Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Bill Sohl" on Wed, Dec 7 2005 2:51 pm
wrote in message Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message snip Publicizing the exact Q&A makes the requirements lower because the prospective ham knows exactly what will be on the test, down to the exact wording, and the exact correct answers. Big difference from secret tests! Yawn.... BUT publishing the questions was never proposed by ARRL. That being so, who in the FCC do you attribute the change to? Those who wanted to save money by getting FCC out of the exam-giving process. So the reality is that no one in the ham community pushed that. I'll conclude then that anytime the FCC proposes a change even if not originated in the ham community, if you view it as a lowering of requirements then it is automatically bad per your opinion. "That's about the size of it..." snip Someone would have to do this in a structured way, by downloading the entire database at regular intervals (say once a month) and analyzing it a la AH0A. ARRL is perfectly capable of that I'm sure. But somebody has to pay for it. ["it's all about money"? :-) ] ARRL has more than enough ability to fund such a study or simply assign the task to one of the permanent ARRL staffers. AH0A is hardly an objective analyzer...whatever he sees is all about morse code... :-) And you can bet that whatever numbers ARRL puts out, some will say they are "massaged" and accuse the ARRL of "fraud" and such. WHO cares? There is always someone that will take issue with any study conclusion, analysis, ets. If you expect a 100% agreed to set of review and analysis as the end result, tyhen yu're expecting the impossible. The ARRL can do no wrong. snip I could care less about those that might want to wait for changes they have no assurance are coming. But those changes have an enormous impact on the numbers. That's the point, whether we care about it or not. The percent of people that might ultimately wait for "possible" (emphasis on possible as opposed to actual) future changes is, I suspect small. Odds are that there aren't many current techs waiting for future free upgrades nor where there likly many that shelved their upgrade plans when the ARRL first proposed free upgrades. (IMHO of course). Morsemen are prescient, see all, know all. We cannot doubt them. [they don't let us] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |