|
Time for the _REAL_ Radio Ham to make a stand?
At 590 posts in only 12 days, and a considerable
undertow of thread drift, perhaps it is time to remind ourselves of the high moral stance of the OP..... Pierian Spring wrote: It seems that anyone of those who are involved in any way with childrens' organisations or with the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten entrance examination (that is represented by the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools' Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only from the children in their care. Is it time for all _REAL_ Radio Hams to refuse to have anything to do with such mental derangees and their charges, and institute an age bar, perhaps 16-years-old, below which we will not associate in any way? Only then, by making it clear that young children are not, and cannot be in any way, part of the society of adult technocrats that is Radio Hammery will be be able to influence them not to attempt to join us until they have achieved maturity? Word will soon get around if children who have been conned by the various Billies-No_Mates into going for the M3/CB fools' Licence find that no-one will speak to them. |
shit
Orator For Decency wrote: At 590 posts in only 12 days, and a considerable undertow of thread drift, perhaps it is time to remind ourselves of the high moral stance of the OP..... what high moral stand? |
shit
On 7 Jan 2006 03:57:33 -0800, "Orator For Decency"
wrote: At 590 posts in only 12 days, and a considerable undertow of thread drift, perhaps it is time to remind ourselves of the high moral stance of the OP..... hsit and hate filled **** at that why are you such a BAD hams? everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will he is lying of course STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
sh*t
wrote:
everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will Everytime you post that it reminds me of the following newpaper article: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet message results in libel award (AP) Richmond, Va -- A former doctor at Emory University School of Medicine has won what his lawyers say is the first libel verdict based on an anonymouse Internet message. A U.S. District Court judge last week awarded $675,000 to Dr. Sam D. Graham Jr., who resigned as chairman of the school's urology department in July 1998. (snip) The judge called the Internet messages "about as despicable as any course of conduct that one could engage in." Graham's attorneys, D. Alan Rudlin and J. Burke McCormick, said they believe the judgement is the first libel verdict based on an anonymous Internet message. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You should be able to pull up the full article from the names mentioned above. Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12 -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
sh*t
Walt Davidson wrote:
On 8 Jan 2006 06:32:36 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman) wrote: Internet message results in libel award (AP) Richmond, Va -- A former doctor at Emory University School of Medicine has won what his lawyers say is the first libel verdict based on an anonymouse Internet message. A U.S. District Court judge last week awarded $675,000 to Dr. Sam D. Graham Jr., who resigned as chairman of the school's urology department in July 1998. (snip) The judge called the Internet messages "about as despicable as any course of conduct that one could engage in." Yes, Jeff, but the trouble is that most posters of such anonymous garbage are losers without two cents to rub together, so suing them is a waste of time. 73 de G3NYY Their ISP might prove to be a little richer. Just a thought. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
Libel lawsuit
Andy Cowley wrote:
Walt Davidson wrote: Jeffrey Herman wrote: Internet message results in libel award Yes, Jeff, but the trouble is that most posters of such anonymous garbage are losers without two cents to rub together, so suing them is a waste of time. Their ISP might prove to be a little richer. Just a thought. The nice thing about a civil lawsuit is that the huge fine can be attached to defendant's wages; for every dollar earned, so many cents go to paying the plaintiff the awarded amount. Also, if property is sold, the funds are seized and again given to the plaintiff. 73, Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12 -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
To Our Colleagues in the UK...Sorry For Mark Morgan's (KB9RQZ) Censorship Attempts...We Don't Like Him Either.
wrote: On 6 Jan 2006 05:48:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: pointyhead wrote: The Magnum wrote: No, sorry your not. Im not going to pass on who it was out of courtesy apart from telling you it wasn't him. Ha! You wouldn't tell me anyway! I'll bet though it was some lazy assed class b with a chip on his shoulder or an M3/Cb'er! Oh dear, Pointyhead really must have a problem. maybe this will let this thread die Maybe you'll tell us what gave you the right to decide? the ablity to act gives me the power what gives you the power to lie and call it censorship? The "power" is called the "truth". Calling your actions censorship was NOT a lie. You attempted to interfere in another person's expression of thought. That's censorship. in your case the ability to type I think what you meant to say was "...in your case the ability to type BETTER THAN I".... Not that it's that hard to do. Steve, K4YZ |
your point jeff?
On 10 Jan 2006 05:58:52 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman)
wrote: Andy Cowley wrote: Walt Davidson wrote: Jeffrey Herman wrote: Internet message results in libel award Yes, Jeff, but the trouble is that most posters of such anonymous garbage are losers without two cents to rub together, so suing them is a waste of time. Their ISP might prove to be a little richer. Just a thought. The nice thing about a civil lawsuit is that the huge fine can be attached to defendant's wages; for every dollar earned, so many cents go to paying the plaintiff the awarded amount. Also, if property is sold, the funds are seized and again given to the plaintiff. your point? after all what you sarted has realy driffted the thing thing stev would need for example was case he was being slandered/libeled you are jumping ahead to a judgment 73, Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
To Our Colleagues in the UK...Sorry For Mark Morgan's (KB9RQZ) Censorship Attempts...We Don't Like Him Either.
Oh and having someone kick off the Internet ISN'T cenorship steve??
right? Todd N9OGL |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com