Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote But since about the mid 1980s, we've been told that the requirementsare "too high".... Who told you that? Not FCC. Not ARRL. Not me. I have proposed to the FCC that the "standard" full privilege license technical requirements should be about on a par with the current Extra requirements. And that there should be one other level, a "learners permit" with a generous term of ten years to study and gain experience to qualfity for a "full privilege" license. Sorry to spoil your (il)logic. 73, de Hans, K0HB PS: Looking for EPA in ARRL 160 tonight. They were scarce last night. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |