Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 06, 07:35 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default Really Hans, no call to be rude


Jeffrey Herman wrote:
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any
better than you seem to


Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech.


obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening
the UoH

BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank, or for that matter why was your motivation
only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of
Mathematics??

obvisoly a lack of motivation?

or is it simplier to simply tell the truth

you were lying when you claimed motivation was everything

No 73 for you,
Jeff KH6O
--
Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 4th 06, 07:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default QRP is for Sissies!


an_old_friend wrote:
Jeffrey Herman wrote:
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any
better than you seem to


Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech.


obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening
the UoH


Nor would you be allowed TO attend "UoH" with THAT grammar.

BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA!!!!

Yet one more example of why it's obvious Markie was NEVER in ANY
branch of the Armed Forces...

One does not "only" make Chief Petty Officer in ANY rate in the
Navy OR Coast Guard, Markie. The course work, pre-requisites,
examination process and selection boards are grueling!

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation
only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of
Mathematics??


Who's to say he's not headed that way?

Please, Markie...P L E A S E cite for us YOUR qualifications in
ANY occupational field other than aggitating, muck raking, lie telling
and deceit, OK...?!?!

Schools? Certificates? Programs? Awards? (We'll even accept
"Head Start")

Steve, K4YZ

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 7th 06, 11:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default why are you lying

On 3 Jan 2006 23:52:45 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
Jeffrey Herman wrote:
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any
better than you seem to

Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech.


obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening
the UoH


Nor would you be allowed TO attend "UoH" with THAT grammar.

BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA!!!!

Yet one more example of why it's obvious Markie was NEVER in ANY
branch of the Armed Forces...


why are you lying?

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces

but even that would be a lie just less of one

what is realy proven is that Jeff was lying when he claimed
motivations all that seperated people acheivements


One does not "only" make Chief Petty Officer in ANY rate in the
Navy OR Coast Guard, Markie. The course work, pre-requisites,
examination process and selection boards are grueling!

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation
only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of
Mathematics??


Who's to say he's not headed that way?

Please, Markie...P L E A S E cite for us YOUR qualifications in
ANY occupational field other than aggitating, muck raking, lie telling
and deceit, OK...?!?!

Schools? Certificates? Programs? Awards? (We'll even accept
"Head Start")

Steve, K4YZ


everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will

he is lying of course

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282

well stevie you assked for it you got it
Mark Morgan


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 8th 06, 05:49 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Jeffrey Herman
 
Posts: n/a
Default why are you lying

wrote:
BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering
submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer
due to the age cutoff.

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything


It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly
go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs.
Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position
than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings
of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't
win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again
next time.

Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in
amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees
in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance;
those that aren't, won't.

I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts.

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces


You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force
outside of the DoD. This is done on purpose, for it allows us to
also enforce federal law within the US borders, something the other
four services are prohibited from due to the Posse Comitatus Act
of 1878.

This calls for Title 14, Part 1, Chapter 1, Section 1, of the US Code:

Establishment of Coast Guard

The Coast Guard as established January 28, 1915, shall be a military
service and a branch of the armed forces of the United States at all
times. The Coast Guard shall be a service in the Department of
Homeland Security, except when operating as a service in the Navy.


HLS, not DoD.


(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was
your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or
even dept head of Mathematics??



It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven
years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with
just the masters degree. Motivation can't overcome seven-year time
limits. That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting
me, and I know better than to bite.

Still no 73 for you,
Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12
--
Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 8th 06, 09:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default why are you lying

On 8 Jan 2006 05:49:23 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman)
wrote:

wrote:
BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering
submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer
due to the age cutoff.

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything


It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly
go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs.
Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position
than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings
of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't
win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again
next time.


that is what you said sir you said the only rason for deifferences in
education level and other things was motivation changing you story,
now you adknow that isn't

my point is made you are not telling the truth

Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in
amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees
in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance;
those that aren't, won't.

now you claim only age limits are valid

when are you going to wake up and smel what you are shoveling




I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts.


you may feel that way t what you are doing is lying

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces


You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force
outside of the DoD.

you are assuming sir incorrectly as you were incorrect in your
earlier stament that motivation is everything which you now back pedal
to motvation is everything escept...
cuting the off topic rant

HLS, not DoD.


(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was
your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or
even dept head of Mathematics??



It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven
years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with
just the masters degree.


