Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters,
but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are
disturbing
the fish!

You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger? We know Riley didn't fine you. He
merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not
'invited') that you retest.
Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that.

Lisping cocksucker II wrote:
Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters,
but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are
disturbing
the fish!

You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.

Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that.

Sort of like those 4 letters you recieved from him (Riley), dumbass.

Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated
(not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.


No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent
you sound like "no reason"???
Still in denial, are you?

Yassar wrote:
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated
(not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.


No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent
you sound like "no reason"???

Yet the retest letter that has been posted ad nauseum gives no reason
like "interference" for the retest.


Still in denial, are you?

You're still a ****ing imbecile, aren't you?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated
(not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.
..............................................
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)

"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."

Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.
Learn to read, Pig.

Who said I was Roger? wrote:


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated
(not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.
.............................................
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)

No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement
letters news section.


"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."

Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no
reason. You lose, ****nuts.


Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.

You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your
lisp is showing.

Learn to read, Pig.

Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL
news section's take on the subject, dumbass!

wrote:
Who said I was Roger? wrote:


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated
(not
'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.
.............................................
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)

No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement
letters news section.


"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."

Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no
reason. You lose, ****nuts.


Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.

You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your
lisp is showing.

Learn to read, Pig.

Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL
news section's take on the subject, dumbass!

"Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post,
dumbass.'

You will find 2test behind the curtains.

Convicted child Molester
Commode Buzz Corey wrote:
"Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post,
dumbass.'

You will find 2test behind the curtains.

And you'll never find you unless you find the **** stains on the floor
because you hide behind doors when other hams come visiting.

AKA 2test wogie wrote:
Convicted child Molester
Commode Buzz Corey wrote:
"Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post,
dumbass.'

You will find 2test behind the curtains.

And you'll never find you unless you find the **** stains on the floor
because you hide behind doors when other hams come visiting.

LOL at the Glendale retard. You better get back to cleaning out those
port-a-potties 2test.