| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
December 18th 05, 06:54 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Reasonable and unique, was One Class of Amateur Radio License?
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Thurs, Dec 15 2005 4:14 am wrote: From: on Dec 13, 7:32 pm wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Dec 7, 5:28 pm wrote: From: Bill Sohl on Dec 6, 6:11 am wrote in message The starting path under discussion was the path to an amateur radio license. You haven't taken the first step on that path. "The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step"...some ancient Chinese proverb, I suppose. Lao Tzu. Any relation to Zack Lao? I found some Chinese proverbs which seem quite fitting to your role he "A crane is too obvious when it stands among a flock of chickens and looks very awkward. It is also true with a camel amidst a flock of sheep and a flea when it stands on top of a hairless head. They all carry a pejoritary tone: the thing that outstands others is something awkward if not necessarily bad." You are the crane, the camel or the flea. You are the chicken, the sheep or the hairless head? "There is an argument between a bird who stopped to drank at a well and a frog therein. They were arguing about how the sky looked like. Regarding where they were, they each had a different view. The frog's vision was of course very limited. Therefore, this proverb refers to somebody who has a very narrow-minded and insulated view of what they see or what they think." You are the frog. The frog gives the bird. I obtained a COMMERCIAL radio operator license 49 years ago. First Class, one test, no repeats necessary. Yeah? So? One exam to run a 100,000 watt transmitter? What would Jim say? WHY was it "required" that I obtain an amateur license? Who ever told you that it was? It isn't, but the way you and Jim needle Len about getting one... Was it necessary to punish amateurs? Who was "punished"? You tell us. You are the one into the dominatrix role. No, *you* need to tell us. You wrote of amateur radio ops being punished over incentive licensing. Back up your claim. I asked about amateurs being punished. Jim said he lost privileges. He was no longer in the privileged class. but you find a way to personalize it. The rules changes of 1968 and 1969 affected me at the time. They affected everyone after you as well. They did not affect you and they did not affect Len. You're simply wrong on that one, Quitefine. Lots of us radio pros without amateur licenses just didn't bother to get an amateur license...not necessarily as a result of "changes of 1968 or 1969." That's fine, Len. Nobody says you have to get ana amateur radio license. "Ana amateur radio license?" Ah, but YOU already said I had some kind of moral imperative to get an amateur radio license. Hypocrite. No one has told you anything of the kind. That's another of your factual errors. Then we will hear no more from you and Jim about Len not having one, right? But it does seem a bit odd that you're expending so much time and energy on the requirements for a license you aren't going to get... "Not going to get?" Who said that...besides YOU? Why, *you* said it. Why did he say it? I'm just wanting the morse code test for an amateur radio license eliminated. That's at least the third version you've told here. Previously, you've waffled between the other two--that you were going to get the "Extra right out of the box or that you weren't going to obtain an amateur radio license. Can't a person want more than one thing? Is Dave putting limits on what people can want? Why are YOU "spending so much time and energy" trying to throw **** on all of those desiring that test element 1 deletion? Doing what? That voodoo that you do. What are you afraid of? Loss of your personal status, title, and privileges? What are you afraid of, Len? That radio amateurs won't show you the respect which you feel is your due? That has certainly been the case on rrap. That you won't get into amateur radio before you're past your expiration date? Len has an expiration date? What is it? What the heck, I'd already started 15 and 14 years before in HF comms where the operating environment was a HELLUVA LOT TOUGHER on all concerned than any amateur activity. How was it "a HELLUVA LOT TOUGHER", Len? I saw your "My 3 Years" thing. The amateur radio service does not require its licensees to wage war and kill the enemy. Did you wage war or kill an enemy? He put himself in the pool of combattants. After that he followed orders. The military "field days" were not little outings in a park once a year. Did you ever participate in a military "field day"? He put himself in the pool of combattants. After that he followed orders. Amateur radio doesn't operate in an environment of high explosive ordinance going off nearby. Did you operate in an environment of high explosive ordinance going off nearby? He put himself in the pool of combattants. After that he followed orders. What did Jim do? Did he excuse himelf? Was he unfit to serve? And why all the comparisons? You seem to feel a need to prove that you had it "TOUGHER" than anybody else..... To use a quaint and traditional military phrase, "****in-A!" Then I suppose you're disappointed that you're efforts toward proving it have fallen a little short. One hundred seventy five miles uphill both ways to the FCC examiners office. In the snow. Yes, sweetums, I - and every other military person - had it TOUGHER than you civilians safe at home. Really? How tough was the rear area life in Japan, Len? I don't recall my military service as having been very TOUGH. Must have been why you got out so quickly. Problem is, Jimmie doesn't think that others can think differently so he doesn't think about the thousands of newcomers who MIGHT want to get into amateur radio. Len, I don't have any problem thinking others can think differently. That doesn't mean I must agree with them. Then why does your lofty highness insist all MUST agree with YOUR opinions? What's with your schtick here, Leonard? Your posts seem to indicate that you believe that all MUST agree with YOUR opinions. It would be nice that once someone rejects an opinion that they say why. Saying that Len doesn't hold an amateur license is not a good reason to reject Len's opinions wrt the ARS. There's no specification for a lot of things in Part 97, yet there's no problem. Yes there is. License test regulations REQUIRE a code test for any class having below-30-MHz operation privileges...BUT...the FCC does not mandate all amateur USING morse code modes over and above any other mode. All are optional. Well now! Yessir, that presents a real dilemma, doesn't it. You should be able to suck it up. After all, your military service was way TOUGHER than this easy civilian stuff. The regulations don't even define Morse Code let alone Farnsworth Code, but the FCC can deny a license based upon an exam it can't define. There's been two whole years of 18 Petitions commented on at length since the end of WRC-03 and now NPRM 05-143 which can settle the morse code testing for a license issue. Probably. But you won't be satisfied with that, despite your frequent claims of only wanting to eliminate the Morse Code test. Jimmie Noserve, GIVE UP trying to tell me "what I will do." You don't have the authority nor the qualifications to be ME nor judgemental on "what I will do." We can only go by what you've written, Len. You've written that you contacted out of band Frenchmen on 6m. Why can't Technicians operate on 14.026? Why can't hams operate on 13.976? And there you go with the ultimatums and strawmen. Jimmie with newsgroup wordplay again. About this point, Hans will jump in saying you are "simply mistaken" and babbling about how the "IARU and ITU" are different or other semi-sweet non-sequitur. Can't answer the questions, eh? Jimmie, you present NO valid questions. Ergo, no valid answers required. The questions were valid enough. You just didn't answer them. Why don't you answer them, Dave? You constantly bring up much older history ("My 3 Years") that doesn't apply to anything NOW.... Tsk, tsk, tsk, that's an entirely different "discussion" concerning overt LYING of military service by Dudly the Imposter (aka "K4YZ"). Your tales precede your manufacturer of the term "Dudly the Imposter" by quite some time. "manufacture" I brought up a VALID example some years ago on why the majority of military communications worldwide was NOT done by morse code mode since 1948...for the reason being that I was assigned at a major Army communications station serving a theater command Hq and stayed there for three years. YOU have NEVER done anything approaching that. In fact, YOU have NEVER served in any military service of the USA. Naturally you would be upset about anyone else doing something big and important in HF communications. TS. That's funny. Jim knows what I've done in professional communications and I've seen no indication that he has ever become upset over it. Then again, I've never made it seem that what I did professionally carried any weight in amateur radio. Your "career" was your DXpedition meal ticket. For example, I think the ARRL made a big mistake not letting WK3C run for Director of the Atlantic Division. That's *my* division, btw... Is your Division mobilized and ready to ship out to fight the War on Terror? Bon voyage. Maybe they can just show up on r.r.a.p, read your posts and begin waging the War on Error. Steve's gonna hate a bunch of usurpers showing up here. No way he's gonna let them edge him out. And so the war escalates. The change of zoning near your house did not remove any privileges from you, did it, Len? It didn't make your taxes go up or require you to change your house in any way, right? Irrelevant to RADIO REGULATIONS. Local zoning laws have NOTHING to do with federal radio regulations. Give it up. Did you miss seeing the parallel to your actions in regard to amateur radio? It was quite evident. Amateur radio regulations are a subset of "RADIO REGULATIONS." Or someone who tells a US Navy veteran to shove something up his I/O port? One military veteran can tell another military veteran lots of things. Brakob, Burke, and myself are all military veterans. YOU have NEVER been an military veteran. I'm a military veteran. You've told me lots of things. I take offense to some of them. Ditto. Here's a quaint old military phrase given in the tradition and sincerity of the military service: "Go **** yourself!" That will take care of Saturday night for you... You certainly write like a fellow who has lost an argument. Dave K8MN Maybe if he refreshes the screen... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
| DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
| DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
