an_old_friend wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
So true....I think that's all he can do due to his lack of brain
capacity

it is his lack of moral fiber that is the cause he could do something
if he realy wanted to but he doesn't realy care enough to do so

Mark, you haven't any moral anything.

Stevie is bascialy lazy he wants the posters to suit there posts to his

"Steve is basically lazy. He wants posters to suit their posts to his"

reading level and abilty and lacks the ability to tolaoarate anyone

"reading level and ability. He lacks the ability to tolerate anyone"

being different from him

"being different from him".

Actually, Mark, you are the fellow who is lazy. You make no effort to
see that your posts are grammatically correct or spelled correctly.
Those things combine to make you appear less intelligent than you might
be. Your posts are difficult for all to read.

makes a guy wonder why he went into the ARS at all I thought the one of
the points was to have contact with different sorts of people.

No one is required to make contact with you or to even pretend to desire
contact with you. Take our local sociopath for example. The only
people in this area who make contact with Roger Wiseman aren't aware of
who or what he is. The guy is a pariah.

perhaps that will become after the R&O goes through and I too will have
an extra class license

....if you pass the exam. I'm sure that you'll suddenly become popular
beyond your wildest dreams.

Dave K8MN

N9OGL wrote:
Steve your a yutz and a looser who abuse people

(comma after "Steve") "you're" "putz" "loser" "abuses"
(period at end of sentence)

And you're a functionally illiterate basement dweller sapping
Mumsy's and Pop's resources.

I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd.

You still haven't enlighten us on what you've done, which is probably
nothing, but write abusive post on here.

You're incapable of being "enlightened", Toiddie. You don't have
the education or comprehension or capacity.

Steve, K4YZ

In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

N9OGL wrote:
Hey Toiddie...If you can bring YOUR mindless trash in here under
the color of protection of the Constitution, then guess what...?!?!?
YOU don't have ANY right to suggest someone else not exercise
their opinions regardless of what YOU think of them.

That's the problem steve with the first amendment huh? BTW I do have
the right to assert and protect myself from ###holes like you,
regardless if you like it or not.

"protect (your)self"...?!?!

What? You're not going to read what I write about you any
more...?!?!

Yeah right steve, lying again
Nope.

Where's your proof, Sure I live at home, but that don't mean I don't
have money, I own my own business.

Sure...Just like a pimp "owns" a business.

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?


NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.



Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before
posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little
nobody. RIGHT!

LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct.
Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois.
Nor is there a business license I can find.

But you forget one thing, as I've stated many times before, there's a
lot more to that LPTV deal it then you know. Secondly my "company" as
you claim isn't a business, it's a club, it always has been, since
1983.

No, it's not, unless you were lying in April.

Allow me to remind you:

QUOTE

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "N9OGL" - Find messages by this author


(Remember when you still had wideband at home, Toiddie...?!?!

Date: 8 Apr 2005 15:37:06 -0700
Local: Fri, Apr 8 2005 4:37 pm
Subject: Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's
some material gleaned from the archives:

HUGE SNIP

So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I
don't believe there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER
getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation!

Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur
radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress
passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go
spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You
don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion (EXPLITIVE
DELETED)

UNQUOTE

So...Toiddie...Are you lying now or were you lying in April?

Maybe a bit more to jog your mind, Toiddie?

QUOTE:

ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS

LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH
PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS
LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND
JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS.


THE PROBLEM WITH THAT STEBIE IS IT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED FOR A LONG TIME, AS
A MATTER OF FACT WHEN I LOG IN TO GEOCITIES THEY SAY THE PAGE DOESN'T
EXIST. I THINK YOU ALSO MISS THE POINT THAT UNDER THE LAW BOTH THE STATE
OF ILLINOIS AND FEDERAL LAW A ORGINIZATION, CLUB OR WHATEVER DOESN'T HAVE
TO PAY TAXES IF THEY MAKE NO MONEY WHAT'S SO EVER.




So today (just below...) you state this was started in 1983, yet
in April you said it was 1999.

That's a 16 year error.

NO YOU **** DICKHEAD, IN THE 90'S THE GROUP WAS REORGINIZED CREATING A NEW
"REINCARNATION" OF THE GROUP.

"I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY
CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK.

Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded!

And I re-address your use of "CEO/PRESIDENT"


IT'S A TITLE BIG ****ING DEAL!


"LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE
CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS"

It started in 1983 as DDC-TV...(SNIP)

Dumb, Dumber and Clueless-TransVestites...?!?!

So...Here we've caught you screwing up SEVERAL stories...

Which one is true?

Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha
Sure there is.

RIGHT.....you've been saying that for a long time now...

Uh huh. And it's still true.

TRUE THAT YOU AREN'T GOING TO DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BUT ACT LIKE AN ASSHOLE
ON HERE.


Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish
you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful.

Keep dreaming steve.

Nope.


STEVE ANIMATION CHILD PORN IS LEGAL, THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE
WROTE IT INCORRECTLY. PAINTING, CARTOONS, SCULPTURE, AND DRAWING ARE
EXEMPTED FROM THE LAW. THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE SAID THE OPPOSITE
OF WHAT THE LAW STATES. WHICH SHOW YOU NOT TO BELEIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ
ON THE INTERNET. THE MAN THAT WAS ARRESTED HAD ANIMATION PORN, BUT HE ALSO
HAD A HUGH COLLECTION OF REAL CHILD PORN WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF HIS
PROBATION. THE MAN HAD BE ARRESTED BEFORE FOR
HAVING REAL CHILD PORN AN SPENT TIME IN PRISON, HE WAS RELEASE AND WAS PUT
ON PROBATION AND HE DOWNLOAD THIS MATERIAL AT WORK AND WAS CAUGHT AND
REALLY WAS FOUND GULITY OF VIOLATING HIS PROBATION. ME, I DON'T MESS WITH
REAL CHILD PORN, NEVER HAVE, I'M INTO JAPANESE ANIMATION AND HENTAI.


Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court
ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS
protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about
it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm

I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd.

What tell your mommy??

Nope.


YOU AIN'T DOING **** ABOUT IT STEVE, EXCEPT GET ON HERE AND CRY LIKE A
LITTLE BITCH. YOU CAN'T DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT'S LEGAL, VIRTUAL
PORN WAS DEEMED PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY THE US SUPREME COURT
IN 2001. THE PURPOSE OF CHILD PORN LAWS IS TO PROTECT CHILD IN MAKING OF
IT, SINCE VIRTUAL PORN IS FROM SOMEONE'S IMAGINATION THERE IS NO VICTIM,
THUS NO CRIME (ACCORDING TO THE US SUPREME COURT) EVEN IN FEBER VS NEW
YORK IN THE 70'S THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT SOME CHILD PORNOGRAPHY WAS
LEGAL, IT'S THE PROCESS OF MAKING IT THAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL.



TODD N9OGL

Putz

Yes, you are! Good step forward!

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

N9OGL wrote:
Hey Toiddie...If you can bring YOUR mindless trash in here under
the color of protection of the Constitution, then guess what...?!?!?
YOU don't have ANY right to suggest someone else not exercise
their opinions regardless of what YOU think of them.

That's the problem steve with the first amendment huh? BTW I do have
the right to assert and protect myself from ###holes like you,
regardless if you like it or not.

"protect (your)self"...?!?!

What? You're not going to read what I write about you any
more...?!?!

Yeah right steve, lying again
Nope.

Where's your proof, Sure I live at home, but that don't mean I don't
have money, I own my own business.

Sure...Just like a pimp "owns" a business.

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?


NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

For now, Toadie, for now... BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!



Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before
posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little
nobody. RIGHT!

LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct.
Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois.
Nor is there a business license I can find.

But you forget one thing, as I've stated many times before, there's a
lot more to that LPTV deal it then you know. Secondly my "company" as
you claim isn't a business, it's a club, it always has been, since
1983.

No, it's not, unless you were lying in April.

Allow me to remind you:

QUOTE

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "N9OGL" - Find messages by this author


(Remember when you still had wideband at home, Toiddie...?!?!

Date: 8 Apr 2005 15:37:06 -0700
Local: Fri, Apr 8 2005 4:37 pm
Subject: Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's
some material gleaned from the archives:

HUGE SNIP

So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I
don't believe there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER
getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation!

Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur
radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress
passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go
spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You
don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion (EXPLITIVE
DELETED)

UNQUOTE

So...Toiddie...Are you lying now or were you lying in April?

