| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#52
January 17th 06, 07:40 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
More Markie Mularkie
|
|
#53
January 17th 06, 07:47 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
mor **** fresh and straight from the asshole of rrap
K4YZ wrote:
wrote: On 14 Jan 2006 06:54:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. then according to wat you typed there everything I said or done in here is repsonse to waht you wanted and that it was under your control Nope. that is what you said this stament would mean that you have no case a for suit (but we already knew that) What you "know" is in error. not likely and cleary that you want RRAp to exist in the sewer No, but you sure do. not realy you led again ..Witness the constant use of profanities and sexual innuendo that you use. you are the one making constant sexual innuuedo you are in control of us you claimed it No, that was what YOU claim. NO i have never made such aclaim you lied again therefore the result are exactly as you wish Where did you get your PhD in Spin Doctoring, Markie...?!?! no where I don't have one but ty for the complement Steve, K4YZ |
|
#54
January 17th 06, 10:09 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
More Markie Mularkie
an Old friend wrote: " mor #### fresh and straight from the ###hole of rrap" I still haven't figured out why Markie has taken to addressing himself in such a foul manner and in the third person... K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 14 Jan 2006 06:54:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. then according to wat you typed there everything I said or done in here is repsonse to waht you wanted and that it was under your control Nope. that is what you said No, it's not. this stament would mean that you have no case a for suit (but we already knew that) What you "know" is in error. not likely Every likelyhood. It's archived right there for all to see. and cleary that you want RRAp to exist in the sewer No, but you sure do. not realy you led again I "led" again....?!?! Led what? ..Witness the constant use of profanities and sexual innuendo that you use. you are the one making constant sexual innuuedo Nope. This week alone YOU have introduced some form of sexual innuendo, including suggestions that I am physically drawn to you or have fantasies about you no fewer than 18 times. you are in control of us you claimed it No, that was what YOU claim. NO i have never made such aclaim you lied again Nope. Just scroll up. There's YOUR words making that very same suggestion. therefore the result are exactly as you wish Where did you get your PhD in Spin Doctoring, Markie...?!?! no where I don't have one but ty for the complement Only you would think that was a compliment, Markie. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#55
January 17th 06, 03:34 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
steve lies some more
On 17 Jan 2006 02:09:38 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an Old friend wrote: " mor**** fresh and straight from the asshole of rrap" I still haven't figured out why Markie has taken to addressing himself in such a foul manner and in the third person... top postsing again and lying some mor K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 14 Jan 2006 06:54:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. then according to wat you typed there everything I said or done in here is repsonse to waht you wanted and that it was under your control Nope. that is what you said No, it's not. this stament would mean that you have no case a for suit (but we already knew that) What you "know" is in error. not likely Every likelyhood. It's archived right there for all to see. and cleary that you want RRAp to exist in the sewer No, but you sure do. not realy you led again I "led" again....?!?! Led what? ..Witness the constant use of profanities and sexual innuendo that you use. you are the one making constant sexual innuuedo Nope. This week alone YOU have introduced some form of sexual innuendo, including suggestions that I am physically drawn to you or have fantasies about you no fewer than 18 times. you are in control of us you claimed it No, that was what YOU claim. NO i have never made such aclaim you lied again Nope. Just scroll up. There's YOUR words making that very same suggestion. therefore the result are exactly as you wish Where did you get your PhD in Spin Doctoring, Markie...?!?! no where I don't have one but ty for the complement Only you would think that was a compliment, Markie. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Really Hans, no call to be rude | General | |||
| Radio call letters: What do they mean? | Shortwave | |||
| FCC resumes issuing calls. | Policy | |||
| FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy | |||
| OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner | |||
Linear Mode
