-rods..... those are "pursuits", Dudly. You claim to have successfully had two concurrent careers, both with very demanding and very conflicting obligations. Big difference. I did? W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?! Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! ! I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K... Oh, so of those 10+ years of experience you claimed to have in 1998, six of them were actually only part-time? How "part time" were they? 10hrs/wk on the average? So those six years of experience while on active duty is really equal to only 1-1/2 years or so of full-time experience? Only a fourth of full-time experience? That's a pretty big disparity, Dud, although not uncharacteristic of your propensity to 'stretch' the truth. But claiming to have 400% more experience than you really had..... that's called "stretching the truth a little too far" and I don't buy it. In your posts you omit the fact that much of your experience wasn't spent as a career. In fact, you state quite clearly in several posts that EMT -was- your career for all those years, even while working at the hospital in California. So either you lied about having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are lying about -not- having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are lying about being on active duty. Take your pick. BTW, you never did answer the question of where you were stationed when you worked as an EMT in PA. Care to give it another try? What part of MCO's were therein violated? Other than during Typhoon Condition 1A on Okinawa, I never spent one minute on Barracks Restriction, and even then THAT was "island wide". That doesn't make sense -- the minute you didn't spend on barracks restriction was island wide? Think -before- you type, you fruitcake. I did...very thoughtfully...The ONLY "barracks restriction" I was ever "on" was during island wide restrictions for Typhoon Condition 1A. Did you have to sign in at the OOD's office every two hours? If not then it's not the same thing. Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine (and probably known by active duty members of the other services as well). Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines... Can YOU say the same thing...?!?! What, are you dense? Haven't you been paying attention all this time? Did I not declare, long ago, that I spent time in the brig? Are you actually -trying- to look like a moron? If you are, it's working. And I never stated, suggested or implied that you "stood" any pushishment for anything. But that wasn't the issue. Not being granted liberty is not restriction. Restriction in regards to punishment simply means that restrictions are placed on your liberty (when granted). You don't know the difference. You claim to have spent 18 years on active duty, where the duty of every NCO is to pull an occasional 24-hr shift in the OOD's office (sometimes as the OOD), the place where Marines on restriction show up every two hours to sign their restriction forms..... yet you don't know the difference. You didn't spend 18 years on active duty, Dud. Like I said, Dudly -- the more you talk, the deeper you dig your hole. How's that? So far, you're the one in "negative numbers", Frankie... Better be careful with your math -- remember, it was 18 years before it was 14 years before it was 12 years..... when is the next revision? Frankie...You should try out for the part of the guy in the comic book "Fantastic Four" that can stretch like Silly-Putty, because you sure earned the opportunity here today! Grow up, "Major". I'm doing just fine. Ok then, don't grow up. But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by facts, Frankie. You validate my arguments just fine. Lastly...The Marine Corps, as do all the services, heavily recruit and covet their various Reserve assets...The USMC in particular requires the same degree of qualifications of their Reservists as they do their active duty components. Yes they do. Many reservists are former active duty Marines. Many active duty Marines are former reservists. Blah, blah, blah. What's your point? The POINT is that YOU seem to express duty as a Reservist as a negativism. I degrade only your service as a reservist, Dud. I do it because of the way -you- feel about -yourself-. You hate yourself for what you think are your failings; for being a reservist that never saw action and got drummed out of the Corps on a medical discharge. And because you hate yourself so much, it's easy to push your buttons. As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with yourself, not with me. Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the torment of being stuck in your own web of lies. This is not something I made up, but a matter of public record and USMC policy. Where did I say anything different? At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was somehow less-than-adequate. No, Dudly. I have clearly stated several times that I think there is nothing at all wrong with being a reservist. It may be different than active duty, but is no less worthy of pride and honor. The problem is that -you- don't feel that way. It is -you- that feels a reservist is "less-than-adequate" and not worthy of the same respect as a Marine who served on active duty. I just push that button and, as expected, you thrash around in a defensive fit of grade-school name calling and emotionally charged avoidance tactics. You really need to learn some discipline, Dud. I should know...I helped train Reservists at various times. Gee, another claim about your military career. I wonder if I should give that one as much weight as I give the rest of your claims.... It doesn't matter what "weight" you give