Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Sohl" wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY Interesting too that the petition and rules changes recommended make no subdivision of HF band segment usage/permissions as a function of being Novice/Tech+, General, Advanced or Extra. If that is so, then what becomes the "incentive" for upgrading? Just my observation...or did I miss something.. Cheers, Bill K2UNK I noticed the same thing and didn't know what to make of it. Perhaps they mean to keep the same segments as now for the different licenses? I suppose that would work as you can always use a mode that is narrower than the max. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |