About Us

January 10th 06, 11:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
On 8 Jan 2006 05:49:23 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman)
wrote:
wrote:
BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made
CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP)

Well, I'm #8 on this year's list for SCPO (E-8) but I'm considering
submitted my package for Warrant Officer. Never could go full officer
due to the age cutoff.

in part is becuase in your eagerness to flame me you did not bother
reading the exchange Jeff was the one claiming that motivation was
everything

It certainly is. Motivation will take you as far as you can possibly
go, but it certainly can't overcome such barriers as age cutoffs.
Motivation also can't create more openings for a particular position
than already exist. If X motivated people are competing for Y openings
of a position, and Y X, then some of those motivated folks won't
win. Because they're motivated, those that lose will try again
next time.

that is what you said sir you said the only rason for deifferences in
education level and other things was motivation changing you story,
now you adknow that isn't

Was that a sentence or a paragraph?

Was there a meaning to it?

This is proof that given a typewritter and opportunity, even a
monkey can bang out a few "words".

my point is made you are not telling the truth

Your point is that you did nothing of the sort.

Now, last I checked, there were no age barriers for advancing in
amateur radio, nor were there any limitations on the number licensees
in any particular class. So, those that are motivated will advance;
those that aren't, won't.

now you claim only age limits are valid

Uhhhhhhh...Markie...?!?!

He specifically said "...there are no age barriers for advancing
in amateur radio..."

So WHY did you insist in the very next "sentence" you wrote that
he said something different?

when are you going to wake up and smel what you are shoveling

Perhaps because all the shovelling is being done at your house,
Markie...And Jeff doesn't impress me as being the kind to "go slumming"
in his free time.

I feel as if I'm teaching a first-grader common-sense facts.

you may feel that way t what you are doing is lying

And you're perpetuating your reputation as an idiot by making such
assinine statements.

therefore your statement is more proper at proving that Jeff is not a
memebr of the armed forces

You apparently don't realize that the USCG is the only armed force
outside of the DoD.

you are assuming sir incorrectly as you were incorrect in your
earlier stament that motivation is everything which you now back pedal
to motvation is everything escept...

More random words seeking organization and meaning.

cuting the off topic rant

What was "off topic" was your reply vis-a-vis Jeff's last
comments.

(UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was
your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or
even dept head of Mathematics??

It's a long story, but suffice it to say that I used up my seven
years in the PhD program (that's all that's alloted), so ended up with
just the masters degree.

Motivation can't overcome seven-year time
limits

meaning motiation isn't everthing and you lied when you said it was

That's not what he said.

Had you acutally obtained the education YOU claim, Markie, you'd
know that in most cases any classwork applied toward a doctorate level
program has a window of application. Exceed the window and the old
work is no longer applicable.

. That's all I'll say about that, for I know you're baiting
me, and I know better than to bite.

meaning you are not honest to deal with that fact you have put out a
statement as tture with at best lots of holes

More meaningless words.

Indeed you have bitten enough

Coming from you, Markie, I am sure that was meant to be a
compliment.

your claim that Motivation is sole difference in educational levels
you yourself have just admitted is not true

No, he did not.

why not be a man and admit you mispoke

Then he WOULD be lying.

Still no 73 for you,

ty I find the use the terms offisive

I am sure you do...what ever "offisive" means...

Steve, K4YZ

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Really Hans, no call to be rude	[email protected]	General	44	January 17th 06 03:34 PM
Radio call letters: What do they mean?	Mike Terry	Shortwave	23	March 7th 05 03:47 AM
FCC resumes issuing calls.	Splinter	Policy	0	November 11th 04 08:29 PM
FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute	Keith	Policy	0	January 22nd 04 11:41 PM
OLD motorola trunking information	jack smith	Scanner	1	December 12th 03 09:48 AM

Menu

About Us