it, Frankie... Very well, I shall give it as much weight as the rest of your claims: none. You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the Marines. True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action (and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did). The fact remains that I served my time on active duty while you were a reservist. Hmmmm...... you claim that your 6 years of EMT work was part-time, and a reservist is really a part-time job too...... Let's see now..... one weekend a month, that's 48 x 12 = 576 hours/yr. Add to that 2 weeks a year, which is another 336 hours. So that's 912 hours/yr, times 16 years (18 years less boot camp and technical MOS training, a very generous estimate) which is 14,592 hours. Now that converts to 608 days, or 1.665 years. So for all practical purposes, after 2 years of boot camp and MOS training you served the active duty equivalent of slightly more than 1-1/2 years, for a grand total of 3-1/2 years, which is -LESS- than my 4 year cruise. Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!! So...that having been said, even if I HAD been a Reservist, I would have had to meet the same standards as the Active Duty forces... That's right. The only difference is that you, as a reservist...(SNIP) Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie. (UNSNIP)...didn't have the same experiences as an active duty Marine. And active duty Marines didn't have the same experiences a you, a reservist...(SNIP) Frank Gilliland has uttered yet another intentional lie. Too bad you couldn't be proud of that fact instead of trying to pass yourself off as something you never were -- an active duty Marine. Three in a row. And considering those same Reserve (and National Guard) forces are carrying the same load as their active duty counterparts in Iraq right now, your "suggestion" that I may have been a Reservist as a negativism is ludicrous and assinine. I have nothing against reservists...(SNIP) Your words in this forum demonstrate otherwise. (That's four) (UNSNIP)...I -do- take issue with reservists who claim to be, or claim to have been, active duty when they weren't. Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum. Your charade is getting really old, Dudly. It's not the same and you know it. Because if you didn't know it then you wouldn't have tried to hide the fact that you spent your entire Marine "career" as a reservist. Five What's wrong with being proud of who you are instead of trying to be someone you're not? It works for me. Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials prove it. You have a strange definition of 'proof', Dud. Care to cite a dictionary or two (assuming you aren't afraid to learn something about critical thinking)? So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to another Lenniesque blustery diatribe? Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the magnifying glass a little later. Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: cut Frankie, the question I asked over and over in the original post was WHAT MCO WAS VIOLATED...?!?! Since when does it require an MCO for a superior officer to give a legal and lawful order to a subordinate? The granting of liberty is at the discretion of the unit's commanding officer. And liberty doesn't mean you are free to do as you please. If you come back from a 96 with a decent sunburn you can end up with NJP -- that very situation has happened more than once. One Dudly is Student of Herr Geobels a decnet sunburn geting an art 15 I don't think so, a Bad sunburn sure shame on you Frank for the LIE:) "What MCO was violated?" That's the wrong question, Dud. ... agains you are slightly off it is the right question for Dudly Dogface it is the right question if ones goals is decietion and we both know that is Dudlies goal cut Gee, and all this time you have refused to provide -any- details about your military "career". How silly of me to think that now, when confronted with an issue even more intrusive than a few lines from a DD-214, you would spit up some specific information. Gee, I need to reconsider my position regarding your credibility........LOL!!!! cut There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie. standard Dudly try to avoid the question byacting stupid, of Dudly doesn't have to ACT MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......? secert sub-marine base no doubt like the Naval air warfare center in INDY cut That is, most -normal- and -mentally balanced- people. well said I'd love to see the MP's dragging off-duty Marines from firetrucks and ambulances. That sort of stuff turns you on, huh? look at the turn of phrase he loves it, watching MEN dpoing something like that I simply point out his represed (it seems to point of pathological) sexual issues cut So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I can't make it in..."...?!?! it has not been established you made it through EMS school cut As a Marine your primary obligation is to the Corps...(SNIP) Obviously a point you didn't have any respect for until AFTER those two courts martials, eh...?!?! Actually, it didn't sink in until after the first court-martial, but well before the second. LOL not sure if I am laughing at Frank or the image of in mind eyes of Stevie reading franks word (UNSNIP)...and I don't think -any- hospital with an emergency room would hire a part-time EMT who is much more likely to miss a shift than a dedicated EMT whose primary obligation is to the hospital and patients. They might let you in as a candy-striper..... Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter at your ignorance and arrogance~! Prove me wrong, Dudly. honestly in some places I know they are so short of Nurses they might take on one that they could not rely on (for reason like Stevie's) in order to have the chance for having enough nurses, don't know anyplace is hard up ebough for EMT's but maybe cut Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for what you are.... YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an 'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT while in active duty. Just one. I suspect I might be able to name one, Steven J Robeson, just not the person posting the more he goes on and on the more I suspect he found the origanal Steve J Roberson dead, perhaps the current one killed him in a car accident (or got him killed by telling a lie) and took on his life, but he doesn't know enough about that life to live it Is it YOUR contention that all of those Marines were NOT "real Marines" because they did something that wasn't associated with their official duties? I said nothing of the sort. You're spinning so hard now you are going to fall down and puke. No... That's what you've implied... Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own distorted imagination? I can answer that for him NO he hasn't Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate your moral confusion. not sure anything can help Stevie cut that's "wrong"... In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in dressing up like a clown. like Gacy Dudly can't seem to help it cut When you get done laughing, how about showing me where I said that getting court-martialed twice is "OK"? I can explain it for you though Dudly thinks no one would do anything they did not think was right, and moral and proper therefore you must have felt it ok to be courtmartialed or you would commited hari-kari first, before standing trail, therefore the fact you are still alive means you found it to be OK to be courtmartaled Stevie tried the same stunts with me I say it is ok to lie when diverting danger or direct attacks sthings like that, therefore stevie claims i have said in the same word it is desireable that the world is as it is and such lying is sometime a good idea Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Did I say it was illegal? You obviously have a problem with it... You obviously have an obsession with it. nothing about Stevie may be questioned cut I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie. I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud. and you don't have 2 court martial "over you head" they are in the past cut I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. yep which I why I will homeschool What more could I ask for...?!?! A better education. a Life of his own? cut No...We HAVE "proven" my cowardly assertions since you won't "straight-up" answer the question. Because the question presumes an untrue premise. And yes, your assertions are cowardly. Nah Dudly is the coward the assertion are just inocent victums Where, Frankie, has NO OTHER MARINE EVER worked a part time job, Disregarding the horrific grammatical structure of your question, 3/8 in 1983-84. cut I suppose I should dumb down my statement to a level that you can understand: Just because some active duty Marines were allowed to take part-time jobs is not proof that you were ever on active duty. nor is it proof that if you were on active YOU were allowed etc Is that simple enough? Or do I need to draw a Venn diagram (i.e, a picture)? Geeze, Frankie...That was a loooooooooooooooooooooooong stretch, Taking a vacation from your "career" as spelling cop? You took one from being a Marine. Twice. Your point? Well, I guess that means that you are no better than me. And never forget that YOU made the equivocation, Dud. no he will never forget it he will never understand he made it cut Why? Is it pertinent to Amateur Radio? Is it pertinent to my USMC career? it is at least as related to both as your attack threads about my sexuality, Todd's, Brain's et al are stealing the atriubtuion form frank since the word earing repeating Absolutely. You accuse me of lying because I broke my oath. You broke -your- oath to your wife and to your God. Therefore, you lied to your wife and to your God. If you don't have enough respect for your God to keep -your- oath, what makes you think that you can hold someone else to the same standard? So it really IS a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do thing, isn't it? You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to -my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies, and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline (let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you- describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your- standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a Marine Gunny. ending my "theft of franks word Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud. Or just another toe-hold you are desperate for since you've been unable to establish one anywhere else...?!?! Forget it, Dud. It's obvious that you can't address anything that deals with reality. Don't even try -- you might stroke out or something. please don't try to disaude him for taking the most honorable exit avalable to a person like Him cut I think you've pretty much reached the "desperate for a stinging insult" phase... Hmmm..... "stinging insult"..... your words, not mine. rememebr Len words about "Mirror" Once again, you're the expert. Nope. But I am better at math and English comprehension...witness the following: Witness this: ============= K4YZ wrote: That's what you've implied...You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification)...