Menu

Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

#2

Report Post

Old

January 5th 06, 01:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

[email protected]

Posts: n/a

Default

Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz

wrote:
Jeff Hermann say use it or lose it is hogwash.

Really?

How much is 220-222 used in Canada?

Will 222-225 be overcrowded because
of the loss of 220-222?

What justification can there be for hams having
5 MHz of prime VHF spectrum if those 5 MHz
aren't being fully utilized?

Reply With Quote

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Kalamazoo Cuckoo' ND8V	GLENN B	General	0	October 19th 04 04:15 AM
Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL).	KC8QJP	General	3	October 11th 04 11:44 AM
New ARRL Proposal	N2EY	Policy	331	March 4th 04 01:02 AM
The Pool	N2EY	Policy	515	February 22nd 04 04:14 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition	D. Stussy	Policy	13	August 5th 03 05:23 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM.

About Us

"It's about Radio"

Contact Us RadioBanter forum home Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2017