Motivation can't overcome seven-year time
limits

meaning motiation isn't everthing and you lied when you said it was

. That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting
me, and I know better than to bite.


meaning you are not honest to deal with that fact you have put out a
statement as tture with at best lots of holes

Indeed you have bitten enough

your claim that Motivation is sole difference in educational levels
you yourself have just admitted is not true

why not be a man and admit you mispoke

Still no 73 for you,


ty I find the use the terms offisive
Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12


everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will

he is lying of course

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282

well stevie you assked for it you got it
Mark Morgan


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 10th 06, 11:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default More Markie Mularkie


wrote:
On 8 Jan 2006 05:49:23 GMT,
(Jeffrey Herman)
wrote:
wrote:
BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering
submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer
due to the age cutoff.

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything


It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly
go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs.
Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position
than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings
of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't
win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again
next time.


that is what you said sir you said the only rason for deifferences in
education level and other things was motivation changing you story,
now you adknow that isn't


Was that a sentence or a paragraph?

Was there a meaning to it?

This is proof that given a typewritter and opportunity, even a
monkey can bang out a few "words".

my point is made you are not telling the truth


Your point is that you did nothing of the sort.

Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in
amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees
in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance;
those that aren't, won't.


now you claim only age limits are valid


Uhhhhhhh...Markie...?!?!

He specifically said "...there are no age barriers for advancing
in amateur radio..."

So WHY did you insist in the very next "sentence" you wrote that
he said something different?

when are you going to wake up and smel what you are shoveling


Perhaps because all the shovelling is being done at your house,
Markie...And Jeff doesn't impress me as being the kind to "go slumming"
in his free time.

I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts.


you may feel that way t what you are doing is lying


And you're perpetuating your reputation as an idiot by making such
assinine statements.

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces


You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force
outside of the DoD.


you are assuming sir incorrectly as you were incorrect in your
earlier stament that motivation is everything which you now back pedal
to motvation is everything escept...


More random words seeking organization and meaning.

cuting the off topic rant


What was "off topic" was your reply vis-a-vis Jeff's last
comments.

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was
your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or
even dept head of Mathematics??



It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven
years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with
just the masters degree.


Motivation can't overcome seven-year time
limits


meaning motiation isn't everthing and you lied when you said it was


That's not what he said.

Had you acutally obtained the education YOU claim, Markie, you'd
know that in most cases any classwork applied toward a doctorate level
program has a window of application. Exceed the window and the old
work is no longer applicable.

. That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting
me, and I know better than to bite.


meaning you are not honest to deal with that fact you have put out a
statement as tture with at best lots of holes


More meaningless words.

Indeed you have bitten enough


Coming from you, Markie, I am sure that was meant to be a
compliment.

your claim that Motivation is sole difference in educational levels
you yourself have just admitted is not true


No, he did not.

why not be a man and admit you mispoke


Then he WOULD be lying.

Still no 73 for you,


ty I find the use the terms offisive


I am sure you do...what ever "offisive" means...

Steve, K4YZ

  #7   Report Post  
Old January 10th 06, 03:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default more **** of seve trying to hijack yet another thread into personal attack

On 10 Jan 2006 03:41:01 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 8 Jan 2006 05:49:23 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman)
wrote:
wrote:
BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)

Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering
submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer
due to the age cutoff.

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything

It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly
go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs.
Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position
than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings
of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't
win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again
next time.


that is what you said sir you said the only rason for deifferences in
education level and other things was motivation changing you story,
now you adknow that isn't


Was that a sentence or a paragraph?

yes

Was there a meaning to it?

yes

This is proof that given a typewritter and opportunity, even a
monkey can bang out a few "words".

so

my point is made you are not telling the truth


Your point is that you did nothing of the sort.


nope my point was and remains that Jeff was lying when he started this
motivation thread


Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in
amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees
in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance;
those that aren't, won't.


now you claim only age limits are valid


Uhhhhhhh...Markie...?!?!

He specifically said "...there are no age barriers for advancing
in amateur radio..."


so

So WHY did you insist in the very next "sentence" you wrote that
he said something different?


I insisted no such thing?

you lied there Steve


when are you going to wake up and smel what you are shoveling


Perhaps because all the shovelling is being done at your house,
Markie.

nope you lied again

Jeff is the one talking **** here
claiming theat motivation is the all there is as a factor then
shoveling all the **** about i"t no no that isn't what I(jef) said"
..And Jeff doesn't impress me as being the kind to "go slumming"
in his free time.


well there you are wrong

any time spent in RRAP is sluming


I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts.


you may feel that way t what you are doing is lying


And you're perpetuating your reputation as an idiot by making such
assinine statements.


nothing assine there

another lie

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces

You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force
outside of the DoD.


you are assuming sir incorrectly as you were incorrect in your
earlier stament that motivation is everything which you now back pedal
to motvation is everything escept...


More random words seeking organization and meaning.\


another lie nothing rnadom at all


cuting the off topic rant


What was "off topic" was your reply vis-a-vis Jeff's last
comments.

nothing of topic about my coments

what was off topic was a elcture on the coast gaurd whcih was jeffs
divertion


(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was
your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or
even dept head of Mathematics??


It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven
years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with
just the masters degree.


Motivation can't overcome seven-year time
limits


meaning motiation isn't everthing and you lied when you said it was


That's not what he said.


it what what he said

Had you acutally obtained the education YOU claim, Markie, you'd
know that in most cases any classwork applied toward a doctorate level
program has a window of application. Exceed the window and the old
work is no longer applicable.


indeed that is true whcih proves my point

that Jeff lied when claimed motivation was the only difference cuasing
people to have differenteeducational level. it isn't as he know say
there are several other

therefore He Motivation is all premise is a lie


. That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting
me, and I know better than to bite.


meaning you are not honest to deal with that fact you have put out a
statement as tture with at best lots of holes


More meaningless words.


nope


Indeed you have bitten enough


Coming from you, Markie, I am sure that was meant to be a
compliment.


then you are a fool but we knew that

your claim that Motivation is sole difference in educational levels
you yourself have just admitted is not true


No, he did not.


yes he did but in materail long since snipped from the thread


why not be a man and admit you mispoke


Then he WOULD be lying.


nope it would be telling the truth

Still no 73 for you,


ty I find the use the terms offisive


I am sure you do...what ever "offisive" means...


more mindless bashing

you realy are unable to read

Steve, K4YZ


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 7th 06, 12:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default why are you lying

On 3 Jan 2006 23:52:45 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
Jeffrey Herman wrote:
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any
better than you seem to

Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech.


obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening
the UoH


Nor would you be allowed TO attend "UoH" with THAT grammar.

BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA!!!!

Yet one more example of why it's obvious Markie was NEVER in ANY
branch of the Armed Forces...


why are you lying?

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces

but even that would be a lie just less of one

what is realy proven is that Jeff was lying when he claimed
motivations all that seperated people acheivements


One does not "only" make Chief Petty Officer in ANY rate in the
Navy OR Coast Guard, Markie. The course work, pre-requisites,
examination process and selection boards are grueling!

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation
only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of
Mathematics??


Who's to say he's not headed that way?

Please, Markie...P L E A S E cite for us YOUR qualifications in
ANY occupational field other than aggitating, muck raking, lie telling
and deceit, OK...?!?!

Schools? Certificates? Programs? Awards? (We'll even accept
"Head Start")

Steve, K4YZ


everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will

he is lying of course

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282

well stevie you assked for it you got it
Mark Morgan


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 7th 06, 12:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default why are you lying

On 3 Jan 2006 23:52:45 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
Jeffrey Herman wrote:
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any
better than you seem to

Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech.


obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening
the UoH


Nor would you be allowed TO attend "UoH" with THAT grammar.

BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)


BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA!!!!

Yet one more example of why it's obvious Markie was NEVER in ANY
branch of the Armed Forces...


why are you lying?

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces

but even that would be a lie just less of one

what is realy proven is that Jeff was lying when he claimed
motivations all that seperated people acheivements


One does not "only" make Chief Petty Officer in ANY rate in the
Navy OR Coast Guard, Markie. The course work, pre-requisites,
examination process and selection boards are grueling!

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation
only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of
Mathematics??


Who's to say he's not headed that way?

Please, Markie...P L E A S E cite for us YOUR qualifications in
ANY occupational field other than aggitating, muck raking, lie telling
and deceit, OK...?!?!

Schools? Certificates? Programs? Awards? (We'll even accept
"Head Start")

Steve, K4YZ


everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

he regualrly makes threats of aresst or of the power to confine folks againsthere will

he is lying of course

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282

well stevie you assked for it you got it
Mark Morgan


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Really Hans, no call to be rude [email protected] General 44 January 17th 06 03:34 PM
Radio call letters: What do they mean? Mike Terry Shortwave 23 March 7th 05 03:47 AM
FCC resumes issuing calls. Splinter Policy 0 November 11th 04 08:29 PM
FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute Keith Policy 0 January 22nd 04 11:41 PM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 09:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017