(SNIP) Excuse me...that was "12"..... Steve, K4YZ ============= Nuff said. cut I did? W H E R E did I say I had "TWO CONCURRENT CAREERS", Frankie...?!?! Mind you, we're quoting YOU now ! ! ! I had a PART TIME JOB...No retirement plan...No 401K... Oh, so of those 10+ years of experience you claimed to have in 1998, six of them were actually only part-time? How "part time" were they? 10hrs/wk on the average? So those six years of experience while on active duty is really equal to only 1-1/2 years or so of full-time experience? Only a fourth of full-time experience? That's a pretty big disparity, Dud, although not uncharacteristic of your propensity to 'stretch' the truth. But claiming to have 400% more experience than you really had..... that's called "stretching the truth a little too far" and I don't buy it. In your posts you omit the fact that much of your experience wasn't spent as a career. In fact, you state quite clearly in several posts that EMT -was- your career for all those years, even while working at the hospital in California. So either you lied about having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are lying about -not- having a career as an EMT while on active duty, or you are lying about being on active duty. Take your pick. BTW, you never did answer the question of where you were stationed when you worked as an EMT in PA. Care to give it another try? cut Anyway, you clearly don't understand the difference between liberty and restriction, something that is known by any active duty Marine (and probably known by active duty members of the other services as well). Sure I do. The POINT having been made that I never stood so much as one minute of any form of punishment in 18 years inn the Marines... Can YOU say the same thing...?!?! What, are you dense? Haven't you been paying attention all this time? Did I not declare, long ago, that I spent time in the brig? Are you actually -trying- to look like a moron? If you are, it's working. and his claim never to stodd for ANY FROM OF punishment for even a minute No way he went through BCT ( or what ever the Marines call it) without it you don't even have to do anything wrong sometimes And I never stated, suggested or implied that you "stood" any pushishment for anything. But that wasn't the issue. Not being granted liberty is not restriction. Restriction in regards to punishment simply means that restrictions are placed on your liberty (when granted). You don't know the difference. You claim to have spent 18 years on active duty, where the duty of every NCO is to pull an occasional 24-hr shift in the OOD's office (sometimes as the OOD), the place where Marines on restriction show up every two hours to sign their restriction forms..... yet you don't know the difference. You didn't spend 18 years on active duty, Dud. maybe he means 18 dog years? cut I'm doing just fine. Ok then, don't grow up. But YOU are the one making strange assertions unsubstantiated by facts, Frankie. You validate my arguments just fine. cut As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with yourself, not with me. indeed that is going to be his problem in "suing " me if I have harmed it was only possible with HIS assiatnce, making him my coconspritor Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the torment of being stuck in your own web of lies. Ah a fellow sadist, and Dudly the willing indeed needfull submission. Np I do hope you enjoy your session cut You were incompetent as a Marine when you were on active duty and you're incompetent to sit in judgement of anyone who was in the Marines. True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action (and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did). That is it been strugling for the Charater Dudly sort a reminds me of Maj Powers but back to Stevie anyone that wishes to see combat is truely mad, who is proud of combat cut Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!! cut Well that leaves out anyone in THIS forum. Your charade is getting really old, Dudly. old eneough it hardly even stink anymore cut Being less that you can be worked for you. Two court martials prove it. You have a strange definition of 'proof', Dud. Care to cite a dictionary or two (assuming you aren't afraid to learn something about critical thinking)? I keep asking him to publish one so we can foolow his words So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to another Lenniesque blustery diatribe? Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the magnifying glass a little later. Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in So...you figure I can make it through EMS school but don't know how to pick up the phone and say "Something's come up at the base and I can't make it in..."...?!?! More proof that you were never on active duty: frequently there are times when you don't have access to a telephone, especially when liberty is cancelled because the alert status of the base or unit is raised. In those cases, outside comm is usually prohibited because of security issues. Happened when the US shot down the Libyan jets, when Beirut got bombed, when Reagan invaded Grenada..... Speaking of which, I had a friend in 2/8 that I knew from MCAGCC. They were prohibited from using the telephone several days before deployment, outgoing mail was held on ship during transit, and even the ship's MARS station was shut down. But you never experienced such things because you were never on active duty..... -or- on float. This new information gives me insight into how Steve thinks. We were given an amateur emergency response scenario by one of the regulars on here. He stated the served agencies requirements and the number of volunteers available. I said that the volunteer group could not meet those stated requirements with available resources. Steve said they could, and wrote a duty