| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
November 22nd 05, 12:17 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL
Jim Hampton wrote: "6H4Ballast" wrote in message groups.com... wrote in message oups.com... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1 Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal. 73 de Jim, N2EY That's fine by me as just 20% of hams who use HF also use CW on a regular basis. And I'm not afraid to switch to CW right in that phone band when someone tries to jump on me. Been there, worn that T-shirt. Funny how 75 watts of cw can get through a kilowatt AM station. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Mighty Macho Morse Man? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
| Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