Maybe a bit more to jog your mind, Toiddie?

QUOTE:

ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS

LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH
PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS
LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND
JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS.


THE PROBLEM WITH THAT STEBIE IS IT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED FOR A LONG TIME, AS
A MATTER OF FACT WHEN I LOG IN TO GEOCITIES THEY SAY THE PAGE DOESN'T
EXIST. I THINK YOU ALSO MISS THE POINT THAT UNDER THE LAW BOTH THE STATE
OF ILLINOIS AND FEDERAL LAW A ORGINIZATION, CLUB OR WHATEVER DOESN'T HAVE
TO PAY TAXES IF THEY MAKE NO MONEY WHAT'S SO EVER.

Quit lying, faggot.




So today (just below...) you state this was started in 1983, yet
in April you said it was 1999.

That's a 16 year error.

NO YOU **** DICKHEAD, IN THE 90'S THE GROUP WAS REORGINIZED CREATING A NEW
"REINCARNATION" OF THE GROUP.

Toad's a theatre fag... BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

"I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY
CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK.

The only entertaining you do is on your knees at the public restrooms,
Toadie.

Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded!

And I re-address your use of "CEO/PRESIDENT"


IT'S A TITLE BIG ****ING DEAL!

And it means nothing.


"LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE
CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS"

It started in 1983 as DDC-TV...(SNIP)

Dumb, Dumber and Clueless-TransVestites...?!?!

So...Here we've caught you screwing up SEVERAL stories...

Which one is true?

Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha
Sure there is.

RIGHT.....you've been saying that for a long time now...

Uh huh. And it's still true.

TRUE THAT YOU AREN'T GOING TO DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BUT ACT LIKE AN ASSHOLE
ON HERE.

Toadie gets his pink panties in a wad........


Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish
you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful.

Keep dreaming steve.

Nope.


STEVE ANIMATION CHILD PORN IS LEGAL, THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE
WROTE IT INCORRECTLY. PAINTING, CARTOONS, SCULPTURE, AND DRAWING ARE
EXEMPTED FROM THE LAW. THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE SAID THE OPPOSITE
OF WHAT THE LAW STATES. WHICH SHOW YOU NOT TO BELEIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ
ON THE INTERNET. THE MAN THAT WAS ARRESTED HAD ANIMATION PORN, BUT HE ALSO
HAD A HUGH COLLECTION OF REAL CHILD PORN WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF HIS
PROBATION. THE MAN HAD BE ARRESTED BEFORE FOR
HAVING REAL CHILD PORN AN SPENT TIME IN PRISON, HE WAS RELEASE AND WAS PUT
ON PROBATION AND HE DOWNLOAD THIS MATERIAL AT WORK AND WAS CAUGHT AND
REALLY WAS FOUND GULITY OF VIOLATING HIS PROBATION. ME, I DON'T MESS WITH
REAL CHILD PORN, NEVER HAVE, I'M INTO JAPANESE ANIMATION AND HENTAI.

Toadie has another fag fit.


Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court
ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS
protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about
it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm

I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd.

What tell your mommy??

Nope.


YOU AIN'T DOING **** ABOUT IT STEVE, EXCEPT GET ON HERE AND CRY LIKE A
LITTLE BITCH. YOU CAN'T DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT'S LEGAL, VIRTUAL
PORN WAS DEEMED PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY THE US SUPREME COURT
IN 2001. THE PURPOSE OF CHILD PORN LAWS IS TO PROTECT CHILD IN MAKING OF
IT, SINCE VIRTUAL PORN IS FROM SOMEONE'S IMAGINATION THERE IS NO VICTIM,
THUS NO CRIME (ACCORDING TO THE US SUPREME COURT) EVEN IN FEBER VS NEW
YORK IN THE 70'S THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT SOME CHILD PORNOGRAPHY WAS
LEGAL, IT'S THE PROCESS OF MAKING IT THAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL.


Little Toad, you'd better have all your books in order at your little
"food service business", you know what happened to Al Capone after the
state and Feds found out he hadn't been paying the right amount of
taxes. But you'd like being a black Bubba's little bitch up in Joilet,
wouldn't you?