schedule with long periods of uncovered and undercovered periods. Probably goes back to his "service" days where he left his unit hanging and thought nothing of it. In the end, he said that I said that no volunteer group could ever satisfy an agencies requirements, a lie like his many other lies. I don't know about the USMC, but in the Air Force, we call uncovered periods in a duty schedule "AWOL" and the person presently on duty just eats it. But I understand that some reserve units are more laid back. |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in My first EMT card was in Pennsylvania in February 1986. PA EMT-MAST 014402. Where you were stationed at Camp .....? There was no "Camp ....." in Pennsylvania, Frankie. MCAS ......? NAS ......? Fort ......? BSA troop ......? VA Medical Center? Third floor, room 308? |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39
On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in etc snip PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992) that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as an EMT...JUST ONE. Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were- allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time. Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time! snip Then once again you've allowed us a moment to break into laughter at your ignorance and arrogance~! Prove me wrong, Dudly. He can't, Frank. After 7 years in here and NO evidence of anything of that "18 year career" there's no point in asking for anything NOW. :-( Name them yourself...I don't have back copies of Leatherneck anymore...However anyone who cares to do some research will see you for what you are.... YOU referenced the source so it's YOUR obligation to validate YOUR claim.... oh, that's right, you didn't understand the meaning of an 'obligation'. Well, now you do so you don't have an excuse. Name one of those Marines that was written up in Leatherneck for being an EMT while in active duty. Just one. Dudly isn't able to do that. He has NO proof. snip That's what you've implied... Have you ever tried to read anything without attaching it to your own distorted imagination? Try it sometime -- it will help to eliminate your moral confusion. He is unable to deviate from his massive, long-running snow job even long after the snow was melted by others. You've suggested that in 18 years (actually 14 at the time I obtained my initial EMT certification) that I SHOULDN'T have had any time or opportunity to be an EMT, and that in doing so, somehow "proved" that I was never on Active Duty...As if 140 hours of night classes over a four month period kept me from my offical duties.. Don't try to be clever, Dud -- in your desperation to defend your fake service record you forgot about the other 3 years and 8 months..... or was it 5 years and 8 months..... gee, Dud, make up your mind: were you an EMT on active duty for four or six years? Must be the "new math" that was taught in school. :-) You even explained why you used it: "If having great respect for an organization (the United States Coast Guard, in this case) that goes so far out of it's way on a daily basis to save human lives makes me a "paramilitary wannabe", guilty as charged." And when taken in context with the preceding post it also makes you a praise-seeking hero wannabe. So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and that's "wrong"... In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in dressing up like a clown. Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-) Yet we have you bragging about allegedly being in Beirut Allegedly? No, I posted the proof, Dud. You should try it sometime. Most of us readers might like to see some REAL proof from Dudly. Anything is an infinity more than the ZERO he has presented. Did I miss some law that says once someone uses a latin word in THEIR motto, no one else can use it...?!?! Did I say it was illegal? You obviously have a problem with it... You obviously have an obsession with it. Nah. Dudly is still dancing around his faux pas. Would a real, live MARINE use a Coast Guard motto in a sign-off? Wouldn't be true to the Corps, would it? I'm not the one with two court martials over his head, Frankie. I'm not the one who lies about his military "career", Dud. True enough! However, since Dudly has NEVER posted any reference proof to his active-duty or reserve career, we have to wonder if Dudly REALLY served in ANY military branch. I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old trick of personal insulting in order to win message points. What more could I ask for...?!?! A better education. I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling. He needs it. You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to -my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies, and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline (let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you- describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your- standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a Marine Gunny. Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud. Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in, could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts, unable to reconcile his desires with reality. snip I degrade only your service as a reservist, Dud. I do it because of the way -you- feel about -yourself-. You hate yourself for what you think are your failings; for being a reservist that never saw action and got drummed out of the Corps on a medical discharge. And because you hate yourself so much, it's easy to push your buttons. As for me, the only buttons you can push are your fraudulent claims about being retired, your "seven hostile actions", and serving your time on active duty -- fabrications which, ironically, are the product of your self-hatred. It's no suprise that I have become your primary adversary. But you don't even see that you are really arguing with yourself, not with me. Sometimes I think that you actually -want- me to post undeniable proof of your bogus service claims so you can quit living the lie. I will in due time, but not before I get my kicks by letting you suffer the torment of being stuck in your own web of lies. Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK, wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS the fantasy that he is all those things. At every suggestion that I may have "only" been a reservist and at the point wherein you made inferences that duty as a Reservist was somehow less-than-adequate. No, Dudly. I have clearly stated several times that I think there is nothing at all wrong with being a reservist. It may be different than active duty, but is no less worthy of pride and honor. The problem is that -you- don't feel that way. It is -you- that feels a reservist is "less-than-adequate" and not worthy of the same respect as a Marine who served on active duty. I just push that button and, as expected, you thrash around in a defensive fit of grade-school name calling and emotionally charged avoidance tactics. You really need to learn some discipline, Dud. Not to mention consistency in his lies and exaggerations. :-) True or not, the fact remains that I earned an honorable discharge and you got kicked out on a medical. The fact remains that I saw action (and wish I hadn't) and you didn't (and wish you did). The fact remains that I served my time on active duty while you were a reservist. Hmmmm...... you claim that your 6 years of EMT work was part-time, and a reservist is really a part-time job too...... Dud hasn't got his ducks in a row...he needs that consistency to be believable. He ain't got it. Let's see now..... one weekend a month, that's 48 x 12 = 576 hours/yr. Add to that 2 weeks a year, which is another 336 hours. So that's 912 hours/yr, times 16 years (18 years less boot camp and technical MOS training, a very generous estimate) which is 14,592 hours. Now that converts to 608 days, or 1.665 years. So for all practical purposes, after 2 years of boot camp and MOS training you served the active duty equivalent of slightly more than 1-1/2 years, for a grand total of 3-1/2 years, which is -LESS- than my 4 year cruise. Kiss my hash mark, Major Dud!!! He can kiss mine, too...four years active in Army. He can kiss my "toilet seat" too (Presidential Unit Citation, awarded to my Battalion twice). Poor guy tried to say that was "impossible" that it "couldn't have been so." Not only were those in my official documentation but in a Signal Corps photograph with the mimeographed data on the back of the photo. Mimeograph went out years ago in the military and is terribly hard to forge now, especially on photographs' backs. We have two more toilet seats here but I wouldn't want him to kiss them...he might dirty them up with infection. Why waste Clorox? snip Your charade is getting really old, Dudly. Frank, it was OLD when Dud began it seven years ago... So...Frankie...Have any REAL proof of your "having been an EMT proves you were a Reservist" claim, or do we just get treated to another Lenniesque blustery diatribe? Watching you squirm is good enough for now. I'll break out the magnifying glass a little later. Poor Dudly. I stood up against him long ago and he hasn't forgotten the anger he felt at being trumped. I said in public that Dudly was doing the Big Lie technique worth of Goebbels' propaganda efforts of the 1930s in Germany. Dud then tried to "turn it around" and equate me to Goebbels for continuing to challenge him for proof of his "service." In seven years Dud hasn't come around with ANY referencible proof of all his "warrior" claims. Tsk, tsk. Dudly uses "Lenniesque" to describe anyone who stands up to him and challenges him to provide PROOF. Since he can't do that, he resorts to the Personal Insult schtick in order to misdirect the subject thread. Very, very old. Frank, you are on the right track with old Dud HATING HIMSELF. To avoid that he looks at all his challengers seeing himself in his mind's mirror and calls them bad things. Whenever he does this Personal Insult thing he is really insulting himself. But, his mind is so mixed up that he doesn't realize what he does. Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ MAJOR DUD. Frank, you called it in a previous message. Excellent. :-) |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in
.com: From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39 On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in etc snip PLEASE CITE just ONE Marine Corps order (from 1986 through 1992) that allegedly "proves" I was unable/unauthorized to work part time as an EMT...JUST ONE. Nice try, Dud, but it won't work. I have no doubt that you -were- allowed to work as an EMT simply because you were a reservist. It would be a different story if you were on active duty at the time. Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time! True story. Now that you mentioned it, I think even a RESERVIST would know the difference between Military Police and Shore Patrol. Dudly has proven that he doesn't. But then again, one weekend each month doing bends-&-thrusts doesn't build much of a knowledge base, nor does it reinforce what little he was taught 30 years ago while standing on the yellow footsteps. snip So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and that's "wrong"... In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in dressing up like a clown. Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-) I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common thread should become glaringly apparent: 1) His 'career' in the USMC; 2) His marital dysfunctions; 3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing; 4) His interest in CAP and YAF; 5) His frequent fits of transference; 6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles. How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA? snip I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old trick of personal insulting in order to win message points. Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave? What more could I ask for...?!?! A better education. I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling. He needs it. Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling, and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking. You will never understand the difference, Dud: I'm not holding you to -my- standard -- I'm holding you to a -higher- standard, just as you would expect. Despite this, you waste your time in the newsgroups throwing around school-yard banter, covering your lies with more lies, and disgracing honorable institutions by leeching their honor and integrity to feed your personal pride and delusions of heroism. Even when I'm not here you pray to me because you don't have the discipline (let alone the common sense) to avoid arguing with someone whom -you- describe as "silly". The fact is that you -can't- set a standard that is higher than mine, a ****bird PFC. Add to that the fact that your tactics are lame and impotent, your 'facts' are generally wrong, and you tuck tail and run from every challenge to the legitimacy of your claims about your military "career", and anyone can see that -your- standards are well below mine, let alone the standards required of a Marine Gunny. Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud. Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in, could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts, unable to reconcile his desires with reality. He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his "retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy..... snip Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK, wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS the fantasy that he is all those things. Uniforms impress young boys. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in .com: From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39 On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in Frankie of Silliland, RRAP's Newest Source Of Comic Relief wrote: On 1 Nov 2005 16:18:14 wrote in Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:18:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in cut snip So...I make some positive inferences to the Coast Guard, and that's "wrong"... In your case, it's as wrong as John Wayne Gacy showing an interest in dressing up like a clown. Careful, he might start singing "Send In The Clowns." :-) I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common thread should become glaringly apparent: 1) His 'career' in the USMC; 2) His marital dysfunctions; 3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing; 4) His interest in CAP and YAF; 5) His frequent fits of transference; 6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles. How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA? did gacy hang out a the Y (never had a reason to be that familier with the case) snip I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old trick of personal insulting in order to win message points. Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave? Stevie thinks he is What more could I ask for...?!?! A better education. I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling. He needs it. Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling, and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking. i doubt he get thrapy that would mean admiting to himself he has a problem, and he can't admit it when he is mistaken about the facts .. Nope, you were never active duty. You're a Major Dud. Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in, could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts, unable to reconcile his desires with reality. He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his "retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy..... interesting that you say this? You have proof? You intend to present such at some point? for myself, Id like to see you get on with it, would make my life easier to if that maggot get exposed snip Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK, wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS the fantasy that he is all those things. Uniforms impress young boys. yes they do |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
On 16 Nov 2005 07:45:48 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com: snip did gacy hang out a the Y (never had a reason to be that familier with the case) google "John Wayne Gacy" snip You have proof? You intend to present such at some point? No proof that can be posted. It's info that recently came back to me through the grapevine after I sent out a frost call about Dudly a few months ago. for myself, Id like to see you get on with it, would make my life easier to if that maggot get exposed In due time. In the meantime, just sit back and enjoy watching Dudly squirm for a while. Right now he has chosen to ignoring me, but he can't do that for very long without industrial-strength blood pressure medication -- wait and see what happens when his supply runs out! ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Gawd, how could I miss THIS one????
