LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 05, 09:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default An English Teacher


wrote

But since about the mid 1980s, we've been told that
the requirementsare "too high"....


Who told you that? Not FCC. Not ARRL. Not me.

I have proposed to the FCC that the "standard" full privilege license technical
requirements should be about on a par with the current Extra requirements.

And that there should be one other level, a "learners permit" with a generous
term of ten years to study and gain experience to qualfity for a "full
privilege" license.

Sorry to spoil your (il)logic.

73, de Hans, K0HB

PS: Looking for EPA in ARRL 160 tonight. They were scarce last night.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Utillity freq List; NORMAN TRIANTAFILOS Shortwave 3 May 14th 05 03:31 AM
DX test Results [email protected] Shortwave 0 April 16th 04 03:52 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
DX test Results [email protected] Broadcasting 0 November 7th 03 11:37 PM
DX test Results [email protected] Shortwave 0 November 7th 03 11:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017