Little Toad, you'd better have all your books in order at your little
"food service business", you know what happened to Al Capone after the
state and Feds found out he hadn't been paying the right amount of
taxes. But you'd like being a black Bubba's little bitch up in Joilet,
wouldn't you?

Hey Dickhead, my food service DOES PAY it's taxes, that's why I've got
an accountant. Keep trying steve, you'll get there.

N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?

NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

Ahhhh! A hot dog stand! Or you're the busboy at a Denny's or
Waffle House.

But I am wondering...Who eats anything YOU have put YOUR hands
on...?!?! Do they KNOW where those hands have been...?!?!

Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before
posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little
nobody. RIGHT!

LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct.
Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois.
Nor is there a business license I can find.

But you forget one thing, as I've stated many times before, there's a
lot more to that LPTV deal it then you know. Secondly my "company" as
you claim isn't a business, it's a club, it always has been, since
1983.

No, it's not, unless you were lying in April.

Allow me to remind you:

QUOTE

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "N9OGL" - Find messages by this author


(Remember when you still had wideband at home, Toiddie...?!?!

Date: 8 Apr 2005 15:37:06 -0700
Local: Fri, Apr 8 2005 4:37 pm
Subject: Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's
some material gleaned from the archives:

HUGE SNIP

So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I
don't believe there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER
getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation!

Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur
radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress
passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go
spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You
don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion (EXPLITIVE
DELETED)

UNQUOTE

So...Toiddie...Are you lying now or were you lying in April?

Maybe a bit more to jog your mind, Toiddie?

QUOTE:

ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS

LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH
PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS
LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND
JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS.

THE PROBLEM WITH THAT STEBIE IS IT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED FOR A LONG TIME, AS
A MATTER OF FACT WHEN I LOG IN TO GEOCITIES THEY SAY THE PAGE DOESN'T
EXIST. I THINK YOU ALSO MISS THE POINT THAT UNDER THE LAW BOTH THE STATE
OF ILLINOIS AND FEDERAL LAW A ORGINIZATION, CLUB OR WHATEVER DOESN'T HAVE
TO PAY TAXES IF THEY MAKE NO MONEY WHAT'S SO EVER.

The fact of the matter is that your "company" doesn't exist save
for the vast deepness of your imagination.

So today (just below...) you state this was started in 1983, yet
in April you said it was 1999.

That's a 16 year error.

NO YOU #### ****HEAD, IN THE 90'S THE GROUP WAS REORGINIZED CREATING A NEW
"REINCARNATION" OF THE GROUP.

But that's not what you said before.

So I reiterate my question...Were you lying then, or are you lying
NOW...?!?!

"I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY
CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK.

Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded!

And I re-address your use of "CEO/PRESIDENT"

IT'S A TITLE BIG ####ING DEAL!

It's just one more bit of proof that you've been lying and got
CAUGHT!

That's why the subject line of this thread is "Keeping Track of
Toiddie's Tales".

"LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE
CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS"

It started in 1983 as DDC-TV...(SNIP)

Dumb, Dumber and Clueless-TransVestites...?!?!

So...Here we've caught you screwing up SEVERAL stories...

Which one is true?

Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha
Sure there is.

RIGHT.....you've been saying that for a long time now...

Uh huh. And it's still true.

TRUE THAT YOU AREN'T GOING TO DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BUT ACT LIKE AN ###HOLE
ON HERE.

Why would I act like you? We already have one-too-many of YOU
here as it is!

Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish
you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful.

Keep dreaming steve.

Nope.

STEVE ANIMATION CHILD PORN IS LEGAL, THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE
WROTE IT INCORRECTLY.

So...You acknowledge that you DO support "child pornography"....

So you ARE the degenerate that all here have claimed you to be...

PAINTING, CARTOONS, SCULPTURE, AND DRAWING ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE LAW.

But the FACTS are that Todd Daugherty, N9OGL, DOES support child
pornography.

THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE SAID THE OPPOSITE
OF WHAT THE LAW STATES. WHICH SHOW YOU NOT TO BELEIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ
ON THE INTERNET. THE MAN THAT WAS ARRESTED HAD ANIMATION PORN, BUT HE ALSO
HAD A HUGH COLLECTION OF REAL CHILD PORN WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF HIS
PROBATION. THE MAN HAD BE ARRESTED BEFORE FOR
HAVING REAL CHILD PORN AN SPENT TIME IN PRISON, HE WAS RELEASE AND WAS PUT
ON PROBATION AND HE DOWNLOAD THIS MATERIAL AT WORK AND WAS CAUGHT AND
REALLY WAS FOUND GULITY OF VIOLATING HIS PROBATION. ME, I DON'T MESS WITH
REAL CHILD PORN, NEVER HAVE, I'M INTO JAPANESE ANIMATION AND HENTAI.

You're into child pornography.

Even the suggestion of acceptance of children engaging in adult
sexual activity is sick. That there are people like you who find a way
to "openly" hide your activites is even moreso.

The "problem" for people like you is that you "get away" with
stuff like this for now, but it only emboldens you to other acts.
Sooner or later, you'll find yourself behind bars wishing you'd
exerecised your "Freedom of Speech" on something more meaningful that
the concept of children having sex.

Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court
ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS
protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about
it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm

I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd.

What tell your mommy??

Nope.

YOU AIN'T DOING #### ABOUT IT STEVE, EXCEPT GET ON HERE AND CRY LIKE A
LITTLE BITCH.

Sure I am...Toiddie. I've already proven that I can effect
change. Why do you continue to suggest otherwise?

No, I don't suggest that ANYthing is going to happen over
night....but it will...

YOU CAN'T DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT'S LEGAL, VIRTUAL
PORN WAS DEEMED PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY THE US SUPREME COURT
IN 2001. THE PURPOSE OF CHILD PORN LAWS IS TO PROTECT CHILD IN MAKING OF
IT, SINCE VIRTUAL PORN IS FROM SOMEONE'S IMAGINATION THERE IS NO VICTIM,
THUS NO CRIME (ACCORDING TO THE US SUPREME COURT) EVEN IN FEBER VS NEW
YORK IN THE 70'S THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT SOME CHILD PORNOGRAPHY WAS
LEGAL, IT'S THE PROCESS OF MAKING IT THAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL.

Like I said, Toiddie...the problem for people like you is that
letting you "take an inch" means you'll eventually try to take a
mile...And in that effort you'll lose your freedom. But then the rest
of us will be just a little bit safer from people like you!

Steve, K4YZ

On 19 Dec 2005 20:19:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?

NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

Ahhhh! A hot dog stand! Or you're the busboy at a Denny's or
Waffle House.

more slander form stevie

a man who wil do anything to have his way
everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

But I am wondering...Who eats anything YOU have put YOUR hands
on...?!?! Do they KNOW where those hands have been...?!?!

Not true steve, I've must be doing something right, I've got a state
license and a certificate from the National Restaurant Association
(NRA)

So...You acknowledge that you DO support "child pornography"....
So you ARE the degenerate that all here have claimed you to be...

No I Support Japanese Animation and Hentai, There a big difference
between that and child porn, Japanese anime and hentai is legal and
child porn is illegal.

But the FACTS are that Todd Daugherty, N9OGL, DOES support child
pornography.

again, I support Anime and Hentai. BIG difference.

Sure I am...Toiddie. I've already proven that I can effect
change. Why do you continue to suggest otherwise?

Yeah, steve, right, the fact remains my site is LEGAL and there really
nothing you can do!


Like I said, Toiddie...the problem for people like you is that
letting you "take an inch" means you'll eventually try to take a
mile...And in that effort you'll lose your freedom. But then the rest
of us will be just a little bit safer from people like you!

No steve the problem is NAZI's like you who don't like what a persons
say, and instead of ignoring it you feel compelled to "do something
about it" thus supressing the persons rights.

Todd N9OGL

On 19 Dec 2005 20:19:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?

NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

Ahhhh! A hot dog stand! Or you're the busboy at a Denny's or
Waffle House.

But I am wondering...Who eats anything YOU have put YOUR hands
on...?!?! Do they KNOW where those hands have been...?!?!

more slander from the master of slander

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005 20:19:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?

NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

Ahhhh! A hot dog stand! Or you're the busboy at a Denny's or
Waffle House.

But I am wondering...Who eats anything YOU have put YOUR hands
on...?!?! Do they KNOW where those hands have been...?!?!

more slander from the master of slander

More stupidity from Ms. Morgan.