From: Frank Gilliland on Nov 15, 9:07 pm
On 15 Nov 2005 13:17:12 -0800, wrote in From: Frank Gilliland on Mon 14 Nov 2005 02:39 On 1 Nov 2005 22:53:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in etc Frank, we readers have NOT seen anything at all to prove Dudly was active-duty OR in the reserves at any time! True story. Now that you mentioned it, I think even a RESERVIST would know the difference between Military Police and Shore Patrol. Dudly has proven that he doesn't. But then again, one weekend each month doing bends-&-thrusts doesn't build much of a knowledge base, nor does it reinforce what little he was taught 30 years ago while standing on the yellow footsteps. Surprising on his lack of attention. Even a long-ago Army person would know the difference between MP and SP...and AP. :-) AP is Air Police to the non-serving veterans of the Code War. :-) I intentionally used the Gacy analogy for a reason. Examine, if you will, the following list of Dudly's interests and behaviors. A common thread should become glaringly apparent: 1) His 'career' in the USMC; 2) His marital dysfunctions; 3) His 'hobby-turned-career' of nursing; 4) His interest in CAP and YAF; 5) His frequent fits of transference; 6) His history of accusing people of being pedophiles. How much you wanna bet he used to hang out at the YMCA? All bets off on that! :-) Frank, put that way, it should be glaringly obvious to all readers. I've proven you to be a liar. If there's one thing that's lacking in public schools these days it's the failure to teach critical thinking skills. Nah. Dud is just trying to turn things around with his very old trick of personal insulting in order to win message points. Who's handing out those "message points"? Dave? Davie Heil, der UberOberst uf das Amatur Schutzstaffel?!? BWAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!! Davie be Der Obliterator, busy busy with his biggest, blackest Sanford Sharpie trying to STRIKE OUT any contrary opinions to his lofty opinions...from his vast experience in the embassies' of mid-Africa "synchronizing" his RTTY machines using morse code. [see long discourses on his adventures in Guinea-Bisseau keeping a close watch on nasty commies in neighboring countries] I would suggest a VERY long time in mental health counseling. He needs it. Mental health counseling is little more than professional coddling, and I'm sure he spends quite a bit of time in therapy for just that reason. What he NEEDS is a good ass-kicking. I was thinking of modern medications, new jacket tailoring, and a padded apartment for "mental counseling"... :-) Frank, my take is that Dudly was NEVER in the USMC. It sounds like he READ about it a lot, wanted to be in, could not get in, then flipped out. He went nuts, unable to reconcile his desires with reality. He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. We all know he has been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his "retirement". But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy..... Hmmm...that's rather cryptic...but it seems to fit. The homosexuality angle might be there but it's difficult to tell. Down here in the movie capital of the world, one in five in the entertainment biz are homosexual (came out in two separate Los Angeles Times feature articles...never a secret down here). I know several socially and it is NOT always easy to tell their gender-preference orientation just by meeting-talking with them. Others are overt about it. Note the "one in five" ratio. Coincidentally, the membership of the ARRL is also "one in five" amateur licensees! :-) Watch the response of the Believers in here and their OUTRAGE vented at my two sentences just above. There are connections and then there are connections. This group isn't in the James Burke "Connections" TV show class. Frank, that is consistent with Dudly's actions in here for so long. He has this mania about UNIFORMS, about RANK, wanting to be an officer, a tuff guy hero type. He is terribly frustrated with the reality of his life and NEEDS the fantasy that he is all those things. Uniforms impress young boys. ...and there's a lot of the "young boy" inside Dudly. |
More Frankie of Silliland (FoS) Mistruths
Frankie of Silliland intentionally lied when he wrote: He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. Nope. Active Duty, save for the Delayed Entry Program. We all know he has been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his "retirement". Nope. But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy..... Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Uniforms impress young boys. It impressed you. Too bad it didn't impress you enough to honor your commitment and stay out of trouble for ONE enlistment, Frankie. Steve, K4YZ |
More Frankie of Silliland (FoS) Mistruths
K4YZ wrote: Frankie of Silliland intentionally lied when he wrote: He was in the USMC alright, and he was a reservist. Nope. Active Duty, save for the Delayed Entry Program. Is your delayed entry period on your DD Form 214? I mean, would it be on there if you had one? We all know he has been tight-lipped about his service because he didn't want to expose the truth about his service. And we also know that he lied about his "retirement". Nope. Yup. But what you may not know is that he wasn't discharged for medical reasons, either. He simply quit. And not voluntarily, I might add. Too bad he quit -before- Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy..... Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. He might have been able to have a full career. Uniforms impress young boys. It impressed you. Your flight-suit photo impresses no one. Too bad it didn't impress you enough to honor your commitment and stay out of trouble for ONE enlistment, Frankie. Steve, K4YZ Does your nurse uniform impress you enough to honor your oath and stay out of medical trouble? Or does your oath encourage you to shoot your mouth off and give medical advice on rrap? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com